[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Mini nuclear plants to power 20,000 homes
Source: UK Guardian
URL Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environme ... re-nuclear-reactors-los-alamos
Published: Nov 8, 2008
Author: John Vidal and Nick Rosen
Post Date: 2008-11-08 21:25:09 by Jhoffa_
Keywords: None
Views: 311
Comments: 15

Mini nuclear plants to power 20,000 homes

Nuclear power plants smaller than a garden shed and able to power 20,000 homes will be on sale within five years, say scientists at Los Alamos, the US government laboratory which developed the first atomic bomb.

The miniature reactors will be factory-sealed, contain no weapons-grade material, have no moving parts and will be nearly impossible to steal because they will be encased in concrete and buried underground.

The US government has licensed the technology to Hyperion, a New Mexico-based company which said last week that it has taken its first firm orders and plans to start mass production within five years. 'Our goal is to generate electricity for 10 cents a watt anywhere in the world,' said John Deal, chief executive of Hyperion. 'They will cost approximately $25m [£13m] each. For a community with 10,000 households, that is a very affordable $250 per home.'

Deal claims to have more than 100 firm orders, largely from the oil and electricity industries, but says the company is also targeting developing countries and isolated communities. 'It's leapfrog technology,' he said.

The company plans to set up three factories to produce 4,000 plants between 2013 and 2023. 'We already have a pipeline for 100 reactors, and we are taking our time to tool up to mass-produce this reactor.'

The first confirmed order came from TES, a Czech infrastructure company specialising in water plants and power plants. 'They ordered six units and optioned a further 12. We are very sure of their capability to purchase,' said Deal. The first one, he said, would be installed in Romania. 'We now have a six-year waiting list. We are in talks with developers in the Cayman Islands, Panama and the Bahamas.'

The reactors, only a few metres in diameter, will be delivered on the back of a lorry to be buried underground. They must be refuelled every 7 to 10 years. Because the reactor is based on a 50-year-old design that has proved safe for students to use, few countries are expected to object to plants on their territory. An application to build the plants will be submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission next year.

'You could never have a Chernobyl-type event - there are no moving parts,' said Deal. 'You would need nation-state resources in order to enrich our uranium. Temperature-wise it's too hot to handle. It would be like stealing a barbecue with your bare hands.'

Other companies are known to be designing micro-reactors. Toshiba has been testing 200KW reactors measuring roughly six metres by two metres. Designed to fuel smaller numbers of homes for longer, they could power a single building for up to 40 years

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#1. To: Jhoffa_ (#0)

There is a Japanese plant similar that operates in Alaska.

The congress and the tree huggers will never allow this.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:29:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

I thought this was "Dirty Bomb" material?

I mean, we threw such a fit about "Uranium from Africa" Now the guys from Los Alamos want to bury some in everyone's backyard?

WTF?

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   21:31:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jhoffa_ (#2)

Not in anyones backyard.

Buried underground. I think the one in Alaska is above ground, been there for some time.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:33:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom (#3)

With a capacity of 20,000 homes, they're bound to be scattered everywhere.. There would be allot of these things.

Perhaps we'll need a "Global Hawk" type system to ensure they remain secure?

Otherwise, what stops me and Dak from getting drunk and digging one up?

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   21:36:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jhoffa_ (#4)

Otherwise, what stops me and Dak from getting drunk and digging one up?

checking on the Alaska one...seems is still in the works because of the tree huggers in government. I thot it had been built.

Ha...

I once worked on a atom powered aircraft process. That was years ago and just recently the industry is looking at that system again because of cost of fuel and pollution.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:42:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Cynicom (#5)

I once worked on a atom powered aircraft process.

Steam Turbine?

I suppose you could use an electric motor now.. They're small and efficient enough.

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   21:43:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Jhoffa_ (#6)

This by Martin aircraft, in the 1950s. It had only progressed to the stage of getting a reactor small enough and light enough to be carried aloft.

If you check, you will find information about a reactor being taken aloft many times by a B-36 years ago. The idea was scrapped but now is being reborn.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:47:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Cynicom (#7)

These things still have to be cooled, right?

I assume the system is evaporative, since they claim they are solid state.

How can one conclusively state that there can be no "Chernobyl type incident" when an earthquake, or anything really, could cause the cooling system to fail?

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   21:51:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Jhoffa_ (#8)

These things still have to be cooled, right?

That was the old technology with massive reactors, that produce huge amounts of heat.

New technology and downsizing must have done away with that. It is coming, sooner the better.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   21:55:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Cynicom (#10)

I don't know.. Uranium, even in its natural state, is a toxic metal and it's even pyrophoric in small amounts.

To cite just one instance.. At the Kakadu mine, there were some people sickened when their drinking water was contaminated with water used for processing.

Jhoffa_  posted on  2008-11-08   22:11:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Jhoffa_ (#12)

I don't know.. Uranium, even in its natural state, is a toxic metal and it's even pyrophoric in small amounts.

There are no obstacles that cannot be overcome. Man needs to stop research on weapons and turn his mind to peaceful pursuits.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-08   22:16:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 13.

        There are no replies to Comment # 13.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]