[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: The Biological Puzzle of Jewish Behavior
Source: National Vanguard
URL Source: http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=5526
Published: Jul 23, 2005
Author: Steven E. Romer
Post Date: 2005-07-23 06:32:46 by Zoroaster
Keywords: Biological, Behavior, Puzzle
Views: 2305
Comments: 192

The Biological Puzzle of Jewish Behavior Opinion; Posted on: 2005-07-22 22:26:25 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]

Is the conflict of conscious Whites with the Jewish power structure a reflection of something deeper, something happening at the genetic level: a competition between two very different and utterly incompatible behavior patterns?

by Steven E. Romer

IT TOOK MANY long years to fully dissect the relatively simple behaviors of the honey bee. Von Frisch was a pioneer in this -- showing that bees had a language all their own. At fist all Von Frisch noticed was the uncanny ability of bees to act in concert to find food sources. So he began to investigate why this was. He tried to find what principles were at work coordinating their behaviors.

Different species have different behavior patterns. Chimpanzees have patterns markedly different from our own because they are different genetically (although the genetic difference is very tiny, at least in the characteristics we are so far capable of measuring). They cannot share our language, for example, or understand the concepts that guide our behaviors.

Other races of humans quite obviously see the world differently than we do. Our tests show it, and the reality of behavioral statistics and real-world situations show this quite clearly. They have different behavior patterns as a result of tiny differences in genetics. Like the weather, research has shown that brain patterns are highly complex -- and sensitive to tiny changes in initial configuration. Our world view can change drastically as a result of the slightest tweaking of the biochemical machinery (as who have taken LSD would certainly attest).

As with the bees, we can observe other human races as groups, study their languages, test their capacities, and look at their behavior patterns now and in an evolutionary sense. We have unlocked the behavioral patterns of much of the animal world in this way. With humans these patterns become much more complex and diverse than with bees. We require all our knowledge and intellectual energy to decipher these things -- and seeing the distinct but camouflaged behavior patterns of Jews is especially difficult. This is why it has often been an elite that has exiled the Jews from various countries of Europe at one time or another, or at least recognized their alien nature -- such as we see in the philosophical "anti-Semitism" of the pre-WWII period.

Today, when we try to show others that the Jews control the media (or some other fact about them), many cannot see it because of Jewish conditioning -- and an inability to put together the pieces of the great puzzle of Jewish behavior and motives. Each piece of the puzzle we bring up may seem in itself small and petty to our listeners, certainly nothing to condemn an entire race. But like the blind men all trying to describe an elephant, there is one monolithic thing behind all the sketchy and diverse descriptions. When we see the Jewish elephant, we are staring directly into the face of the deceiver and destroyer often spoken of in our religions, standing right before us in the flesh. This is no supernatural bogeyman, but a very real result of the evolutionary processes surrounding us. Despite the danger it poses, this phenomenon is quite interesting to the scientific mind.

Jewish behavior has one overriding theme. That theme is their control of others, and, insofar as they interact with us, the attendant destruction of everything higher we have ever stood for as a people.

Our main theme as a people has been to take on the overall patterns of the creator of this world and reflect them as well as possible, as we strive toward a higher understanding. Our systems of justice based on truth, our sciences, and the deeply moving symbols in our arts have been the result of our unique and near-miraculous world view.

The Jews have entered all the great avenues of the expression of the soul of our people (which is unequivocally the soul of the creator -- see my book The Textbook of the Universe). They have entered academia; they have entered the arts; they have entered our communications and entertainment industries; they have entered publishing; they have entered news reporting; they have entered our courts and our halls of justice; they have entered our government. They have the most powerful lobby in Washington in addition to their control of the mass media, so important to any major politician's election chances. All of these things work together as a great engine of destruction. We are surrounded. They enter and they begin to tear at the soul of our people, to remove the foundation of our culture and spit on the graves of all our ancestors who strove and gave their lives to build a cathedral of light and truth in the ideals of our civilization.

The World Wars they caused did more than overtly destroy our earthly cathedrals built over so many generations, they destroyed what those cathedrals symbolized in the hearts and souls of our people. Those hearts and souls would soar so much higher if not for the stones the Jews have cast at us, breaking our wings and toppling the flying buttresses of our cultural and intellectual cathedrals. Theirs is a war against beauty and truth: They hate these things.

It is our blind projection of our own shining motives onto them (an error which they deliberately cultivate in us) that is our undoing. Marx, Freud, Boas, Norman Lear, Newhouse, Redstone, and all the rest, have sent their minions to rend our souls and destroy the beautiful future we have repeatedly tried to build. They are like a great bully kicking over a beautiful, artistic sandcastle built by a dreamer.

Life is the sandcastle of the creator, and we are the creator's dream. The blind justice of evolution gave great benefits to those creatures which followed truth. This occurred for a real and meaningful reason. This is what the Jews hate -- this is why they have come into every civilization we have ever tried to build, and attempt to destroy it. They dash it upon the stones and eat out the soft center where the pearl of God slowly gestates...

It is a very very important time in history today. It doesn't feel like it, but then it never does...

Today we must find our way -- more than at any other time in history. This is the final battle of the greatest good, truth, and justice against the relentless assault of darkness, confusion, fear and death. In the next few years we must decide once and for all if we love the life the creator has given us. We must decide whether we want eternity or death. In just a few decades, we will be overrun by those without the divine spark. A blanket of Hell will fall over the Earth, darker and more primitive than the hundreds of millions of years the dinosaurs kept our ancestors from emerging from the trees.

Other behavioral patterns, vastly different from ours, can take over, especially now in the world of abundance -- and coddling of the inferior -- which we have created with our great gifts. Others now partake of what we have created, openly and freely, no matter what their motives or qualities of character or intellect. We invented television, and the Jews tore it from us and turned it into a weapon by which they deceive, manipulate, and destroy.

They want darkness to blot out the light of our greatest minds -- for one simple reason. We are a threat to them. Wherever any significant community of Whites begins to see the world well enough to understand why we must not race-mix, the Jews know the jig is up for them. They know their pattern cannot work there. They know that we will see their dangerously camouflaged behavior pattern. They feel the classic 'fight or flight' response when they see truth, because they see the emerging head of their own final judgement in it. This is why their opposition to articles like this one, or to any free speech about them, is so fierce and unrelenting.

Their opposition to the ideas of eugenics and race are similarly motivated. A vampire cannot brook the sunlight let in by the genes and minds of those who built Stonehenge, the great temples and cathedrals of our people, and the even greater temple of science.

The Jewish anthropologist Boas destroyed physical anthropology by divorcing it from biology, and this worked well as part of their engine of destruction, along with their alien ideas of communism and egalitarianism.

Our love of truth is not universal among all human beings. We must begin to see this. It is a strategy for surviving and becoming strong. The Jews know this, and know our truth is stronger than they. If it spreads and grows, so will we. It will be the end of their pattern.

Our best minds managed to figure them out and send them packing from every single country of Europe (and Egypt too) at one time or another. This is the only serious threat to them. Everyone knows they hated Hitler; they never stop talking about it. But they also hated Henry Ford; they Hated Charles Lindbergh; they hate David Duke; and they especially hated William Pierce. And there are so many others they hate, ferociously. Truth, and those who bring it, must be destroyed, according to their inborn behavior pattern.

We must see and understand the web of deceptions they have woven for us. These deceptions and inversions of reality were created for one purpose only: to eliminate our people forever from the Earth. The greatest deception -- and one which they spend a great deal of time inculcating in our people -- is their attempt to make us think that the people trying to save us are the bad guys, when it is really they who are the threat. It is amazing to me how they can divert the energy of our souls with such monstrously twisted lies. It never crosses our minds that someone might tell a lie so big and so diabolical -- we cannot imagine such lies precisely because we are not people of the lie....

They know their house of cards can fall very fast if people penetrate even one aspect of their illusions. This is why they are so frantic to quell opposition. There is hope in that.

We can turn this around overnight. We must have faith and courage now more than ever. All the children of truth in the future, and all the ancestors who brought us out of darkness, are depending on what we do in our relatively short lives today.

Mr. Romer is a behavioral neuroscientist and is the author of The Textbook of the Universe: The Genetic Ascent to God.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-106) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#107. To: Lady X (#104)

My words speak for themselves, LadyX. I won't be baited.

What he will do is simply dodge questions that he cannot answer.

It's his MO.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   11:58:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#108. To: Phaedrus, crack monkey (#104)

Another question dodged..

You are unbelievable.

You need to quit now, you are going down in flames.

Lady X  posted on  2005-07-23   11:58:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#109. To: Phaedrus (#105)

Whatever makes you happy.

People have you pegged as a loudmouthed, cowardly bullshitter who dodges questions by either refusing to answer or hiding behind the bozo filter.

When you act like a cowardly bullshitter who didges questions by either refusing to answer or by hiding behind the bozo filter - as you just did above - you reinforce this ugly image.

Can't you see this?

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:00:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#110. To: Lady X (#108)

Another question dodged..

You are unbelievable.

You need to quit now, you are going down in flames.

I count nine questions dodged.

I predicted 10 before he accuses you of playing word games. That's his final dodge.

If you pursue him past this point he'll go personal and hide behind the bozo filter.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#111. To: christine (#103)

I don't believe that all opinions are equal, but I believe everyone has the right to have them. I believe there is truth and I believe each individual should have the freedom to seek and decide for himself what he believes that to be. This forum can be and is a venue for that.

A fair, no a good, response to tough questions. It is not enough, IMO, to not decide. One must make a judgement as to what is fair, and right and true (we do this whether or not we talk about it) and align with it. Would you agree? If Anti-Semitism can be shown to be twisted and destructive (is there any doubt?), should it be given voice?

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:02:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#112. To: crack monkey (#106)

I called you on that one.

You certainly did.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:03:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#113. To: crack monkey (#110)

If you pursue him past this point he'll go personal and hide behind the bozo filter.

Okay then, I have one more question for him...

By the way, he should be ashamed of himself!

Lady X  posted on  2005-07-23   12:03:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#114. To: Phaedrus (#111)

If Anti-Semitism can be shown to be twisted and destructive (is there any doubt?), should it be given voice?

SHOWN BY WHOM?????

Lady X  posted on  2005-07-23   12:04:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#115. To: Lady X (#108)

You are unbelievable.

Thank you.

You need to quit now, you are going down in flames.

I don't think so.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:05:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#116. To: Lady X (#114)

SHOWN BY WHOM?????

Hitler.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:06:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#117. To: Phaedrus (#104)

My words speak for themselves ...

Let me help you here.

If you can't make a rational and coherent argument, or if you are unable to respond to intelligent and foreseeable questions regarding your comments, or if you are unable to defend your position - as appears to be the case here - then you probably don't belong on a forum such as this one.

You would probably be better off pontificating to you kids and your dog. They won't pose questions back to you.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:07:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#118. To: crack monkey (#109)

Name-calling. Sooner or later it had to happen.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:07:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#119. To: Phaedrus, Lady X (#115)

You need to quit now, you are going down in flames.

I don't think so.

Maybe Phaedrus set out to make himself look like a cowardly boob. If this is the case, Phaedrus has been wildly successful. Don't be so quick to judge.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:09:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#120. To: Phaedrus (#116)

Hitler.

He's dead!

Stop being obtuse.

Lady X  posted on  2005-07-23   12:09:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#121. To: Phaedrus (#118)

Name-calling. Sooner or later it had to happen.

If I remember correctly it was you that first used the term "idiot savants"..

"...when a society believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda..."

Zipporah  posted on  2005-07-23   12:10:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#122. To: Phaedrus (#118)

Name-calling. Sooner or later it had to happen.

Dodge, twist and squirm. We sure have you pegged don't we?

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:10:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#123. To: crack monkey (#119)

Maybe Phaedrus set out to make himself look like a cowardly boob. If this is the case, Phaedrus has been wildly successful. Don't be so quick to judge.

I think he set out to make himself look like a tyrant and dictator..

Lady X  posted on  2005-07-23   12:11:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#124. To: Zipporah (#121)

If I remember correctly it was you that first used the term "idiot savants"..

No, Zipporah, I have not attacked anyone personally here by calling them names.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:11:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#125. To: Lady X (#120)

Stop being obtuse.

Nonsense, LadyX. You asked, I answered. Chew on it and address it, if you can.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:13:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#126. To: Zipporah (#121)

Name-calling. Sooner or later it had to happen. If I remember correctly it was you that first used the term "idiot savants"..

Phaedrus doesn't give a damn about that. If he did, he himself wouldn't hide behind the bozo filter while insulting other people. Recall that Phaedrus is the only person on this site to employ this tactic.

Phaedrus has been asked some tough questions that he can't answer without looking like an idiot. Phaedrus is trying to change the subject in order to squirm out of the box he has put himself into.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:14:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#127. To: Lady X (#123)

I think he set out to make himself look like a tyrant and dictator..

It's impolite to talk about me in the third person, LadyX.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:15:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#128. To: Lady X (#120)

I think I understand it now.

Since Adolph Hitler was a bad, bad man.. it naturally follows that we can't post & discuss news articles on Christine's forum?

"Working Three Jobs is: Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic... Get any sleep?" (Laughs) ~ George W Bush

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-07-23   12:15:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#129. To: All (#125)

Chew on it and address it, if you can.

Your first response should be: "Words are not actions."

To which I will respond: "But do inflammatory words lead to actions?"

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:18:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#130. To: Phaedrus (#127)

It's impolite to talk about me in the third person, LadyX.

I think we all know that.

We are just giving you the consideration and respect that you have earned for yourself.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:19:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#131. To: Phaedrus (#111)

If Anti-Semitism can be shown to be twisted and destructive (is there any doubt?), should it be given voice?

Pro semitism is the Jews putting their group interest ahead of all other groups in our society.

Antisemitism is when people in those other groups put their group interest ahead of the Jewish group interest. Antisemitism is also speech Jews do not like.

Anti anti semitism is Marxism.

Bayonne  posted on  2005-07-23   12:19:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#132. To: Phaedrus (#129)

Hopefully. After all, that's why we're here. To educate ourselves and take the proper course of action later in the polling place and to educate our friends and convince them to act accordingly.

This standard would deny us the right (The Constitutionally Protected Right, BTW) to discuss political issues and later, to act on them.

Perhaps we should stop criticizing Government, as it could inflame the populace and lead to riots?

"Working Three Jobs is: Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic... Get any sleep?" (Laughs) ~ George W Bush

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-07-23   12:22:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#133. To: Phaedrus (#124)

Au contraire.. as in fact you did.. of course you were quite careful not to point the finger at ONE person..but rather to generalize.. to paint name on many.

"...when a society believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda..."

Zipporah  posted on  2005-07-23   12:23:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#134. To: crack monkey, Phaedrus, Jhoffa (#130)

Okay, does all this mean that we have to check with him before we post anything??

Lady X  posted on  2005-07-23   12:25:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#135. To: Jhoffa_, phaedrus (#132)

I asked phaedrus if he supports the thought crime legislation now in Congress that is being pushed by Jewish groups. He did not answer. I assume, by looking at his pattern on this thread, that this lack of response means he supports it. A Conservative who supports thought crime legislation.

Bayonne  posted on  2005-07-23   12:26:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#136. To: Lady X (#134)

I don't know, but that's certainly the way it sounds.

It would appear that merely discussing these things is dangerous because the subject matter is considered to be inflamatory and could result in some course of action being taken, somewhere, by someone.. at some point in the future.

"Working Three Jobs is: Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic... Get any sleep?" (Laughs) ~ George W Bush

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-07-23   12:28:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#137. To: christine (#111)

Are you beginning to see that a "let it all hang out" attitude as to what is permitted and what is not, "free speech", can be a righteous copout? But I didn't say it was easy. It's not.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:29:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#138. To: Bayonne (#135)

In fairness, I don't knwo that he ever claimed to be a Conservative.

Actually, I'm a bit fuzzy on what that means nowdays anyway.

"Working Three Jobs is: Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic... Get any sleep?" (Laughs) ~ George W Bush

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-07-23   12:29:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#139. To: Zipporah (#133)

Au contraire.. as in fact you did.. of course you were quite careful not to point the finger at ONE person..but rather to generalize.. to paint name on many.

So one is the same as many? Come on, Zipporah. Personal attack means personal attack.

Phaedrus  posted on  2005-07-23   12:31:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#140. To: Phaedrus (#137)

As can arbitrary censoring for the "common good"

"Working Three Jobs is: Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic... Get any sleep?" (Laughs) ~ George W Bush

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-07-23   12:32:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#141. To: Lady X (#134)

Okay, does all this mean that we have to check with him before we post anything??

I think Phaedrus would appreciate that.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:32:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#142. To: Phaedrus (#129)

To which I will respond: "But do inflammatory words lead to actions?"

Hmm since you brought up Hitler..


Goebbels and his cronies watch with glee as the books are burned.

So as in Germany, books were burned..words destroyed.. where does it end?

"...when a society believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda..."

Zipporah  posted on  2005-07-23   12:34:09 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#143. To: Phaedrus, Christine (#137)

Are you beginning to see that a "let it all hang out" attitude as to what is permitted and what is not, "free speech", can be a righteous copout?

I think what Phaedrus is saying here is that he would like to review everything before it goes up. He is, after all, the only one qualified to decide what is "good" content and what is "bad" content.

crack monkey  posted on  2005-07-23   12:35:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#144. To: Phaedrus (#139)

So one is the same as many? Come on, Zipporah. Personal attack means personal attack.

You said name calling.. and now youre back peddling .. just as you are accusing some here of doing.. you are doing the same..

"...when a society believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda..."

Zipporah  posted on  2005-07-23   12:37:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#145. To: crack monkey (#143)

Correct.

I think the First Amendment should be scrapped and media likewise censored..

After all, their inflammatory rhetoric could, conceivably lead to someone, somewhere taking some kind of action at some point in the future.

Surely this kind of anarchy cannot be what the founders intended.

"Working Three Jobs is: Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic... Get any sleep?" (Laughs) ~ George W Bush

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-07-23   12:38:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#146. To: crack monkey (#143)

We are 143 posts into this thread and phaedrus has not even laid out his argument on why this article is hate speech. In fact, he has not even made a single comment about it. How screwed up is that? He is simply against the 'idea' of the article.

Bayonne  posted on  2005-07-23   12:39:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (147 - 192) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]