[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Washington Post Admits Bias for Obama, Calls Pro-Life Policies "Offensive"
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.lifenews.com/nat4563.html
Published: Nov 11, 2008
Author: Steven Ertelt
Post Date: 2008-11-11 08:34:21 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 437
Comments: 33

Washington Post Admits Bias for Obama, Calls Pro-Life Policies "Offensive"

by Steven Ertelt

LifeNews.com Editor

November 10, 2008

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- In a weekend article, the ombudsman for the Washington Post admitted that the liberal newspaper had a bias for pro-abortion candidate Barack Obama during the elections. The paper followed the article with a report on how the President-elect would overturn "ideologically offensive" pro-life policies.

- Snip


Poster Comment:

I suspected that the off the wall attacks on Palin, post-election, are related to this issue and are coming from the feminazi wing of the radical left. Their dupes simply march in line.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#7. To: Jethro Tull (#0) (Edited)

I find it hard to understand that anyone would be surprised that a human creation, such as a newspaper, is biased. Anything created by a human is biased.

Every election season, all newspapers explicitly endorse particular candidates for public office and specific ballot issues.

How can anyone with an IQ above room temperature be surprised that any newspaper is biased?????????

By the way, so-called feminazis are not nazis, because a nazi is a racist, and so-called feminazi are definitely not racist. Women are the majority of voters, and they demand legal privileges for women guaranteed by Uncle Sugar. Abortion rights are one of the many legal privileges women demand of Uncle Sugar. Women are the bolsheviki, the voting majority faction. What you call a feminazi is really a femshevik.

Word History: The word Bolshevik, an emotionally charged term in English, is derived from an ordinary word in Russian, bol'she, "bigger, more," the comparative form of bol'sho-, "big." The plural form Bol'sheviki was the name given to the majority faction at the Second Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Workers' Party in 1903 (the term is first recorded in English in 1907). The smaller faction was known as Men'sheviki, from men'she, "less, smaller," the comparative of maly-, "little, few." The Bol'sheviki, who sided with Lenin in the split that followed the Congress, subsequently became the Russian Communist Party. In 1952 the word Bol'shevik was dropped as an official term in the Soviet Union, but it had long since passed into other languages, including English.

Rush Limbaugh, a blabbering bullshite artist, invented the term feminazi because he is a bullshite artist with an agenda.

Googolplex  posted on  2008-11-11   12:12:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Googolplex (#7)

Feminazi is a wonderful term for radical feminists. I don't give a rats butt who uses it. I like it and will continue to use it. That said, the rest of your post doesn't apply to me since your wild assumptions have zero to do w/my political positions.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-11-11   12:27:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jethro Tull (#10)

I didn't make any wild assumptions about you, nor was it my intention to do so.

If I conveyed that impression, I take back anything that I said.

If you were to use the more correct terminology of femshevik, the obvious deception inherent to the word feminazi would lose it's impact.

The use of the word feminazi by some people makes them appear ignorant by people with a little education

Googolplex  posted on  2008-11-11   12:35:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Googolplex, jethro tull (#12)

The use of the word feminazi by some people makes them appear ignorant by people with a little education

Say what?

Good heavens, now someone is assessing others "education"?

That is quite impossible, assessing your intelligence is very possible.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-11   12:37:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Cynicom (#13)

That is quite impossible, assessing your intelligence is very possible.

Can you explain that again, but this time in plain english?

Googolplex  posted on  2008-11-11   12:40:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

#17. To: Googolplex (#15)

Good heavens, now someone is assessing others "education"?

That is quite impossible, assessing your intelligence is very possible.

Good heavens, now someone is assessing others "education",that is quite impossible, assessing your intelligence is very possible.

Is that better.

I was trying to make it easy for the lesser educated here.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-11 12:42:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]