[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’ Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics, BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk, Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up! Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It! Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!] 1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires. Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!! Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances "NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk) Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat Cinnamon reduces fat How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3. 'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Washington Post Admits Bias for Obama, Calls Pro-Life Policies "Offensive"
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.lifenews.com/nat4563.html
Published: Nov 11, 2008
Author: Steven Ertelt
Post Date: 2008-11-11 08:34:21 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 510
Comments: 33

Washington Post Admits Bias for Obama, Calls Pro-Life Policies "Offensive"

by Steven Ertelt

LifeNews.com Editor

November 10, 2008

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- In a weekend article, the ombudsman for the Washington Post admitted that the liberal newspaper had a bias for pro-abortion candidate Barack Obama during the elections. The paper followed the article with a report on how the President-elect would overturn "ideologically offensive" pro-life policies.

- Snip

Poster Comment:

I suspected that the off the wall attacks on Palin, post-election, are related to this issue and are coming from the feminazi wing of the radical left. Their dupes simply march in line.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#7. To: Jethro Tull (#0) (Edited)

I find it hard to understand that anyone would be surprised that a human creation, such as a newspaper, is biased. Anything created by a human is biased.

Every election season, all newspapers explicitly endorse particular candidates for public office and specific ballot issues.

How can anyone with an IQ above room temperature be surprised that any newspaper is biased?????????

By the way, so-called feminazis are not nazis, because a nazi is a racist, and so-called feminazi are definitely not racist. Women are the majority of voters, and they demand legal privileges for women guaranteed by Uncle Sugar. Abortion rights are one of the many legal privileges women demand of Uncle Sugar. Women are the bolsheviki, the voting majority faction. What you call a feminazi is really a femshevik.

Word History: The word Bolshevik, an emotionally charged term in English, is derived from an ordinary word in Russian, bol'she, "bigger, more," the comparative form of bol'sho-, "big." The plural form Bol'sheviki was the name given to the majority faction at the Second Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Workers' Party in 1903 (the term is first recorded in English in 1907). The smaller faction was known as Men'sheviki, from men'she, "less, smaller," the comparative of maly-, "little, few." The Bol'sheviki, who sided with Lenin in the split that followed the Congress, subsequently became the Russian Communist Party. In 1952 the word Bol'shevik was dropped as an official term in the Soviet Union, but it had long since passed into other languages, including English.

Rush Limbaugh, a blabbering bullshite artist, invented the term feminazi because he is a bullshite artist with an agenda.

Googolplex  posted on  2008-11-11   12:12:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Feminazi is a wonderful term for radical feminists. I don't give a rats butt who uses it. I like it and will continue to use it. That said, the rest of your post doesn't apply to me since your wild assumptions have zero to do w/my political positions.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-11-11   12:27:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I didn't make any wild assumptions about you, nor was it my intention to do so.

If I conveyed that impression, I take back anything that I said.

If you were to use the more correct terminology of femshevik, the obvious deception inherent to the word feminazi would lose it's impact.

The use of the word feminazi by some people makes them appear ignorant by people with a little education

Googolplex  posted on  2008-11-11   12:35:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The use of the word feminazi by some people makes them appear ignorant by people with a little education

Say what?

Good heavens, now someone is assessing others "education"?

That is quite impossible, assessing your intelligence is very possible.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-11   12:37:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

That is quite impossible, assessing your intelligence is very possible.

Can you explain that again, but this time in plain english?

Googolplex  posted on  2008-11-11   12:40:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Good heavens, now someone is assessing others "education"?

That is quite impossible, assessing your intelligence is very possible.

Good heavens, now someone is assessing others "education",that is quite impossible, assessing your intelligence is very possible.

Is that better.

I was trying to make it easy for the lesser educated here.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-11   12:42:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

If you noticed, I mentioned the word "ignorant" when referring to users of the word feminazi.

I didn't say they were stupid.

Intelligence tests measure the degree of stupidity, not ignorance.

Ignorance is curable through education, stupidity is not.

Googolplex  posted on  2008-11-11   12:46:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The use of the word feminazi by some people makes them appear ignorant by people with a little education

Your words not mine.

You defined educated on your terms. What is unacceptable to you is quite acceptable to others. Defining by "education" is trite.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-11   12:51:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Once again, I don't understand your point.

People, through a little extra education, can be less ignorant.

That is a fact.

What is it about this fact that you don't agree with?

I showed a dictionary definition of the word bolshevik.

That was the extra little education I offered.

What is it specifically you disagree with...the dictionary definition or the assessment?

Googolplex  posted on  2008-11-11   12:53:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#21. To: Googolplex (#20)

What is it about this fact that you don't agree with?

Fact?????

Written where in stone.

I forget what we were discussing if anything. Getting old.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-11 12:56:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]