4um: Liberals clinically mad, concludes top psychiatrist - Eminent doctor makes case leftist ideology is a mental disorder

Title: Liberals clinically mad, concludes top psychiatrist - Eminent doctor makes case leftist ideology is a mental disorder
Source: WND
URL Source: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56494
Published: Nov 13, 2008
Author: wnd
Post Date: 2008-11-13 13:03:15 by Rotara
Keywords: None
Views: 434
Comments: 27

WASHINGTON – Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness." "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing conspiracy."

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by both Barack Obama and his Democratic primary opponent Hillary Clinton can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do."

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

Throw the Democrat Socialist Globalist Juan McNutz in there too. The Repubicans are infested with trash too. Not to the same degree of course (The RAT Wing is completely honeycombed with Socialists/Communists), but getting there. I don't buy into psychiatry as a whole, fwiw. (1 image)

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams

I've read it, actually. Dr. Lyle Rossiter contends that liberalism is a psychological disorder in that liberals allegedly “rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

He contends there is a preying on weakness and insecurities in the population by “rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government” that liberals are allegedly guilty of.

Rossiter characterizes modern liberals as “whining about imaginary villains,” depicting them as neurotic. Of course we were told by the Bush Administration that, “You’re either with us or against us?” Wasn’t this conservative government repeatedly insisting they’ve been saving us from being attacked?

His premise is that caring about others is infantilizing. If liberal can be seen as a psychological disturbance, would not the conservative agenda qualify as narcissistic? You can't say liberals are nuts without recognizing that by doing so you maintain all players in American politics are nuts, and perhaps what he talks about in regards to liberals a response to conservative policies and agendas.

Frankly, where there is allegedly a problem or grace with liberals, the same exists in the conservative realm too, as sickness and wellness is systemic to all the players in the entire population of the United States. Much as is recognized that an abusive alcoholic is not an isolated sickness in a family, as the entire family is sick and all are affected by the problems of the one.

No one group on the political spectrum in the United States has a monopoly on faults or graces, and this guy does a great job trying to examine the bark of one tree inches from his nose.

Unfortunately, this vantage point denies him the perspective of what is true about the entire forest.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

The Soviets put out vast amounts of medical tracts, as did the Nazis, stating that opposition to their regimes was a mental illness. And even when confronted with headspinning Uturns, like the Molotov Ribbentrop pact, managed to keep the faithful singing from the same soundsheet.

You ever consider that you may have a masochistic tendency to have actually read this? ;>

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

I'm an American that always has and always will defend our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

Merely taunting without the meat of an argument behind it to back it up is hard to take seriously. I submit it is you, not I would has issues with the freedoms and protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

If you are angry with the results of this election, have the decency and character to buckle down to the fight to change things. One of the central notions of the U.S. Constitution is the aspect of how elements of the government act as a check and balance to keep people honest as well as to create opportunities to exercise power.

This document was written that way because the Founding Fathers had a keen eye as to how this sort of system of checks and balances works in the general population as the competition for ideas and ideology creates a winning result that benefits everyone.

If one ideology and faction destroys all the others, they injure themselves as much as they do so to anyone else. Nothing exists in a vacuum in this world or the United States, and all factions and ideologies need each other just as much as they create the struggle for power and influence as to how things are done or will be.

Show some personal responsibility here and compete rather then to advocate conquest. Destroying others to create the monopoly of one faction in government and society is not constitutional, and the poison of fascism deadly to everyone, including the fascists who seize power.

That wil keep that from happening. (period in example just there to keep the code visible)

MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist."
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html

Honestly I was amused to see that story recently about how people who try to bully others do so because it gives them a rush of pleasure. Is this what is happening to you when you try to browbeat me?

Who's stopping you from running your big fat L-Y-I-N-G Traitorous mouth in your quest to create your anti-American fucking Utopia on earth.

this reminds me of something that would be on world net daily or some neocon blog.. while the doctor's ideas about not depending on government are correct, i suspect his response when confronted with the truth about our degenerate govt and those they oppress would most certainly fall into his category of 'imaginary victims and villians'.

You would, if you could. And I have explained why this paradigm of yours' is unconstitutional and contrary to anything resembling a mentally healthy way to run someone's outlook on life.

Your post here is a paradox, you accuse others of being unAmerican, and are advocate for destruction of constitutional rights and prerogatives.

You continue to try to promote a theme of working to label those you oppose to advance your concept of a sterile Utopia where your political and social paradigm is on a pedestal with nothing opposing it.

It is you who are conflicted here, and you who are playing a game you could never hope to win.

You're so fucking stupid, twisted, sick, disturbed and negative for America's restoration that I pity you, Obamalamadingdonger. Ciao lying commie pig.

ha ha. I just realized that this WAS posted from WND. i hadnt noticed that when i first replied.

I have been saying for years liberalism is a mental disorder, which is why only married white people with jobs should be allowed to vote. Very few of them are liberals.

Anyone who would characterize Bush as being a conservative deserves to be committed for being delusional.

"A leader, for a change." - Jimmy Carter, 1976 campaign slogan. Sound familiar? Here it comes again!

Psychiatrists and Lawyers destroying mankind
Drivin' 'em crazy...and stealing 'em blind
Bankers and Brokers ruling the world
Storing the silver and hoarding the gold
Ain't no use in preachers preaching
When they don't know what they're teaching
The weakest man be strong as Samson
When you're being held to ransom

Famine and hardship in true living colour
Constant reminders...the plight of our brother
Daily starvation our diet of news
Fed to the teeth with a barrage of views
Ain't no use in preachers preaching
When they don't know what they're teaching
The weakest man be strong as Samson
When you're being held to ransom

Black men and white men, and Arabs and Jews
Causing congestion and filling the queues
Fighting for freedom the truth and the word
Fighting the war for the end of the world
Ain't no use in preachers preaching
When they don't know what they're teaching
Weakest man be strong as Samson
When you're being held to ransom