[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Health See other Health Articles Title: The Human Plan. Please Read If You Want To Better Humanity Do you know somebody who has cancer? Do you know somebody who has died from cancer? Do you know somebody who has been laid off work? Do you know anybody who is struggling to put food on the table? Do you know somebody who is in a state of depression? Do you know somebody who had ADD or ADHD? Do you know somebody who has had a stroke and is suffering from brain damage? Are you worried about the current energy crisis and the price of gas? Are you worried that the materials you possess will depreciate in value? Are you worried about how flimsy and cheap products made today are? I am trying to help inform you that there is an answer to these problems. I am going to give you the list of more than credible sources that back my statements up. I’m giving you USA Today, a Wisconsin State Legislative document, peer reviewed scientific journals, MSNBC, CBS, a doctor with a PhD, The Washington Post, a college newspaper, visual evidence that Henry Ford’s Hemp Car was lighter and could withstand 10 times the impact of steel, and visual evidence of a Mercedes running off of hemp oil as fuel to convince you of my views on the hemp plant. I want to make it clear that hemp has been used for THOUSANDS of years. Hemp was the starter to the industrial revolution. Oil came along and was cheap as water because there was so much of it and it flowed from the ground. It then replaced hemp products. I want you to read this information and click on these links because I want to use these links to move you and allow for me to cure cancer, cure ADD, cure ADHD, cure joblessness, cure hunger, cure brain damage, cure the energy crisis, cure economic problems, and cure the degeneration of “quality” products (curing diseases requires oral ingestion - smoking it does not get close to the health benefits of orally ingesting the THC. This means that you could smoke all the medical marijuana you want and you will not see the affects of any cure). After these links, I have listed my business plan because we need transparency and to know what businesses set out to accomplish. HEALTH REASONS news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2538065.stm it’s not a gateway drug. www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj72e5q61Fs&NR=1 MSNBC reports it kills ADD and ADHD. www.newscientist.com/arti...22.400-smoke-for-stroke... it prevents brain damage caused by strokes. www.jci.org/articles/view/JCI25509 it creates new brain cells which kills depression and anxiety. www.usatoday.com/tech/col...holladay/2004-08-19-won... it does not kill brain cells or ALTER anything within your brain. www.sciam.com/blog/60-sec...post.cfm?id=whoa-the-st... it kills antibiotic-resistant bacteria. www.youtube.com/watch?v=n31Nuj_AvTg Dr. Robert Melamede, PhD, Professor of Biology at the University of Colorado, explains how the body's Endo-Cannabinoid system (and plant based Cannabinoids as suppliment) kills cancer cells and inhibits tumor growth. news.illinois.edu/NEWS/04/0608oralcancer.html it does not give you any type of oral cancer. www.cbsnews.com/stories/2...alth/webmd/main2696726.... it kills lung, brain, skin, and prostate cancer cells. www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oPaSnjHawo&NR=1 MSNBC reports it stops the spread of breast cancer and could stop the spread of other aggressive cancers like pancreatic cancer. www.cpmc.org/professional...rograms/science/sean.html this is the site of the people who are doing the experiment of stopping the spread of aggressive cancer and says that it could kill those cancer cells. cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17038690 it kills cancer cells of the most common brain cancer. www.sethgroup.org/ this is where you can see the experiment of it killing the most common brain cancer cells. You will also see here that it does not kill regular brain cells and that the natural substance works better than the synthetic substance. The synthetic substance is what’s recorded because it’s illegal to use the natural substance. www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=large-study-finds-no-link it does not cause lung cancer when you smoke it. www.washingtonpost.com/wp.../article/2006/05/25/AR2... another source saying it does not cause lung cancer if you smoke it. INDUSTRIAL REASONS www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxlj6fgQ-ZU&feature=related Henry Ford’s car made from the fibers of the soil was plastic and could withstand 10 times the impact of steel. www.legis.state.wi.us/1999/data/AJR49.pdf Wisconsin Legislative document stating that it can be made into over 25,000 different products. These products range from building materials, carpeting, pulp, paper products, oil, paints, cosmetics, plastics, automobile parts, fuel, animal feed, food, canvas, twine, clothing to rope. This also says that it rejuvenates the soil and does not need pesticides to grow. www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaHoIhjUsxM&feature=related WB11, a news station, reports how healthy for you it is. At the end they also say that our founding fathers used to grow it and was required for farmers to grow. www.kentuckyhemp.com/library/facts.html facts courtesy of The Kentucky Hemp Museum & Library, Versailles, KY. It was legal tender. www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9Am3yUDt3M Mercedes running off hemp oil. www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/pressrel/pr100901.html this shows that hemp and “marijuana” are the same plant. The difference between hemp and “marijuana” is that hemp is the male cannabis plant and “marijuana” is the female cannabis plant. The cannabis plant is the only plant in the world which a person can visually distinguish male from female. All other plants have to be distinguished after looking at their DNA. I know that many people are dealing with personal issues that this plant has been proven to solve. I demand change. I’ve been told that things are going to change, but I demand change. I have 2 cousins who are sisters who both have a different kind of cancer. One is three years old and the other is eleven years old. We have been informed that the doctors have done all they could for the three year old. The eleven year old has an inoperable tumor because it is wrapped around the base of her spine. Both of these children have gone through a lot and the family has been forced to endure a lot. The children have suffered a lot. I want you, the people, to make cannabis legal under law. I want you to inform everyone you know about everything I have said and shown you about the cannabis plant. I want to get a petition signed by enough of us to overthrow this law so that we can live in a peaceful world. We need transparency. What I am calling for is for prosperity. What I’m calling for is the right to start my own company. I am calling upon you, my brothers and sisters, to help me. I want you to help me try and cure my cousins. I want you to help me try and cure EVERYONE else who has cancer. We have enough information to know that THC and cannabis does not hurt the body in any way. I want you to help me make cannabis legal but illegal to drive cars or operate machinery while under its influence. I want you to help me make it legal like alcohol. Under these conditions, we would all be treated easily and very cheaply of our illnesses. After you help me accomplish this goal. I will bring together all the necessary people to start constructing these everyday items out of plant matter. We will build our own building from this plant. We will make the concrete and all the wood necessary for this building to stand from this plant. We will then start selling the everyday products. The only charge we would have to charge is for the bills we must pay to own property and enough to pay us for manual labor. Since it is a plant, it is free to make. I also want a separate petition to be started. I also want to call for the legalization of competitive currency in the United States. The definition of currency is “prevalence, circulation, exposure; acceptance, popularity.” Since everything that I would be making was created from this plant, I would make this plant the backing of my currency. I could then pay my taxes and whatever else the government wishes me to pay with my plant because my currency is easily transformed into the paper currency the FED currently provides. People could pay me in cannabis plants. They could pay me in how many cannabis plants created the item. Since there would be a certain number dedicated towards certain items, there would have to be paper money with this plant backing the paper. This is why I would in turn build my own bank. Since this is the fastest growing plant in the world, I could back all of my dollars with this plant and have nobody worried about the availability because this plant can and will grow forever. I would imagine that the currency I create would start to really compete with the FED because everything that I create is from a plant and that same plant backs my currency. That means that the things I make are the exact value of my money. That means that if I produce more and more money, then everything I create will fall in price. The more of something, the less value it has. If my money overtook the current currency and everything was made out of my product, then there would be no need to charge more than nothing. The catch is that every human being’s back yard, basement, or closet could also be the creator of money. I would not have the option of hoarding all of the wealth. This plant grows in ALL 50 states. Money would grow on trees. This currency could turn into the world’s currency after I shared all the information on how to create everyday items in your own home, back yard, or field. Everything in the world could be free and we would be living without hate since every individual and human being on the planet would be set with their fundamental basic “life rights.”. We would have no problems with terrorism. We would have no more world hunger. We would not have these issues because the root of all evil is greed and jealousy. If we all have the same thing and this one thing is prosperous and is capable of sustaining life in everyway, then there is no such thing as greed and jealousy. We would all have the power of having a house and money. This plant can and will grow in all conditions. That means that all the people who cannot grow grass for animals or any other plants could grow this plant and live off of it’s proteins and amino acids for a healthy life. We all could only eat this plant and live longer and healthier than ever. Please pass this information on and share it with everyone that you know personally. We are all in a financial stroke right now. We all know somebody who has cancer problems. We all know that something needs to be done. I am offering the solution of ending all of the world’s problems. All I am asking for is a chance. I was born into having the chance and I have all of the sources backing my words up. Please allow me the change my nation’s founding fathers fought for. I understand that this will not rid the world of its problems because humans have the freedom to do whatever they want and sometimes they choose to do illegal things. I think that if we were able to create everything out of plants and, mainly one plant, then that would solve a lot of the world’s issues. This will not solve the issue of Israel fighting Palestine over land. That is a religious dispute. I think that if a plant can create anything we use and we give that technology to poor countries then they would have a lot of their problems solved because they are way behind us when it comes to health. Diminished health, lack of money, and lack of energy (everything this plant has proven to consist of) are the causes to most of today’s wars. I think that if we solve the problem of diminished health, lack of money, and the lack of energy, then we as a whole world can start working our other problems out. The basic needs of every human being would be met. Once we take care of the basic need problems, we can start talking about the other problems. If there is a problem at the foundation of something and you try and fix the other problem that was built on top of that shaky foundation, there will always be another problem. When you try and fix the foundation, then the other problems can be taken care of. Since they are basic human rights, they are the foundation of all of our lives. The arguments against this plan are Inflation, Dumbing Down The Human Drive, and Forced Socialism. It is not forced upon the people. That’s why I want into the market; to make the people decide what they want and like. As it grows then it is chosen to be better and better until it is the best. That’s the way an Austrian free market is supposed to be (the market America has). Let the best company finish. If it doesn’t succeed while putting out high quality products then it wont sell. It’s all business and there cannot be greed in something that is forever. Money of today is not boundless. Money backed by silver and gold is not boundless. It has been illegal since 1937. Who knows the real reason why it got criminalized, but the people back then were fed lies not backed up by scientific facts. I just think that if we were to legalize it, we would be able to get the experiments rolling, get the economy rolling, and find a way to better every individual and, from what I have seen through the current research, it could possibly just be the power of stereotypes working a person's mind into a state of laziness. There are millions of successful people in this country who smoke marijuana but they aren’t open about it because of it being completely illegal. I do know that everything somebody intakes into their body affects each individual differently. I also know that this needs to be a controlled substance and should be taken in moderation. In no way do I want people to be high all the time. I do not see anything wrong with somebody going home after a long day of work and rollin’ a doobie, baking some brownies, or pullin’ out a vaporizer, kickin’ back, and relaxing as long as they don't drive somewhere. Let’s get it legalized since it doesn’t cause harm to us and is nontoxic and let’s get the testing done so we can find out if it affects our drive at 8 a.m. to accomplish anything when we are not under the state of mind of being "high" from smoking marijuana the night before. The affects only last a couple of hours and, when slept off, I do not think that it has an affect on what you want to do. This is a hypothesis for a science experiment and we could both be right or wrong. This next link says that it does not cause brain damage or kill brain cells and that it only affects short-term memory only when "high." It also says that marijuana has the effect of slightly increasing alpha-wave activity in your brain. Alpha waves are generally associated with meditative and relaxed states, which are, in turn, often associated with human creativity. It also talks about how marijuana overdose happens at 40,000:1 intake when alcohol overdose is 10:1. It says that THC might stimulate the immune system. They do say that it could cause cancer, but they are wrong because of my other links. It also says that it is not linked to the gateway drug theory. It also states that there is not a device that delivers pure THC. This does not matter because THC and other compounds in the plant do not cause cancer, but if a vaporizer is used, you don’t have a problem from inhaling carbons created from a burning material. www.askmen.com/sports/health/20b_mens_health.html Yes, there is inflation with that currency. It is, however, not the inflation that we have today. There are two kinds of money in the world: fiat money and commodity money. Fiat money is what our government is running with today. We have not had our money backed by gold since 1971. ALL COUNTRIES OR EMPIRES WHO HAD FIAT MONEY PERISHED BECAUSE OF INFLATION. Right now we have major inflation. We are going down the tube. There is no link between our money and the material we buy. If we switch over to gold and silver backing our money, then we have a solid substance that does not inflate and has a finite amount in the world. The problem with gold and silver is that it can be hoarded. The problem that we as America had in the early 1900's was that banks were trusted with all the gold and printed off certificates, or money, stating that they had this money. The banks then started printing more money than they had gold. Then the society called the banks out and went and tried to get all of their gold, but there was not enough and then caused one hell of a depression. The currency that I call for CANNOT be created until there are enough things around the entire world that have been created from this plant. Since plastics can be created that are 10 times more durable than steel, I believe that everything that we have today (except for glass, unless we created a clear plastic that was as strong or stronger than glass) can be rid of by creating all of these different products from this plant. This plant can create basically everything around us. After there have been so many different things created, I would then ask to back my dollar with this plant. Since this plant is the creator of all the substances around us and can be grown anywhere and everywhere (EVEN UNDERGROUND for those who say we don't have enough space to grow our food and this plant), then we would have inflation. The difference between this currency, gold, and fiat money, is that this money is the creator of everything around us. When everything around us is created by the dollar we posses today, then when we have inflation, the COST of our dollar diminishes greatly. The catch is that when everything is made out of our dollar, then we have EVERYTHING AROUND US drop in cost as well. IT IS THE GREATEST INFLATION OF THE WORLD. People say have our money as good as gold, I say lets have our dollar as stable as the globe. To sum it all up, make all the products in the world out of one thing. Take this one thing and make it our currency since it is the makeup of all things we use. Mass-produce this one thing that is our dollar and everything that we use. If it is mass-produced, the price of all products will fall to zero because the value of the currency will fall to zero. The reason why this will happen is because EVERY PRODUCT'S value/cost is directly parallel with the dollar since the products are MADE out of the dollar. Another argument I have come across is, “I don't want cures for natural ailments. Cancer is nature’s way of controlling the population.” This THEORY could be right. I, however, will disagree. There are more children and young adults getting diagnosed with cancer than ever before. I will go back to the mid 60's to early 70's. When we reached that point in history, there were not very many people at ALL getting cancer. How can we increase that quickly the amount of people getting cancer? I tried to find this information in a 10-minute search and was unable to find what I was looking for. To back your theory up, I would like for you to find me the birthrate over the past 100 years and I would like for you to find me the rate at which people are diagnosed with cancer over the past 100 years (I do not want the death rate of cancer patients). I would also like individual age group rates of being diagnosed with cancer. If it is truly an all natural process, then the rate of getting diagnosed with cancer in comparison to the birthrate should be parallel when it comes to the age groups of people from 0-14, 15-21, and 22-45. I also want you, when you go to get your next gas fill, to look at the pump and find the sticker that says, "Warning: Studies in laboratory rats report breathing gasoline vapors increases the chance of getting cancer." When you find this sticker, I want you to think of your theory. I want you to think of what you smell when you are pumping your gas. I want you to think of what happens when you burn these vapors into the air. Do you think that after all these vapors are burned, there is a change and there is no risk of cancer? I then want you to look around you and think of all the cars that are surrounding you, burning this PROVEN cancer causing agent into the air. If your theory were correct, we would switch to ALL NATURAL, non-polluting everything, especially our gas, tomorrow. After switching to all natural, non-polluting everything, diagnosed cancer rates should still be increasing parallel with the birthrate, but my theory is that the cancer diagnosis of people in all age groups under the age of 45 would drop dramatically over the next 100 years. My other question to you is, how is it natural if we don’t live in a natural world? We are surrounded by synthetic material, everywhere. I’m all for all natural with this argument, but we must realize our surrounding environment is far from all natural. If you take pills, almost all of the pills humans take are synthetic, even vitamins. I hope you don't drink diet pop because aspartame (Nutra-Sweet/Equal - synthetic sweetener), found in over 6,000 food products, has been found to cause cancer in lab rats. These foods include all sugar free gum and all diet pops (read the ingredients labels). Here is a links for you. www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDqUpuZu8mY this is a report from "60 Minutes" in 1996 talking about aspartame causing brain cancer. I gave you the first part out of 2 and the second one can easily be found after you finish the first part. I would also like to point out that THC and the other cannabinoids have not been proven to kill ALL cancer cells, so, maybe, those cancer cells are truly the all-natural cancer cells?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#3. To: freepatriot32 (#0)
EPA Devises Rules on the Use of Data From Pesticide Tests on Humans Standards Would Continue to Allow Some Studies Involving Children and Pregnant Women, Critics Say www.washingtonpost.com/wp...8/10/AR2005081001876.html A storm is gathering as EPA's proposed rules for human pesticide experiments have been made public by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility. Stephen Johnson who heads the EPA has delivered what, Eric Olson called, a "slap in the face" to Congress. This is not the first time he has shown bad faith. When his appointment was held up by Senator Barbara Boxer and Senator Bill Nelson.until he suspended the notorious Children's Environmental Exposure Research Study (CHEERS)--that was designed to expose toddlers to pesticide and record their reactions, Johnson agreed only to invite pesticide producers to submit their own study. This time, EPA diddled Congress pretending to change its draft only to resubmit the same language to the White House. As Eric Olson, senior attorney for the National Resources Defense Council, said: "It's clearly a violation of Congress' direct prohibition on all testing of pregnant women, infants and children." The EPA proposed rules would essentially overturn the ethical principles of the Nuremberg Code which prohibit exposing human beings in experiments that test poisonous substances. The EPA is serving as the mascot for the pesticide industry--leading the charge down the slippery slope to genocide. www.ahrp.org/infomail/05/08/11.php US set to endorse human pesticide testing Meredith Wadman Top of page Abstract Pesticide manufacturers are pushing hard to ensure that data from toxicity tests on people can be used in licence applications for their products. www.nature.com/nature/jou...7/n7055/full/437024a.html The U.S. EPA’s new Protections for Subjects in Human Research rule, which came into force on 7 April 2006, was born of a need to tighten the ethical guidelines controlling nonmedical human experimentation. The rule was ostensibly designed to offer people greater protection in pesticide toxicity experiments. But just two weeks after its coming into force, a coalition of labor and environmental interest groups filed suit against the EPA, challenging the rule’s legality and ethics. Against a backdrop of claims of industry influence, financial interests, and bipartisan rhetoric, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York City must now determine whether this rule safeguards Americans against unethical experimentation or sells them out to big business. The plaintiffs—the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Pesticide Action Network North America, San Francisco Bay Area Physicians for Social Responsibility, and Northwest Treeplanters and Farmworkers United, Oregon’s union of farm, nursery, and reforestation workers—filed their suit on 23 February 2006. They claim the new rule does not meet the demands of Congress to afford the fullest protection to human subjects—especially pregnant women and children—in pesticide experiments, and charge that the rule is undercut by numerous loopholes that ultimately encourage, rather than deter, human testing. “EPA is giving its official blessing for pesticide companies to use pregnant women, infants, and children as lab rats in flagrant violation of [the EPA Appropriations Act of August 2005] cracking down on this repugnant practice,” said Erik Olson, senior attorney for the NRDC, in a 23 January 2006 press release from that organization. “There is simply no legal or moral justification for the agency to allow human testing of these dangerous chemicals. None.” www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov...render.fcgi?artid=1480534 UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE OFFICE OF SENATOR BARBARA BOXER ENVIRONMENTAL STAFF Under the Bush Administration, EPA has reversed the moratorium on consideration of human pesticide experiments involving pesticides. EPA justifies this change in policy on the grounds that such studies are “available, relevant, and appropriate.” This report analyzes 22 human pesticide experiments that EPA is currently reviewing or expects to review under the new policy. It finds that the studies have serious ethical problems, including experimental designs that caused adverse health effects or put human subjects at risk, lack of informed consent, impermissible waivers of liability, scientific invalidity, systematic dismissal of adverse events as unrelated to the chemicals being tested, and lack of long-term monitoring.
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||