[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade


World News
See other World News Articles

Title: IPCC Scientists Caught Producing False Data To Push Global Warming
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/ipcc-sc ... ta-to-push-global-warming.html
Published: Nov 17, 2008
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2008-11-17 13:56:33 by gengis gandhi
Keywords: None
Views: 284
Comments: 29

Al Gore-linked Goddard Institute claimed “hottest October on record” after using temperature figures from September

Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet.com Monday, November 17, 2008

Climate scientists allied with the IPCC have been caught citing fake data to make the case that global warming is accelerating, a shocking example of mass public deception that could spell the beginning of the end for the acceptance of man-made climate change theories.

On Monday, NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), run by Al Gore’s chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, announced that last month was the hottest October on record.

“This was startling,” reports the London Telegraph. “Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures last month, from the American Great Plains to China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. China’s official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its “worst snowstorm ever”. In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years.”

It soon came to light that the data produced by NASA to make the claim, and in particular temperature records covering large areas of Russia, was merely carried over from the previous month. NASA had used temperature records from the naturally hotter month of September and claimed they represented temperature figures in October.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

When NASA was confronted with this glaring error, they then attempted to compensate for the lower temperatures in Russia by claiming they had discovered a new “hotspot” in the Arctic, despite satellite imagery clearly showing that Arctic sea ice had massively expanded its coverage by 30 per cent, an area the size of Germany, since summer 2007.

The figures published by Dr Hansen’s institute are one of the primary sets of data used by the IPCC to promote its case for man-made global warming and they are widely quoted because they consistently show higher temperatures than other figures.

“Yet last week’s latest episode is far from the first time Dr Hansen’s methodology has been called in question,” reports the Telegraph. “In 2007 he was forced by Mr Watts and Mr McIntyre to revise his published figures for US surface temperatures, to show that the hottest decade of the 20th century was not the 1990s, as he had claimed, but the 1930s.”

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC and a close ally of Hansen, also raised eyebrows recently during a presentation in Australia, during which he claimed that global temperatures have recently been rising “very much faster” than ever as he cited a graph showing purported temperature increases over the last decade. In fact, as even the vast majority of man-made global warming advocates will concede, temperatures since 1998 have moved sideways and over the last 18 months they have clearly begun a downward trend.

Whether such “mistakes” are made in genuine error or are part of a politicized push for man-made global warming to be universally accepted, and the evidence clearly suggests that latter is the case, the fact is that we can no longer tolerate the cry that “the debate is over” on man-made global warming in light of such gargantuan falsehoods.

Likewise, the push for carbon emissions to be reduced by 80 per cent or more, a figure that would completely cripple western economies and lower living standards to a near third world level, can no longer be accepted as a reasonable course of action now that the primary authority on man-made global warming, the UN IPCC, has been proven to be using fraudulent data to make its case.

Foisted upon the public by means of giant multi-million dollar PR campaigns and brainwashing mandates that have worked themselves into every sector of society, including education, movies, television the arts and culture, all the attention and funding is being lavished upon a manufactured hoax, peddled with the aid of phony data, as governments prepare to suck what’s left out of the middle class and poor with carbon taxes that do nothing to help the environment, while all the real environmental problems are left in the shadows.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

#1. To: farmfriend, FormerLurker (#0)

(((((The Sky Is Falling! Ping.)))))

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-11-17   14:29:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Original_Intent (#1)

(((((The Sky Is Falling! Ping.)))))

Oh yeah, and has been for some time. If you don't believe it just ask Algore--that is, if you can catch him between flights on private jets or going places with an entourage of those humongous Chevrolet SUV's. If you can't catch him maybe you can catch his "friend" Hansen, the one who should lose his job with NASA for promoting bs propaganda.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-11-19   15:21:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: James Deffenbach (#9)

As I said earlier, I'm not certain if EVERYTHING Hansen said is wrong, or if he was sabatoged by those who wanted to discredit him. Either way, I still find his comments concerning the oil industry spot on.

I've used it for my tagline in case you haven't noticed.

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-11-19   15:54:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: FormerLurker (#10) (Edited)

Why should anyone pay any particular attention to anything he says when he uses out of date data to try to "prove" a lie? I find his ties to Algore more than enough for me to discount him and there are plenty of scientists who say that the "global warming" that Algore is always yammering about is propaganda. Don't know if you know this or not but the guy who started the weather channel (John Coleman) has scientists behind him who says it is hogwash and have offered to debate people like Hansen. Hansen and Algore very conveniently say "the debate is over."

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-11-19   18:03:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: James Deffenbach (#11)

Why should anyone pay any particular attention to anything he says

"the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children"

The guy has balls most public figures only pretend to have. Has ANY politician or pundit EVER made such sweeping remarks about globalist corporate greed?

Did you even know that the above quote comes from James Hansen? The guy can't be all bad to have made that public statement.

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-11-19   20:18:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: FormerLurker (#12)

Yes, I already read all that in your tagline and haven't gone blind so that you need to post it in the body of your reply and in bigger font. And I have never said he was "all bad." Even the most useless among us can always be pointed to as a bad example.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-11-19   20:23:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: James Deffenbach (#13)

Yes, I already read all that in your tagline

When you posted the words, "Why should anyone pay any particular attention to anything he says ", I was assuming you didn't KNOW what I was talking about.

Now that I know that YOU know what I meant, I find your words, "Why should anyone pay any particular attention to anything he says" interesting to say the least.

Do you disagree with what I quoted, and if so, do you think the power brokers and globalists are really nice guys who are looking out for us, and who would never even consider doing anything that could be considered harmful to human health and well-being?

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-11-19   20:35:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: FormerLurker (#14)

do you think the power brokers and globalists are really nice guys who are looking out for us

I don't know what I have ever posted that may have led you to believe I might be a fool, but no, I don't think any such stupid thing. Nor do I think any ah who pals around with Al Gore and lies about "global warming" gives much of a $hit about us either. I think you know that if Al Gore found out that he could make more money if he went around yammerin' about the sky fallin' and an Ice Age right around the corner he would be saying that. And I strongly suspect anyone who hangs with Gore or any other establishment whore.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-11-19   20:41:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: James Deffenbach (#15)

And I strongly suspect anyone who hangs with Gore or any other establishment whore.

Hansen had published his findings concerning global warming well before Al Gore entered the scene. He perhaps saw him as a powerful ally who could be beneficial to his cause. He might have been duped, and Gore could simply be buddying up with him to turn public opinion AGAINST Hansen. That has always been my impression of the situation.

As I said earlier in this thread, perhaps Hansen's data was sabatoged, perhaps he IS just a fraud in terms of his global warming positions, right know it's up in the air.

I strongly disagree with his ideas concerning the Carbon Tax however, and have made that clear in earlier comments.

I just found what he said about the establishment to be spot on. I can't see your point in trying to portray him as one who is pro-establishment where he is strongly against the status quo and opposes the establishment.

And who knows, perhaps Gore ISN'T the evil monster you think he is, maybe he has seen the light so to speak. Anything is possible.

Speaking of establishment whores, MANY if not MOST of the scientists that disagree with Hansen's general findings ARE establishment whores, or are funded by those who are. Now put THAT in your pipe and smoke it.

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-11-19   21:55:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: FormerLurker (#21)

And who knows, perhaps Gore ISN'T the evil monster you think he is, maybe he has seen the light so to speak.

Yeah, that must be it. I am sure he must be a wonderful guy other than being a hypocrite and a liar and all.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-11-19   21:59:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: James Deffenbach (#22)

Yeah, that must be it. I am sure he must be a wonderful guy other than being a hypocrite and a liar and all.

I would have VERY MUCH prefered Gore to Bush over the last 8 years. I didn't vote for him, I voted for Harry Browne, since I too distrusted Gore due to his ties with Clinton. I already knew Bush was going to be a problem, but decided to vote my conscience rather the lesser of two evils.

HOWEVER, in hindsight with what's happened during Bush's presidency, I can't help but think how things may have been different with Gore as president. I doubt he could have or would have been any worse. It's possible that he might have been a MUCH better president and we might not have had the problems we've had to deal with under Bush, but we'll never know.

In any case, I think Obama is going to be a LOT worse that Gore would have been, as Obama has already shown his cards in what he has planned for us, and none of it is good. Gore was nowhere near as dangerous as Obama, of that I'm fairly certain.

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-11-19   22:06:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 23.

#24. To: FormerLurker (#23)

I would have VERY MUCH prefered Gore to Bush over the last 8 years.

He would have done pretty much the same things Bush has. They are both controlled by the same people and anyone who has ever paid attention knows that.

"For you see, the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."
Benjamin Disraeli

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-11-20 08:05:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]