[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade


World News
See other World News Articles

Title: IPCC Scientists Caught Producing False Data To Push Global Warming
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/ipcc-sc ... ta-to-push-global-warming.html
Published: Nov 17, 2008
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2008-11-17 13:56:33 by gengis gandhi
Keywords: None
Views: 268
Comments: 29

Al Gore-linked Goddard Institute claimed “hottest October on record” after using temperature figures from September

Paul Joseph Watson Prison Planet.com Monday, November 17, 2008

Climate scientists allied with the IPCC have been caught citing fake data to make the case that global warming is accelerating, a shocking example of mass public deception that could spell the beginning of the end for the acceptance of man-made climate change theories.

On Monday, NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), run by Al Gore’s chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, announced that last month was the hottest October on record.

“This was startling,” reports the London Telegraph. “Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures last month, from the American Great Plains to China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. China’s official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its “worst snowstorm ever”. In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years.”

It soon came to light that the data produced by NASA to make the claim, and in particular temperature records covering large areas of Russia, was merely carried over from the previous month. NASA had used temperature records from the naturally hotter month of September and claimed they represented temperature figures in October.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

When NASA was confronted with this glaring error, they then attempted to compensate for the lower temperatures in Russia by claiming they had discovered a new “hotspot” in the Arctic, despite satellite imagery clearly showing that Arctic sea ice had massively expanded its coverage by 30 per cent, an area the size of Germany, since summer 2007.

The figures published by Dr Hansen’s institute are one of the primary sets of data used by the IPCC to promote its case for man-made global warming and they are widely quoted because they consistently show higher temperatures than other figures.

“Yet last week’s latest episode is far from the first time Dr Hansen’s methodology has been called in question,” reports the Telegraph. “In 2007 he was forced by Mr Watts and Mr McIntyre to revise his published figures for US surface temperatures, to show that the hottest decade of the 20th century was not the 1990s, as he had claimed, but the 1930s.”

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC and a close ally of Hansen, also raised eyebrows recently during a presentation in Australia, during which he claimed that global temperatures have recently been rising “very much faster” than ever as he cited a graph showing purported temperature increases over the last decade. In fact, as even the vast majority of man-made global warming advocates will concede, temperatures since 1998 have moved sideways and over the last 18 months they have clearly begun a downward trend.

Whether such “mistakes” are made in genuine error or are part of a politicized push for man-made global warming to be universally accepted, and the evidence clearly suggests that latter is the case, the fact is that we can no longer tolerate the cry that “the debate is over” on man-made global warming in light of such gargantuan falsehoods.

Likewise, the push for carbon emissions to be reduced by 80 per cent or more, a figure that would completely cripple western economies and lower living standards to a near third world level, can no longer be accepted as a reasonable course of action now that the primary authority on man-made global warming, the UN IPCC, has been proven to be using fraudulent data to make its case.

Foisted upon the public by means of giant multi-million dollar PR campaigns and brainwashing mandates that have worked themselves into every sector of society, including education, movies, television the arts and culture, all the attention and funding is being lavished upon a manufactured hoax, peddled with the aid of phony data, as governments prepare to suck what’s left out of the middle class and poor with carbon taxes that do nothing to help the environment, while all the real environmental problems are left in the shadows.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#1. To: farmfriend, FormerLurker (#0)

(((((The Sky Is Falling! Ping.)))))

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-11-17   14:29:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Original_Intent (#1) (Edited)

If true, I'd be rather disillusioned. Hansen seemed to be a person who was simply trying to get the facts out. It wouldn't be the first time someone's been sabatoged by those with an agenda, but even if the erroneous data was purposely submitted for that reason, he and his team should have double checked the data and the conclusions.

Perhaps global warming IS all a bunch of crap, but I can't see why the oil companies would be siding WITH global warming given that they'd lose a LOT of money if viable alternative energy was actually realized, and petroleum was no longer necessary.

Of course, everything I've read indicates they are against the idea of global warming. So who IS behind it do you think?

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-11-18   23:07:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: FormerLurker (#2)

Of course, everything I've read indicates they are against the idea of global warming. So who IS behind it do you think?

"The Club of Rome"

CFR

Trilateral Commission

and ultimately the big banksters who pull their strings and want a "Carbon Tax" to continue to siphon ever more of the sustenance of the "useless eaters". The "usual suspects" i.e., the Rotchilds and Rockefuckers et. al., ...

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-11-19   1:15:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

#6. To: Original_Intent (#5) (Edited)

Don't forget to add to your list communist internationalists. Maurice Strong, multi-millionaire, and Under Secty to Koffi Annan is a main mover and shaker of Global Warming. Strong chaired the Rio Earth Summit, where all this Global Warming bugaboo and its concomitant idea for transfer of $ for sales of carbon credits. Strong is big slimeball.

scrapper2  posted on  2008-11-19 02:34:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Original_Intent (#5) (Edited)

'the big banksters ... want a "Carbon Tax"'

The political culture we have the misfortune to be stuck with is tax maximization. These parasites are anti-life, as you imply, and we have to stop paying taxes to stop this anti-life culture. Not with confrontation (yet), because we'll get killed for that, but by frugal living.

Peter Carswell  posted on  2008-11-19 02:36:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Original_Intent (#5)

the big banksters who pull their strings and want a "Carbon Tax"

For the record, I've never supported the idea of a Carbon Tax. I felt we needed to look at viable ideas for alternative energy, and that we should reduce pollution as much as feasible, but I never thought it necessary to impose a tax on nations in regards to carbon output.

On the other hand, those countries that pollute the atmosphere and the oceans with mercury and other highly toxic substances SHOULD be penalized. Hell, you can't eat fish these days without ingesting mercury.

FormerLurker  posted on  2008-11-19 15:12:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Original_Intent, FormerLurker (#5)

The "usual suspects" i.e., the Rotchilds and Rockefuckers et. al., ...

My favorite post.

So it isn't exactly by coincidence that it is those same colossal foundations that are making all those "charitable" donations to those icky Greens. The Environmental Grantmakers Association? That's Rockefeller. The Pew Charitable Trusts? That's Sunoco. W. Alton Jones? That's Citgo. The World Wildlife Fund? BP and Shell.

The Pew Charitable Trusts
Global Warming Power Nexus

Thus, in 1991, Pew joined with two other giant philanthropies, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation ($4.2 billion assets 2001) and the Rockefeller Foundation ($2.6 billion assets 2001), to create a single-purpose consortium that argues against fossil fuels: the San Francisco- based Energy Foundation. They were joined within a few years by four other foundations, including the powerhouses David and Lucile Packard Foundation ($6.1 billion assets) and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation ($5.1 billion assets). Today the Energy Foundation has some $50 million of its own in the bank and its seven constituent foundations list over $23 billion in combined assets. This conglomerate is critical to Pew’s success as the pre-eminent climate change leader.

Enron: Courting Clinton and the Environmentalists

The Kyoto Protocol on climate change represented an opportunity for Enron to make a profit, because the carbon dioxide requirements of the treaty dovetailed with numerous corporate projects that emitted less carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

Vice President Al Gore championed the Kyoto Protocol, which would have required 40 industrialized nations to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2012.

In realizing that opportunity, Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay applauded Clinton's support for the Kyoto Protocol in an Oct. 22, 1997 corporate statement, calling it "a comprehensive, yet realistic, program that starts to move the United States and the world toward minimizing carbon dioxide emissions."

Lay liked the emission targets and incentives to develop new energy and environmental technology as well as the "carbon dioxide trading program."

Enron was invested in both natural gas energy alternatives and wind power technologies, both of which fit the profile of what the Kyoto Protocol demanded, and the company needed little prodding when it came time to support the global warming treaty.

How Enron hyped global warming for profit

Amidst the talk about the benefits that Kyoto Protocol is sup-posed to promote, it is perhaps forgotten especially amongst the greenies how Kyoto was born in the corridors of very big business. The name Enron has all but faded from our news pages since the company went down in flames in 2001 amidst charges of fraud, bribery, price fixing and graft. But without Enron there would have been no Kyoto Protocol.

The world has never seen such freezing heat

A GISS spokesman lamely explained that the reason for the error in the Russian figures was that they were obtained from another body, and that GISS did not have resources to exercise proper quality control over the data it was supplied with. This is an astonishing admission: the figures published by Dr Hansen's institute are not only one of the four data sets that the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) relies on to promote its case for global warming, but they are the most widely quoted, since they consistently show higher temperatures than the others.

farmfriend  posted on  2008-11-20 15:53:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]