[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
World News See other World News Articles Title: Ex-CIA Officials Tied to Rendition Program and Faulty Iraq Intel Tapped to Head Obama’s Intelligence Transition Team John Brennan and Jami Miscik, both former intelligence officials under George Tenet, are leading Barack Obamas review of intelligence agencies and helping make recommendations to the new administration. Brennan has supported warrantless wiretapping and extraordinary rendition, and Miscik was involved with the politicized intelligence alleging weapons of mass destruction in the lead-up to the war on Iraq. We speak with former CIA analyst Melvin Goodman and Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights. Guests: Melvin Goodman, Former CIA and State Department analyst. He is a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and director of the Centers National Security Project. His latest book is Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA. He is also co-author of the book,Bush League Diplomacy: How the Neoconservatives are Putting the World at Risk. Michael Ratner, President of the Center for Constitutional Rights. His latest book is The Trial of Donald Rumsfeld: A Prosecution by Book. AMY GOODMAN: Its been less than two weeks since Obamas election. Speculation is already rife about the change he intends to bring to Washingtons intelligence community. The Washington Post reported last week that Obama is expected to replace the countrys top two intelligence officials over their support for controversial Bush administration policies like torture and electronic surveillance. Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and CIA chief Michael Hayden reportedly wish to remain on the job. No appointees have been named as yet, but questions are already being raised about the people heading Obamas transition efforts on intelligence policy. John Brennan and Jami Miscik, both former intelligence officials under George Tenet, are leading the review of intelligence agencies and helping make recommendations to the new administration. Brennan has supported warrantless wiretapping and extraordinary rendition, and Miscik was involved with the politicized intelligence alleging weapons of mass destruction in the lead-up to the war on Iraq. Im joined now by Washington, D.C.in D.C. by former CIA and State Department analyst Mel Goodman. Hes a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy, director of the Centers National Security Project. His latest book is called Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA. He is also co-author of Bush League Diplomacy: How the Neoconservatives are Putting the World at Risk. Were joined here in New York by Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights. His latest book is The Trial of Donald Rumsfeld: A Prosecution by Book. We welcome you both to Democracy Now! I want to start with Mel Goodman in Washington. Long years at the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department. Youve just written an op-ed piece in the Baltimore Sun that looks at these two top transition officials. Explain who they are and what they represent. MELVIN GOODMAN: Well, I think its important to understand who John Brennan is. He[no audio] AMY GOODMAN: We seem to have lost the sound, Mel Goodman. Lets see if weif we have it back. Mel, can you hear us? MELVIN GOODMAN: Can you hear me? AMY GOODMAN: Hi. Can you hear us, Mel Goodman? MELVIN GOODMAN: I can hear you fine. AMY GOODMAN: OK, good. Now we hear you fine. So just start from the top. Talk about Brennan. MELVIN GOODMAN: OK. John Brennan was deputy executive secretary to George Tenet during the worst violations during the CIA period in the run-up to the Iraq war, so he sat there at Tenets knee when they passed judgment on torture and abuse, on extraordinary renditions, on black sites, on secret prisons. He was part of all of that decision making. Jami Miscik was the Deputy Director for Intelligence during the run-up to the Iraq war. So she went along with the phony intelligence estimate of October 2002, the phony white paper that was prepared by Paul Pillar in October 2002. She helped with the drafting of the speech that Colin Powell gave to the United Nations[inaudible] 2003, which made the phony case for war to the international community. So, when George Tenet said, "slam dunk, we can provide all the intelligence you need, [inaudible] to the President in December of 2002, it was people like Jami Miscik and John Brennan who were part of the team who provided that phony intelligence. So what I think people at the CIA are worried aboutand Ive talked to many of them over the weekendis that there will never be any accountability for these violations and some of the unconscionable acts committed at the CIA, which essentially amount to war crimes, when youre talking about torture and abuse and secret prisons. So, where are we, in terms of change? This sounds like more continuity. AMY GOODMAN: I want to turn to excerpts from a December 2005 interview with John Brennan, the former CIA official now leading Obamas intelligence transition. Brennan was interviewed by Margaret Warner on the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer about his views on the Bush administrations practice of extraordinary rendition. MARGARET WARNER: So, was Secretary Rice correct today when she called it a vital tool in combating terrorism? JOHN BRENNAN: I think its an absolutely vital tool. I have been intimately familiar now for the past decade with the cases of rendition that the US government has been involved in, and I can say, without a doubt, that it has been very successful as far as producing intelligence that has saved lives. MARGARET WARNER: So is itare you saying bothin two ways, both in getting terrorists off the streets and also in the interrogation? JOHN BRENNAN: Yes. The rendition is the practice or the process of rendering somebody from one place to another place. It is moving them. And US government will frequently facilitate that movement from a country to another. MARGARET WARNER: Why would you not, if thisif you have a suspect whos a danger to the United States, keep him in the United States custody? Is it because we want another country to do the dirty work? JOHN BRENNAN: No, I dont think thats it at all. Also, I think its rather arrogant to think that were the only country that respects human rights. I think that we have a lot of assurances from these countries that we hand over terrorists to that they will in fact respect human rights. And there are different ways to gain those assurances. But also, lets say an individual goes to Egypt, because theyre an Egyptian citizen, and the Egyptians then have a longer history, in terms of dealing with them, and they have family members and others that they can bring in, in fact, to be part of the whole interrogation process. AMY GOODMAN: Thats John Brennan, who heads up the transition team on intelligence. Mel Goodman? MELVIN GOODMAN: Well, John Brennan is being completely dishonest there. All of the operational people Ive talked to know that the people who were turned over to the Arab intelligence servicesand remember, this is Egypt, this is Syria, this is Jordan, this is Saudi Arabiathat all of these foreign intelligence services commit torture and abuse. Now, if any of these suspects had anything to say to us that was of any utility, we would have kept them. We would have controlled these people. They would have become our sources and our assets. When we turned them over, we were turning over people who we felt had very little to offer, and we were turning over them to them, to the Arab liaison services for torture and abuse. John Brennan has defended the warrantless eavesdropping. John Brennan has basically defended all of the violations that were committed at the CIA in the run-up to the war and in the postwar period. So the signal this sends to CIA employees who tried to get it rightand there were a few who tried to get it rightis the worst kind of signal. And if this is Obamas judgment about a national security team, its very reminiscent of what Bill Clinton did in 1993, when he appointed people such as Jim Woolsey and Les Aspin and Warren Christopher and Tony Lake to the national security positions, and all of them had to be removed before the first term was over. So this is very disquieting, what were learning now. AMY GOODMAN: In fact, NPR attributed Obamas reversal on FISA and telecom immunity to the fact that he was relying on the advice of John Brennan, an emphatic supporter of these policies. MELVIN GOODMAN: Well, then you have to wonder who hes relying on, in terms of advice, to keep Bob Gates at the Pentagon, which I think is another example of continuity and not change. You mean to tell me that there are no Democrats who are qualified to become the Secretary of Defense? Bob Gates has supported all of the policies that Obama said he was going to look at very carefully and seemed to oppose: expansion of NATO, bringing Georgia and Ukraine into NATO, deployment of missiles in Poland, deployment of radars in the Czech Republic, the continued acquisition of a national missile defense, which is the most expensive item in the Pentagons procurement project, an item that weve spent over $500 billion on in the last forty years. This isagain, this is not change; this is continuity. AMY GOODMAN: Michael Ratner, as you listen to John Brennan, again, heading up the transition team on intelligence, your thoughts? MICHAEL RATNER: Well, its extremely, extremely disturbing. When you read Jane Mayers book, the worst and most onerous chapter is the chapter on what the CIA did to people in secret sites, from small coffins to waterboarding. John Brennan was there at the time. To hear him say that this stuff works is reallyor that its very important to do is really remarkable. Hes saying that at the same time when we know about the Centers client, Maher Arar, being sent to Syria, tortured, so-called diplomatic assurances somehow able to protect him. Another Guantanamo peopleother Guantanamo people sent to Egypt with the worst kind of torture. So, the idea that Brennan, who should probably, along with Tenet, be facing some kind of war crimes trial, is actually heading the transition on this is extremely disturbing. AMY GOODMAN: And Jamie Miscik, Mel Goodman, talk about her significance. MELVIN GOODMAN: Jami Miscik was the Deputy Directorshe was the Deputy Director of Intelligence during the run-up to the war and in the immediate postwar period. That was a period of politicized intelligence. That was a period of the corruption of the process. That was a period when all analytic trade craft, all of the rules of analytic trade craft were ignored. She passed judgment on the October 2002 estimate. She passed on the white paper, which was the phony paper that violated the CIA charter, because it took classified material and then declassified it and sent to the Congress only days before the vote on the authorization to use force in Iraq in October 2002. She was part of the slam-dunk team that George Tenet was so proud of that prepared a phonynot only that phony estimate, but the speech that Colin Powell gave, that outrageous speech with twenty-eight allegations, all of them false, prepared in February of 2003, which was the case to the international community. Hundreds of millions of people heard that phony speech, and its still an embarrassment to Colin Powell to this very day. She was part of the team that allowed George Bush to go before this country in January of 2003 in a State of the Union address and use a fabricated intelligence report to say that Iraq was getting enriched uranium from a West African country. Jami Miscik was a part of all of this. And a lot of us were very pleased when Porter Goss actually fired Jami Miscik. My guess is he probably fired her for the wrong reasons and not the right reasons, but we were glad to see her go. And now, for Obama to turn around, put Jami Miscik back in the CIA in transition and Brennan in the transition process, and then you look at people such as the former deputy to Tenet, John McLaughlin, who is also an intelligence adviser, and Rob Richer, who was a key operations adviser, who was the deputy to Jose Rodriguez, who is now being investigated by the Justice Department for the illegal destruction of the torture tapes, you know, you have to wonder, who is Obama relying on for advice on the Washington community? Hes only been in Washington, we know, for two years, and obviously there are things he needs to know about national security, the CIA and the intelligence community. And obviously, hes listening to the wrong people. AMY GOODMAN: Mel Goodman, I want to thank you for being with us, former CIA and State Department analyst. His latest book is called Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#0)
Ich lache meinen Arsch ab!
Seeing as how you are all arsch I wouldn't do that. There will be nothing left.
whoa. obama's turning out to be much worse than even i expected. A Republican in charge of the Pentagon, a pro-torture anti-civil liberties CIA chief, and now Hillary Clinton as secretary of state is there any principle you've forgotten to sell out? Justin Raimondo add a couple more to the list.
Regular readers and listeners know I have long contended that the Democruds are more fun than the Republicruds. Sure, Republicruds essentially do the same thing, but so blandly that it looks different. I figure that if you are going to h-e-c-k anyway, you may as well enjoy the trip. Illegal alien-elect Hussein certainly does not disappoint; the only thing I did not expect was that the fun would start so soon. ~Alan Stang
anybody wish to translate?
Regular readers and listeners know I have long contended that the Democruds are more fun than the Republicruds. Sure, Republicruds essentially do the same thing, but so blandly that it looks different. I figure that if you are going to h-e-c-k anyway, you may as well enjoy the trip. Illegal alien-elect Hussein certainly does not disappoint; the only thing I did not expect was that the fun would start so soon. ~Alan Stang
And unlike the Hegelian dialectic propaganda (birth certificates, race etc) pushed by the neocons, this is something of substance that should cause concern.
ROFLMAO is a loose translation.
Regular readers and listeners know I have long contended that the Democruds are more fun than the Republicruds. Sure, Republicruds essentially do the same thing, but so blandly that it looks different. I figure that if you are going to h-e-c-k anyway, you may as well enjoy the trip. Illegal alien-elect Hussein certainly does not disappoint; the only thing I did not expect was that the fun would start so soon. ~Alan Stang
thanks
Regular readers and listeners know I have long contended that the Democruds are more fun than the Republicruds. Sure, Republicruds essentially do the same thing, but so blandly that it looks different. I figure that if you are going to h-e-c-k anyway, you may as well enjoy the trip. Illegal alien-elect Hussein certainly does not disappoint; the only thing I did not expect was that the fun would start so soon. ~Alan Stang
We didn't need 'experts' to tell us that...........look at who he was listening to in his campaign......Zig was enough for me....not to mention Soros. Seems like the change is merely from white to black...very reminescent of the early days of the cowboy presidunce!
Well, we were promised CHANGE! by the Obama campaign. Obama changed. No more lofty rhetoric. Business as usual in the swamp.
It is now time for Atlas to shrug.
i sure didn't think we'd get to say i told you so this soon. are his actions this soon out of the gate worse than you expected too?
Als die Welt kommunistischer Messias in Berlin war, haben viele von uns gewusst, dass Obama seinen Vater der Teufel vertrat.
I expected it to be empty campaign rhetoric and no real change once the ballots were in. In four years I expect the country will lurch violently to the right - at least in the campaign and in the election - with no real change then either.
It is now time for Atlas to shrug.
Translation courtesy of Babelfish: When the world was communist Messiah in Berlin, many of us knew that Obama represented his father the devil. I apologize, all I remember is some kinderdeutsch....and not very much of that.
It is now time for Atlas to shrug.
Regardless of the respect and esteem once deserved by those statesmen and public servants that dedicated their lives to better the country (like waaaayyyyy back there around 1787) the imposters feathering their own nests in D.C. today are "turkeys" ! The collective power of the people united, either through boycotts, protests and strikes is our only defense. As long as we continue to participate in what we all know is a fraud we continue to be led around by the nose and into the abyss. 8 long years we've been whining about Bush and before that Clinton and before that Bush. How much fascism do we need to stomach before we rise up and throw these evil bastards out on their asses ? Now this (usurper) asshole wants to openly demonstrate his disdain for the American people by importing this long list of shit eating commie-fascist Israeli firsters and other assorted scumbags into his administration. America is the last bastion of "claimed" freedom and if we would like to be remembered favorably by our posterity it's past time for us to resist this tyranny.
Where's your birth certificate Barack ?
"I laugh my ass off" would be mu guess, but the only german I know comes from watching Hogans Heroes and war movies.
Seems like it didn't matter who won the election, whether it was Obama or McCain, they'd still have the VERY same team. Those people were probably picked out for this election cycle WELL before the November election.
Herzlich willkommen!
Sie sind sehr gütig!
"Not the victory but the action; Not the goal but the game; In the deed the glory" Dies ist gut |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|