[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Warning America About Palantir: Richie From Boston I'm not done asking questions about the killing of Charlie Kirk. 6 reasons the stock market bubble is worse than anyone expected. Elon Musk: Charlie Kirk was killed because his words made a difference. Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor) The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding! Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025 LadyX Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show 1963 Chrysler Turbine 3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report $200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030 Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis Fooling Us Badly With Psyops The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Health
See other Health Articles

Title: What about population control?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 17, 2008
Author: salemguy
Post Date: 2008-11-17 23:35:10 by salemguy
Keywords: None
Views: 1427
Comments: 127

So I've been looking at comments about Obama's new war plans, not, and something that's been bugging me for a while causes me to post this. I'm curious what you think and what you think we should do, as a freedom forum.

When, with all these crises on climate change, energy, food, water, land use, environment, etc., are we going to address the problem of too many people?

I'm pretty sure we already have too many people. How should we do that?

I think we should have global goals for a population reduction of 50% by 2050, via natural deaths, contraception, and abortion.

How do we get there?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

#7. To: salemguy (#0)

I think we should have global goals for a population reduction of 50% by 2050, via natural deaths, contraception, and abortion.

How do we get there?

How's about we start with you ?

You really should resign from this 4UM because you're too stupid to compete in the market place of ideas ... and I fear for your sanity as you will be beaten to a pulp intellectually by the membership here because they aren't restrained through pc moderators.

noone222  posted on  2008-11-18   5:10:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

How's about we start with you ?

You really should resign from this 4UM because you're too stupid to compete in the market place of ideas ... and I fear for your sanity as you will be beaten to a pulp intellectually by the membership here because they aren't restrained through pc moderators.

LMAO! I'm dyin' over here..

Ya'll crack me up..

Lady X  posted on  2008-11-18   9:46:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

LMAO! I'm dyin' over here..

Ya'll crack me up..

Hey, straighten up.

Notice Salem left out " EUTHANASIA"?????

Cynicom  posted on  2008-11-18   9:52:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Notice Salem left out " EUTHANASIA"?????

Good idea, cynicom. Are you volunteering?

I do live in a state that supports physician-assisted suicide, and I'm glad for that. Euthanasia, realistically and humanely, has been practiced for a long time by doctors and others, so yeah, I think we ought to allow that, too.

A large piece of US medical costs are foolishly spent in the last six months of life. It would save a bundle and relieve a lot of suffering.

Apart from we should all buy guns and shoot each other, anybody have any positive contributions here?

For RickyJ, I'm pretty sure there are already too many people because we are now damaging planetary systems, big time, with no end in sight. People, among animals, have by far the greatest impact on natural resources, and it's clear that our endless growth is not sustainable.

salemguy  posted on  2008-11-18   15:43:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

For RickyJ, I'm pretty sure there are already too many people because we are now damaging planetary systems, big time, with no end in sight. People, among animals, have by far the greatest impact on natural resources, and it's clear that our endless growth is not sustainable.

What planetary systems are we damaging?

The overpopulation myth has been going on since the end of WW2. It is a myth or else we wouldn't be letting millions of Mexicans into America to work if we already had too many people.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-11-18   16:03:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What planetary systems are we damaging?

Huh?

Where have you been for the last few decades? Do you deny global warming, the decimation of northern and southern ice caps? The incredible, omnipresent pollution of the planet? Watersheds everywhere increasingly contaminated? The acidification and warming of ocean waters? The death of coral reefs?

Much of this results from industrial and consumer use of petroleum and petro- chemicals, not directly from overpopulation, but now at over 6 billion, and rising living standards in India and China, only more pressure on ecological systems can be expected... more damage guaranteed.

Globally, we could address this either by ratcheting back on living standards or focusing on fewer people. I think fewer people is a better choice. Otherwise, collapsing ecosystems will see to it, hmm? At that point what is your standard of living worth?

salemguy  posted on  2008-11-24   21:46:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The population problem is the keystone dilemma facing this world. There are way, way too many people on 'spaceship Earth.' We consume so much, there is not enough resources and space for other life forms every bit as valuable and important as our species of primate.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-11-24   21:56:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The population problem is the keystone dilemma facing this world. There are way, way too many people on 'spaceship Earth.

The entire earth population can fit in Texas with about 1400 sq ft per person. It is nowhere close to full or overpopulated. Problems with food etc is because of mans wars and greed. Not overpopulation. Anyone who thinks that we are overpopulated needs to kill themself.

Old Friend  posted on  2008-11-24   22:37:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The entire earth population can fit in Texas with about 1400 sq ft per person

Do you think you'd be able to enjoy the quality of life that you have with a population density that high? For starts, many of the western states have water shortages now. If you had twice the population that the US has today, you can say hello to water rationing over a good part of the country.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-25   11:36:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

For starts, many of the western states have water shortages now. If you had twice the population that the US has today, you can say hello to water rationing over a good part of the country.

Do to bad government policy driven by environmentalism.

farmfriend  posted on  2008-11-25   13:45:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's mostly due to morons who live in places like Southern California or Arizona and run their sprinklers 24 hours a day, seven days a week to grow a lawn.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-11-25   14:00:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's mostly due to morons who live in places like Southern California or Arizona and run their sprinklers 24 hours a day, seven days a week to grow a lawn.

No it's mostly do to enviros who insist on having water for their yachts like during the Klamath water crisis. Oh they claimed it was for the fish, that didn’t need it btw, but the reality was the guy who set the water levels was commodore of the yacht club and that was the first year they didn't have to pull their boats out. He claimed there still wasn't enough water though the lake was at record levels.

It's due to enviros who want to save an artificial lake at the expense of the farmers who created it, all because birds have managed to take advantage of it.

It's because our forests are overgrown with all those trees sucking up the water supplies causing less runoff and unhealthy forests.

I could go on but I won't.

farmfriend  posted on  2008-11-25   14:11:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 33.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]