[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Time for MASSIVE change in America (Black Crime and the Media))

How Much Are Teachers Paid Around The World?

Spain's Power Grid: Net Zero Drive Pushes Economy Toward Paralysis

Pepe Escobar: So the death cult "defends itself" by bombing..

Banks Are Hiding Credit Losses (Here’s How) | Bill Moreland of BankRegData

Housing stability is being propped up by hidden bailouts and toxic FHA debt,

Why Did Qatar's Air Defenses Fail During Israel's Attack?

German POWs Expected Execution — Instead an American Farmer Invited Them for Dinner

Charlie Kirk has been shot

Elon Musk Commits $1 Million To Murals Of Iryna Zarutska Nationwide, Turning Public Spaces Into Culture War Battlegrounds

Trump's spiritual advisor, Paula White: "To say no to President Trump would be saying no to God."

NETHERLANDS: Young natives are hunted and beaten on the streets by savage migrants

Female Police Officers Arrest Violent Man The Ponytail Police In Action

Lighter than Hare - Restored Classic Bugs Bunny

You'll Think Twice About Seeing Your Medical Doctor After This! MUST SEE

Los Angeles man creates glass that withstands hammers, saving jewelry from thieves.

This is F*CKING DISGUSTING... [The news MSM wishes you didn't see]

Nepal's Gen Z protest against Govt in Kathmandu Explained In-depth Analysis

13 Major World War III Developments That Have Happened Just Within The Past 48 Hours

France On Fire! Chaos & Anarchy grip Paris as violent protesters clash with police| Macron to quit?

FDA Chief Says No Solid Evidence Supporting Hepatitis B Vaccine At Birth

"Hundreds of Bradley Fighting Vehicles POURING into Chicago"

'I'll say every damn name': Marjorie Taylor Green advocates for Epstein victims during rally

The long-awaited federal crackdown on illegal alien crime in Chicago has finally arrived.

Cash Jordan: ICE BLOCKS 'Cartel Caravan'... HAULS 'Army of Illegals' BACK TO MEXICO

Berenson On Black Violence, Woke Lies, & Right-Wing Rage

What the Professor omitted about the collapse of the American Empire.

Israel Tried to Kill Hamas in Qatar — Here’s What REALLY Happened

Katie Hopkins: Laurence Fox and my beaver. NOT FOR THE WEAK

Government Accidentally Reveals Someone Inside Twitter Fabricated 'Gotcha' Accounts To Frame Conservative Firebrand


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Donofrio v Obama Citizenship Case Moves To New Supreme Court Level
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://rense.com/general84/scotus.htm
Published: Nov 19, 2008
Author: Devvy Kidd
Post Date: 2008-11-19 23:49:01 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 730
Comments: 6

Leo Donofrio's case submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court reagrding Obama's citizenship has reached a new level: the case has been "distributed for conference."

On December 5, 2008, only ten days before the electoral college votes, the nine Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court will meet in private to discuss this case identified as:

Leo C. Donofrio, v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey United States Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407

Leo informed me earlier today via telephone about this historic event and wanted to thank everyone who sent their letters to Justice Clarence Thomas.

This is the link to the Supreme Court showing the docket and action:

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm

If you go to this link, it will give you the process under Title 18:

http://nocriminalcode.blogspot.com/2007/10/petition-distributed-for- conference-on.html

Click on Justices Conference for more history on this process.

This docketing today by the court for this next step should send ripples of fear through the Obama camp. Obama has been proceeding at lighenting speed to put together a cabinet and take possession of the White House with the hope that he won't have to answer the question of whether or not he was "at birth" a "natural born citizen."

Every major news network, print and cable news like FOX, CNN and MSNBC, have ignored all the court cases challenging Obama's eligibility as sore losers or conspiracy theories. It might be in their best interest at this point to report this critically important meeting to take place on December 5, 2008, or lose what little credibility they have left.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

#1. To: nolu_chan (#0)

i think i've read that you believe this birth certificate issue is nonsense. what's your opinion of this news?

also, have you read Dr. Edwin Vieira's (constitutional lawyer), OBAMA MUST STAND UP NOW OR STEP DOWN? in his opinion, this is a constitutional crisis with very serious consequences. it's rather lengthy, but i think well worth the time as it's compelling and, imo, convincing.

christine  posted on  2008-11-20   0:49:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: christine (#1)

According to the Docket No. 08-570 at the United States Supreme Court, the Federal Election Commission yesterday filed a waiver of its right to respond to attorney Philip Berg's Petition for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 31 and currently pending before the Court.

Contrary to Internet rumor that Justice Souter had ordered Barack Obama to provide the vault copy of his birth certificate, the Court merely set December 1, 2008 as the date by which the respondents--Obama, the Democratic National Committee and Federal Election Commission--were to respond to Berg's petition if they chose to do so at all. Yesterday's filing, which appeared on the docket this afternoon, shows that the respondents have waived their right to respond.

It also suggests that a decision on Berg's petition could be imminent.

There are a number of reasons why the respondents here would choose not to respond. First, because the Court only grants between 70 and 120 of the 8,000 or so petitions it receives every year, perhaps they just liked their odds of Berg's petition getting denied. Second, because they have made arguments as to Berg's lack of standing several times at the district court level and beyond, perhaps they felt as though any arguments had already been made and were available on the record. Or, perhaps the waiver shows that the FEC and other respondents do not take seriously the allegations put forth by Berg, and did not wish to legitimize the claims with a response.

Another thing which is not completely clear is whether the FEC is filing for itself or on behalf of all respondents. On the docket, the FEC's attorney is noted as being the attorney for all respondents; on yesterday's docket entry, it states that the waiver was filed by "respondents Federal Election Commission, et al." As it were, the FEC's attorney, Gregory Garre, is with the Solicitor General's office, and does not represent Obama or the DNC. While attorneys acting on behalf of a group of defendants or respondents is not necessarily rare, the difference here is the involvement of the Solicitor General's office, a federal office.

This distinction is not lost on Philip Berg.

"If it were just the FEC filing the waiver, I must say that I'm surprised," Berg said. "I'm surprised because I think they should take the position that the Supreme Court should grant standing to us. I think they have a responsibility not only to Phil Berg, but to all citizens of this country, to put forth a sense of balance which otherwise doesn't seem to exist."

"However, if this was filed by the FEC on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion," he said, noting that the attorney from the Solicitor General's office should be representing federal respondents and not the DNC or Obama.

Indeed, neither the DNC nor the president-elect are, for now, federal respondents, though Obama's status as Illinois senator--a position from which he resigned this past weekend--could place him under the representational umbrella of the Justice Department.

While outright collusion could be a stretch, if indeed the FEC's attorney is acting on behalf of all respondents and not just the FEC, there certainly is the appearance of coordination. Regardless of the veracity of the allegations put forth against Barack Obama, for the Department of Justice and the Solicitor General of the United States to be facilitating a defense which is calculated to shield from disclosure, rather than compel disclosure, of manifestly relevant and critical information bearing directly upon not just the qualifications but the very constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama -- the word "unorthodox" comes to mind. As does "shameful." And yet, in these post- election times, especially considering the FEC's decision not to audit Obama's $600 million take during his campaign (at least $63 million of which was from undisclosed sources), this appears to be the new standard in post-election times.

Either way, Berg says that he is hopeful that the Court will "do the right thing," and ensure that "the American public is provided with the opportunity to know that the person leading the United States of America is eligible, under our Constitution, to do so."

As for New Jersey firebrand and attorney Leo Donofrio, his application for an emergency stay was denied by Justice Souter, Donofrio was able to refile and resubmit it to the Justice of his choosing, and properly did so. Today, the docket for his action shows that after being put before Justice Clarence Thomas, the application will be discussed by the Court in a December 5, 2008 conference.

Normally, during their term, the Supreme Court Justices conference on Wednesday (typically, but not always) and review the various petitions and applications before them, deciding which of the many such proceedings should be heard by the Court. I suspect that we could soon see a similar entry on the docket for Berg's case as well.

Now, this does not mean that the Court has decided to hear either of these matters and, in fact, is fairly typical when it comes to the process. Still, for those hoping to have these cases heard on their merits, for those who feel these issues are more about the United States Constitution than Barack Obama, this is a step in the right direction.

Certainly, the proceedings moving along normally is positive with regard to publicity for Donofrio and Berg as well. Just yesterday, news of Alan Keyes' suit in California reached the Drudge Report, so the questions surrounding this aspect of Obama's candidacy are seemingly beginning to see the light of day.

www.americasright.com/

Horse  posted on  2008-11-20   1:54:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Horse (#2) (Edited)

Certainly, the proceedings moving along normally is positive with regard to publicity for Donofrio and Berg as well. Just yesterday, news of Alan Keyes' suit in California reached the Drudge Report, so the questions surrounding this aspect of Obama's candidacy are seemingly beginning to see the light of day.

This "trip" through the fairytale province of Amerika reminds me of having an expensive meal at an exclusive restaraunt only to take a healthy dump the following morning. Sitting on the shitter one is unable to note "any" difference between that dump and the one taken after eating a Big Mac.

What I'm trying to say is Amerika is taking a 5 trillion dollar shit, D.C. has been taken over by the SANHEDRIN and some communist mullato from Kenya; the electorate is in a trance like moths attracted to a light that will kill them but incapable of altering the flight pattern.

When the law of the land is based upon "democracy" or the "mob" rather than the guiding principles upon which it was founded, the ship of state loses its moral compass and a wild eyed drunk takes the helm.

noone222  posted on  2008-11-20   2:09:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 3.

#4. To: noone222 (#3)

What I'm trying to say is Amerika is taking a 5 trillion dollar shit, D.C. has been taken over by the SANHEDRIN and some communist mullato from Kenya; the electorate is in a trance like moths attracted to a light that will kill them but incapable of altering the flight pattern.

When the law of the land is based upon "democracy" or the "mob" rather than the guiding principles upon which it was founded, the ship of state loses its moral compass and a wild eyed drunk takes the helm.

Well done.

IndieTX  posted on  2008-11-20 03:11:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]