See other Editorial Articles
Title: OBAMA FAILS TO SALUTE THE U.S. FLAG, WON'T WEAR THE AMERICAN PIN, WEARS ISRAEL'S, REMOVES AMERICAN FLAG FROM HIS PLANE & DRESSES UP IN MUSLIM GARB
Source:
supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com
URL Source: http://supportbordercontrols.blogsp ... e-us-flag-wont-wear.html#links
Published: Nov 10, 2008
Author: clifylq
Post Date: 2008-12-18 18:16:44 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 6514
Comments: 246
OBAMA FAILS TO SALUTE THE U.S. FLAG, WON'T WEAR THE AMERICAN PIN, WEARS ISRAEL'S, REMOVES AMERICAN FLAG FROM HIS PLANE & DRESSES UP IN MUSLIM GARB I WOULD SAY THAT THIS NEW BASTARD YOU ELECTED TO OFFICE TO REPLACE BUSH IS ANTI AMERICAN WOULDN'T YOU? OR DON'T YOU EVEN CARE? Barack Obama recently finished a $500,000 total overhaul of his 757. And as part of the new design, he decided to remove the American flag from the tail. What American running for President of the United States would remove the symbol of his country? And worse, he replaced the flag with a symbol of himself.This is not the same as “forgetting” to put your hand over your heart during the national anthem. It is not even the same as wearing or not wearing an American flag lapel pin. It is a conscious, expensive decision to emphasize the importance of self over country. It is the very essence of arrogance, hubris, and, yes, megalomania. Poster Comment: Does he like "Bald Heads" too?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 182.
#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
You don't actually believe any of this do you?
Did you know that the American flag on the tail is the logo for North American Airlines, and that it is required to be replaced with a candidate's personal emblem when that plane is chartered by a candidate? Now here's Obama's jet. Notice the American flag is present on the fuselage. Take a look at McCain's plane. There is NO American flag on it at all... As far as the tear jerking story about Obama not shaking hands with the troops over in Afghanistan, it'd be a bit more believable if the person was brave enough to use their name instead of hiding behind the curtain of anonymity. Anybody can "report" whatever they want when they are anonymous. I'm not a huge fan of Obama, but let's not feed into any false reports about him spread about for propaganda purposes. I'm sure there will be enough REAL info to report and to be concerned about.
I am so sorry to see Christine's site turning into a laughing stock. I have no problem with her tolerating all these cretinazis because I approve of tolerance and subjecting the lesser specimens to therapy via participation. The problem is not them being tolerated but it's them being encouraged and prodded into a frenzy of absurdities. It seems to me that Jethro Tull is allowed to help these freakish idiots destroy and discredit what used to be one of the better discussion forums South of the North Pole. Too bad.
I have no problem with her tolerating all these cretinazis because I approve of tolerance and subjecting the lesser specimens to therapy via participation. The problem is not them being tolerated but it's them being encouraged and prodded into a frenzy of absurdities. It seems to me that Jethro Tull is allowed to help these freakish idiots destroy and discredit what used to be one of the better discussion forums South of the North Pole. There is nothing much to laugh about vast, it's just people exchanging ideas and offering different viewpoints. It's called freedom of expression and freedom of speech. That christine allows open debate here and doesn't choose sides is a miracle as most sites are biased and would ban anyone who stirs the pot a bit too much in regards to any topic that site deems sacred. You should respect that and not be so eager to give her an underhanded slap across the face while posting on her site that she provides free of charge out of her own goodwill. To many, you are as much of a "lesser specimen" and/or "cretinazi" as you view others here. Nobody is being prodded and encouraged to do anything; we are all here to speak our minds and perhaps try to change the minds of others. As far as your mention of Jethro, if you have something to say to him then you should say it to him directly rather than bumping your remarks about him off of me. From what I've read so far on this thread, I take it your remark concerning Jethro has something to do with his positions on Obama. I haven't been involved in the Obama debates because I can't find anything worth discussing about him. He's just another globalist controlled puppet who will do the bidding of his masters; his recent Cabinet appointments bears that out in spades (excuse the pun). If you find Obama to be a better man than that, well that's your opinion and your right, but don't look down upon others who don't share your views, in fact, you should perhaps heed their advice and wake up from your slumber.
Take heart, his new enviromental appointment will have us paying carbon credits in no time. NWO here we come.
Does the thought of that fill you with glee or something? Are you trying to imply that I have supported the idea of carbon credits, where I have consistently stated that I DO NOT?
There are no replies to Comment # 182. End Trace Mode for Comment # 182.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: FormerLurker (#1)
#3. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#2)
#6. To: FormerLurker (#3)
#163. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, christine, Jethro Tull (#6)
I am so sorry to see Christine's site turning into a laughing stock.
#168. To: FormerLurker (#163)
He's just another globalist controlled puppet who will do the bidding of his masters; his recent Cabinet appointments bears that out in spades (excuse the pun).
#182. To: farmfriend (#168)
Take heart, his new enviromental appointment will have us paying carbon credits in no time.
Replies to Comment # 182.