See other Editorial Articles
Title: OBAMA FAILS TO SALUTE THE U.S. FLAG, WON'T WEAR THE AMERICAN PIN, WEARS ISRAEL'S, REMOVES AMERICAN FLAG FROM HIS PLANE & DRESSES UP IN MUSLIM GARB
Source:
supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com
URL Source: http://supportbordercontrols.blogsp ... e-us-flag-wont-wear.html#links
Published: Nov 10, 2008
Author: clifylq
Post Date: 2008-12-18 18:16:44 by Itisa1mosttoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 3131
Comments: 246
OBAMA FAILS TO SALUTE THE U.S. FLAG, WON'T WEAR THE AMERICAN PIN, WEARS ISRAEL'S, REMOVES AMERICAN FLAG FROM HIS PLANE & DRESSES UP IN MUSLIM GARB I WOULD SAY THAT THIS NEW BASTARD YOU ELECTED TO OFFICE TO REPLACE BUSH IS ANTI AMERICAN WOULDN'T YOU? OR DON'T YOU EVEN CARE? Barack Obama recently finished a $500,000 total overhaul of his 757. And as part of the new design, he decided to remove the American flag from the tail. What American running for President of the United States would remove the symbol of his country? And worse, he replaced the flag with a symbol of himself.This is not the same as “forgetting” to put your hand over your heart during the national anthem. It is not even the same as wearing or not wearing an American flag lapel pin. It is a conscious, expensive decision to emphasize the importance of self over country. It is the very essence of arrogance, hubris, and, yes, megalomania. Poster Comment: Does he like "Bald Heads" too?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
You don't actually believe any of this do you?
Did you know that the American flag on the tail is the logo for North American Airlines, and that it is required to be replaced with a candidate's personal emblem when that plane is chartered by a candidate? Now here's Obama's jet. Notice the American flag is present on the fuselage. Take a look at McCain's plane. There is NO American flag on it at all... As far as the tear jerking story about Obama not shaking hands with the troops over in Afghanistan, it'd be a bit more believable if the person was brave enough to use their name instead of hiding behind the curtain of anonymity. Anybody can "report" whatever they want when they are anonymous. I'm not a huge fan of Obama, but let's not feed into any false reports about him spread about for propaganda purposes. I'm sure there will be enough REAL info to report and to be concerned about.
BTW, that picture embedded in your article is a pretty cheesy Photoshop job. Whoever did it must not have been trying too hard to be taken seriously. VS the real thing... reminds me too much of I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise. I am so sorry to see Christine's site turning into a laughing stock. I have no problem with her tolerating all these cretinazis because I approve of tolerance and subjecting the lesser specimens to therapy via participation. The problem is not them being tolerated but it's them being encouraged and prodded into a frenzy of absurdities. It seems to me that Jethro Tull is allowed to help these freakish idiots destroy and discredit what used to be one of the better discussion forums South of the North Pole. Too bad.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
You have a point.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" It falls on deaf ears.
We haven't drank the Obama Kool-Ade like you have. Sorry.
i see your comment is directed to FL and i assume then since he replied to itisa1mosttoolate that you are referring to iiatl as a cretinazi? and tell me please, why would you mention JT here when he had not posted to this thread?
why don't you name names? who have i encouraged and prodded into a frenzy of absurdities? who are the freakish idiots?
what point do you think vast has made, tom?
you know, you didn't bother to flag me either. i consider your post a sucker punch. further, this forum is here strictly on my dime. i've never asked you or anyone else for a cent. my purpose in creating 4um was to provide a place free of oppressive moderation and where guests have freedom and comfort of expression. if you don't appreciate my hospitality or that which i extend to anyone else here, i invite you to find another place more satisfying or, better yet, start one of your own.
christine, let me use this parable: Even the Four Seasons Hotel has an obnoxious customer stagger into the bar on occasion, it's no reflection upon the proprietor of the establishment.
1st, Obama is the largest absurdity to hit the U.S. and National prominence in at least a hundred years, maybe ever. That being said, you insinuate that Christine has promoted or encouraged a frenzy of freakish idiots attacking your poor political choice but you say nothing of her tolerating your exuberant ignorance in support of this unknown negroe, communist, change agent. You have an ungrateful attitude with respect to your own unfettered ability to freely publish nonsense in support of Hussein, and feel no shame when disrespecting someone elses opinion and on top of not being satisfied with debate you slander the forum's host. Sometimes people are just too fucking stupid to have dialogue with and you are the epitomy of this condition. Which element of the socialist agenda do you represent moron ? Are you a commie, a queer, a gun grabber, an atheist, or like most voters for the changer (as opposed to the decider) just too fucking stupid. This "so called election" is proof positive that mob rule is the most wicked of political systems and you do your part in proving this by showing up for the asshole faction of the socialist party. It baffles me to see anyone arguing these candidates qualifications or qualities since none of the candidates have shown any interest in bettering the country by stopping the illegal invasion, locking up the Wall Street thugs, eliminating the "fed" or ending the fucking war ... but your boy did at least lie about that part. Goody for him. If you want to debate flags on airplanes or even pledging "allegiance" to the flag that these traitors operate under that's OK by me, but to lash out at someone for hosting a website made available even to the retarded such as yourself is really uncalled for.
They call it the AMERIKAN DREAM because you have to be asleep (and you are) to believe it !
Amen!
You're too kind !
They call it the AMERIKAN DREAM because you have to be asleep (and you are) to believe it !
With the war against Israel's enemies in the Middle East, Black Obama, not to mention wretched, third-world invasion of immigrants crossing our borders, god's pets have made a nightmare of the the American Dream. Folks who come on public forums and praise this nonsense--I call it national suicide--belong in the madhouse.
Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.
Well said.
Amen to that !!!!!
They call it the AMERIKAN DREAM because you have to be asleep (and you are) to believe it !
I appreciate the compliment.
They call it the AMERIKAN DREAM because you have to be asleep (and you are) to believe it !
I could do a better Photoshop than that with my left hand.
Republicans believe in abortion -- they just wait until they're born and then call them 'collateral damage'.
Such a talented turtle. What else can you do with your left hand?
Turtle is schocked! Shocked, I tell you! Shocked! Your evil little mind is as pure as the driven slush!
Republicans believe in abortion -- they just wait until they're born and then call them 'collateral damage'.
angle, tom & a east european communist butt boy: Life's a bitch when you blow your cover, ain't it you fucking Traitors ? Kool-Aid does that.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
World Communists: Fucking things up for as long as I can remember. Exile or Termination. I don't really care anymore.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Christine, I fully understand that this site is your hobby. You might have noticed that I did state that this site used to be a good vehicle for interesting exchanges of views and ideas. I believe that all that changed when you allowed Jethro and wackos he believes are his friends - and they may be so - to encourage the replacing of discussions and debates with screams and what they believe were clever insults. What did you gain out of it: you gained intellectually challenged members of the calibers of Peppa (come and gone), someone by the name of Olivia, come and gone, some cretin who claims to be a Germ, come and gone and Jethro using your site to project his battered cop fears of darkies and encouraging his little army of insulters to be as 'offensive' as possible. The problem is that you are losing some of your more thoughtful members, and I am not including myself in that category. They are either completely gone or, if they are checking your site, occasionally, they are probably too disgusted or find the 'discussions' too boring or uninteresting to express their views, one way or another. That is how I feel myself, even though I could not count myself among the more thoughtful members. In the good old days, I used to post a dozen articles or more almost every day and there were some good discussions on some of them. Right now, I probably make contributions once or twice a week and I rarely post any new 'stuff' because there are very few worth posting for so why bother. By the way, I understand and I appreciate your effort. I know that I could not find the time to do what you do and, if I did it and I started my own forum, chances are no one would bother coming. You called what I wrote 'a sucker punch'. This is in line with the current atmosphere at your site where just about all you get is sucker punches and sub-basement-level 'humor'. My intention is not to sucker punch anyone and, if you really want to know why I wrote what I wrote on THIS thread, I will tell you. I just happened to check the latest threads at your site and I opened that thread and... I simply felt like writing something about the quality of the 'debate'. Yes, I do refer to some of the members at this site as 'cretinazis' and I probably use some other creative terms because sometimes I decide to come down to their level and see if some rudimentary exchange of ideas is possible - it's not. Calling them these fine names is probably not as low as Dr. Jethro cheerfully predicting my children's bright future or the constant torrent of idiotic insults coming from some of those I bozoed already. You know, for a long, long time I thought that the purpose of a sites like FreeRepublic was to attract all the low-lifes there so that the rest of the Internet can be a cleaner, more enlightening experience. It's possible that, as the Internet becomes increasingly crowded, the FRs and the LPs of the world are overflowing and... they are here now. Anyways, I really wish you success in pulling out from the swamp Jethro and his friends dragged you into. I suspect that there is a lot of goodwill amongst the more intelligent members to come back and improve the quality of debate here. Like I said, the issue is not kicking the idiots out, it's them being encouraged to put forward the worst of what they got instead of gently but firmly attempt to guide them back into a more rational interaction with the outside world. I remember you stating at one time, in a private email, that, while you had your own views, as the chief moderator you thought inappropriate to express them in public. I thought that was a most responsible approach. Sadly, you are no longer guided by that principle. First, you allowed your first lieutenant to openly, loudly and stridently (cop-style) express his so-called views, then you began to take sides yourself on debates where the sides were not as important as the 'tools' used to 'debate' - as in one side or both sides aiming at hurting the other side's feelings or simply show off their ugliest features and call it a debate. I understand that I am in no position to give you advice but, if I may express my view, the older approach was probably the superior one and, I believe you were running a better forum then. So, no sucker punches, just expressing some views. And, in my view, this forum looks more and more like the online version of the Jerry Springer show where the guests are running it.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Show me how and where this began. And why would you suggest that christine "allowed" me to do this?
I hope she sucks it up and tells you Traitors what she really thinks. You lowlife JBT licking tool.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
The many decades of running down their rabbit trails with them are over. Let them mentally masturbate amongst themselves, somewhere more befitting the bat shit crazy lunatics. Like DUmpster. They've appealed to the lowest common lowlife denominator and jawed their boy into the selection. Fuck'em. They won the battle and we're going to win the war.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
The hotel analogy seems good, seems like a few freaks are pissing on the carpets here. I don't think JT has anything to do with it tho. That said, I have a thick skin, and the babellings of a few scatological pin heads are but dust in the wind.
"Satan / Cheney in "08" But they dont want discussions or debates. They want people to agree with them that black is white and up is down. When resistance is met, they bitch and moan that we unplugged are oh so stupid not to believe them. Look at the Bright Side, obamatards. Your man takes office in 1 month. You think things will be all peachy, I say you are going to get royally reamed. All-in bets are on the table, river card is dealt, we'll see the cards shortly. Let's see who is right. Will it be the obamatards, or us country bumpkins.
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files Nehemiah 4:14 And I looked and arose and said to the nobles and to the officials and to the rest of the people, “Do not be afraid of them. Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome, and fight for your brothers, your sons, your daughters, your wives, and your homes.”
Early on in the Obama campaign, it became obvious that many of our fellow Bush Bashers were Democrats. Whereas we thought, all along, that they were opposed to big, bloated, socialistic government, in truth they thought all that was needed was for a Democrat to ascend to the throne. That is the core of the differences we have; they believe in government as long as it's Democrat controlled, and most others here reject government regardless of who is president.
ah..but yes i am. only you took it the wrong way. it's the views and opinions of you partisans that i tolerate and with whom i hold my tongue. your bias is showing, vast. i notice that it's only you and your fellow obamaphiles complaining about who and what is posted on this forum. as for your complaints about JT or the others you mentioned, take it to them. i don't speak for them. i speak for no one but myself.
Early on in the Obama campaign, it became obvious that many of our fellow Bush Bashers were Democrats. Whereas we thought, all along, that they were opposed to big, bloated, socialistic government, in truth they thought all that was needed was for a Democrat to ascend to the throne. That is the core of the differences we have; they believe in government as long as it's Democrat controlled, and most others here reject government regardless of who is president. Obingo They were 'friends' and 'patriots' when it was a republicrat brand we were all bashing. They suckered us, but we also let them. As PSUSA pointed out so well; I have long ago given up playing their game. They WILL NOT walk away laughing. That I guarantee.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
They sure got a lot of suckers, rubes, twits and suckers (did I say suckers already) to go along with their double think. Pure communist jew program. Now we have Obamalamadingdong, the golden calf jews' best friend. TO HELL with the Globalist feudalistic commie NeoCon leninist trotskyite scum !
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
It still is you enemy of free speech. You see good people just don't like you evil folk. You are the enemy so get used to it.
You can't suck up to people. Let people say what they want. I have made that mistake. Hey Jethro sorry for ***ing out your nigger word.
That is smart. I wish I would have done that way back when.
Comments (41 - 246) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#2. To: FormerLurker (#1)
#3. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#2)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#4. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#5. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
Funny Video Sharing Site
#6. To: FormerLurker (#3)
#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)
#8. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)
what used to be one of the better discussion forums South of the North Pole.
#9. To: angle (#8)
It falls on deaf ears.
#10. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)
(Edited)
#11. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)
#12. To: tom007 (#7)
You have a point.
#13. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)
#14. To: christine (#13)
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#15. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)
The problem is not them being tolerated but it's them being encouraged and prodded into a frenzy of absurdities. It seems to me that Jethro Tull is allowed to help these freakish idiots destroy and discredit what used to be one of the better discussion forums South of the North Pole.
#16. To: X-15, christine (#14)
Even the Four Seasons Hotel has an obnoxious customer stagger into the bar on occasion, it's no reflection upon the proprietor of the establishment.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss — The Who
#17. To: noone222 (#15)
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss — The Who
#18. To: farmfriend (#17)
#19. To: noone222 (#15)
#20. To: noone222, a vast rightwing conspirator, christine, all (#15)
...to lash out at someone for hosting a website made available even to the retarded such as yourself is really uncalled for...
"It is like a trance. So what can break a trance? The only thing that can break the trance is the light of truth."
~ Canadian Philosopher John McMurtry as he comments on the psychological warfare that has afflicted us all
#21. To: Zoroaster (#19)
Folks who come on public forums and praise this nonsense--I call it national suicide--belong in the madhouse.
#22. To: wudidiz (#20)
#23. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
#24. To: Turtle (#23)
I could do a better Photoshop than that with my left hand.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss — The Who
#25. To: farmfriend (#24)
What else can you do with your left hand?
#26. To: Jethro Tull, angle, tom007, a vast rightwing conspirator (#9)
We haven't drank the Obama Kool-Ade like you have. Sorry.
#27. To: noone222 (#15)
#28. To: christine (#13)
(Edited)
#29. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#28)
I believe that all that changed when you allowed Jethro and wackos he believes are his friends - and they may be so - to encourage the replacing of discussions and debates with screams and what they believe were clever insults.
#30. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Christine (#28)
I remember you stating at one time, in a private email, that, while you had your own views, as the chief moderator you thought inappropriate to express them in public. I thought that was a most responsible approach. Sadly, you are no longer guided by that principle.
#31. To: Jethro Tull (#29)
encourage the replacing of discussions and debates with
#32. To: christine, Jethro Tull (#12)
what point do you think vast has made, tom?
#33. To: Jethro Tull, Christine, All (#29)
to encourage the replacing of discussions and debates with screams and what they believe were clever insults.
#34. To: PSUSA, Rotara, tom007, all (#33)
But they dont want discussions or debates. They want people to agree with them that black is white and up is down.
#35. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#28)
I remember you stating at one time, in a private email, that, while you had your own views, as the chief moderator you thought inappropriate to express them in public. I thought that was a most responsible approach. Sadly, you are no longer guided by that principle.
#36. To: Jethro Tull, PSUSA (#34)
(Edited)
But they dont want discussions or debates. They want people to agree with them that black is white and up is down.
#37. To: PSUSA (#33)
They want people to agree with them that black is white and up is down.
#38. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#28)
. You might have noticed that I did state that this site used to be a good vehicle for interesting exchanges of views and ideas.
#39. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Jethro Tull (#28)
The problem is that you are losing some of your more thoughtful members, and I am not including myself in that category. They are either completely gone or, if they are checking your site, occasionally, they are probably too disgusted or find the 'discussions' too boring or uninteresting to express their views, one way or another.
#40. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Christine (#28)
I remember you stating at one time, in a private email, that, while you had your own views, as the chief moderator you thought inappropriate to express them in public
.
.
.