[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Neocon Nuttery See other Neocon Nuttery Articles Title: Supreme Court to talk about Obama 3rd time (Berg eligibility case set for conference Jan. 9) Posted: December 19, 2008 © 2008 WorldNetDaily One of the original legal challenges to President-elect Barack Obama's eligibility for office to reach the U.S. Supreme Court now has been scheduled for a conference, a meeting at which the justices discuss its merits and whether to step into the fray. Online schedules posted by the court show the case brought by attorney Philip J. Berg is set for a conference Jan. 9. The case is one among several that already have reached the U.S. Supreme Court and address the issue of Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that presidents be "natural born" citizens. Berg has submitted several requests for injunctions, seeking the court's order to stay proceedings in the electoral process until his case is heard, but the request have been rejected. His original claim, however, remains on track to be heard. "I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified natural born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of president of the United States," Berg said in a statement on his ObamaCrimes.com website. "Obama knows he is not 'natural born' as he knows where he was born and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; Obama is an attorney, Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; Obama knows his candidacy is the largest 'hoax' attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; Obama places our Constitution in a 'crisis' situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world who know Obama is not qualified," Berg's statement continued. The justices already have discussed two cases in conference but refused to give them further hearings. As WND has reported, more than a dozen lawsuits have been filed over Obama's eligibility to assume the office of the president. Many have been dismissed while others remain pending. The cases, in various ways, have alleged Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President." Some of the legal challenges have alleged Obama was not born in Hawaii, as he insists, but in Kenya. Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time. Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born. Several details of Obama's past have added twists to the question of his eligibility and citizenship, including his family's move to Indonesia when he was a child, his travel to Pakistan in the '80s when such travel was forbidden to American citizens and conflicting reports from Obama's family about his place of birth. Perhaps the most perplexing detail, however, has been Obama's refusal to allow the public release of a signed "vault" copy of his original birth certificate. A partial listing and status update for several of the cases surrounding Obama's eligibility to serve as president is below: Private investigator Douglas Hagmann of HomelandSecurityUS.com reported earlier he found 13 cases challenging Obama's eligibility still active or semi-active. Last month, WND reported the worries over a "constitutional crisis" that could loom over the issue of Obama's citizenship. "Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void," argues the Alan Keyes case pending in California, "Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal." With such high stakes, WND earlier launched a letter campaign to contact Electoral College members and urge them to review the controversy. WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi had gone to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions. The biggest question was why, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn't simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors. The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii? Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject. A one point a Kenyan ambassador said Obama's birthplace in Kenya already was being recognized. Poster Comment: AmeriKa might have a 'preznit'; Americans should not recognize any aspect of the illegal shadow government.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Rotara (#0)
The nine shyster political hacks have not the backbone to confront the issue and give it a proper airing. Instead they hide behind matters of "law".
Just like they did in 2000 when they named dumbass dumba as our dictator. He may not leave especially if they rule obanger ineligible. We already know obanger is unfit as is mclame. Who ddo you want to see in that office? Homer Simpson?
Instead they hide behind matters of "law". Anyone that has a nice thing to say about: The Bilderberg Society, The Trilateral Commission or the Council on Foreign Relations - is automatically not to be trusted. Anyone that hangs out with such, takes council from such etc. needs to be monitored. Anyone that BELONGS to these groups ... well, you can imagine. Unfortunately, all sides are represented amongst our Supreme Kangaroos.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.Samuel Adams
Like a good union boy you voted for whom in 2000 & 2004 ? How about '92 & '96 ?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.Samuel Adams
Homer would be a great improvement over Bush or Obama.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Over mclame too!
I see you are up to the same old bullshit. You open your big mouth say stupid things and then go running away. I don't like bushbots and neocons and try not to associate with them. #9. To: Rotara, all (#7) Good. They had a hand in orchestrating the 'orderly collapse' of our country. That must be some mighty powerful stuff you are snorting. They say when you snort it up the bottom end it gets to your brain faster. The real answer is guys like kenny lay, ivan boesky, the joo madoff,greenspan, paulson, andrew carnegie, the bushes,the rothchilds, david rockefeller, the clintons, the dick cheney and thousands of others just like them and including those like you who were born with a silver spoon in their mouths and probably never had to work an honest days worth of work. Are you a descendant of one of these honest, outstanding, up right,dishonorable, leeches? I don't think any of these freaks were union members! Are you afraid to answer this? Tell us the real honest reasons why you are so anti-union. May your decendants end up working as virtual slaves in some lousy sweatshop, living on bread and water. That my friend would be GOOD! LACUMO posted on 2008-12-18 21:04:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|