[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Judge upholds Chicago's handgun ban A federal judge today upheld Chicagos 1982 handgun ban as Mayor Daley disclosed plans to strengthen it by following Washington D.C.s lead. In a 5-to-4 decision in June, the Supreme Court overturned the D.C. handgun ban on grounds that the Second Amendment establishes the right to own a handgun for personal self-defense. Hours later, the National Rifle Association and the Illinois State Rifle Association filed lawsuits seeking to overturn handgun bans in Chicago, Morton Grove, Evanston and Oak Park. Wilmette and Morton Grove subsequently repealed their handgun bans. Chicago held fast. Today, U.S. District Judge Milton Shadur rewarded the city for hanging tough, rejecting a pair of lawsuits challenging Chicagos handgun freeze. The Daley administration was pleased, but not surprised by the decision. City attorneys are well aware that the fight goes on. We believe this decision will ultimately end up in the hands of the U.S. Supreme Court, said Law Department spokeswoman Jennifer Hoyle. This is a victory for us, but, its just one step in what is probably going to be a long battle. Todd Vandermyde, Illinois legislative liaison for the NRA, called todays ruling a temporary victory for the city. It was expected. We went to court knowing its going to take a higher courts ruling. As Judge Shadur enumerated in his decision, hes still bound by the precedent set by the 7th Circuit [Court of Appeals]. He wasn't going to stick his neck out on an issue that the 7th Circuit hasn't changed its mind on," he said. "City taxpayers are going to pay more money in legal fees for a fight they will ultimately lose. The city is only postponing the inevitable. They won this round. But if this thing goes to the Supreme Court, we will prevail. The court laid out a very compelling case with a lot of foundation for an individual's right to bear arms," said Vandermyde. In his ruling, Shadur appeared to caution the city that its victory might be short-lived. "This court should not be misunderstood as either rejecting or endorsing the logic of plaintiff's argument. It may well carry the day before a court that is unconstrained by the obligation to follow the unreversed precedent of a court that occupies a higher position in the judicial firmament," the decision stated. Earlier this week, the D.C. Council replaced its overturned law with new regulations that require gun owners to receive five hours of safety training and register their firearms every three years. Gun owners in the nation's capital would also face criminal background checks every six years. At a news conference on school violence that preceded Shadurs ruling, Daley hinted strongly that he intends to follow Washingtons lead. The mayor said he plans to hold a gun conference early next year to consider current trends in gun violence and how they might be addressed within the legal parameters established by the nations highest court. I believe the courts ruling presents us with an opportunity to continue our efforts to enact reasonable, common sense gun laws that put conditions on gun ownership and sales and that also puts limitations on where guns are permitted, all of which the courts ruling allows, the mayor said. Asked point-blank whether he intends to use the citys sweeping home-rule powers to mimic the D.C. changes, Daley said, Thats what were looking at. Youre not gonna rush into something so quickly. Thats why you have a conference and listen to people. In the days and months that followed the Supreme Courts landmark gun ruling, Daley also talked about strengthening Chicagos handgun ban in a way that protects police officers. If the nations highest court says its OK to keep guns in your home for self-defense, whats to prevent those guns from being used against police officers and firefighters who respond to a domestic quarrel or other emergency, the mayor asked. What does a policeman do when theres a domestic battery [call] and theyre both armed? Do they enter the home or apartment or do they wait outside? Daley asked reporters earlier this year. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All, *libertarians*, *Jack-Booted Thugs*, *Ron Paul for President 2008* (#0)
ping
Americans used to roar like lions for liberty. Now they bleat like sheep for security Anyone else wonder why we have a supreme court, if its rulings do not mean anything, if the government doesn't agree with the ruling?
I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise. What does a policeman do when theres a domestic battery [call] and theyre both armed? If a cop or fireman is afraid of this scenario, then they need to find a new line of work. I hear that Wal-Mart is always hiring.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 19731976 The purpose of the legal system is to protect the elites from the wrath of those they plunder.- Elliott Jackalope
Obama approves from afar. Don't think he isn't taking notes for the near future.
Exactly.
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|