Bilderberg luminary Henry Kissinger has repeated his routine call for a new international political order, stating that global crises should be seen as an opportunity to move toward a borderless world where national interests are outweighed by global necessities.
Speaking with Charlie Rose earlier this week, Kissinger cited the chaos being wrought across the globe by the financial crisis and the spread of terrorism as an opportunity to bolster a new global order.
I think that when the new administration assess the position in which it finds itself it will see a huge crisis and terrible problems, but I can see that it could see a glimmer in which it could construct an international system out of it. Kissinger said, referring to the transition between the Bush and Obama administrations.
The former National Security advisor and Secretary of State compared the current world climate to the period immediately following the second world war, which led to the creation and empowerment of global bodies such as the UN and NATO.
If you look back to the end of the second world war, many people now think that the period between the end of 1945 and 1950 was in many ways the most creative period or one of the most creative periods of foreign policy, but it started with chaos and fear of Russian invasion of Europe and governments that were very weak. Kissinger stated.
The new administration is really coming into office at a strange period in this sense, he continued. It looks like a period of horrendous crisis all over the world. And we ourselves are in a severe crisis financially, but at the end of it our relative position in the world is actually stronger than it has been in the sense that Russia, China, India all have strong reasons to contribute to a quiet international environment because of the preoccupation they must have with their domestic affairs.
They do not wish and have good reasons not to wish for an international atmosphere of crisis. So Paradoxically, this moment of crisis is also one of great opportunity. Kissinger commented.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Interviewer Charlie Rose, who has previously listened to Kissingers calls for a new world order, recognized the direction the conversation was taking and urged Kissinger to elaborate:
When you talk about a new structure, Im not sure, youve used the term new world order, what is it? Is it simply a world order that is defined by new interest and new mutuality of interest? Rose asked.
Thats certainly how you have to start. I know the view that you start by converting the whole world to our political philosophy. I dont think that can be done in one or two terms of an administration. That is an historic process that has its own rhythm. Kissinger replied.
There are so many elements in this world at the moment that can only be dealt with on a global basis, and thats unique, Kissinger continued. Proliferation, energy, environment, All of these issues necessitate a global approach, so you dont have to invent an international order. So every country has to mitigate its pure national interests by the global necessities, or define its national interests by global necessities But it cannot push its own technically selfish interests only by throwing its own weight around. he stated.
Kissinger also related that he has been struck by how much the move toward a new global order has been enhanced by the recent crises.
The jihadist crisis is bringing it home to everybody, that international affairs cannot be conducted entirely by drawing borders and defining international politics by who crosses what borders with organized military force. he said.
This has now been reinforced by the financial crisis, which totally unexpectedly has spread around the world. It limits the resources that each country has for a foreign policy geared to an assertion of its own pure interests.
Kissinger claimed that the key players in international politics, India, China, Russia, America, Europe, should recognize they have parallel concerns and work together to forge what he termed an age of compatible interests.
Im not saying that leaders will be up to all the opportunities that I may perceive but I think they can start moving in that direction and Im actually fairly hopeful that we will be moving in that direction. Kissinger said.
If you look back to the end of the second world war, many people now think that the period between the end of 1945 and 1950 was in many ways the most creative period or one of the most creative periods of foreign policy, but it started with chaos and fear of Russian invasion of Europe and governments that were very weak. Kissinger stated.
The new administration is really coming into office at a strange period in this sense, he continued. It looks like a period of horrendous crisis all over the world. And we ourselves are in a severe crisis financially, but at the end of it our relative position in the world is actually stronger than it has been in the sense that Russia, China, India all have strong reasons to contribute to a quiet international environment because of the preoccupation they must have with their domestic affairs.
They do not wish and have good reasons not to wish for an international atmosphere of crisis. So Paradoxically, this moment of crisis is also one of great opportunity. Kissinger commented.
==============
In case anyone was wondering what time it is.
So did he mention when he and the rest of his Bilderberger friends would be bringing in the aliens from outer space, to finish bringing in their new world order-out-of-chaos?
So did he mention when he and the rest of his Bilderberger friends would be bringing in the aliens from outer space, to finish bringing in their new world order-out-of-chaos?
Deception Upon Deception Perhaps Henry Kissinger and a few others in the elite hierarchy of the system have been "enlightened" on this deeper explanation. That Henry Kissinger has been enlightened to some extent on this matter seems apparent when one considers an unusual comment he made several years ago.
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened their very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
In a statement to the Bilderberger Conference, held in Evian, France, May 21. 1992. Unbeknown to Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting.
Kissinger is not alone in this thinking. President Reagan referred to such possibilities in different comments made during his presidency. The most famous comment was made initially in private to the leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev during a summit meeting held in 1985. Later, both Reagan and Gorbachev referred to Reagan's comment about an "alien invasion" of Earth and how should such a scenario occur, the world would unite in common. Gorbachev later responded in a speech saying:
"At our meeting in Geneva, the U.S. President said that if the earth faced an invasion by extra-terrestrials, the United States and the Soviet Union would join forces to repel such an invasion. I shall not dispute the hypothesis, though I think it's early yet to worry about such an intrusion..."
Mikhail Gorbachev on February 17. 1987 made those comments in a speech at the Kremlin to the Central Committee meeting of the Communist Party.
The reader should note that Gorbachev's statement doesn't deny the possibility of such a threat but that it's merely "too early to worry" about it. What did he mean by that statement. It is as if Gorbachev is actually acknowledging that at some future point, such a situation will develop.
Reagan responded in a speech before a full session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on September 21, 1987.
"in our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. ... I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. And yet, I ask - is not an alien force ALREADY among us? What could be more alien to the universal aspirations of our peoples than war and the threat of war?
So, occasionally, the curtain is pulled back and we get a glimpse of the wizard behind the curtain pulling the levers of power in our visible world.
Why mention the "alien invasion" aspect? Because, it ultimately addresses the core reasoning why, these human beings would work towards a one-world government and hand off control and power to a "messiah" figure.
This "illuminated movement" of dedicated believers believes it has a moral agenda for doing what is best for the entire human species. The problem is - they've taken a leap of faith towards a deceptive set of claims and thesis.
In accomplishing their goal of a one-world government, the strategy for implementation requires humanity to remain divided and weak. In oder to accomplish this, wars are created. When humans won't fight naturally, then reasons have to be invented. Humanity must not be allowed to know the Truth about their creation and the Creator. Humanity must be kept confused about God and his program of redeeming humanity and of not only restoring human beings to purity but also of elevating humanity above that of the Angelic realm and Satan.
In order to keep humanity keep from figuring out God's truth, one of the best methods for obscuring God's truth is war. In order to keep humanity mired in wars, the Satanic strategy conveyed to the Illuminists is war and it is made palatable to the illuminists by bribery. Wars can be very profitable for those who control money and wealth. In order to create wars, the Illuminists use a precept known as Hegelian dialectic.