[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Feds consider searches of terrorism blogs
Source: USA Today
URL Source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-12-23-terrorblogs_N.htm
Published: Dec 24, 2008
Author: Thomas Frank
Post Date: 2008-12-24 11:33:37 by bush_is_a_moonie
Keywords: None
Views: 194
Comments: 16

WASHINGTON — The Homeland Security Department may soon start scouring the Internet to find blogs and message boards that terrorists use to plan attacks in the USA.

The effort comes as researchers are seeing terrorists increasingly use the Internet to plan bombings, recruit members and spread propaganda. "Blogging and message boards have played a substantial role in allowing communication among those who would do the United States harm," the department said in a recent notice.

Homeland Security officials are looking for companies to search the Internet for postings "in near to real-time which precede" an attack, particularly a bombing. Bombings are "of great concern" because terrorists can easily get materials and make an improvised-explosive device (IED), the department said.

"There is a lot of IED information generated by terrorists everywhere — websites, forums, people telling you where to buy fertilizer and how to plant IEDs," said Hsinchun Chen, director of the University of Arizona's Artificial Intelligence Lab. Chen's "Dark Web" research project has found 500,000,000 terrorist pages and postings, including tens of thousands that discuss IEDs.

Chen and others aren't sure how helpful blogs and message boards will be in uncovering planned attacks.

"I just can't envision a scenario where somebody posts to a message board, 'I'm getting ready to launch an IED at this location,' and the government will find that," said terrorism analyst Matt Devost. A lot of postings about attacks are "fantasy, almost role-playing," Devost said.

Internet searches are used routinely by government agencies, such as the Defense Department, in gathering intelligence, said Chip Ellis of the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism.

The searches use methods similar to a Google query and can be helpful in uncovering the latest IED technology, Ellis said.

Steven Aftergood, an intelligence expert at the Federation of American Scientists, praised Homeland Security for "trying to develop innovative approaches" and said its effort would not jeopardize privacy because the department would be scanning public websites.

The department, which declined comment, has made no decision about using Internet searches and is reviewing statements that companies submitted last month describing their ability to do the searches.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

#1. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#0)

This will evolve into the feds keeping a database of anyone who has ever said anything the government considers a threat. For an example of what they consider a threat just look at the flyer put out by the Phoenix FBI and the Maricopa county joint terrorism task force

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2008-12-24   11:47:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Hayek Fan (#1)

Not for anything, but I've been hearing this BS since I first hopped on the 'net. Abe and the boys plant these stories to keep the more timid of us under our beds. eff them. We either use our 1st or willingly surrender it.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-12-24   12:22:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

A few years a go there were some (I won't mention any names LOL) that automated emails that had specific words being tracked via NSA satellites and other locations. This caused emails with these words to be generated non-stop from PCs etc. It was so bad/heavy that the FCC and NSA stopped the monitoring because everything was so overloaded.

Revolution created America and every now and then it is again needed to maintain liberty and freedom.

EFF and a coalition of public interest, industry, and academic groups filed suit in 2005 challenging the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) unjustified expansion of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). By forcing broadband Internet and interconnected voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services to become wiretap-friendly, the FCC ignored CALEA's plain language and threatened privacy, security, and innovation.

Congress passed the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) in 1994 to make it easier for law enforcement to wiretap digital telephone networks. CALEA forced telephone companies to redesign their network architectures to make wiretapping easier. It expressly did not regulate data traveling over the Internet.

But now federal law enforcement agencies want to change that. On March 10, 2004, the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) filed a joint petition with the FCC. The petition requested that CALEA's reach be expanded to cover communications that travel over the Internet. Thus, Broadband providers would be required to rebuild their networks to make it easier for law enforcement to tap Internet "phone calls" that use VOIP applications such as Vonage, as well as online "conversations" using various kinds of instant messaging (IM) programs like AOL Instant Messenger (AIM).

www.eff.org/issues/calea#23

hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_p...achmatch/FCC-04-187A1.pdf

On May 5, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in a suit brought by EFF and a coalition of public interest, industry, and academic groups challenging the FCC's unjustified expansion of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). By forcing broadband Internet and interconnected voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services to become wiretap-friendly, the FCC ignored CALEA's plain language and threatened privacy, security, and innovation.

www.eff.org/deeplinks/200...vices-be-wiretap-friendly

The FBI has drafted sweeping legislation that would require Internet service providers to create wiretapping hubs for police surveillance and force makers of networking gear to build in backdoors for eavesdropping, CNET News.com has learned.

news.cnet.com/FBI-plans-n.../2100-1028_3-6091942.html

WASHINGTON – The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) today released the following statement in reaction to recent actions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that imperil basic civil liberties of American citizens:

CCIA regrets that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is advancing an agenda that endangers the basic rights of millions of Americans. However temporarily appealing it may seem to fight the "evils du jour," the Federal government’s persistent efforts make it easier to spy o n not just terrorists or criminals, but law-abiding citizens as well. Our Founding Fathers were well aware of the omnipresent presence of evil in the world. However, they recognized such evil does not justify indiscriminate government intrusion. Their brilliance was in their commitment to checking the power of the federal government. Where the potential for abuse exists, it often occurs. The First and Fourth Amendments were conditioned o n precisely this principle: The capacity to use government power for good can easily result in excess and overreaching, and place undesirable burdens o n the innocent.

The FCC’s actions to facilitate surveillance of Internet communications is yet another example of federal government overreaching. This effort, currently being questioned before a federal court of appeals, will place an undue burden o n the rights of average citizens and o n those of thousands of innovative companies in an important, expanding market.

The controversial FCC order adopted in August 2005 requires broadband Internet providers and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) companies to configure their networks for simplified eavesdropping by law enforcement agencies. In addition to being fundamentally flawed, the FCC’s rigid 18-month deadline for compliance provides little technical guidance and, as a result, is not feasible given the scope of the ambiguous order.

In its First Report and Order, the FCC recognized that "broadband Internet access providers today are subject to a number of electronic surveillance statutes that compel their cooperation with law enforcement agencies." Because these agencies already possess the tools necessary to enlist service providers’ assistance in electronic surveillance, this order fails to justify the burden it will impose o n private companies and institutions.

When enacting the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) in 1994, Congress recognized the potential value and benefits of the Internet and the problems inherent in constraining Internet companies with design mandates. Consequently, Congress explicitly exempted the Internet from the provisions of the law. Extending CALEA beyond—and in conflict with—congressional intent by regulatory fiat is unwise policy and well outside the authority vested in the FCC by Congress.

The FCC order imposes:

* a government "back door" into Internet communications applications and private institutions that threatens privacy o nline * a significant and unjustified burden o n anyone who routes Internet traffic, including private universities and VoIP companies * increased overhead costs and barriers to entry in a fragile, emerging market * industry compliance with a timetable that is neither clear nor technically feasible

"Broadening CALEA to include the Internet will further cast a shadow of surveillance on all Internet users and impose significant burdens o n well-functioning, emerging markets," CCIA president Ed Black said. "This is another example of ill-conceived, heavy handed government regulation that will stymie innovation and threaten privacy."

www.ccianet.org/artmanage...rnet_Communications.shtml

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2008-12-24   12:44:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 3.

        There are no replies to Comment # 3.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]