[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination

CNN Stunned As Majority Of Americans Back Trump's Mass Deportation Plan

Israeli VS Palestinian Connections to the Land of Israel-Palestine

Israel Just Lost Billions - Haifa and IMEC

This Is The Income A Family Needs To Be Middle Class, By State

One Big Beautiful Bubble": Hartnett Warns US Debt Will Exceed $50 Trillion By 2032

These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm


Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: Can there be any doubt who the real terrorists are?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.redress.cc/palestine/slittlewood20081228
Published: Dec 29, 2008
Author: .
Post Date: 2008-12-29 09:40:14 by PSUSA
Ping List: *WAR CRIMES*     Subscribe to *WAR CRIMES*
Keywords: None
Views: 272
Comments: 10

US definition fits perfectly

By Stuart Littlewood

28 December 2008

Stuart Littlewood calls on Western leaders to pull the plug on Israel until it conforms to international law and the will of the United Nations, pulls back behind the 1967 border and strictly observes the principles of universal human rights. Otherwise, they “risk a mighty moral backlash from ordinary people, who are beginning to learn the awful truth”.

The patience of all decent men must surely be exhausted.

Today’s [27 December] slaughter of innocents in Gaza, with at least 230 reported killed in raids on “Hamas terror operatives” (as the Israeli military put it), amounted to “a mass execution”, said Hamas.

Can there now be any doubt who the real terrorists are?

The killing spree couldn’t have happened without the tacit approval of America, Britain and the European Union. The political pea-brains that direct the pro-Israel Western alliance were partying, gorging themselves on Christmas fare or binge-shopping while this massacre of hungry women and children and their despairing menfolk in Gaza was being planned and executed.

According to the US's own definition of terrorism Israel is squarely in the frame. Under Section 3 of Executive Order 13224 "Blocking Property and prohibiting Transactions with Persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support Terrorism", the term “terrorism” means an activity that:

(i) involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, property, or infrastructure; and (ii) appears to be intended

* to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; * to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or * to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, kidnapping, or hostage-taking.

The order and its definition of terrorism, signed 23 September 2001 by George W. Bush, is used to outlaw and crush any organization, individual or country the US doesn’t like. The Israeli regime’s "amoral thugs", as a British MP branded them, have plainly been terrorizing the Palestinians for the last 60 years.

Israel's massacre of Gazans no doubt took place with the tacit approval of America, Britain and the European Union

The long drawn-out siege and blockade of Gaza, and the numerous military assaults on its people and their legitimate government, are only the latest crimes in a catalogue of torment and terror. They are clearly attempts to "intimidate and coerce", while the mass destruction of Gaza's infrastructure, the withholding of humanitarian aid, the assassinations, the abductions, the bulldozing of Palestinian homes, and the many violent and dangerous acts, including indiscriminate bombing and shelling (and the use of cluster bombs in Lebanon), ensure Israel’s ugly head is a perfect fit for America’s terrorist hat.

How does the world feel about Obama pledging to “forge an unshakeable bond” with the "miracle" of terrorist Israel?

How do we feel about the EU rewarding Israel for its terrorist acts with enhanced benefits under the EU-Israel Association Agreement?

How do we Britons feel about our Intelligence and Security Committee being chaired by a Friend of Terrorist Israel and 5 out of its 9 members also being the Zionist regime’s devoted Friends? How do we feel about our Foreign Affairs Committee being chaired by a Friend of Terrorist Israel – and our Defence Committee too?

Britain’s prime minister, Gordon Brown, and his predecessor, now peace envoy Tony Blair, both self-confessed Zionists, have given their undying support to a terrorist state and steered Britain’s foreign policy on a course that has earned the opprobrium of civilized people.

The best Brown could do today was urge “restraint”. He called on Gazan “militants” to “cease all rocket attacks on Israel immediately”, but didn’t urge his bosom pals to end the siege and their illegal occupation which, as every sane person knows, are the cause of the strife. Our Foreign Office went so far as to say they were “deeply concerned” then spouted the mantra: “The only way to achieve a lasting peace is through peaceful means”.

The only peaceful means of achieving a lasting peace is for Western leaders to pull the plug on Israel until the regime conforms to international law and the will of the United Nations (without whose misguided generosity there would never have been a state of Israel), pulls back behind the 1967 border and strictly observes the principles of universal human rights.

If they don’t shoulder their responsibility, they risk a mighty moral backlash from ordinary people, who are beginning to learn the awful truth. Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. For further information please visit www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk. Subscribe to *WAR CRIMES*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

#6. To: PSUSA (#0)

The killing spree couldn't have happened without the tacit approval of America, Britain and the European Union.

It's important to note the nature of this "tacit approval." Since Israeli (zionist) agents financed the election campaigns of politicians in these countries, along with the zionist-controlled media giving them backing, the approval for Israel doing whatever it wants is an implicit foregone conclusion.

The illegal Israeli state has been a terrorist regime since before its day one in that its zionist Jews, having been authorized by the British to settle in Palestine, violated the basic condition of the (Balfour) settlement directive which prohibited the prejudicing the rights of indigenous inhabitants. Not only did those zionist gangsters use armed force to steal Palestinian property, the traitors carried out an insurrection against the British authority in Palestine, killing dozens of British soldiers (so they couldn't restore law and order).

So "fearful" are today's ZOG politicians of losing the financial and voter support of organized Jewry as well favorable publicity of its media that they totally ignore the illegal status of the Israeli regime, the war crimes its been committing against its Palestinian victims for half a century, and zionist intrigues to get others to fight Israel's enemies (in Afghanistan and Iraq).

The epitome of this hypocrisy is the statement: Israel has a right to defend itself, most recently uttered by Prime Minister Harper of Canada. The ridiculousness of this foreign policy position is illustrated by asking: If Israeli thieves have a right to defend against repossession (by Hamas) of stolen property, why cannot any Canadian thief do the same, as one did by wiping out four Mounties who had come to recover some stolen vehicles? I'm sure Harper would have brought down the full force of the law on this thief, had he lived, and has done so on two possible (yet to be explained) accomplices of the shooter. Why one set of laws domestically and a totally opposite foreign policy position?

Tatarewicz  posted on  2008-12-30   1:39:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Tatarewicz (#6)

It's important to note the nature of this "tacit approval."

I agree with you. I'd have used the word "explicit" instead of tacit for the reasons you list. There is nothing implied about it.

Why one set of laws domestically and a totally opposite foreign policy position?

Political expediency? Hypocrisy as the result of cosmic scale arrogance? That, and the fact that most 'christians' (which is about 80% of the people here depending on whose stats you believe) believe the .gov has a divine right to rule doesn't help matters any. As if God is a hypocrite too...

PSUSA  posted on  2008-12-30   8:43:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 7.

#8. To: PSUSA, Tatarewicz (#7) (Edited)

Political expediency?

that's my opinion and typical of politicians.

christine  posted on  2008-12-30 10:19:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: PSUSA (#7)

Certainly is political expediency and characteristic of political novices seeking a quick way to power. No party has toadied up to Israeli interests as much as Harper's Tories and no party gets a kinder treatment from talking heads in the media.

I don't know that it's a case of people believing government has a divine right to rule. That's probably a carryover from earlier times of Kings who originated this myth. More likely people believe government right to rule because they think whatever the government does is the will of the majority, which is erroneous since governments are rarely elected by a majority due to significant numbers not voting and then the vote being split among competing candidates.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2008-12-30 23:52:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]