[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination or within two days

In 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law

MUSK is going after WOKE DISNEY!!!

Bondi: Zuckerberg Colluded with Fauci So "They're Not Immune Anymore" from 1st Amendment Lawsuits

Ukrainian eyewitnesses claim factory was annihilated to dust by Putin's superweapon

FBI Director Wray and DHS Secretary Mayorkas have just refused to testify before the Senate...

Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt.

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine

President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture

Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA

F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!


Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: Can there be any doubt who the real terrorists are?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.redress.cc/palestine/slittlewood20081228
Published: Dec 29, 2008
Author: .
Post Date: 2008-12-29 09:40:14 by PSUSA
Ping List: *WAR CRIMES*     Subscribe to *WAR CRIMES*
Keywords: None
Views: 202
Comments: 10

US definition fits perfectly

By Stuart Littlewood

28 December 2008

Stuart Littlewood calls on Western leaders to pull the plug on Israel until it conforms to international law and the will of the United Nations, pulls back behind the 1967 border and strictly observes the principles of universal human rights. Otherwise, they “risk a mighty moral backlash from ordinary people, who are beginning to learn the awful truth”.

The patience of all decent men must surely be exhausted.

Today’s [27 December] slaughter of innocents in Gaza, with at least 230 reported killed in raids on “Hamas terror operatives” (as the Israeli military put it), amounted to “a mass execution”, said Hamas.

Can there now be any doubt who the real terrorists are?

The killing spree couldn’t have happened without the tacit approval of America, Britain and the European Union. The political pea-brains that direct the pro-Israel Western alliance were partying, gorging themselves on Christmas fare or binge-shopping while this massacre of hungry women and children and their despairing menfolk in Gaza was being planned and executed.

According to the US's own definition of terrorism Israel is squarely in the frame. Under Section 3 of Executive Order 13224 "Blocking Property and prohibiting Transactions with Persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support Terrorism", the term “terrorism” means an activity that:

(i) involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life, property, or infrastructure; and (ii) appears to be intended

* to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; * to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or * to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, kidnapping, or hostage-taking.

The order and its definition of terrorism, signed 23 September 2001 by George W. Bush, is used to outlaw and crush any organization, individual or country the US doesn’t like. The Israeli regime’s "amoral thugs", as a British MP branded them, have plainly been terrorizing the Palestinians for the last 60 years.

Israel's massacre of Gazans no doubt took place with the tacit approval of America, Britain and the European Union

The long drawn-out siege and blockade of Gaza, and the numerous military assaults on its people and their legitimate government, are only the latest crimes in a catalogue of torment and terror. They are clearly attempts to "intimidate and coerce", while the mass destruction of Gaza's infrastructure, the withholding of humanitarian aid, the assassinations, the abductions, the bulldozing of Palestinian homes, and the many violent and dangerous acts, including indiscriminate bombing and shelling (and the use of cluster bombs in Lebanon), ensure Israel’s ugly head is a perfect fit for America’s terrorist hat.

How does the world feel about Obama pledging to “forge an unshakeable bond” with the "miracle" of terrorist Israel?

How do we feel about the EU rewarding Israel for its terrorist acts with enhanced benefits under the EU-Israel Association Agreement?

How do we Britons feel about our Intelligence and Security Committee being chaired by a Friend of Terrorist Israel and 5 out of its 9 members also being the Zionist regime’s devoted Friends? How do we feel about our Foreign Affairs Committee being chaired by a Friend of Terrorist Israel – and our Defence Committee too?

Britain’s prime minister, Gordon Brown, and his predecessor, now peace envoy Tony Blair, both self-confessed Zionists, have given their undying support to a terrorist state and steered Britain’s foreign policy on a course that has earned the opprobrium of civilized people.

The best Brown could do today was urge “restraint”. He called on Gazan “militants” to “cease all rocket attacks on Israel immediately”, but didn’t urge his bosom pals to end the siege and their illegal occupation which, as every sane person knows, are the cause of the strife. Our Foreign Office went so far as to say they were “deeply concerned” then spouted the mantra: “The only way to achieve a lasting peace is through peaceful means”.

The only peaceful means of achieving a lasting peace is for Western leaders to pull the plug on Israel until the regime conforms to international law and the will of the United Nations (without whose misguided generosity there would never have been a state of Israel), pulls back behind the 1967 border and strictly observes the principles of universal human rights.

If they don’t shoulder their responsibility, they risk a mighty moral backlash from ordinary people, who are beginning to learn the awful truth. Stuart Littlewood is author of the book Radio Free Palestine, which tells the plight of the Palestinians under occupation. For further information please visit www.radiofreepalestine.co.uk. Subscribe to *WAR CRIMES*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#6. To: PSUSA (#0)

The killing spree couldn't have happened without the tacit approval of America, Britain and the European Union.

It's important to note the nature of this "tacit approval." Since Israeli (zionist) agents financed the election campaigns of politicians in these countries, along with the zionist-controlled media giving them backing, the approval for Israel doing whatever it wants is an implicit foregone conclusion.

The illegal Israeli state has been a terrorist regime since before its day one in that its zionist Jews, having been authorized by the British to settle in Palestine, violated the basic condition of the (Balfour) settlement directive which prohibited the prejudicing the rights of indigenous inhabitants. Not only did those zionist gangsters use armed force to steal Palestinian property, the traitors carried out an insurrection against the British authority in Palestine, killing dozens of British soldiers (so they couldn't restore law and order).

So "fearful" are today's ZOG politicians of losing the financial and voter support of organized Jewry as well favorable publicity of its media that they totally ignore the illegal status of the Israeli regime, the war crimes its been committing against its Palestinian victims for half a century, and zionist intrigues to get others to fight Israel's enemies (in Afghanistan and Iraq).

The epitome of this hypocrisy is the statement: Israel has a right to defend itself, most recently uttered by Prime Minister Harper of Canada. The ridiculousness of this foreign policy position is illustrated by asking: If Israeli thieves have a right to defend against repossession (by Hamas) of stolen property, why cannot any Canadian thief do the same, as one did by wiping out four Mounties who had come to recover some stolen vehicles? I'm sure Harper would have brought down the full force of the law on this thief, had he lived, and has done so on two possible (yet to be explained) accomplices of the shooter. Why one set of laws domestically and a totally opposite foreign policy position?

Tatarewicz  posted on  2008-12-30   1:39:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Tatarewicz (#6)

It's important to note the nature of this "tacit approval."

I agree with you. I'd have used the word "explicit" instead of tacit for the reasons you list. There is nothing implied about it.

Why one set of laws domestically and a totally opposite foreign policy position?

Political expediency? Hypocrisy as the result of cosmic scale arrogance? That, and the fact that most 'christians' (which is about 80% of the people here depending on whose stats you believe) believe the .gov has a divine right to rule doesn't help matters any. As if God is a hypocrite too...

PSUSA  posted on  2008-12-30   8:43:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: PSUSA, Tatarewicz (#7) (Edited)

Political expediency?

that's my opinion and typical of politicians.

christine  posted on  2008-12-30   10:19:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#9. To: christine (#8)

It would be so much better if they did what was right, even if it was a little painful in the short term, than to keep digging us into a ever deepening pit.

I give them the benefit of the doubt too, since I really believe this is all intentional. The real people in charge give the useful idiots and fellow travelers in office a choice, and people being people they will always take the easy way out.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2008-12-30 10:37:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]