[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: The Arrogant Self-Righteousness of Vichy Liberalism There was a time when liberalism was the undisputed philosophical underpinning of Western Civilization. Consider the first liberal: John Locke’s ideals freed the world from kings and tyrants and their arrogant self-righteousness that assumed the citizenry was put on earth just for them to command. The forces of liberalism changed the authoritarian paradigm, leading people to believe that consensus was more important than accidents of births. But by the 20th century, liberalism had changed, coming full circle. Today the advocates of modern liberalism no longer embrace liberty and tolerance, but a new type of ruler: a benevolent government determined to make people equal by whatever means possible. Government is again the means by which to control society, but this time, for "noble" causes. Except for the "classical liberals" who still adhered to the traditions of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson, most modern liberals embraced the redistribution of wealth, larger government agencies, and a bureaucratic society dependent on the largesse of the political system. They have legislated womb-to-tomb economic policies reminiscent of 1930s–40s national socialism in Europe, embodied in the Vichy regime in France – hence my term "Vichy liberalism." Vichy liberals have somehow failed to realize that the larger the ruling authority, the greater the temptation for abuse. In addition, as that abuse enlarges, so does an arrogant self-righteous attitude toward citizens, as if ordinary people were put on the earth merely to provide the political elite with money and employment. Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich’s refusal to resign after being caught trying to sell Obama’s vacant U.S. Senate seat to the highest bidder illustrates this feeling of entitlement. Saying he had done nothing wrong, the liberal Democrat also tried to fire some critical editors from the Chicago Tribune and to solicit a bribe from a hospital. A less publicized case of arrogant disregard for people occurred in Carmel Valley, California, during the 2008 fires. Ivan Eberle, a well-known wildlife photographer, was commended for heroism in saving the Monterey Institute for Research Astronomy observation station on Chews Ridge from a raging wild fire. A few days after the fire, he was visited by six Monterey County Sheriff and charged with the crimes of battering a firefighter and interfering with a firefighting crew in the line of duty. Calling the charges "ironic" and "truly bizarre," Eberle said he felt that his "constitutional rights were violated to an egregious degree." To him, the charges filed by the fire department were in retaliation for his public criticism, as he had spread the word that the firefighters refused to help him save the observatory, which is also his home. To Eberle, the firefighters were acting with "willful negligence or dereliction of duty." Eberle believes the bogus charges stem from his quick actions to save the observatory. When a large tongue of flames raced toward propane tanks next to a grove of pines, he unrolled a fire hose from the facility’s hydrant and bumped into a sleep-deprived firefighter. Although the observatory is the only structure on Chews Ridge, Eberle single-handedly saved it. Nobody from the fire department would help. Similar to the theme of Fahrenheit 451, the firefighters seemed to have forgotten their primary purpose. So how could such arrogant misconduct occur? Some have pointed to the consolidation of local volunteer fire departments with more formal, government-operated ones. Years earlier in 2001, the Valley Volunteers Inc. in Carmel Valley Village merged with a government fire department in the Mid-Valley area. The merger quickly turned sour. In 2004, the volunteer fire department circulated a petition for "detachment," arguing that their privately raised million-dollar fund had been squandered and that the two groups had different philosophies on how to operate a fire department. Although explicitly told that a detachment could easily be arranged if either side found the merger unsatisfactory, the LAFCO government agency in charge of such disputes refused to allow the separation. Many of the citizen firefighters quit the department, saying that they were being "treated as subordinates" by the new consolidated fire department. The most dangerous threat from Vichy liberals is that they do not trust ordinary people to do the right thing. Instead, government control and bureaucracy are substituted to run society. Politics and officiality overshadow anything that citizens attempt to do, preventing society from self-organizing into a system to which people are willing to dedicate valuable time and money. Unfortunately, as consolidation grows, so does an attitude that only government can solve problems, leaving the citizenry defenseless and dependant. Obviously, government has gotten too big for it britches, and its arrogance is showing through. January 1, 2009 L.K. Samuels [send him mail] is editor and contributing author of Facets of Liberty: A Libertarian Primer and a forthcoming book, In Defense of Chaos: the Chaology of Politics, Economics and Human Action. He was recently elected Chair to the Project Area Committee (PAC), a citizens committee to advise the Seaside Redevelopment Agency and the city of Seaside over eminent domain issues. He is on the Executive Committee board of the Libertarian Party of California. He is winner of the 2007 Karl Bray Memorial Award. Visit his website.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ada (#0)
good summation
Good article - thank you. The Grand Experiment has turned into the Grand CF - it's time to start over.
Government types never bother me. It's like what Obi-Wan did to the stormtroopers. i just zotz them with my brain and they wander away.
Have pug, will laugh.
I have personally seen this to be the case. I know several liberals - and they have this attitude of "if we don't force people to help they won't help. Basically the difference between them and a Libertarian/Paleocon like myself is that they think all people are base and will not help others at the point of a gun, and I, and others like me, think most people are decent and do not have to robbed at gunpoint by government or FORCED to take part in Government "Aid" programs for the "less fortunate" i.e., often just shiftless. The reality is that those who help out of their own pocket of their own free will DISCRIMINATE between those actually needing help and those who are simply lazy sacks of shit who feel the world owes them a living. Not only that the people who help of their own accord are often "shudder" religious. Again - if you get a liberal, actually socialist as they are anything but "liberal" in the true sense, to let their hair down and coax them into opening up this is exactly what they want - enforced government control and the belief that you do not have the right to maintain control of your own property. My benchmark liberal, a Nader/Oh'bummer voter, actually told me that she thinks GloBull Warming is a good idea even if it is not true because it is needed to stop people from being wasteful and polluting. When I pointed out that there are true environmental problems that need to be solved and that phoney GloBull Warming was not one of them she just clammed up and didn't want to talk about it any more. In other words a LIE which promoted her personal prejudices and misconceptions was OK because it was for "Mother Earth" and people don't count. You run into other irrational reasoning and "thinking" with them as well when you just gently prod and listen sympathetically to the bilge they squeeze out. It is very enlightening - if scary and stomach turning. These are the kind of people who became guards at the Gulags out of "conviction" in the rightness of mass murder "for the good of the State".
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||