See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: Kissinger: Obama can create a "new world order" - CNBC 1/5/09
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jan 5, 2009
Author: me
Post Date: 2009-01-05 09:42:20 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 2868
Comments: 88
Ah.....the year is only 5 days old and Henry Kissinger just mumbled the magic words - New World Order. He said that Obama is in a position to create it, thanks to all the global good will he is receiving. YouTube to follow shortly.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 54.
#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
that was before his silence on gaza, wasn't it?
It wouldn't help anyone to have a president-elect starting a contriversy about the current chain of command of government. Bush is accountible for his administration, not Obama. Obama's starts noon, eastern time on the 20th of this month. I support him not muddying the waters, I still remember how deep and lasting a problem Clinton had when he didn't chose his battles wisely upon assuming the presidency in regards to the gays in the military question, even though he was right; gays and lesbians should not be discriminated against. If Obama does not turn the screws on Israel upon assuming the presidency, this is a different matter. At the very least, the Israelis need a bit of tough love delivered to them. In the form of a deminishment or ceasing of support politically, and in terms of aid provided them. They are very wrong in this invasion of Gaza. It won't end the problems they want it to. It will exaerbate and expand it.
It wouldn't help anyone to have a president-elect starting a contriversy about the current chain of command of government. Bush is accountible for his administration, not Obama. Obama's starts noon, eastern time on the 20th of this month. I support him not muddying the waters, I still remember how deep and lasting a problem Clinton had when he didn't chose his battles wisely upon assuming the presidency in regards to the gays in the military question, even though he was right; gays and lesbians should not be discriminated against. If Obama does not turn the screws on Israel upon assuming the presidency, this is a different matter. At the very least, the Israelis need a bit of tough love delivered to them. In the form of a deminishment or ceasing of support politically, and in terms of aid provided them. They are very wrong in this invasion of Gaza. It won't end the problems they want it to. It will exaerbate and expand it. So, genocide, ethnic cleansing, "liquidating the ghetto", is not a big enough issue for the Obamessiah to comment on? What IS a big enough issue then? Do you consider genocide equivalent to "Queers in the Military"? Your apologias are running a bit thin. And when he bends over forward for the Zionazis what will your excuse be then? I know you'll have one I'm just curious. I could use a little humor right about now.
I like 'queers.' A whole lot better then I like bigoted fuss budgets like you. Whatever Barack Obama did, you and your ilk would whine horribly about it. If he spoke up you would be accusing him of neutralizing his effectiveness by creating a controversy about what is proper involvement politically for a president-elect and what is not. You are a 'give them a fair trail before you hang him' sort. So why in the world should I care to be anything but rapturously amused and bemirthed by your butt headed sort of posturing? I can really say I am not. As for the gay in the military analogy you make no sense at all. You piously whine that the Gaza situation and the injustice toward gays and lesbians in the military are not remotely the same level of situation. I actually agree with you, the genocide is a bigger story and issue. But think about it, Hasbro; if a lesser issue paralyzed and bedeviled Bill Clinton's new penny shiny presidency, what would a mis-step on a globally important issue possibly do to hurt President Obama who could have waited until 21 January 2009 to say or do something? You also ignore the fact I am more then willing to criticize Obama if he does not remain consistent with his past rhetoric about the situation in the Middle East, or does not recognize that the status quo of how our mutual relationship with Israel under Bush cannot continue. But then again, this too is not surprising, and consistent with the sort of behavior curmudgeon you are deep down inside are only capible of.
If you washed the polish off of Obingo mug, you'd be the same old Mikey.
There are no replies to Comment # 54. End Trace Mode for Comment # 54.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestHe said that Obama is in a position to create it, thanks to all the global good will he is receiving.
#3. To: christine (#1)
"that was before his silence on gaza, wasn't it?"
#30. To: Ferret Mike, christine, all (#3)
"that was before his silence on gaza, wasn't it?"
#53. To: Original_Intent (#30)
#54. To: Ferret Mike (#53)
Replies to Comment # 54.