See other Immigration Articles
Title: What is Racism? Why is it a bad thing?
Source:
MajorityRights
URL Source: http://majorityrights.com/index.php ... /what_is_racism_why_is_it_bad/
Published: Jan 18, 2009
Author: Unknown
Post Date: 2009-01-18 15:48:54 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 383
Comments: 30
Like breathing, being racist isn’t considered very important until one stops doing it. Then the people who never paid any attention to being racist but figured it would take care of itself, suddenly find themselves choking to death and on the edge of extinction. The need for explicit, conscious racism instead of implicit, subconscious racism is more dire than ever before, due to the breakdown of impersonal natural forces keeping the races apart. Our people are having an asthma attack, the natural working of the lungs has failed, and only explicit, conscious, reasoned racism can be the inhaler that rescues them. The impersonal barriers of separation are gone. It is time for personal barriers to be thrown up, and thus the time for Racism the ideology, the reasoning process of this survival mechanism, to emerge. Which brings me to the second point that until recently, it was hard to know if racism was true, or truly necessary, or just an outdated prejudice due to ignorance. If everyone were truly the same if raised in the same way, then racism would have no meaning. If everyone were just as related to each other as everyone else, then racism would have no meaning. There was a brief period of time where it was intellectually feasible to reject racism as a primitive prejudice born of ignorance instead of knowledge. These people were objecting to the inborn racism built into everyone not used to seeing foreigners or differences, they assumed time and education would erase all the observed differences and the age of aquarius would roll in. However, the exact opposite occured. Science proved the exact opposite point, and every single study only showed how vital, how intransigent, how unchangeable our genetic differences were. Ethnic Genetic Interests by Frank Salter. IQ and Global Inequality by Lynn and Vanahu. Bell Curve/Human Accomplishment by Charles Murray. And a variety of different racial research that shows clear, distinct, genetic, real and irrevocable differences between the races, has made racism not prejudiced or ignorant, but knowledgable post-judice, that only prejudice and ignorance can avoid admitting is true. It may be that eventually genetic engineering will erase all the differences between people and we really will all be essentially the same. For now, however, race is real, the consequences of mixing races are really disastrous, and the evidence of this disaster is well documented and proven and observable all around the world. Research into the human genome and the influences of each gene and its unequal distribution among the various races will only continue to show how vastly different humans are, how some are far superior to others, and how imbecilic treating them as equal or expecting equal results from them is. What is truly amazing is there is no longer any debate in academic circles that IQ is genetic and varies between the races. There is no questioning the correlations between IQ and criminality, productivity, great accomplishments, morality, stability, and so on. And thus there is no questioning that the high IQ races are better by any measure than the low IQ ones. But racism, inherent in this position, is the most derided belief of all. How can a well agreed upon, utterly proven, irrevocably established factual knowledge of reality be the worst possible belief on earth? Or, to go back to my title, why is racism bad? The truth is, racism is commonly defined as: “Hatred and malicious intent towards a race, or any belief that might possibly justify hatred and malicious intent towards a race, or any belief that might justify any position that has any negative impact on a race.” Of course, this definition leaves out whites who, due to our presumably happy situation and circumstances in the world, don’t deserve any protection from racism and indeed deserve to be taken down a few notches to, presumably, a more ‘fair’ spot on the totem pole. By expanding the fishing net to include tertiary and secondary causes of the primary fear, hatred and malicious intent towards a race, a vast haul of racists is brought in to trial. Anything that could promote hatred for or harming of a racial group, is in this case just as bad as directly hating and wishing harm to said group. People who protest they take no sadistic glee in butchering darker skinned people are still racist by this definition, because their views, if enacted, would still do vast harm to said dark skinned people, and that is good enough. Imagine if a sensible racist goal were enacted, for instance, immigration were not permitted to any white controlled territory. For the vast dark skinned masses, this is irreparable harm to their ethnic genetic interests. They could use all of that land and all those resources to house billions more of their people, but we refuse to let them and use it to house, feed, and clothe our own instead. This is inhumanly cruel to them and a vast harm to their folk. Thus, it is racist. Or consider another sensible racist goal, restricting the technological advances we invent to benefit only our own people. This would give us a competitive advantage in productive capacity and thus the other races would shrink and shrink as a proportion of the gene pool. This is irreparable harm as the dark skinned races of course wish to grow their numbers and become the vast majority of the gene pool. Without these new technologies they couldn’t support all the extra people necessary for their race to thrive, and thus it is racist to not give it to them. Or another racist goal, to colonize a new planet in space with only whites, allowing no other race on board. What enormous harm we have done to them! Now an entire planet won’t be available to them, billions of their people will not be born or be rich, and all because of our racism that discriminates against them. Thus ANY sensible measure, any benefit whites ever do by themselves for themselves, falls under the rubric of malicious hatred of everyone else. It does not matter whether sadism was our motivating force or just love of our own and preference for the objectively Good and noble, because the result is the same. Any belief that might lead to a negative impact on the well being of other races, is racist, and must be stopped at any cost. Everything must be shared equally and everyone must benefit equally from whatever we do, lest any race be left behind or become worse off. Any sensible belief, like blacks are idiots and thugs, is the same as hatred and malicious intent towards a race, because those who believe such things are more likely to have hatred and malicious intent. It is like how drinking and drug use are themselves illegal, in large part because they lead to criminal behavior once used. Not everyone who drinks or everyone who uses drugs then goes out and does a crime, but the risk factor is so increased that society has deemed it wise to forbid it and thus forestall the likely consequences. A belief that blacks are idiots and thugs, won’t 100% lead to a new holocaust, but it raises the risk factor of the believer initiating such an action and thus is forbidden from the start to forestall such a consequence. With logic like this, the facts themselves can become forbidden, truth becomes criminal, and reality is legislated away. “Racism is bad because it leads to the Holocaust.” To these people, it does not matter whether racism is technically true or not. What matters is it ups the chances of inter-racial conflict and thus it must be stopped. An anti-racist is less likely to enslave, genocide, rape, or eat members of another race than a racist. This is all that need be known. Clearly, racism is thus bad. This is like people who view radiation as bad because it harms living tissue even while a cancer patient is in the emergency room on the brink of death. Or that knocking someone down is bad because it hurts even if it’s to stop him from getting hit by a car. Yes, racism is dangerous. Yes, racism ups the risks for inter-racial conflict (at least in the short term, in the long term it actually decreases conflict by keeping races separate and thus depriving them of opportunity to conflict about anything). Yes, racism can justify genocide, slavery, rape, or anything else. But what is the alternative? Without racism the world is doomed. It cannot be simpler than this. For every bad consequence racism could produce, the consequences of not being racist are all around us and infinitely worse. It is like worrying about whether you turned the light off while the house is on fire. Yes, keeping the light on will slightly raise your electric bill at the end of the month, and all things being equal it’s best to turn off your lights as you leave the room, but given the fact that the house is BURNING DOWN and you will DIE if you don’t leave, it may be appropriate to consider ignoring the lights and just going. Here is what will happen if racism and its attendant actions are not implemented: The white race, currently 10% of the world, will dwindle to 1% by the end of the century. Birth rates, immigration, miscegenation, and anti-white legislation will all take its toll, and our day will be done, even if gas chambers don’t round up and exterminate our pilfering remainder. It will effectively cease to exist, without the ability to influence society or make any impact on the future. Don’t complain to me about this prediction, take it up with the UN. These are their population forecasts not mine. With it will die the most creative, smartest, highest achieving, most moral people on earth. The rest of humanity’s future will be that much inferior to what it should have been. As almost all history is simply the progress of the white race across time, it is possible that with us will die all progress entirely, and that furthermore all races will regress to the point in time before they met us and relied on us to provide them with the advancements we made. Jews are set to die out as a population even sooner than whites, their birth rates and miscegenation are just as disastrous as ours, and they are far fewer to begin with. No reliance can be made on them. East Asians though more numerous have an even lower birth rate than ours, and historically speaking no confidence can be placed in their politics, science, art, or human decency. If they do inherit the earth, it will most likely be with an iron fist, lives will be stratified, impoverished, meagre and strict. Conformity will be required and change banned. Such is the way of eastern despotism. Supposing East Asians also commit mass racial suicide, Islam will rule the world by the end of the century. There has seldom been a more stultified, totalitarian, ridiculous and evil belief system as theirs. The race of its practictioners are the most violent, terrible, civilization wreckers to ever walk the earth, and after they destroy all the temples of their opponents and slowly choke to death all their minorities that live underneath them, their inherent stupidity as a race makes sure nothing will replace whatever they just destroyed. Jihad has claimed something like 500 million lives already. No doubt if Islam did conquer the world, it would claim billions more. Without whites or E. Asians to oppose them, nothing could stop them from rolling over all remaining peoples of the earth. From there they would impose their draconian policies that forbid all ‘innovation’ as a sin against Allah. There would be no reason to believe that the resultant dark age would ever be escaped. Supposing Islam didn’t succeed we could instead have a future of ‘Greater Mexico’ or ‘Greater Brazil.’ Countries where lawlessness and corruption are king, no advancements in science or the arts ever occur, and the economy never improves since robber baron after robber baron bankrupts any money as soon as it’s made. Taking whites out of the picture of Mexico and South America, all of its virtues and productivity would leave with it, and all the vices would redouble now totally unrestrained. It would be a banana republic where anything goes and nothing gets done--only writ across the whole world. Or perhaps, just for completion’s sake, sub-saharan Africa will inherit the earth. Do I even have to portray the comedy of Africa writ large? Murder and rape everywhere, starvation and disease everywhere, mutilation and black magic everywhere, shacks and cardboard considered the height of architecture, Big Men with their 100 mistresses and 1,000 kids walking around bedecked in bling and surrounded by ak-47 toting skinny mean looking guards chanting ‘kill x, kill y’, whoever the rival of the day is. South Asians, do to their passivity and stupidity, I assure you could never conquer the world because across all history they have never conquered anything and been conquered over a dozen times. Forget about them, whoever rules the world, they will all find it quite easy to wipe out the Indians. Muslims in India are already making a fine work of it, having purged all hindus out of Pakistan and Bangladesh while still continuing to grow as a proportion of mainland India’s population. Anyone else could do the same. These are our choices folk. Who do we pass the baton to? Who do you trust with the future of life and all things noble and good? If not whites, who? The obvious B-team is Japan, Korea, and China but Human Accomplishment already tells us what to expect from them. Is this really what we want to make of our only chance at life? Is there any guarantee the East Asians won’t die out just like us as shown by their birthrate removing 40% of their whole population each generation? Forget about them. Relying on them so that we can lazily avoid the responsibility ourselves is mere childishness. Gambling the future of the whole universe on such inadequate successors is mere nihilism. If we value anything, we must forestall the end of the white race. We are the key to every good outcome. We always have been, we are currently, and there is a 99% chance that only we ever will be. The risk is too great to simply lay down and die. But, we are told, a far less important risk, a danger of a much lesser magnitude, which is purely theoretical and NOT, in fact, happening all over the world like the death of the white race is--that racism will lead to a new holocaust, or harm dark skinned people in some way--means we must lay down and die. Means the white race must perish. The risk, you see, is simply too high. If we don’t lay down and die, someone might get hurt. Just imagine the horrible future where africans are no longer butchering, raping, mutilating and infecting each other because evil white racists got rid of them! Just imagine how many fewer drug wars, gang wars, and bankruptices South America would have if evil white racists succeeded in getting rid of hispanics! Just imagine how many fewer slum cities, rat worshippers, and medidative trancers India would hold if whites were to replace them! Just imagine how many fewer beheadings, burqas, and terrorist bombings would occur if we were to so cruelly wipe out the muslims! And then think of all that rich diverse food we could no longer eat! Yes, racism is bad, you see, because in one case an inferior race might get harmed, whereas right now we are only sure that the superior race, with superior accomplishments, superior civilization, superior wealth, superior technology, superior looks, superior traditions and superior thinking is only sure to die. Better to not take the risk! We don’t want to rock the boat after all! And so it goes. And all this simply from the viewpoint of objective racism, never mind the love and happiness and pride one can take in his people subjectively, and what a tragedy it would be to be surrounded by aliens completely unlike you, who don’t look like you, think like you, talk like you, or love you--who most likely hate you when push comes to shove. Supposing you were the last survivor of the white race wandering around a country of darker skins, the alienation and loneliness and misery would be nearly the same as the last inhabitant on earth. A fugitive in our own historic homeland, everything we made overturned, every graveyard vandalized, every church bombed, every book burned. No, it is sickening to even think about how defenseless our minority status will make us be, how the efforts of all our ancestors will be vilified, expropriated, and smashed, how all hope for our children will be gone before they’re even born, never given a chance by the supremacist hateful dark skins all around them. Most likely, like when the turks or arabs had the ascendancy over Europe, sold as harem slaves for their beautiful exotic faces--boy or girl. This is our future without racism. So if with racism, gasp, conflict might occur, people might be killed, or even enslaved, or whatever the horror story is, to this I say: BETTER HIM THAN ME. BETTER THEM THAN US.
Poster Comment: Nearly everything in the world was invented by people from an arc from northern Italy, through France and Germany and northern Europe, then over to England and Scotlamd. Whites create, Asians copy, blacks sing and dance. If whites disappeared, Africa would sink back to 20,000 B.C, Muslims to 700 A.D. Asia to about 1000 A.D. In other words, it would be Hell for the vast majority of the world's population.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Turtle (#0)
The race to extinction is being led by ...WHITES... Rememer, ALL Semites are A COLORED RACE.
The ruling class EVERYWHERE will be white; Indians, Chinese, and Japanese will lighten their children's skin; rich Mexican women will make their children blondes. Boy is this great! < / Flounder >
A Filipina I know told me almost all Filipinas would marry white guys. When I asked why, she blurted, "That white skin!"
In politics there is no murder.
That's the Helter-Skelter theory. I believe Charlie Manson has a scholarly volume on that. Seriously, racism is an artifact of statism or social engineering. Like sexism and many other isms it lingers in a virtual state until 'someone' begins observing it and applies strategies to encourage it or to suppress it - at which point racism manifests itself.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Hardly. Blacks have an average genetic IQ of 85, and it's more like 70 in Africa. In all of history, they have created exactly nothing. They are the only race that thrived under slavery. Asians are group-oriented drones who lack creativity. They copy what whites have created. Believe as you wish, but you are wrong.
In politics there is no murder.
No disrespect meant, but this is one of the stupidest (most idiotically ignorant, if you prefer) statements I've ever heard. It would be a waste of my time for me to say more on this topic.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
No disrespect but the stupidest statement I have ever heard was...Paul cant win, Paul cant win...
And, who was right? I believe the context was that Paul can NEVER win and he must not compete for the stupid GOP nomination. Did you notice who the most popular stupid GOPer is these days? It's Sara Palin. Enough said.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Vast...Your memory is either very short or you are being a tad disingenuous. If you recall, NO ONE here ever had the slightest belief that Paul could win, or is that still too great a concept for you to grasp? Until you finally realize that the government is the ENEMY of the people, not its servant, you are just one of the sheep. That is sad.
Your memory is short, my friend. There were numerous strategists, explaining how Mr. Paul was going to hijack the various state conventions. Articles were written, predictions were made, money bombs were exploded. At the time, I was trying to explain the over- excited that Dr. Paul seeking the nomination of THAT party or of ANY party was a betrayal and a cheapening of his message and it was his, probably involuntary. contribution to legitimize the corrupt 2-party political system. But 'no', I was told. I didn't understand how politics worked. He HAD to seek the GOP's nomination, instead of going straight after the PEOPLE's vote because that's how politics worked and if we was going to 'win'. So he bastardized his message and continued to mingle with the Stupid party because that was the way to 'win'. He won nothing. The GOP is now the party of Palin and Limbaugh, the party of forever losers, the new Whigs, and Dr. Paul is lonelier as a GOP Whig bencher than he would be as a proud independent.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Vast if I recall it was you on this forum that was running up and down the sidelines crying Paul could not win. Please do not drag in others from outside. It was just YOU and the rest of us. With that in mind, what in Gods name is it you refuse to understand about Paul, or is it just a simple matter that you are indeed a political partisan??? I suspect you are indeed partisan.
I suggest you go back to the source. My views haven't changed because I was right then. Paul's running as a GOP strengthened and legitimized the current, corrupt 2-party system and, of course, he could not be nominated by the party of aggressive wars and statism. Find any of my contributions from that time that stated anything different.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
You are partisan, because no one could be that naive. One more time. You have never offered anything of substance here, never.
LOL - yes, friend. Whatever it is that you believe, you believe. And, if you believe it strong enough then... your beliefs are strong. By the way, I am SOOOO happy we didn't get McCain/Tina Fey in the WH. Aren't you too? (oh, I forgot, they desame).
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Of all the people here on 4um, there are only a few that have never posted anything of value and followed it with intelligent discussion. It just seems to beyond your ability. Try it sometime, astound me and others, post something of interest, leave out your personal attacks, they are childish and boring.
Oh, you forgot to address the issue at hand: did Paul legitimize the 2-party system by seeking the GOP nomination? Did he waste other people money organizing and running his campaign for GOP nomination that he was guaranteed to lose - notwithstanding the 'conventions hijacking' strategies? Let me make it simpler: did he advance the cause of freedom by running as a GOP and by staying inside the GOP party? (I'll give you a hint as to what the correct answer is: "no").
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
It was VAST that had only one input...Paul cannot win... EVERYONE ELSE KNEW THAT LONG BEFORE YOU DID. Paul had thrown in the towel ONCE before. WE ALL KNEW HE HAD OPTED OUT ONCE BEFORE BUT WE CHOSE NOT TO GO WITH THE SYSTEM CANDIDATES. You might call it dissent, if that rests in you mind anywhere. Vast added nothing to the forum or any discussion, a total zero, that is why you are generally ignored by myself and others.
I see that you refuse to admit that I am (always) right and that you are always wrong, unless you agree with me when I am right (which is always). So, remember, any time you disagree with me, you are wrong. I know that you don't like it but it's reality so you better bow to it. Oh, and I don't expect an answer. I'm sure you are busy. You need to get back to the important thread on 'which armpit did the Tortoise wash this month?'. As for who ignores whom, I haven't contributed to this site in about one week and I'm signing off now but, don't despair, I may be back in a few days.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Countries Without a Draft circa 2001 (You'll need this soon if you have kids) RUN SILENT, RUN DEEP The only time you are right is in the sense a stopped clock is right, and I can prove it. I want you to move to Zimbabwe and live there (I'm assuming you are white, although you're retarded enough to be Jewish). You wll not do it because you will be killed by blacks.
In politics there is no murder.
Oh, woe is us! To be deprived of all your infant wisdumb is just too much. But maybe in the fullness of time we might get over it (I suspect it could take as long as a couple of seconds).
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. No one would miss Vast, but all would miss Turtle.
In politics there is no murder.
Not even Mrs. Vast or his boys, the half-vast twins who will be cannon fodder for Obummer.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. A+ You outdo turtle sometimes.
Thank you kindly (I think).
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Some people really believe the persona presented by Turtle. If one observes with an unbiased eye, there is a keen intellect there. Dont tell Turtle I said that.
Oh no, I wouldn't tell him. That is why I keep my Turtle filter on most of the time. I might say something nice, or almost nice, about him. I have been tempted to before but have managed to hold off on that.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I want you to move to Zimbabwe and live there (I'm assuming you are white, although you're retarded enough to be Jewish). You wll not do it because you will be killed by blacks. LOL Are you guys from the Asylum? :)) But why am I asking when the answer is obvious. Judging by the completely moronic threads that the likes of character Turtle produce.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
You outdo turtle sometimes. What can I say? Anything coming from the toothless beak of someone who likens himself to some slow, vegetarian reptile... LOL
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
YOU GUYS ARE TALKING ABOUT ME BEHIND MY BACK!!! Serously, though, it is surprising the number of people who think that Turtle person I pretend to me is actually me. I am much smarter and handsomer than Turtle.
In politics there is no murder.
Of course, this definition leaves out whites who, due to our presumably happy situation and circumstances in the world, don’t deserve any protection from racism and indeed deserve to be taken down a few notches to, presumably, a more ‘fair’ spot on the totem pole.
#2. To: Turtle (#0)
It may be that eventually genetic engineering will erase all the differences between people and we really will all be essentially the same.
#3. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#2)
#4. To: Turtle (#0)
If whites disappeared, Africa would sink back to 20,000 B.C, Muslims to 700 A.D. Asia to about 1000 A.D. In other words, it would be Hell for the vast majority of the world's population.
#5. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#4)
Seriously, racism is an artifact of statism or social engineering.
#6. To: Turtle (#5)
(Edited)
Asians are group-oriented drones who lack creativity.
#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)
No disrespect meant, but this is one of the stupidest (most idiotically ignorant, if you prefer) statements I've ever heard. It would be a waste of my time for me to say more on this topic.
#8. To: Cynicom (#7)
#9. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#8)
And, who was right?
#10. To: Cynicom (#9)
(Edited)
#11. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#10)
#12. To: Cynicom (#11)
#13. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#12)
#14. To: Cynicom (#13)
#15. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#14)
#16. To: Cynicom (#15)
#17. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#16)
#18. To: Cynicom (#17)
(Edited)
#19. To: Turtle (#0)
"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." ~~ IndieTx
#20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#18)
I see that you refuse to admit that I am (always) right and that you are always wrong, unless you agree with me when I am right (which is always).
#21. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Cynicom (#18)
As for who ignores whom, I haven't contributed to this site in about one week and I'm signing off now...
Lord Acton
#22. To: James Deffenbach (#21)
(Edited)
#23. To: Turtle (#22)
No one would miss Vast
Lord Acton
#24. To: James Deffenbach (#23)
Not even Mrs. Vast or his boys, the half-vast twins who will be cannon fodder for Obummer.
#25. To: Cynicom (#24)
(Edited)
Lord Acton
#26. To: James Deffenbach (#25)
#27. To: Cynicom (#26)
If one observes with an unbiased eye, there is a keen intellect there. Dont tell Turtle I said that.
Lord Acton
#28. To: Turtle (#20)
(Edited)
The only time you are right is in the sense a stopped clock is right, and I can prove it.
#29. To: Cynicom (#24)
(Edited)
A+
#30. To: Cynicom, James Deffenbach (#26)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest