[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
History See other History Articles Title: President Obama's Rise Due to 'Blue Blood' Ancestry The following family tree was posted by the New York Post: According to Rosemary E. Bachelor, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, historian and genealogical publisher, Obamas is related to at least eight American presidents (sharing) common ancestors, (with) 1. James Madison [Edwin and Martha (Eltonhead) Conway], 2. Woodrow Wilson [Edward and Elizabeth (Blossom) FitzRandolph], 3. Harry Truman [Mareen Duvall], 4) Gerald Ford [Joseph and Rose (Allen) Holley], 5. Lyndon Johnson [Phillip and Maria (Schmidt) Ament], 6. Jimmy Carter [Adrian and Mary (Disharoone) Gordy], 7. George Bush Sr. and 8. George Bush Jr. [Gov. Thomas and Mary (Richards) Hinckley]. Obama is also a distant cousin to Katharine Hepburn, Brad Pitt, Christopher Reeve, Winston Churchill and astronaut John Glenn, but Obama genealogical pedigree does not stop here. Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, historian and genealogical publisher, Rosemary E. Bachelor, further documents that Obama does have European royalty- from Edward Fitz Randolph back to William I, King of Scots, and from Martha Eltonhead back to Edward I, King of England. [See Gary Boyd Roberts, The Royal Descents of 600 immigrants (2008: Baltimore).] So what is the big deal with William I, King of Scots being an ancestor of Obama? Well
According to historian and genealogical publisher, Rosemary E. Bachelor, Obamas so-called opponent in the Presidential Election of 2008 Republican nominee John McCain and his Vice-Presidential running mate, Sarah Palin, all claim William 1, King of Scots, as an ancestor
(Palins) descent in this Carolingian line is via ancestor Edmond Hawes (1612-1693) of Yarmouth, MA
and she (Palin) also descends from Henry III of England by way of ancestor Edward Raynsford, who died in 1680 in Boston
(who) is alleged to be a Plantagenet descendant of Charlemagne. In addition, Sarah Palins pedigree shares ancestor John Lathrop with presidents Ulysses S. Grant, Franklin D. Roosevelt and both Bush presidents
Revolutionary War traitor Benedict Arnold, (and) the list (also) includes Joseph Smith, founder of the Mormon religion, poet Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Dr. Benjamin Spock, financier John Pierpoint Morgan and the original fuller brush man, Alfred Fuller
Tumbling out of the list of politicians who descend from Lathrop are Adlai Stevenson, John Foster Dulles, Thomas Dewey and presidential hopeful Mitt Romney. Sarah Palin, according to Rosemary E. Bachelor, is also a 12th cousin of John McCain and descends from Simon Newcomb of Edgarton, MA and Lebanon, CT, as do both Bush presidents
President Bush, Barack Obama and Sarah Palin all descend from Samuel and Sarah (Soule) Hinckley. (whose) son Thomas Hinckley (1618-1706), held several governmental posts in the Plymouth Colony and served as its last governor from 1681 to 1692. In her article entitled Lineages of Presidential Candidates McCain and Obama Compared written on September 2, 2008 weeks before the Presidential election, Rosemary E. Bachelor documented that McCain is a distant cousin of First Lady Laura Lane (Welch) Bush, their common ancestors being Valentine and Nancy Anne (Arnold) Allen, and concluded that McCains list of ancestors is a bit ho-hum, with nearly monolithic Scotch Irish dominance and none of the links to famous statesmen Obama counts as kin (.)" Based upon the above genealogical evidence, the Presidential Election of 2008 clearly involved both Republican and Democratic Presidential nominees that descend from prominent royal and presidential blue blood sharing common progenitors directly to William I, King of Scots. Coincidentally or not, the victor, Obama, has the more affluent pedigree. What percentages of commonAmerican family trees have such ancestral pedigree? Nevertheless, did Americans really have a real choice between Obama and McCain in casting their votes for a candidate that would bring about change we can believe in? Or did the elites contrive another election predicated upon the Hegelian dialectic where the result would be the same regardless for whom we cast our votes?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#0)
Most everyone could claim the same. Totally meaningless.
#2. To: Cynicom (#1)
So you're related to Bush?
Exactly right. Go back several generationis and nearly everyone in the world is related. Even we are probably eighth cousins,as horrifying as it is to admit you are related to the Royal Turtle.
took the words outta my mouth. this is pure bs.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|