See other War, War, War Articles
Title: 'Nuke From Iran Within This Year'
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Wo ... arhead/Article/200901415211260
Published: Jan 27, 2009
Author: Geoff Meade
Post Date: 2009-01-27 09:28:14 by Disgusted
Keywords: None
Views: 1640
Comments: 148
'Nuke From Iran Within This Year' Breaking News2:14pm UK, Tuesday January 27, 2009 Geoff Meade, defence correspondent Iran will have enough enriched uranium to make a single nuclear weapon later this year, the prestigious International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) predicts. The think tank's Mark Fitzpatrick made the announcement at today's launch of its annual global review of military powers. "During 2009, Iran will probably reach the point at which it has produced the amount of low-enriched uranium needed to make a nuclear bomb," he said. "But being able to enrich uranium is not the same as having a nuclear weapon." However, the survey reports doubts over US Intelligence estimates that Iran halted its work on nuclear weapons six years ago. This points to Tehran's continued development of long-range ballistic missiles able to reach targets in Israel and beyond. The IISS recommends a mixture of carrot and stick as the best international response. It concluded a dual policy of engagement and sanctions, testing possibilities for Iranian cooperation while adopting targeted containment strategies, is the best way to deal with Iran's nuclear programme.
Poster Comment: http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/news/story.html?id=2363ebc6-babf-432a-aa4e-e172ce04f9a8 No more nukes, Obama tells Iran - Country 'grave threat' to France, U.S. if armed Peter O'Neil, Canwest News Service Published: Saturday, July 26, 2008 PARIS - Democratic candidate Barack Obama, basking in his rock star reception in European capitals, warned Iran on Friday to end its "illicit" nuclear program before a next American president takes control of the White House.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-107) not displayed.
.
.
.
#108. To: PSUSA (#107)
(Edited)
The truth is whatever scientific investigation says is the truth. If you want to find truth, turn to science and the scientific method. The bible isn't truth, it's a mythological fairy tale. Truth is not some amalgamation of unsupported claims and half-truths found in pop media, or bible babble, or arbitary sources of information. Most people can't discover truth because they don't understand the scientific method. Some people prefer to believe stories that make them feel good about themselves. There's nothing wrong with feeling good, but accepting things that make you feel good isn't a legitimate search method for finding truth.
Is evolution scientific?
I dont know anyone that believes in the scriptures that makes them "feel good" about themselves. It's the exact opposite. We are the fools on this planet. The nobody's, the losers. That's what it says. I wouldn't have it any other way. .
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files When it was revealed that Israel (illegally) developed nuclear weapons, there was no trade or travel embargo against Israel, no sanctions, no threats of military action. So apparently, it was OK for Israel to break international law (once again), but it isn't OK for Iran or any other country in the region to do so. Iran has threatened other countries such as Israel with annihilation. Once again, compare track records. Who has Iran attacked in the last century, and what countries Israel has bombed or invaded? Zero versus a half dozen?
So you are one of these supporters of imaginary international law.
Why do you hate Iran? Did an Iranian kid beat you up when you were a kid?
So you're a supporter of one standard for Israel and another for the rest of the world. You say that you oppose nuclear proliferation - except by "the chosen." Is that about right? In other words, you're fine with "international law" about nuclear proliferation, as long as it's applied to Muslim countries that you and other neoconservatives don't like.
Iran could be closer to nuclear weapon Iran could be closer to nuclear weapon: Enriched uranium found at plant, inspectors say By DOUGLAS FRANTZ Los Angeles Times Wednesday, August 27, 2003 Istanbul, Turkey -- International inspectors confirmed Tuesday that particles of highly enriched uranium were discovered in two separate samples taken at a nuclear facility in Iran, raising the possibility that Tehran is further along in developing a nuclear weapon than experts had predicted. The finding is contained in a confidential report from the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria, which provides detailed descriptions of numerous contradictions and misstatements by Iran in recent months. A source outside the agency provided the Los Angeles Times with a copy of the report. ***** Russia (and U.S.) help Iran build weapons.(nuclear weapons in Iran) Article from: Insight on the News Iran is becoming more of a nuclear threat because of Russian plans to build a nuclear power plant there and other international investment. The US should take steps to prevent this by limiting oil exports from Iran and urging other countries not to cooperate with Iran. The Jan. 8 announcement that Russia has agreed to build a nuclear power plant in Iran has intensified concern in Washington about Tehran's determined efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. Although there is considerable uncertainty about the size and pace of Iran's nuclear program, the uncovering of Saddam Hussein's covert effort to build an Iraqi nuclear weapon underscores the danger of complacency. Western intelligence agencies believe that Iran, like Iraq, is using its civilian nuclear program as a cover for acquiring the technology and expertise with which to build nuclear weapons. ******** Reporter warns that Iran has nuclear weapons now Article from: Cleveland Jewish News Cleveland Jewish News 11-11-2005 Since the end of the hostage crisis at the American embassy in Tehran in 1979, Americans have put Iran on the back burner, said investigative reporter Kenneth Timmerman. "Iran is a clear and present danger," he recently commented to a small audience at The City Club. "This regime owes its birth to terrorism. Terrorism is public policy. And Iran has nuclear power." Although U.S. intelligence agencies speak of Iran as a potential nuclear power, Timmerman said the evidence indicates that Iran already possesses nuclear weapons. Before Iran gives a nuclear weapon to a terrorist group intent on incinerating an American target, the U.S. should be helping democratic factions already in the Islamic nation, the journalist said. ******** Officials Say Iran Is Seeking Nuclear Weapons Capability; China Sale of Equipment Worth Millions Cited Article from: The Washington Post The U.S. intelligence community has recently concluded that Iran is aggressively seeking to develop a nuclear weapon and that China has provided Iran with equipment capable of making some fissile material for such a weapon, according to Bush administration officials.
You seem to hate many people. Do you have any friends (besides the zionists)?
Relative to your bible babble quoting methods, evolutionary theories are truth, truth that is subject to revision by the scientific method. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scie ntific_method The bible fairy tales about Adam & Eve in the garden of Eden are stories targeted for a childs mentality. The earth is not 5000+ years old, and modern men didn't co-exist with dinosaurs in the Jurassic period (190 to 140 million years ago). You don't even understand or practice the Golden Rule, a simple and fundamental ethic for real christians. Mainstream christians correctly interpret and practice the Golden Rule, but to them and your kind they are cults. How can anyone realistically expect you to understand the scientific method, with your demonstrated contempt for logic? For gods sake, at least use "you're" = "you are" in correct correspondence! "Your" is not the same as "you're", but you consistently get this wrong too.
Did an Iranian kid beat you up when you were a kid? I hate any country that pushes international law. Globalization.
You babbled but you didn't advance your belief an inch. Better luck next time.
Not only that but they have said so themselves. Said it is irreversible. I guess theoretically they have a right to do what they want to do in their country. But when they threaten to wipe Israel off the map with these weapons. Don't be surprised when Israel nukes them out of fear. I'm not saying it is right or wrong. Just human nature. You have an enemy developing a weapon that can utterly destroy you. A country that has threatened as much.
I'm against international law. Iran doesn't need permission to develop these weapons. But if they do they should know there will be a reaction. Maybe even a nuclear one.
I think Old Fiend believes bible-babble because it makes him feel good, as in self-righteous good feelings. The bible says man was created to dominate the earth, over all animal, vegetable, and mineral. It also says man was created in the image of god. That's not chopped liver. I'm fairly certain these ideas appeal to Old Fiend's sense of feeling good about himself.
I don't support any standards. No international law BS. It is incompatible with our constitution.
Then why isn't it kosher for Iran to nuke them out of fear?
Go eat a banana monkey boy.
Israel exists entirely due to international law. Do you hate that Israel exists? Or do you hate international law only when it does not suit your Zionazi agenda?
As a human being I can see Iran thinking the same way. But Israel has had them for 40 years and hasn't used them. So it seems Iran has a lot less to fear. Nothing to do with Kosher.
Israel was on the way to becoming a country despite the usurpation of that process by the shit sucking UN.
Then Israel should have faced the same reaction when it developed nuclear weapons. If nuclear annihilation of Iran is acceptable to you, why do you complain about people on this site who think that Israel should be annihilated? There's no difference between them and you, just as there's no moral difference between Muslim jihadists and Zionists.
N. Korea, India and Pakistan are new members of the nuclear club and they haven't used them, so why shouldn't Iran develop them? Who are we or Israel to limit club membership? I'd argue that nukes make nations safer, not more dangerous. See the concept of MAD (mutually assured destruction) that was very effective during the Cold War.
I don't support nuking Iran. I just said it is a possibility knowing human nature. I did say Iran should be taken out if they are pushing international law. But that doesn't mean nuked or even necessarily war.
Israel's creation met with the blessing of every Internationalist cabal of the 20th century from the Balfour Declaration on. It was a pet project for the League of Nations and for Truman, Marshall, and other US globalists. The same people who helped create the UN helped to create Israel.
Maybe you are right. I'm just stating my beliefs and opinions. There is a difference though. Israel and Jews have been threatened for centuries. It is an ongoing conflict that has no end in site. I don't like N. Korea or Pakistan with nukes either. India on the other hand has been responsible to date.
Better luck next time. I'm not trying to convince you of anything, because I know what you are. I also know it's futile to teach a pig to tell time, because it's impossible for a pig to understand the concept of time, and any method used would probably irritate a pig. Babble-on Beelzebub bible-boy. Seriously, you should stop claiming you are a christian, because you are an embarassment to mainstream christians, who are generally more thoughtful and considerate.
The same people who helped create the UN helped to create Israel. God works in mysterious ways. Sometimes using his enemies to do his bidding.
If you want to be stupid and believe in the spontaneous generation of life from mud. Then that is your problem not mine. Anyone who believes in the religion of evolution has a small mind indeed.
Israel is an experiment, a model for the so-called third way, an alternative to Nazism (racial supremacy) and Communism (proletarian supremacy). Israel is a model experiment for new nationhood, implementing the concept of Diversity (victim supremacy). The US has been faithfully transitioning to the Israeli Diversity model since the election of FDR.
As opposed to believing that Big Daddy in the Sky waved a magic wand and it was all here?
That's pretty funny, considering what it actually claims about man-mud in the genesis section of the bible. No-one can be this dumb. You seem to be a parody of a snake-handler from Hicksville. William Jennings Bryant was significantly more coherent than you.
I put it that way on purpose. It wasn't spontaneous. There was a "potter" if you will.
No magic wand. Spoken words.
The US has been faithfully transitioning to the Israeli Diversity model since the election of FDR. Israel was originally supported by leftwing multiculturalists as part of the diversity and victimhood program. Once the Israelis started brutalizing the Arabs, a lot of the multicultural left turned against Zionism. It's great to see "persecuted minorities" tear at one another. It was only a matter of time before the grand coalition of "victims" (blacks, hispanics, Jews, Muslims) came to decide that they don't like each other any more than they like "The Man."
If the myths and fairy tales of 1-2K BC Middle Eastern goat herders are your source of history and science, that can't be helped.
The bible says man was created to dominate the earth, over all animal, vegetable, and mineral. It also says man was created in the image of god. That's not chopped liver. I'm fairly certain these ideas appeal to Old Fiend's sense of feeling good about himself. I dont know that that is right. I cant fault anyone for being a christian zionist, because I used to be one myself. Somehow I got set straight about a few things. But this being set straight did not come from another person, because I would have totally ignored that person. I reacted just like Old Friend reacts. This is why arguing with them is not effective. It also doesn't mean that others wont see the light at a later time. Now THAT might seem arrogant. It's not. It has nothing to do with me being smarter or more valuable than anyone else. Anyone has the capacity of being used to bring others along. Using anger and name calling doesn't help matters any. .
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files Judaics are not a minority inside Israel, by design. Israeli immigration policies specifically promote universal jewish naturalization, to always ensure an Israeli jewish majority. Israel allows dual nationalist jews to vote in Israeli elections, another strategy to ensure jewish dominance in Israel. The philosophy of Diversity requires a good versus evil bifurcation of society. The bad-guy in Israel isn't just arab gentiles, it is all gentiles. The reason arab gentiles bear the brunt of jewish wrath is because palestinian arab gentiles resist Israeli Diversity more vigorously than any other gentiles living in or around Israel. If christians living in Israel were to vigorously demand rights, especially landowner rights same as a jewish citizen, they would get similar treatment to arab gentiles. Muslims are not considered victim class under US-style Diversity. Muslims are generally people of color, and US-style Diversity favors people that are not white. British and Canadian Diversity are different in details from US-style Diversity, where Muslims may indeed be recognized as victim class. One thing is always constant in any implementation of Diversity on the planet earth....judaics are always formally recognized as victim class by a central totalitarian government.
Dream along with me. There was no there there without the UN fiat.
WEll as it turns out, the hype was full of shit. Who woulda thunk it Ayuck ___FIRE
But you can get a good idea on the truth of a matter if you look at different sources.
#109. To: Googolplex (#108)
Most people can't discover truth because they don't understand the scientific method
#110. To: Googolplex (#108)
Some people prefer to believe stories that make them feel good about themselves.
#111. To: Old Friend (#100)
Because Israel already has them. Can't change that. The more countries that have them the more unstable the world becomes. Besides Israel has proved they use them only for defense.
#112. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#111)
When it was revealed that Israel (illegally) developed nuclear weapons,
#113. To: Old Friend (#112)
#114. To: Old Friend (#112)
(Edited)
So you are one of these supporters of imaginary international law.
#115. To: Old Friend, all (#112)
These alarmist headlines go back to 1991. It's all anti-Iranian proaganda.
Article from: The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Article date: August 27, 2003
Author: DOUGLAS FRANTZ
Article date: February 20, 1995
Author: Phillips, James
Article date: November 11, 2005
Author: Karfeld, Marilyn H.
Article date: October 30, 1991
Author: R. Jeffrey Smith
#116. To: Old Friend (#112)
#117. To: Old Friend (#109)
#118. To: TwentyTwelve (#113)
Why do you hate Iran?
#119. To: Jethro Tull (#115)
These alarmist headlines go back to 1991. It's all anti-Iranian proaganda.
#120. To: Googolplex (#117)
#121. To: Jethro Tull (#115)
The U.S. intelligence community has recently concluded that Iran is aggressively seeking to develop a nuclear weapon and that China has provided Iran with equipment capable of making some fissile material for such a weapon, according to Bush administration officials.
#122. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#114)
So you're a supporter of one standard for Israel and another for the rest of the world.
#123. To: PSUSA (#110)
#124. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#114)
So you're a supporter of one standard
#125. To: Old Friend (#121)
Don't be surprised when Israel nukes them out of fear.
#126. To: Googolplex (#123)
#127. To: Old Friend (#118)
I hate any country that pushes international law.
#128. To: Jethro Tull (#125)
Then why isn't it kosher for Iran to nuke them out of fear?
#129. To: scrapper2 (#127)
Israel exists entirely due to international law.
#130. To: Old Friend (#122)
I'm against international law. Iran doesn't need permission to develop these weapons. But if they do they should know there will be a reaction. Maybe even a nuclear one
#131. To: Old Friend (#128)
But Israel has had them for 40 years and hasn't used them
#132. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#130)
Then Israel should have faced the same reaction when it developed nuclear weapons. If nuclear annihilation of Iran is acceptable
#133. To: Old Friend (#129)
Israel was on the way to becoming a country despite the usurpation of that process by the shit sucking UN
#134. To: Jethro Tull (#131)
N. Korea, India and Pakistan are new members of the nuclear club and they haven't used them, so why shouldn't Iran develop them? Who are we or Israel to limit club membership? I'd argue that nukes make nations safer, not more dangerous. See the concept of MAD (mutually assured destruction) that was very effective during the Cold War.
#135. To: Old Friend (#120)
You babbled but you didn't advance your belief an inch.
#136. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#133)
Israel's creation met with the blessing of every Internationalist cabal of the 20th century from the Balfour Declaration on. It was a pet project for the League of Nations and for Truman, Marshall, and other US globalists.
#137. To: Googolplex (#135)
#138. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#133)
#139. To: Old Friend (#137)
If you want to be stupid and believe in the spontaneous generation of life from mud. Then that is your problem not mine
#140. To: Old Friend (#137)
If you want to be stupid and believe in the spontaneous generation of life from mud. Then that is your problem not mine.
#141. To: Googolplex (#140)
#142. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#139)
#143. To: Googolplex (#138)
Israel is a model experiment for new nationhood, implementing the concept of Diversity (victim supremacy).
#144. To: Old Friend (#142)
No magic wand. Spoken words.
#145. To: Googolplex (#123)
(Edited)
I think Old Fiend believes bible-babble because it makes him feel good, as in self-righteous good feelings.
#146. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#143)
#147. To: Old Friend (#129)
Israel was on the way to becoming a country despite the usurpation of that process by the shit sucking UN.
#148. To: Disgusted (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest