[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination


Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: Sarah Palin Champions Barbaric Aerial Hunting of Wolves
Source: YouTube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGPFPBmzRrQ
Published: Sep 3, 2008
Author: defendersactionfund
Post Date: 2009-02-03 17:56:11 by FormerLurker
Keywords: Barbaric, Animal slaughter, Compassionate Conservatism, Sarah Palin
Views: 18434
Comments: 460


Poster Comment:

"Compassionate Conservatism" at it's best...

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 174.

#7. To: FormerLurker, Christine, All (#0)

I was raised in the Alaskan "bush." This is an old issue.

If wolves are a factual problem to mankind, who cares as to how they are killed. That's not to sanction aircraft in place of a rifle or a trap, relative to "ordinary" hunting and trapping. For one thing, the aircraft accident rate would go through the already sky-high roof, for 'bush' accidents. To do such hunting requires a slow airspeed -add sharp maneuvering - putting an aircraft on top of a stall-spin scenario at too low an altitude, for successful recovery.

Often, herds of thousands of caribou manage to slip into the bush, undetected, for six months, or more. So to blame wolves for over-kill of the herds is often poorly justified. In reality, wolves can kill caribou like delta-force on a rampage, but nature has her magical way of reliably balancing the wildlife populations.

In the background, the State Fish & Game has historically had near gestapo powers to preclude even the 'ordinary' hunting of any wildlife, add fishing. Arial wolfe hunting was once legal, but has historically been one of the worst offences one can commit.

Sarah may be pissing atop a powerful air vent. (Even with her Chutzpah, she can't piss into the wind.)

SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2009-02-03   19:13:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: SKYDRIFTER (#7)

Often, herds of thousands of caribou manage to slip into the bush, undetected, for six months, or more. So to blame wolves for over-kill of the herds is often poorly justified. In reality, wolves can kill caribou like delta-force on a rampage, but nature has her magical way of reliably balancing the wildlife populations.

Exactly. Nature has done quite well on her own for millions of years, I don't think she needs nor wants Man's help.

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-03   20:21:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: FormerLurker (#12)

own for millions of years

lol

Old Friend  posted on  2009-02-03   20:25:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Old Friend (#13)

lol

What's so funny?

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-03   20:26:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: FormerLurker (#14)

What's so funny?

You believe in millions of years.

I find that quite humorous.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-02-03   20:28:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Old Friend (#15)

You believe in millions of years.

So what are you, one of those "geniuses" who think the Earth and all life on it was created 2000 years ago?

Do you think the world is flat too?

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-03   20:42:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: FormerLurker (#17)

So what are you, one of those "geniuses" who think the Earth and all life on it was created 2000 years ago?

Do you think the world is flat too?

A few more years then 2000. Millions is laughable.

The world flat. lol. That is what "scientists used to think. If they had only consulted their Bible and read Isiah they would have known better.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-02-03   20:45:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Old Friend (#19)

A few more years then 2000. Millions is laughable.

Like what, 2090, 3029, 3091? Give me a time frame that YOU think life was around for...

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-03   20:46:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: FormerLurker (#21)

Go read your Bible. Add up all the begats and begats. Go back to the original creation and you have your answer. I haven't counted it up but I know its not millions.

Besides if it was millions of years old where are all the bodies?

Old Friend  posted on  2009-02-03   20:57:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: Old Friend (#23)

Go read your Bible. Add up all the begats and begats. Go back to the original creation and you have your answer.

Which version, the Hebrew or the English? I can't seem to find where in Genesis the exact year was given of Creation, can you find it?

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-03   22:06:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: FormerLurker (#53)

Which version, the Hebrew or the English? I can't seem to find where in Genesis the exact year was given of Creation, can you find it?

It doesn't matter. The dates are the same. Show me a contradiction in dates if your not just blabbering.

Or just use the good old King James version. God promised his word would be translated into all tongues. Have faith in your creator. He is not a weakling like some seem to think.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-02-03   22:08:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Old Friend (#56)

God promised his word would be translated into all tongues

Did you know the Hebrew word ADAM means MANKIND and is NOT the name of a man?

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-03   22:18:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: FormerLurker (#64)

You said that earlier. You sound like a broken record player. Anyway Adam is the name of a man. That being so someone probably took his name and used it as the name for mankind. Not that complicated. I'm surprised you didn't figure it out. On second thought no i'm not.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-02-03   22:20:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: Old Friend (#66) (Edited)

Anyway Adam is the name of a man.

Only to those who know absolutely nothing about Hebrew and believe whatever bullshit somebody tells them because it makes them feel good.

So again, what DATE DID GOD CREATE THE EARTH? I wouldn't ask if you didn't firmly say you knew what it was.

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-03   22:25:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: FormerLurker (#69)

So again, what DATE DID GOD CREATE THE EARTH? I wouldn't ask if you didn't firmly say you knew it what it was.

The date?

I don't really know the exact date, but I am sure it was a Sunday.

Approx. 6000 years ago is a good estimate though.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-02-03   22:37:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: RickyJ (#71)

Approx. 6000 years ago is a good estimate though.

BTW, did you know that Sumeria was a civilization with cities, agriculture, government, and science around that time? Are you saying the Sumerians popped up magically all of sudden out of nothing?

In fact, the Sumerian civilization can be traced back to 5300 BC.

That's 7300 years ago, and there were people around WAY before them...

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-03   22:41:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#174. To: FormerLurker (#81)

That's 7300 years ago, and there were people around WAY before them...

According to the Carbon-14 dating method. I suppose you believe that there is nothing wrong with that method. But you also believe man is causing global warming despite the lack of scientific evidence. Stating something as fact without having solid science behind it means very little, unless of course you would rather just have faith that no would lie to you about the accuracy of Carbon-14 dating, as you have faith that no one would lie to you about man causing global warming.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-02-04   0:19:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 174.

#177. To: RickyJ (#174)

According to the Carbon-14 dating method.

Go argue with the archeologists. I'm sure you've studied this stuff more than they have, eh?

Ubaid period: 5300 – 4100 BC (Pottery Neolithic to Chalcolithic) 
Uruk period: 4100 – 2900 BC (Late Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age I) 
Uruk XIV-V: 4100 – 3300 BC 
Uruk IV period: 3300 – 3000 BC 
Jemdet Nasr period (Uruk III): 3000 – 2900 BC 
Early Dynastic period (Early Bronze Age II-IV) 
Early Dynastic I period: 2900 – 2800 BC 
Early Dynastic II period: 2800 – 2600 BC (Gilgamesh) 
Early Dynastic IIIa period: 2600 – 2500 BC 
Early Dynastic IIIb period: ca. 2500 – 2334 BC 
Akkadian Empire period: ca. 2334 – 2218 BC (Sargon) 
Gutian period: ca. 2218 – 2047 BC (Early Bronze Age IV) 
Ur III period: ca. 2047 – 1940 BC 

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-04 00:26:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#179. To: RickyJ (#174)

as you have faith that no one would lie to you about man causing global warming

Pot meet kettle...

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-02-04 00:27:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 174.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]