See other Activism Articles
Title: Sarah Palin Champions Barbaric Aerial Hunting of Wolves
Source:
YouTube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGPFPBmzRrQ
Published: Sep 3, 2008
Author: defendersactionfund
Post Date: 2009-02-03 17:56:11 by FormerLurker
Keywords: Barbaric, Animal slaughter, Compassionate Conservatism, Sarah Palin
Views: 18804
Comments: 460
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 216.
#50. To: FormerLurker (#0)
Are you sure you aren't a former mental patient? Or maybe an escaped one?
Let's see; YOU - needless massacre of innocent creatures. Uh huh. So are you still slapping your mom around and killing puppies to pass the time? Or have you progressed to bigger and better things yet?
There are no innocent creatures. None. Herds have to be thinned out from time to time. I am sorry you do not appreciate this or comprehend why. Animals are not human, treating them as if they are is a mistake.
That's a convenient notion and self-righteous excuse if you plan on killing them.
How can I eat them if I don't kill them first? Eating them alive would be wrong.
Thing is, there are MANY other things to eat. I'm not a vegetarian, YET. But I do feel sorrow over those creatures who live miserable lives being raised in horrific conditions simply to serve as food, and those who die agonizing deaths for whatever reason.
i do too.
That's what I find extremely interesting in terms of the Essenes and their way of life, as it IS in harmony with Nature, and what a truly spiritual person would seek.
Please give us all YOUR definition of "a truly spiritual person" if you would.
One who has forsaken material desires and devoted him or herself to seeking communication with God through various techniques including prayer and meditation, as well as the rejection of any animal flesh for food.
Why would you include that when the Creator made us omnivors?
God didn't. In fact, we don't have the teeth to be natural meat eaters, we only acquired the taste for flesh over time. We were originally herbivores.
Your article is a bunch of bullshit.
Didn't catch this well thought out comment of yours. So you're saying the video is fake and people aren't shooting at wolves from aircraft, and that Sarah Palin doesn't support it?
No. I'm saying the article you linked about man not being omnivors is bullshit.
We have INCISORS for MEAT: P.S. coyotes have been known to get into watermelons but that doesn't mean they're evolving into cows.
Horses have INCISORS, are you saying they are meat eaters?
Horses have INCISORS, are you saying they are meat eaters? I can open a beer bottle with my teeth.
Hmmm. I wonder what sort of scientific name that would be, brewavore?
Monkeys don't eat meat, do they?
Most are true herbivores, and some are opportunistic omnivores. In other words, most only eat plants and nuts, but some eat bugs, snails, etc. when or if they can find them.
Monkeys don't eat meat, do they? Most are true herbivores, and some are opportunistic omnivores. In other words, most only eat plants and nuts, but some eat bugs, snails, etc. when or if they can find them. Fruitarian Evolution: Science Fact or Science Fiction? In contrast to the extensive fossil record evidence of meat in the evolutionary diet, there is virtually no credible scientific evidence of a strict fruitarian or veg*n diet by our prehistoric human (and australopithecine) ancestors. Much much more at the link.
You quote a blog site (an anti-vegan site at that) as your "scientific proof"? Find me a university that states what you believe, then perhaps I'll concede. Till then... I could list hundreds of pro-vegan sites that state the opposite of what you posted. I can also post SCIENTIFIC sources.
Oooo big assumption. You didn't read the site did you. Knew you wouldn't.
It's obvious that YOU didn't, or if you did, you thought it said something that it doesn't.
There are no replies to Comment # 216. End Trace Mode for Comment # 216.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestBarbaric, Animal slaughter, Compassionate Conservatism, Sarah Palin
#58. To: RickyJ (#50)
Are you sure you aren't a former mental patient? Or maybe an escaped one?
ME - against needless massacre of innocent creatures.
#61. To: FormerLurker (#58)
#63. To: RickyJ (#61)
There are no innocent creatures.
#76. To: FormerLurker (#63)
That's a convenient notion and self-righteous excuse if you plan on killing them.
#89. To: RickyJ (#76)
How can I eat them if I don't kill them first?
#93. To: FormerLurker (#89)
But I do feel sorrow over those creatures who live miserable lives being raised in horrific conditions simply to serve as food, and those who die agonizing deaths for whatever reason.
#117. To: christine (#93)
i do too.
#120. To: FormerLurker (#117)
what a truly spiritual person would seek.
#130. To: Rotara (#120)
Please give us all YOUR definition of "a truly spiritual person" if you would.
#132. To: FormerLurker, Rotara (#130)
as well as the rejection of any animal flesh for food.
#135. To: farmfriend (#132)
Why would you include that when the Creator made us omnivors?
#146. To: FormerLurker (#135)
God didn't. In fact, we don't have the teeth to be natural meat eaters, we only acquired the taste for flesh over time. We were originally herbivores.
#171. To: farmfriend (#146)
Your article is a bunch of bullshit.
#186. To: FormerLurker (#171)
Didn't catch this well thought out comment of yours. So you're saying the video is fake and people aren't shooting at wolves from aircraft, and that Sarah Palin doesn't support it?
#188. To: farmfriend, FormerLurker (#186)
#190. To: X-15 (#188)
We have INCISORS for MEAT
#192. To: FormerLurker, X-15, all (#190)
We have INCISORS for MEAT
#194. To: wudidiz (#192)
I can open a beer bottle with my teeth.
#195. To: FormerLurker (#194)
Hmmm. I wonder what sort of scientific name that would be, brewavore?
#198. To: wudidiz (#195)
Monkeys don't eat meat, do they?
#210. To: FormerLurker, wudidiz (#198)
Humans have been eating meat since the dawn of the Homo genus. Humans appeared with the advent of a brand-new genus (Homo) ~2.5 million years ago. Humans evolved on the savanna-- a very different environment from the forest home of the great apes. From the very inception of our genus, humans have been eating animal foods. There is overwhelming scientific evidence to support this point. (Some of the evidence is discussed in this and the preceding section; also see Part 1 of the Paleolithic Diet vs. Vegetarianism interview series, available on this site, for additional information and citations.) The diet of some vague prehistoric frugivore that may or may not be an ancestor is irrelevant in light of the status of humans as a new genus with a different diet (i.e., eating more animal foods) and evolving in a different environmental niche.
#212. To: farmfriend (#210)
#214. To: FormerLurker (#212)
You quote a blog site (an anti-vegan site at that) as your "scientific proof"?
#216. To: farmfriend (#214)
You didn't read the site did you. Knew you wouldn't.
Replies to Comment # 216.