[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them

Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson

Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute

ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest

Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music

Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok

Trump wants concealed carry in DC.

Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River

COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS.

Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies

Man attempts to carjack a New Yorker

Test post re: IRS

How Managers Are Using AI To Hire And Fire People

Israel's Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS

14 Million Illegals Entered US in 2023: The Cost to Our Nation


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: White House Wants Space Weapons Ban
Source: Aviation Week
URL Source: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/gene ... 0Wants%20Space%20Weapons%20Ban
Published: Jan 27, 2009
Author: Frank Morring, Jr.
Post Date: 2009-02-06 00:13:51 by X-15
Keywords: None
Views: 16

The new White House Web site puts the administration of President Barack Obama on record as favoring a "worldwide ban on weapons that interfere with military and commercial satellites."

But the wording on the site raises questions about exactly what it means.

"Does that really run counter to some of the major programs, and what's important?" asked Marion Blakey, president and CEO of the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), during a Jan. 26 roundtable at Aviation Week's offices in Washington. "I don't know that it does, because the terminology to my mind argues toward weapons, and not toward communication and surveillance."

Under the heading "ensure freedom of space," the defense section of the new White House portal states that "the Obama-Biden Administration will restore American leadership on space issues" and pursue the anti-satellite weapon ban.

But the language also calls for continued research on protecting space assets, including "the best options, military and diplomatic, for countering them, establishing contingency plans to ensure that U.S. forces can maintain or duplicate access to information from space assets and accelerating programs to harden U.S. satellites against attack."

Detailed space policy remains a work in progress in the Obama White House, according to one source in the new administration, and specific guidance is sparse even among experts beginning to take their places in the executive branch.

The White House site also includes a position on missile defense, declaring the administration will support it, "but ensure that it is developed in a way that is pragmatic and cost-effective; and, most importantly, does not divert resources from other national security priorities until we are positive the technology will protect the American public."

The Bush administration, the Rumsfeld-era Pentagon and some conservative lawmakers had pushed to study a concept for a space-based test bed of missile interceptors in recent years, but Congress - including most Democratic members - repeatedly rejected the request (Aerospace DAILY, Sept. 15, 2008).

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  



[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]