See other Activism Articles
Title: 30 States to Secede? What do You Think? !!!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 8, 2009
Author: unknown
Post Date: 2009-02-09 19:03:48 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 412
Comments: 16
30 States to Secede? What do You Think? !!! Good information to pass on to the sleeping public. It is preaching to the choir for most of you. Redistribute to the sleepers. sovereignty yonibluestar@yahoo.co.uk [This forwarded post by Marty StompingElk was edited, by Millennium Twain.] groups.yahoo.com/group/Seven-Seven/message/3891 artistry courtesy Amy Sophia: www.oracleofthegrailcode.com/cards.htm (ITEM 1) 10+ States are now encouraging a dialog on State Sovereignty, now add Washington to the list. [20 more States are said to be on the way: In case you didn't hear about it on the mainstream media(which you haven't), umerous states are discussing [VERY] modest limits to further increases in power of the Federal government, and are advertising this dialog as 'State Sovereignty': Washington New Hampshire Arizona Montana Michigan Missouri Oklahoma California Georgia Hawaii Possibly: Colorado, Pennsylvania, Montana, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Alaska, Kansas, Alabama, Nevada, Maine, Illinois It is interesting to note that Arizona explicitly speaks about continuity of government and the role of servicemen. ..."if the President or any other federal entity attempts to institute martial law or its equivalent without an official declaration in one or more of the states without the consent of that state ... individual members of the military return to their respective states and report to the Governor until a new President is elected;..." guardian Full text: www.azleg.gov/FormatDocum...leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm "The Tenth Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time the Constitution was adopted, that powers not granted to the United States were reserved to the States or to the people. It added nothing to the instrument as originally ratified." -- United States v. Sprague, 282 U.S. 716, 733 (1931). Audio/Video Clip: Ron Paul on the Obama's probable future for US sovereignty: video.google.com/videosea...reignty+obama&hl=en&emb=1 For those unaware, the GOP and the Democrats are playing good cop - bad cop on the American people. The two political parties work direcly for the international banking cartel currently working very hard to destroy the dollar, bring about a collapse of the economy, then offering a solution to the crisis to the American people by erasing our sovereignty, creating a regional (multi-country) currency and signing on to robust international treaties which ndermine and render the US Constitution dead. They use terrorism and economic crisis to prompt the American people to acquiesce to demands. By creating fear and a general sense of helplessness the public curls up and takes it. Sometimes the truth comes out in humor, the public laughs and continues to take it. Sometimes it comes out in public but the corporate news media refusesto investigate the truth and the media no longer serves the public interest. www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSk4SUpWVuY The cure will be seen by the masses as a 'lesser of two evil' solution to the crisis they themselves engineered. The Council on Foreign Relations, the United Nations, the World Bank, Federal Reserve, Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Homeland Security, the Conservative Underground, NeoConservatives (NeoCons), the CIA and countless other think tanks, corporate powers/laws, standing armies, etc are the enemies of liberty. They are you guaranteed oppressors who enslave you by incremental alterations in the fabric of law, society and culture. video.google.com/videopla...oL8rgLXuIHGCw&q=cfr&hl=en Do not forget, security of the nation does not equal patriotism, rather defending freedom and an individuals liberty is patriotism. The Redcoats and many of the first colonists were loyal to King George. They were known as Loyalists. Those that espoused liberty, taxation with representation and the formation of a new Republic, the signers of the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution were not Loyalists, they were known as Patriots.. And so it is today that we find ourselves at the same juncture, a continuation of the revolution that began so long ago. Be you Loyal to the Government or be you a defender of the Constitution, for they are not synonymous. There is no left and right, there is no longer a difference between the actions a Democrat and a Republican and absolutely there is not such thing as a liberal or a conservative. There are only Loyalists or Patriots. Choose. (ITEM 2) Historic Summit Brings Together Ron Paul, Cynthia McKinney, Chuck Balwin, Grover Norquist and More! Transpartisan Cabinet announcement, February 12, 7pm MST republicmedia.tv/index.ph...task=view&id=583&Itemid=1 On the evening of Lincoln's Bicentennial at 7pm MST at the Denver Sheraton we will announce the formation of an interim, national Transpartisan Cabinet to serve as the interim voice of this emerging movement of movements. Confirmed members thus far -- in person or by video teleconference -- include monetary reform leader Ron Paul, co- founder of MoveOn.org and President of Momsrising.org Joan Blades, conservative activist Grover Norquist, co-founder of the Liberty Coalition Michael Ostrolenk, human potential movement visionary Barbara Marx Hubbard, humorist Steve Bhaerman, and director of the Committee for a Unified Independent Party Jackie Salit. Pending invitations include Ralph Nader, as well as former Green and Constitution Party presidential nominees, Cynthia McKinney and Chuck Baldwin. At the Summit participants will design a transparent, inclusive process for choosing the final Cabinet to serve as the transpartisan voice. Here is a video, a good video and the people mean well, but there is one thing missing from this video and as a military man, it spooks the heck out of me - see if you can guess what answer is missing. Hint: Congressman Ron Paul would know. www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2H0ogBpP8o Recommend distribution: Information old news to you? Then send it to someone who needs to know. Who needs to know? Litmus test: Do they know the first three words to the preamble of the Constitution? That would be a good person. Because we could all use a good lift of spirit: A Tribute to the Ron Paul Revolution www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPJtOPFQCs Founding Fathers: The Threat of Tyranny www.youtube.com/watch?v=osFKsmjwe6g Don't want to wait for this newletter? Go to pyrabang.com/go/login for current events and a virtual clearing house of independent news. merriment Spiritual freedom is my birthright. I am a free thinker. I am able to rise above mental prejudices and stereotypes of others. I am a free thinker. Nobody and nothing can manipulate me or deceive me. I am a free thinker. I freely choose truth and love. Today, I embrace a greater degree of spiritual freedom.
www.pyrabang.com/view.php...ost_id=11341&visitor=true ]
apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/....aspx?year=2009&bill=4009
www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html
www.azleg.gov/FormatDocum...leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm
data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm
legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?2009-HCR-0004
www.house.mo.gov/content..../bills091/bills/HR212.HTM
axiomamuse.wordpress.com/...ts-to-limit-federal-power
www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/93..._44_bill_940829_chaptered
www.legis.state.ga.us/leg...96/leg/fulltext/sr308.htm
www.hawaii-nation.org/
Oldie but goody.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DioQooFIcgE
www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJZw9psqbBw
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)
i notice Texas isn't one of them.
The ultimate effect of shielding men from the effects of folly, is to fill the world with fools. - Herbert Spencer
Bush hasn't been out of office long enough and Perry is a "loyalist" ! Texas will come around !
If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. Henry David Thoreau - 1849
To whom or what is Hairdo Perry loyal?
Who is Perry?
TX is run by Statists good old boy LAWYERS who bend over to the feds and love to excercise their CourtIndustrialComplex brand of facsism.. Tx is a sad state of affairs.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition You think the people of this country exist to provide you with position. I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom.~~William Wallace ALAS, BABYLON
That sucks
4um Traitor Our current governor. He was Dubya's heir apparent (as Lt. Governor) and is an open-border turd like the rest of the Republicans.
_________________________________________________________________________ Our current governor. He was Dubya's heir apparent (as Lt. Governor) and is an open-border turd like the rest of the Republicans. Search "Bilderberg Rick Perry" - he's a class A-1 Quisling.
4um Traitor "His hair was perfect" -the werewolf of Austin ;-)
_________________________________________________________________________ LOL
4um Traitor Perry is Texas NWO Governor / Bilderberger
If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. Henry David Thoreau - 1849
The article referenced Loyalists (those during the Revolution remaining loyal to George III). Perry is one of those loyal to his NWO Masters.
If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. Henry David Thoreau - 1849
New Hampshire Fires First Shot Of Civil War Resolution Immediately Voids Several Federal Laws, Threatens Counterstrike Against Federal "Breach Of Peace" By Pat Dollard. The Betrayal: The New Hampshire state legislature took an unbelievably bold step Monday by introducing a resolution to declare certain actions by the federal government to completely totally void and warning that certain future acts will be viewed as a "breach of peace" with the states themselves that risks "nullifying the Constitution." This act by New Hampshire is a clear warning to the federal government that they could face being stripped of their power by the States (presumably through civil war! The remarkable document outlines with perfect clarity, some basics long forgotten. For instance, it reminds Congress "That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever;. . . . . therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force;" Federal gun crime laws? Void. Federal drug crime laws? Void. The gazzillion other federal criminal laws that deal with anything other than the specific enumerated crimes? ALL VOID. One would think that if any lawyer anywhere in the entire country was worth his salt, all federal criminal trials would have ended years ago. This seems to prove that most lawyers are dullards. New Hampshire deals a complete death blow to the pending federal hate crimes legislation by pointing out "That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force; . . . . ." Later in the Resolution, New Hampshire makes clear what the feds are now risking if they proceed further: The removal of all powers from the federal government by the States! Quoting directly from the Resolution: "That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to: I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State. II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law. III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law. IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government. V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press. VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually." I have reported on this blog for quite some time that we here in the United States are heading toward Civil War. Many of you told me I was a nut for thinking that. The simple fact is that we are long overdue for another Rebellion in this nation and I heartily endorse the idea of having one again very soon; preferably starting THIS year! We must stop our federal government dead in its tracks because it is out of control and very dangerous. If stopping them means attacking them and destroying them by force, then so be it. The full New Hampshire resolution is printed below, or you can to the Government33;s website and read it there. HCR 6 33; AS INTRODUCED 2009 SESSION 09-0274 09/01 HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 6 A RESOLUTION affirming States33; rights based on Jeffersonian principles. SPONSORS: Rep. Itse, Rock 9; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Sen. Denley, Dist 3 COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs ANALYSIS This house concurrent resolution affirms States33; rights based on Jeffersonian principles. 09-0274 09/01 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine A RESOLUTION affirming States33; rights based on Jeffersonian principles. Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 1, Article 7 declares that the people of this State have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent State; and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the United States of America in congress assembled; and Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 2, Article 1 declares that the people inhabiting the territory formerly called the province of New Hampshire, do hereby solemnly and mutually agree with each other, to form themselves into a free, sovereign and independent body-politic, or State, by the name of The State of New Hampshire; and Whereas the State of New Hampshire when ratifying the Constitution for the United States of America recommended as a change, "First That it be Explicitly declared that all Powers not expressly & particularly Delegated by the aforesaid are reserved to the several States to be, by them Exercised;" and Whereas the other States that included recommendations, to wit Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia, included an identical or similar recommended change; and Whereas these recommended changes were incorporated as the ninth amendment, the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people, and the tenth amendment, the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people, to the Constitution for the United States of America; now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring: That the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a General Government for special purposes, 33; delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress; and That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory; and That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitution, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people;" and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against all abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same. And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press:" thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, and that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are withheld from the cognizance of federal tribunals. That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force; and That the construction applied by the General Government (as is evidenced by sundry of their proceedings) to those parts of the Constitution of the United States which delegate to Congress a power "to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States," and "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof," goes to the destruction of all limits prescribed to their power by the Constitution: that words meant by the instrument to be subsidiary only to the execution of limited powers, ought not to be so construed as themselves to give unlimited powers, nor a part to be so taken as to destroy the whole residue of that instrument: that the proceedings of the General Government under color of these articles, will be a fit and necessary subject of revisal and correction; and That a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolutions to the Legislatures of the several States; to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and union which it has manifested from that moment at which a common danger first suggested a common union: that it considers union, for specified national purposes, and particularly to those specified in their federal compact, to be friendly to the peace, happiness and prosperity of all the States: that faithful to that compact, according to the plain intent and meaning in which it was understood and acceded to by the several parties, it is sincerely anxious for its preservation: that it does also believe, that to take from the States all the powers of self-government and transfer them to a general and consolidated government, without regard to the special delegations and reservations solemnly agreed to in that compact, is not for the peace, happiness or prosperity of these States; and that therefore this State is determined, as it doubts not its co-States are, to submit to undelegated, and consequently unlimited powers in no man, or body of men on earth: that in cases of an abuse of the delegated powers, the members of the General Government, being chosen by the people, a change by the people would be the constitutional remedy; but, where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy: that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact, (casus non foederis), to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them: that nevertheless, this State, from motives of regard and respect for its co-States, has wished to communicate with them on the subject: that with them alone it is proper to communicate, they alone being parties to the compact, and solely authorized to judge in the last resort of the powers exercised under it, Congress being not a party, but merely the creature of the compact, and subject as to its assumptions of power to the final judgment of those by whom, and for whose use itself and its powers were all created and modified: that if the acts before specified should stand, these conclusions would flow from them: that it would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights: that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism 33; free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence; it is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power: that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no further, our confidence may go. In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. That this State does therefore call on its co-States for an expression of their sentiments on acts not authorized by the federal compact. And it doubts not that their sense will be so announced as to prove their attachment unaltered to limited government, whether general or particular. And that the rights and liberties of their co-States will be exposed to no dangers by remaining embarked in a common bottom with their own. That they will concur with this State in considering acts as so palpably against the Constitution as to amount to an undisguised declaration that that compact is not meant to be the measure of the powers of the General Government, but that it will proceed in the exercise over these States, of all powers whatsoever: that they will view this as seizing the rights of the States, and consolidating them in the hands of the General Government, with a power assumed to bind the States, not merely as the cases made federal, (casus foederis,) but in all cases whatsoever, by laws made, not with their consent, but by others against their consent: that this would be to surrender the form of government we have chosen, and live under one deriving its powers from its own will, and not from our authority; and that the co-States, recurring to their natural right in cases not made federal, will concur in declaring these acts void, and of no force, and will each take measures of its own for providing that neither these acts, nor any others of the General Government not plainly and intentionally authorized by the Constitution, shall be exercised within their respective territories; and That the said committee be authorized to communicate by writing or personal conferences, at any times or places whatever, with any person or person who may be appointed by any one or more co-States to correspond or confer with them; and that they lay their proceedings before the next session of the General Court; and That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to: I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State. II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law. III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law. IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government. V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press. VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State33;s legislature.
Make it stick !
If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. Henry David Thoreau - 1849
Merck, Glaxco-Smith-Cline, the Trans-Texas Corridor Commission, Cintra-Zachary, his buddy Boosh, and anyone else who fills his pockets.
#2. To: Itistoolate (#0)
30 States to Secede? What do You Think? !!!
#3. To: christine (#1)
i notice Texas isn't one of them.
#4. To: noone222 (#3)
Perry is a "loyalist"
#5. To: noone222 (#3)
#6. To: christine (#1)
"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." ~~ IndieTx
#7. To: IndieTX (#6)
Tx is a sad state of affairs.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#8. To: Itistoolate (#5)
Who is Perry?
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?”
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#9. To: X-15, Itistoolate (#8)
Who is Perry?
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#10. To: Rotara, christine (#9)
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?”
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#11. To: X-15 (#10)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#12. To: Itistoolate (#5)
(Edited)
#13. To: scrapper2 (#4)
To whom or what is Hairdo Perry loyal?
#14. To: noone222, Scrapper2. christine, IndieTX, Rotara, X-15, Dakmar (#13)
#15. To: Itistoolate (#14)
#16. To: scrapper2 (#4)
To whom or what is Hairdo Perry loyal?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest