See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse
Source:
PrisonPlanet
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/fire-co ... uilding-does-not-collapse.html
Published: Feb 10, 2009
Author: pp
Post Date: 2009-02-10 00:46:34 by Rotara
Keywords: None
Views: 1220
Comments: 35
Giant flames engulf every floor of 44-story building and it remains standing, yet limited fires across just 8 floors of WTC 7 brought down building within 7 seconds on 9/11. How can NIST’s “new phenomenon” explain this one? Paul Joseph Watson A fierce fire consumed all 44 floors of a skyscraper in Beijing today, shooting 30 foot flames into the air, but unlike the similarly-sized 47-story WTC 7, which suffered limited fires across just eight floors, the building in China did not collapse. “The fire was burning from the ground floor to the top floor of the large building, the flames reflecting in the glass facade of the main CCTV tower next to the hotel and cultural center,” reports the New York Times. “The 241-room Mandarin Oriental hotel in the building was due to open this year. Flames were spotted around 7:45 p.m. and within 20 minutes the fire had spread throughout the building, dominating that part of the city.” “Hundreds of firefighting vehicles and police blocked off all approaches to the building - which was also set to house a luxury hotel due to be opened in 2009 - with flames appearing to leap 20 to 30 feet into the air,” adds The London Times. Compare images of WTC 7 with those of the skyscraper fire in Beijing. Note that the Beijing skyscraper appears to be leaning due to the unorthodox design of the building - it did not suffer any kind of collapse. To any sane and rational observer, which of these buildings would have been the most likely to collapse? And yet it was WTC 7 which collapsed within 7 seconds into its own footprint on 9/11. The Beijing skyscraper, though gutted by fire damage, remains standing. How do the debunkers explain away this one? How come NIST’s newly invented “phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” didn’t put paid to the skyscraper in Beijing? Does fire have different properties in China compared to the U.S.? Does it behave in different ways depending on what country it’s in? Remember that WTC 7 was structurally reinforced and suffered limited fires across just 8 floors. The core of NIST’s explanation, that an “extraordinary event” called “thermal expansion” was to blame for the sudden total collapse of WTC 7 is of course on the face of it a fraud when one considers the innumerable number of buildings that have suffered roaring fires across the majority of their floors and remained standing, whereas WTC 7 suffered limited fire damage across a handful of floors. The Beijing skyscraper fire provides yet more comparable evidence to illustrate the monolithic hoax that fire damage alone can cause buildings to collapse implosion style, adding more weight to the argument that both WTC 7 and the twin towers were destroyed by explosives that were seen and heard by dozens of eyewitnesses who were at ground zero. Take another example - the Windsor building in Madrid, a 32 story skyscraper which was a raging inferno for no less than 24 hours before fire crews were able to put out the flames. Despite the building being constructed of columns a fraction as thick as those used in the WTC twin towers, as well as a total lack of fireproofing, the building’s top section only partially collapsed while the integrity of the whole structure remained firmly intact. Compare these images of the Windsor building fire to those of WTC 7 and the twin towers. The skyscraper fire in Beijing offers another stark and bold reminder that when one eliminates the dodgy, agenda-driven, and incomprehensible delusions of NIST, one fact remains abundantly clear; Office fires - even the flame shooting towering inferno variety - cannot cause modern buildings to implode in on themselves and collapse. Only deliberately placed explosives can achieve this end. The Windsor fire, the Beijing skyscraper fire and many more yet to come painfully underscore the awful truth that the only way WTC 7 and the twin towers could have collapsed in the manner that they did was by means of controlled demolition.
Poster Comment: I guess they just make'em better in china. ;-)
Prison Planet.com
Monday, February 9, 2009 
Beijing skyscraper.
WTC 7
Beijing skyscraper.
WTC 7 
Beijing skyscraper.
WTC 7
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
#3. To: yukon, WhiteSands, SOD, 22rifle, Marguerite, Sven Golly, Ua Deaghaidh, Perkunas, ALL EL PEE CFR WANNABES (#0)
I have a dream. In this dream, you pu**ies leave the comfy confines of your IsraelFirst website and wander into Freedom4um. Where you are broken down bit by byte, crushed and shredded. You people aren't worthy to carry Bill D Berger's nut sweat. You and goldi-sux deserve each other.
BE SURE AND CLICK ON CONTENTS AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE WTC7.net the hidden story of Building 7: The Collapse of WTC ... An investigation of WTC 7's collapse, evidence of controlled demolition. Building 7 was the third skyscraper to be reduced to rubble on September 11, 2001. According to the government, fires, primarily, leveled this building, but fires have never before or since destroyed a steel skyscraper. The team that investigated the collapse were kept away from the crime scene. By the time they published their inconclusive report in May, 2002, the evidence had been destroyed. Why did the government rapidly recycle the steel from the largest and most mysterious engineering failure in world history, and why has the media remained silent?
Bodies in WTC 7: Jennings Interview Demolishes Official Version
www.jonesreport.com/artic...07_bbc_lost_response.html BOMBSHELL: 9/11 COVER-UP UNRAVELING CNN, BBC 24 Reports Conclusively Prove Media Prior Knowledge and False-Start Scripting of Building 7 Controlled Demolition Aaron Dykes and Alex Jones /Jones Report | February 27, 2007 It has now been discovered that BBC 24 also reported the Building 7 collapse before it fell. Furthermore, CNN’s Aaron Brown reported that Building 7 "has collapsed or is collapsing" over an hour before it fell. These clips both reinforce the shocking, newly discovered BBC coverage wherein Jane Standley reports the collapse early-- with the building still standing behind her.
FABLED ENEMIES - 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB - EMBRACE REALITY - SAVE AMERICA - VIDEO
tyrannyalert.com/800.html LARRY SILVERSTEIN BUILT WTC7 AS A "BUILDING WITHIN A BUILDING" ''We built in enough redundancy to allow entire portions of floors to be removed without affecting the building's structural integrity..." ~ Larry Silverstein ~
Newly Found Archived Footage: New: Fox News 5 reports WTC 7 collapse BEFORE it happens
From ENRON, CHENEY, 9/11, LIVE HIJACKERS, & DEAD MICROBIOLOGISTS 1. WTC 7 housed the largest CIA station in the United States outside of Washington DC. 2. In addition to the CIA, WTC 7 also housed the NYC offices of the IRS, FBI, and SEC. 3. Many months later, a government source was quoted in the mainstream press saying that the records stored in these offices - including years of evidence files - were, for the most part, lost without backup. Evidence files that were part of active investigations into such things as organized crime, bank and securities fraud, money laundering, drug trafficking, terrorism. Congressman Tauzin was looking into records relating to Enron; now deleted. How unfortunate because it makes you wonder what these documents could tell us.
2. In addition to the CIA, WTC 7 also housed the NYC offices of the IRS, FBI, and SEC. 3. Many months later, a government source was quoted in the mainstream press saying that the records stored in these offices - including years of evidence files - were, for the most part, lost without backup. Evidence files that were part of active investigations into such things as organized crime, bank and securities fraud, money laundering, drug trafficking, terrorism. Congressman Tauzin was looking into records relating to Enron; now deleted. How unfortunate because it makes you wonder what these documents could tell us. k00k ! (I know you miss that;-)
(I know you miss that;-) Yeah, can't we get BeALoser back to yell KOOK and democRAT at everyone who doesn't toe the party line? I am sure some folks are probably having bad withdrawals from not getting much of that.
How's the tinfoil hat feeling, KooK ?! (I always loved that one)
#30. To: Rotara (#29)
Ah, I feel much better now. Thank you very much.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#6. To: yukon, WhiteSands, SOD, 22rifle, Marguerite, Sven Golly, Ua Deaghaidh, Perkunas, ALL EL PEE CFR WANNABES (#3)
An investigation of WTC 7's collapse, evidence of controlled demolition.
www.wtc7.net/ - 7k -
#9. To: TwentyTwelve (#6)
#13. To: Rotara (#9)
#14. To: TwentyTwelve (#13)
#16. To: Rotara (#14)
#17. To: TwentyTwelve (#16)
#18. To: Rotara (#17)
#19. To: TwentyTwelve (#18)
1. WTC 7 housed the largest CIA station in the United States outside of Washington DC.
#27. To: Rotara (#19)
k00k !
#29. To: James Deffenbach (#27)
Yeah, can't we get BeALoser back to yell KOOK and democRAT at everyone who doesn't toe the party line? I am sure some folks are probably having bad withdrawals from not getting much of that.
Replies to Comment # 29. How's the tinfoil hat feeling, KooK ?!
End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.