[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: An excerpt from BUTCHERS' UNION CO. v. CRESCENT CITY CO., 111 U.S. 746 (1884)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 19, 2009
Author: USSC
Post Date: 2009-02-19 17:58:59 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 68
Comments: 8

As in our intercourse with our fellow-men certain principles of morality are assumed to exist, without which society would be impossible, so certain inherent rights lie at the foundation of all action, and upon a recognition of them alone can free institutions be maintained. These inherent rights have never been more happily expressed than in the declaration of independence, that new evangel of liberty to the people: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident'-that is, so plain that their truth is recognized upon their mere statement-'that all men are [111 U.S. 746, 757] endowed'-not by edicts of emperors, or deerees of parliament, or acts of congress, but 'by their Creator with certain inalienable rights.'-that is, rights which cannot be bartered away, or given away, or taken away, except in punishment of crime-'and tha among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and to secure these'-not grant them, but secure them- 'governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.' Among these inalienable rights, as proclaimed in that great document, is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant the right to pursue any lawful business or vocation, in any manner not inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculties, so as to give to them their highest enjoyment. The common business and callings of life, the ordinary trades and pursuits, which are innocuous in themselves, and have been followed in all communities from time immemorial, must therefore be free in this country to all alike upon the same conditions. The right to pursue them, without let or hinderance, except that which is applied to all persons of the same age, sex, and condition, is a distinguishing privilege of citizens of the United States, and an essential element of that freedom which they claim as their birthright. It has been well said that 'the property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of the poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his own hands, and to hinder his employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property. It is a manifest encroachment upon the just liberty both of the workman and of those who might be disposed to employ him. As it hinders the one from working at what he thinks proper, so it hinders the others from employing whom they think proper.' Smith, Wealth Nat. bk. 1, c. 10.


Poster Comment:

Read this excerpt carefully and ask yourself if you are as free as people who lived a hundred years ago.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

Read this excerpt carefully and ask yourself if you are as free as people who lived a hundred years ago.

Near 80 years ago...we knew what freedom was...along came Roosevelt and the beginning of the end.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-02-19   18:02:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

Yeah, his stealing people's gold under color of law was pretty brazen. And of course the way he got us involved in a war which we had no business in (nor the first one when that criminal, Wilson, got us involved in another one of Europe's bloodletting). Most of the presidents we have had, especially since the time of Lincoln (and including him) should have been hanged before they ever got close to the White House.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-02-19   18:11:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: James Deffenbach (#2)

James...

Beyond that...

We the unwashed masses back then never saw or heard from the Federal government, in any way or form. They were totally unknown, totally. As for the State, it was only by their mandatory school education that we knew them.

The school systems were owned and operated by your city, town or township. No money came from anywhere, therein lies the key to the downward trend. Once the States and Federal took over education, that was total control.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-02-19   18:18:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom (#3)

We the unwashed masses back then never saw or heard from the Federal government, in any way or form.

You lived through some hard times I know but you lived in some good times too.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-02-19   19:52:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: James Deffenbach (#4)

You lived through some hard times I know but you lived in some good times too.

Poverty does not mean one has to be unhappy.

You do the best you can, and no one bothered us.

Cynicom  posted on  2009-02-19   19:55:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Cynicom (#5)

Poverty does not mean one has to be unhappy.

Got that right. Many things are more important than money.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-02-19   20:06:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

Great info but I would even go a step further and dispute this particular portion:

The right to pursue them, without let or hinderance, except that which is applied to all persons of the same age, sex, and condition, is a distinguishing privilege of citizens of the United States, and an essential element of that freedom which they claim as their birthright

I don't ever approve of their use of the WORD 'privilege', simply because words matter, and the very definition of the word ''privilege'', as i understand it, is the opposite of inherent rights. is it not??

also, the 'u.s. citizen' thing,. you know about that.

{listening to all those eric whoru programs paid off i guess.. lol

Glory to God in the highest, and Peace to His people on Earth.
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html

Artisan  posted on  2009-02-19   21:43:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Artisan (#7)

I don't ever approve of their use of the WORD 'privilege', simply because words matter, and the very definition of the word ''privilege'', as i understand it, is the opposite of inherent rights. is it not??

Yes, you are correct. I don't approve of the use of the word privilege(s) when referring to rights. They are not the same thing as most of us know.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-02-20   13:41:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]