[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Obama's Troop Drawdown Decision Will End Iraq War in Late 2010, Officials Say
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/fir ... d-iraq-war-late-officials-say/
Published: Feb 27, 2009
Author: Major Garrett
Post Date: 2009-02-27 12:59:10 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 100
Comments: 7

The Iraq war will come to an end on Aug. 31, 2010, senior officials said, following President Obama's decision to end all counter-insurgency missions by that time.

Obama told top leaders in Congress on Thursday that he will transition the mission in Iraq to training, advising and engaging in limited counter-terrorist operations, according to congressional sources.

The president is expected to deliver a speech Friday at the Marine base in Camp Lejeune, N.C, in which he will order the immediate drawdown of the 142,000 Marines and Army personnel in Iraq.

Obama's decision reflects his belief that "there have been real advances" in the country and, as result, the U.S. military should now be ordered to carry out "a fundamental change in mission," senior administration officials said.

With 142,000 U.S. forces in Iraq now and counter-insurgency operations conducted on a near-daily basis, "it is a war, no question," a senior adviser said.

And this war, senior officials said, will officially come to an end on Aug. 31, 2010, when the president orders all U.S. troops to focus their efforts on advising, equipping and training Iraqi security forces as well as assisting in reconstruction and political reconciliation.

"This is a plan that responsibly ends the war in Iraq," said a senior official who participated in the deliberations. "He is living up to a commitment he made as a candidate but is doing so in a way that has the support of the inter-agency task force on Iraq."

The president will order U.S. military commanders to leave a residual force of between 35,000 and 50,000 troops in Iraq. Under the Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government, the U.S. must remove all military personnel by Dec. 31, 2011.

The move reflects the consensus plan presented to Obama by Defense Secretary Robert Gates; Army Gen. Ray Odierno, the top military commander in Iraq; Army Gen. David Petraeus, head of U.S. Central Command; Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and the president's top intelligence officials.

Though the size of the residual force drew criticism from some Democrats, key Republicans, including House Minority Leader John Boehner and former presidential nominee John McCain, voiced support for the president's overall plan.

"Given the gains in Iraq and the requirements to send additional troops to Afghanistan, together with the significant number of troops that will remain in Iraq and the president's willingness to reassess based on conditions on the ground, I am cautiously optimistic that the plan as laid out by the president can lead to success," McCain said.

"This is not a political calculation," a senior official said. "This is a plan the president believes will advance U.S. national security interests. This is not a plan that just hopes we can get to a spot. This really represents a meeting of the minds. This is really a big project for an entirely different mission."

The president reached his decision after 12 advisory group meetings on Iraq and 10 inter-agency meetings since Inauguration Day. The first Iraq advisory meeting occurred at the White House Jan. 21.

Obama intends to convey his decision about U.S. troop withdrawals by telephone to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki on Friday. Scheduling conflicts prevented the two leaders from speaking by phone Thursday, officials said. The president and his advisers have kept the Iraqi civilian leadership informed about internal U.S. deliberations on troop withdrawals, administration officials said.

The president decided to order the troop withdrawals on Wednesday.

Obama told lawmakers about his decision on Thursday. He told lawmakers the troops remaining in Iraq after Aug. 31, 2010, will carry out new missions and will be trained and organized in a way that de-emphasizes combat-readiness and intensifies the focus on these three missions:

-- Train, equip and advise Iraqi security forces

-- Support civilian operations in Iraq aimed at reconstruction, redevelopment and political reconciliation

-- Conduct targeted counter-terrorism missions

To underscore the president's desire to end combat and counter-insurgency missions, officials said after Aug. 31, 2010, there will be no brigade combat teams in Iraq. There are 14 brigade combat teams in Iraq now. The remaining troops will be "reconstituted," officials said, into "advisory and assistance brigades."

Even so, if security conditions in Iraq deteriorate in the coming months the president "retains the flexibility" to slow down or reverse troop withdrawals. Officials said Obama's drawn-down is unlikely to jeopardize security gains achieved as a result of the Bush administration surge that has seen a significant reduction in terrorist-inspired and insurgent-led violence in Iraq.

A portion of the 35,000 to 50,000 remaining troops will be combat-ready and will be ready to deploy in counter-terrorism missions. That means combat operations are still possible, even after Aug. 31, 2010, an official said. Senior officials would not say how large the counter-terrorism force will be, but said it would be well under half the remaining troop strength.

"There will be a capability left to engage in targeted counter-terrorism operations," the official said, calling the this capability "a prudent part of the puzzle."

Overall, the size of the remaining U.S. force was "driven by the mission," officials said. U.S. troops will begin leaving Iraq this spring and the numbers of returning troops will grow during the summer, officials said. A sizable number of troops will remain in Iraq, however, to provide security and training as the country prepares for regional and sub-regional elections this spring and national elections in December.


Poster Comment:

I see. So Iraq ends in 2010 but we will leave 50,000 troops there as an "anti insurgency" force, which means the "war" doesn't end.

No CHANGE in policy; no DIFFERENCE in parties.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/07/15/2008-07-15_john_mccain__barack_obama_urge_afghanist.html

John McCain & Barack Obama urge Afghanistan surge

BY RICHARD SISK and MICHAEL McAULIFF
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU

Tuesday, July 15th 2008, 10:18 PM

John McCain at a campaign stop at the Hotel Albuquerque in Albuquerque, 
N.M., Tuesday

Kaster/AP

John McCain at a campaign stop at the Hotel Albuquerque in Albuquerque, N.M., Tuesday

WASHINGTON - John McCain joined Barack Obama in calling for a surge in Afghanistan Tuesday as the presidential contenders sparred over who was right about Iraq.

"The central front in the war on terror is not Iraq, and it never was," said Obama, who has claimed combat brigades needed to battle the Taliban have been diverted to Iraq and vowed to take the fight to "Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan."

McCain, a resolute supporter of the U.S. troop "surge" in Iraq, countered by mocking Obama for recently declaring his 16- month withdrawal plan was open to refinement.

"Flip-floppers all over the world are enraged," McCain quipped, turning what had been billed as a jobs speech in New Mexico into a lengthy foreign policy critique of Obama. "He opposed the surge. ... Today, we know Sen. Obama was wrong," he added. "I know how to win wars."

McCain, who has changed course from his previous stance that Iraq had little to do with Afghanistan, said the success of the surge will free up soldiers and "our commanders in Afghanistan must get them."

Obama jabbed at McCain as still focused on the wrong war.Besides more U.S. troops, Obama proposed hiking aid to Afghanistan by $1 billion, and, like McCain, getting more help from NATO.

"I have argued for years that we lack the resources to finish the job because of our commitment to Iraq," he said.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-02-27   13:02:40 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#1) (Edited)

McCain backs Obama's Iraq troop withdrawal plan

McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in an interview Friday he thinks the plan is "significantly different" from the one Obama pushed during his campaign.

During the campaign, Obama had advocated a complete withdrawal within 16 months of taking office.

McCain said that members of Congress were told in a White House meeting Thursday that the majority of troops in Iraq now would be kept there through the end of the year to protect against violence during Baghdad elections next December. Then, even as troops begin to leave, some 50,000 forces would be kept behind to advise the Iraqi troops.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-02-27   13:07:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

*not why they voted for Obama*

christine  posted on  2009-02-27   13:09:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: christine (#3)

*why we didn't vote*

Jethro Tull  posted on  2009-02-27   13:11:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

pantload of the day bump

Iran Truth Now!

Lod  posted on  2009-02-27   13:11:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: christine, Jeth (#3)

Jews run America. When it comes to national security in Washington, Israel comes first no matter who sits in the Oval Office. McCain is not playing with a full deck, Obama is less likely to start World War Three, though he could suffer the same fate as JFK if god's pets deem it necessary.

Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.

Zoroaster  posted on  2009-02-27   13:45:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

The president decided to order the troop withdrawals on Wednesday.

Withdrawals to where......?????

Last week in his historic address he said we would be adding MORE Soldiers and Marines to our overall total, thousands more.

What on earth for?

Cynicom  posted on  2009-02-27   14:49:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]