[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Pawlenty Says Republicans Must Move Beyond Reagan to Rebuild Their Party
Source: Bloomberg News
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news? ... 87&sid=a97T5pGNMgp8&refer=home
Published: Mar 3, 2009
Author: By Heidi Przybyla
Post Date: 2009-03-03 11:42:47 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 508
Comments: 28

March 3 (Bloomberg) -- Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty has a message for his fellow Republicans: Get over Ronald Reagan.

Like most Republicans, Pawlenty pays homage to the Reagan legacy. At the same time, he is urging his party to get beyond its Reaganite past. Pawlenty, 48, presented his vision of Reagan 2.0 at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington last weekend.

The old Republican orthodoxy of limited government, lower taxes and conservative social policies needs an update if the party hopes to challenge Democrats on issues such as health care, energy and education, he said.

“We need to develop new Ronald Reagans and new reference points,” Pawlenty said in an interview after addressing CPAC. “It would be as if Barack Obama was going around and constantly talking about Truman or LBJ. It’s just become a reference point that isn’t as relevant for young people.”

The CPAC gathering is regarded as an open audition for Republicans with ambitions of national office and a prominent venue for candidates to raise their profiles. With Democrats ascendant in Washington, many Republicans are searching for a message and messenger to lead them back to power.

In a presidential preference straw poll taken before his speech, Pawlenty finished behind former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal and Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, among others.

Challenge to Obama

His message and his appeal, though, have attracted notice. Pawlenty, who was on the short list to be John McCain’s running mate in 2008, may be a fresh face for a party in need of new leadership to challenge Barack Obama’s youth and popularity.

As a Midwestern governor with a working-class upbringing, Pawlenty offers himself as a source of new ideas for a party whose electoral victories were largely confined to the South and rural areas in 2008.

John Weaver, a former adviser to McCain during his 2000 campaign, said Pawlenty’s admonition to move beyond Reagan is critical to the future of the party.

“I put a lot of credibility in someone who’s been elected and re-elected in a blue state,” Weaver said. “We’re headed for status as a minority party for decades if we don’t start making significant inroads with Hispanics, blue-collar voters and young people. That’s how Tim has gotten himself elected and re- elected.”

‘Honor and Respect’

At the same time, Pawlenty is careful to stress the need to “continue to honor and respect and remember Ronald Reagan.” His point, he said, is that “if you’re under 40, people didn’t live through the Reagan era.”

The former president’s principles are “alive and well,” though they must be brought up to date for a new era, Pawlenty said.

David Keene, chairman of the Alexandria, Virginia-based American Conservative Union, which hosted the conference, said Pawlenty’s message may resonate.

“It doesn’t mean that you change your values,” Keene said. “It means that you talk to people in today’s language about today’s problems.”

Pawlenty was one of the few speakers who challenged his party to speak directly about the needs of what he calls “Sam’s Club voters,” and to meet Democrats on their home turf on issues such as health care.

‘Bread-and-Butter Issues’

In his speech, Pawlenty said his two brothers, who were union members, told him, “‘the conservatives or the Republicans, they’re not for the working person.’ You ever heard that before?”

He said “the face and voice and tone of the Republican Party and the conservative movement needs to be more about bread- and-butter issues for everyday people.”

The focus on working-class issues may be a gamble with his party’s leadership. Saul Anuzis, the former chairman of the Michigan Republican Party who touted his background as a member of the Teamster’s union, recently lost his race to lead the national party.

Still, Weaver said many of the politicians who show up at national Republican conferences don’t represent mainstream Republican voters, and the winners of straw polls rarely emerge as the ultimate party nominee. Romney, 61, has won three years in a row.

Limbaugh’s Comments

One measure of the Republican leadership void is that the Democrats are defining the debate. Last week, Democrats began a campaign to nominate talk show host Rush Limbaugh as the Republican Party’s unofficial leader. An ad running this week on cable television highlights Limbaugh’s statement that he wants Obama to fail.

Pawlenty, without directly addressing Limbaugh, called this a losing strategy. “It would be a sad day if all the conservatives had to offer was a wish or a hope that the president would fail so that we could benefit,” he said in the interview.

Pawlenty’s path to national office is obscured by the better-known leaders such as Palin, 45, Romney and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, 53, who also ran for the Republican nomination last year. Jindal, 37, had been touted by some Republicans as the party’s answer to Obama until he delivered a response to Obama’s joint address to Congress last week that was criticized as lackluster, including by some members of his own party.

Before any run for national office, Pawlenty must decide whether to seek re-election in 2010. A presidential bid also would subject Pawlenty to increased scrutiny, with some nonpartisan analysts saying that his record might belie his claim to be a different kind of Republican.

“Here’s the big puzzle about Tim Pawlenty,” said Larry Jacobs, chairman of the politics department at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. “He’s very smart and he’s very winsome in person. He is a talent. He stands out. When you actually look at what he’s done he’s extremely conservative.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#4. To: Brian S (#0)

Pawlenty Says Republicans Must Move Beyond Reagan to Rebuild Their Party

Like most Republicans, Pawlenty pays homage to the Reagan legacy. At the same time, he is urging his party to get beyond its Reaganite past.

Like most Republicans, Pawlenty pays homage to the Reagan legacy. At the same time, he is urging his party to get beyond its Reaganite past.

As long as the pubbies think reagan was a god they will forever remain as one wing of our one party. I don't blame pawlenty for wanting to get beyon reagan. He was an asshole like all the rest including the new messiah.

We need another president cut from the same cloth as Teddy Roosevelt. Pawlenty and jindahl aren't even close. Of course the stupid Amerikan electorate wouldn't know that.

LACUMO  posted on  2009-03-03   14:28:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: LACUMO (#4)

As long as the pubbies think reagan was a god they will forever remain as one wing of our one party. I don't blame pawlenty for wanting to get beyon reagan. He was an asshole like all the rest including the new messiah.

No one thinks Reagan was a God. But he was the greatest President of the twentieth century. If you didn't spend all your time licking the shit stains off of toilet seats you might know that.

Old Friend  posted on  2009-03-03   18:05:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Old Friend (#15) (Edited)

your second sentence was unnecessary. as for great presidents of the 20th century, there were none. all were puppets of the central banking interests which makes them all traitors although some would argue that kennedy might be the exception as he did attempt to buck them--the reason he was assassinated, imo.

christine  posted on  2009-03-03   18:13:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: christine (#17)

I would consider Kennedy as a possibility too. Reagan wasn't perfect but I stand by my statement that there were none better during the twentieth century. Remember they tried to kill Reagan too.

Besides Kennedy who was better then Reagan?

Old Friend  posted on  2009-03-03   18:43:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

#22. To: Old Friend (#20)

as for great presidents of the 20th century, there were none.

christine  posted on  2009-03-03 18:45:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]