See other Editorial Articles
Title: The National Ponzi Scheme
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.gmu.edu/departments/econ ... /09/TheNationalPonziScheme.htm
Published: Feb 4, 2009
Author: Dr. Walter E. Williams
Post Date: 2009-03-03 16:23:59 by IndieTX
Keywords: None
Views: 99
Comments: 5
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was set up to combat fraudulent practices. The SEC's website explains that "Ponzi schemes are a type of illegal pyramid scheme named for Charles Ponzi, who duped thousands of New England residents into investing in a postage stamp speculation scheme back in the 1920s." It goes on to say, "Decades later, the Ponzi scheme continues to work on the 'rob-Peter-to-pay-Paul' principle, as money from new investors is used to pay off earlier investors until the whole scheme collapses." That is how the SEC described the recent Bernard Madoff $50 billion Ponzi scheme, "a stunning fraud that appears to be of epic proportions." A Ponzi scheme does not generate any wealth whatsoever; that is why it ultimately collapses. As Circuit Judge Anderson said in the 1922 Lowell v. Brown case, the Ponzi scheme was "simply the old fraud of paying the earlier comers out of the contributions of the later comers." So long as the number of late comers -- you might call them suckers -- grows, the fraudulent scheme has life. We have a national Ponzi scheme where Congress collects about $785 billion in Social Security taxes from about 163 million workers to send out $585 billion to 50 million Social Security recipients. Social Security's trustees tell us that the surplus goes into a $2.2 trillion trust fund to meet future obligations. The problem is whatever difference between Social Security taxes and benefits paid out is spent by Congress. What the Treasury Department does is give the Social Security Trust Fund non-marketable "special issue government securities" that are simply bookkeeping entries that are IOUs. According to Social Security trustee estimates, around 2016 the amount of Social Security benefits paid will exceed taxes collected. That means one of two things, or both, must happen: Congress will raise taxes and/or slash promised Social Security benefits. Each year the situation will get worse since the number of retirees is predicted to increase relative to the number in the workforce paying taxes. In 1940, there were 42 workers per retiree, in 1950 there were 16, today there are 3 and in 20 or 30 years there will be 2 or fewer workers per retiree. Social Security is unsustainable because it is not meeting the first order condition of a Ponzi scheme, namely expanding the pool of suckers. Social Security has been one congressional lie after another since its inception. Here's what a 1936 Social Security pamphlet said: "After the first 3 years -- that is to say, beginning in 1940 -- you will pay, and your employer will pay, 1.5 cents for each dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year ... beginning in 1943, you will pay 2 cents, and so will your employer, for every dollar you earn for the next 3 years. ... And finally, beginning in 1949, twelve years from now, you and your employer will each pay 3 cents on each dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year. That is the most you will ever pay." The pamphlet also said, "Beginning November 24, 1936, the United States government will set up a Social Security account for you. ... The checks will come to you as a right." That's another lie. In .Flemming vs Nestor (1960), the U.S. Supreme court held that you have no "accrued property rights" to a Social Security check. That means Congress can do anything it wishes with Social Security. There is little or nothing that can be done to prevent the economic and political chaos that will result from the collapse of Social Security. Today's recipients of Social Security, along with their powerful AARP lobby, represent a powerful political force. Few politicians are willing to risk their careers alienating today's senior citizens for the benefit of Americans in 2040. After all what do today's seniors and politicians care about a 2040 calamity? They will be dead by then.
Poster Comment: Wake up!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: IndieTX (#0)
It doesn't matter. SS will fail in the upcoming depression. Unemployment will soon be 20 percent and millions more will be working part time and/or at jobs paying less. That will reduce tax revenue and the extra unemployment payments and food stamps will greatly increase government spending. The government will just print more money on top of the $2 trillion they are already printing out of thin air. This will cause prices to double, but wages and SS payment will remain the same. This will force SS recipients to choose between food and house and utility payments. Higher prices means less purchasing so even more people will become unemployed, reducing tax revenue even more. The government will raise taxes which will leave even less money for private spending resulting in more unemployment. So the government will print even money causing prices to double again but they will not increase SS check forcing SS recipients to buy beans in bulk to eat and cut back on utilities. With so many unemployed and begging for work at even lower wages, workers will not be able to demand an increase in wages and when forced to choose between their children crying and begging for something to eat, they will forgo their mortgage payments and many will end up homeless. Others will refuse to pay the income tax reducing tax revenues even more. The government will pass laws giving the foreclosed homes to "DESERVING" blacks and unwed teen mothers and the resulting crime wave will cause neighborhood property values to collapse. After that, with tens of millions homeless and hungry, it will get interesting.
That's another lie. In .Flemming vs Nestor (1960), the U.S. Supreme court held that you have no "accrued property rights" to a Social Security check. Ya mean they're gonna fuck us ... again ?????
Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces. De La Boétie
Coming to a neighborhood near all of us.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition You think the people of this country exist to provide you with position. I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom.~~William Wallace ALAS, BABYLON
No shiite bump.
#2. To: IndieTX (#0)
"Beginning November 24, 1936, the United States government will set up a Social Security account for you. ... The checks will come to you as a right."
#3. To: DWornock (#1)
Your scenario
"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." ~~ IndieTx
#4. To: IndieTX (#0)
#5. To: noone222, lodwick, IndieTX (#2)
BO-HICA !
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams 
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest