See other Editorial Articles
Title: ‘No Deal’ Republicans Map Disaster of Own Making
Source:
Bloomberg News
URL Source: http://www.bloomberg.com
Published: Mar 4, 2009
Author: John Berry
Post Date: 2009-03-04 11:51:27 by war
Keywords: republicans, economy, stimulus
Views: 307
Comments: 31
March 4 (Bloomberg) -- Republicans are headed for a political disaster of their own making. As bad news about the economy gets ever worse, the party of growth, markets and business is opposing every effort by President Barack Obama to shorten the recession and put people back to work. Congressional Republicans have crowed about their almost- unanimous nay vote against Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package. They say the money will be wasted, add to the national debt and do little to help promote economic recovery. They are wrong. There’s every reason to think the added spending and tax cuts will slow the sharp contraction in economic growth and then speed the ensuing recovery. The claim that governments can’t boost growth -- because, as this theory goes, anything they spend reduces resources available to the private sector -- is bogus. Some officials in the British Treasury made the same claim during the Great Depression to counter John Maynard Keynes’s argument that added government spending was needed to fill the gap left by the big drop in private consumption and investment. The U.S. economic boom produced by World War II spending buried this view. You have to wonder why Republicans exhumed this discredited theory. Now that they have, all that’s needed for a spectacular Republican failure is for a solid recovery to start before the mid-term elections in November 2010 -- a highly likely prospect. By then, after two years of opposition to Obama’s efforts to make the lives of most Americans better, it shouldn’t be hard to convince voters that Republicans are an uncaring lot. Polls show that almost two-thirds of Americans believe the Republican opposition is nothing more than an attempt to gain political advantage. Shrinking Ranks If those feelings persist, the Republican minorities in the House and Senate will be even smaller after the next elections than they are today. The all-out opposition to Obama is more than a political calculation that may backfire. It’s an attempt to rewrite history. For when times are tough, even many conservatives look to the government for help, as President George H.W. Bush found when he ran for re-election in 1992. During the 1990-1991 recession, conditions weren’t close to as bad as they are today, and a recovery had begun before the election. Still, there was a widespread perception that Bush didn’t understand or care about the suffering of Americans when times were hard. The message was delivered in the 1992 New Hampshire presidential primary when Pat Buchanan got more than a third of the vote against the sitting president. I remember several conservative voters telling me they would vote for Buchanan to send Bush a signal about their unhappiness with his economic policies. Less Stimulating Republicans weren’t able to block the Obama-backed stimulus bill. Still, their obstinacy in the Senate limited its effectiveness. To win just the handful of Republican “yes” votes needed to pass, the bill had to include a provision preventing the alternative minimum tax from affecting a wide swath of middle-income taxpayers. That meant $70 billion -- almost 10 percent of the total measure -- wouldn’t provide any stimulus at all. Just think about the dire state the financial system would be in today if Republicans had succeeded in defeating the Troubled Asset Relief Program last year. Without TARP money to shore up some big banks, the financial system would be in far worse shape than it is now. In case you’ve forgotten: Even after the failure of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in September shocked the world’s financial system, many Republicans -- and some Democrats -- refused to vote for the $750 billion in TARP funds. Doctrinaire Freshmen A closer look revealed a telling discrepancy. A large share of the House Republicans who were retiring voted for it; none of the freshmen Republicans did so. The younger, more doctrinaire members weren’t moved by concerns about what might happen to the financial system without the TARP money. The older, retiring members felt less bound by conservative orthodoxy. No one likes bailing out banks or other financial institutions. Some, though, really are too big to be allowed to fail. Republicans and Democrats alike have to accept that fact. If it takes hundreds of billions of dollars worth of taxpayer money to keep Citigroup afloat -- and it already is -- then the money has to be available. Citi has almost $1.8 trillion of liabilities and a vast array of deals with other institutions, companies and individuals around the globe. Its failure could create doubts about the creditworthiness of many of those other parties, undermining the world financial system. It’s fine to worry about the cost to taxpayers of risking their money on bank rescues or raising the government’s annual deficit and long-term debt. Just be sure to consider as well the value of lost jobs, personal income and tax revenue if the Obama administration were to rely on the advice of those who argue it should do little or nothing. That cost would be far, far greater.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
#7. To: war (#0)
The one thing that is universal among all partisan tools, like you war, is that you're about 1/10th as bright as you believe yourselves to be and about 1/50th as witty. Sad
Possibly. But it still puts me at quite an exponential advantage to you. I try to promote a point of view with reason and logic. You, on the other hand, are like that little yip dog panting and following behind "Spike"...
Utter nonsense... A few days ago you had utter disdain for commonly held knowledge, because it was common knowledge of which you were entirely bereft. Instead you had only snide remarks, nothing of intellectual value, nothing.
How many times must I call you on this lie? +1 more I guess, eh?
Lie??/ what lie???/
The lie that I had fled that thread when I clearly sbhowed you that I had several posts beyind yours all addressed to you and which you ignored as well as the fact that I showd surprse at NOTHING. That lie...
Tell you what. I am not interested enough to go looking for any such.
Chuckles... You come on here and accuse me of something that is patently false and then when you get called on it you feign disinterest.
Stay away from the mirror.
There are no replies to Comment # 29. End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#8. To: Rotara (#7)
The one thing that is universal among all partisan tools, like you war, is that you're about 1/10th as bright as you believe yourselves to be and about 1/50th as witty.
#9. To: war, rotara (#8)
I try to promote a point of view with reason and logic.
#11. To: Cynicom (#9)
A few days ago you had utter disdain for commonly held knowledge, because it was common knowledge of which you were entirely bereft.
#13. To: war (#11)
#17. To: Cynicom (#13)
Lie??/ what lie???/
#18. To: war (#17)
That lie...
#20. To: Cynicom (#18)
am not interested enough to go looking for any such.
#27. To: war, All (#20)
#29. To: Turtle (#27)
Replies to Comment # 29.