[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)

France reacted to the words of a US senator on sanctions against allies

Trump nominates former Soros executive for Treasury chief


Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Who will replace Michael Steele as RNC chairman?
Source: The Political Cesspool
URL Source: http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org ... ichael-steele-as-rnc-chairman/
Published: Mar 5, 2009
Author: James Edwards
Post Date: 2009-03-06 01:16:27 by X-15
Keywords: None
Views: 996
Comments: 19

Probably nobody. Because the GOP hasn’t got the guts to dump him. He should’ve been sacked on the spot when he went on national TV and agreed with DL Hughley that the GOP convention “literally looked like Nazi Germany.” But he’s black, so he can’t be fired.

Now, after his spineless groveling to Rush Limbaugh, he’s become nothing but a punchline. The late night TV shows are ridiculing him mercilessly. He’s turning the GOP into a laughingstock. But, still they refuse to fire him. They know he’s destroying them, but he’s black, so he gets to keep the job. That’s what affirmative action is all about - giving incompetent people jobs that are way over their heads because they’re not white. And they’re already seen as “racist”, so they can hardly dump their first black chairman. They want to, but they’re deathly afraid to.

If a party won’t fire their putative leader after he agrees on national TV they look like the Nazi Party, what exactly would it take for them to dump him?

If Michael Steele were a white man, he’d be history. But the party is stuck with Steele because he’s black. And if Steele continues to embarrass them so badly that they eventually do find the gumption to get rid of the bozo, you can bet they’ll put Ken Blackwell or another black in as his replacement.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#7. To: X-15 (#0)

It is not funny how many on this forum still support and still love the GOP after what that party and the bushwhacker and friends have done to this country. That is exactly why this country will never recover and become a great country as it once was and is supposed to be. It is past time to divorce yourselves from that traitorist organization. It is the home of the neocons and will forever be so.

LACUMO  posted on  2009-03-06   8:40:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: LACUMO (#7)

It is not funny how many on this forum still support and still love the GOP

who are you referring to? and to be fair, that would include Ron Paul, wouldn't it?

christine  posted on  2009-03-06   12:09:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: christine (#12)

It is not funny how many on this forum still support and still love the GOP who are you referring to? and to be fair, that would include Ron Paul, wouldn't it

I'm referring to those of you who post articles favoring the GOP over the Demonwit party and there are plenty on here who do just that. I guess it would include whom ever you want to include. We need a revolution to do away with both wings of our one party. Kapish?

LACUMO  posted on  2009-03-06   19:02:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: LACUMO (#14)

those of you? that wouldn't be me.

We need a revolution to do away with both wings of our one party.

i agree...and that's why i was disappointed when "I'm a republican and I'll always be a republican" Ron Paul made the decision not to go third party. imo, he had the momentum and the time was then for the R3volution.

christine  posted on  2009-03-06   19:20:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: christine (#15)

i agree...and that's why i was disappointed when "I'm a republican and I'll always be a republican" Ron Paul made the decision not to go third party. imo, he had the momentum and the time was then for the R3volution

I'll say this once again. Once Ron Paul ran as a GOP candidate in the primary election for the office of president, in Pennsylvania and alot of other states he couldn't turn around and run as a third party candidate for the same office in the same election year or cycle. He was allowed to run for congress last year because it was not for the same office he ran for in the primary. You'll have to look up your own state's rules regarding this.

As for the timing being right, don't kid yourself. There were too many things going against him and other candidates who were third party candidates and chief among those were the MSM controlling our election process and the results are clear how much control they had. We ended up with who they supported.

Do you remember how many votes Ron Pasul got? Not that many and the support for him would be about the same support for a revolution. It ain't ever going to happen any time soon, nor possibly within your nine lifetimes. The truth is Amerikans are a bunch of controlled dumbed down pussies. The women got more balls than the men. Just don't hold your breath waiting for someone to come along to lead the way in taking back our country and restoring our Constitution to its rightful place as the centerpiece of law in Amerika. It is over and done with.

LACUMO  posted on  2009-03-06   19:37:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: LACUMO (#17) (Edited)

I'll say this once again. Once Ron Paul ran as a GOP candidate in the primary election for the office of president, in Pennsylvania and alot of other states he couldn't turn around and run as a third party candidate for the same office in the same election year or cycle. He was allowed to run for congress last year because it was not for the same office he ran for in the primary. You'll have to look up your own state's rules regarding this.

Had he run Independent in the states where he was eligible, and garnered more than 8% of the national vote, a distinct possibility given the Tweedledee and Tweedledum duo offered us, he would have left the next candidate of the new party both ballot access and federally matching campaign funds. Ron Paul instead chose to remain in the party of pederasts.

Yellow Cake  posted on  2009-03-06   19:48:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Yellow Cake (#18) (Edited)

Had he run Independent in the states where he was eligible, and garnered more than 8% of the national vote, a distinct possibility given the Tweedledee and Tweedledum duo offered us, he would have left the next candidate of the new party both ballot access and federally matching campaign funds. Ron Paul instead chose to remain in the party of pederasts.

I'm not arguing any of what you say. There are lots of people on here who blame him for not running for president twice in the same election cycle.

Hindsight is always 20/20. Putting it another way, if the dog hadn't stopped to shit he would have caught the rabbit. Ron Paul did not have billions of dollars like Ross Perot had. Perot garnered about 19% of the vote in 1988. The PTB would never allow another candidate they were opposed to to come that close ever again.

Perot left a big matching fund for Pat Buchanan for the 2000 election, but Buchanan still didn't have ballot access.Buchanan got about 1% of the vote in 2000 after leaving the GOP. Ron Paul was smart enough to know what the odds were and what his chances were. He woke a lot of people up and planted a seed hoping the people would nurture that seed and restore liberty in our country. It is most unfortunate that so many sided with the lousy son-of-a-bitch bush and did little if anything when the prick scoffed that our Constitution was nothing but a God Damned piece of paper. That my friend should tell you a lot about a third party candidate's chances in an election. Those who want to speculate and second guess elections and election results might as well speculate and play the stock market. The ony things that are a sure bet are dying and paying taxes.

LACUMO  posted on  2009-03-06   20:12:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

        There are no replies to Comment # 19.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]