See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: THE NAME FRAUD !!
Source:
.apfn
URL Source: http://www.apfn.net/Messageboard/04-04-05/discussion.cgi.92.html
Published: Apr 4, 2005
Author: Gordon Warren Epperly
Post Date: 2009-03-06 08:06:43 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 2549
Comments: 22
Very long but very informative !! "Our" entire "legal" system and "government" are UN-constitutional !!! Memorandum of Law on the Name by Gordon Warren Epperly Many people are involved in diligent research concerning the use of all capital letters for proper names, e.g., JOHN PAUL JONES as a substitute for John Paul Jones in all court documents, driver's licenses, bank accounts, birth certificates, etc.. Is the use of all capital letters to designate a name some special English grammar rule or style? Is it a contemporary American style of English? Is the use of this form of capitalization recognized by educational authorities? Is this an official judicial or U.S. government rule and/or style of grammar? Why do attorneys, court clerks, prosecutors judges, insurance companies, banks, credit card companies, utility companies, etc. always use all capital letters when writing a proper name? What English grammar experts say One of the foremost authorities on American English grammar, style, composition, and rules is The Chicago Manual of Style. The latest (14th) Edition, published by the University of Chicago Press, is internationally known and respected as a major contribution to maintaining and improving the standards of written or printed text. Since we can find no reference in their manual concerning the use of all capitalized letters with a proper name or any other usage, we wrote to the editors and asked this question: "Is it acceptable, or is there any rule of English grammar, to allow a proper name to be written in all capital letters? For example, if my name was John Paul Jones, can it be written as JOHN PAUL JONES? Is there any rule covering this?" The Editorial Staff of the University of Chicago answered: "Writing names in all caps is not conventional; it is not Chicago style to put anything in all caps. For instance, even if 'GONE WITH THE WIND' appears on the title page all in caps, we would properly render it 'Gone with the Wind' in a bibliography. The only reason we can think of to do so is if you are quoting some material where it is important to the narrative to preserve the casing of the letters. “We're not sure in what context you would like your proper name to appear in all caps, but it is likely to be seen as a bit odd." Law is extremely precise. Every letter, capitalization, punctuation mark, etc., in a legal document is utilized for a specific reason and has legal (i.e. deadly force) consequences. If, for instance, one attempts to file articles of incorporation in the office of a Secretary of State of a State, if the exact title of the corporation — down to every jot and tittle — is not exactly the same each and every time the corporation is referenced in the documents to be filed, the Secretary of State will refuse to file the papers. This is because each time the name of the corporation is referenced it must be set forth identically in order to express the same legal entity. The tiniest difference in the name of the corporation identifies an entirely different legal person. It is therefore an eminently valid, and possibly crucial, question as to why governments, governmental courts, and agencies purporting to exist (in some undefined, unproved manner) within the jurisdiction of “this state” insist on always capitalizing every letter in a proper name. Mary Newton Bruder, Ph.D., also known as The Grammar Lady, who established the Grammar Hotline in the late 1980's for the "Coalition of Adult Literacy," was asked the following question: "Why do federal and state government agencies and departments, judicial and administrative courts, insurance companies, etc., spell a person's proper name in all capital letters? For example, if my name is John Paul Jones, is it proper at any time to write my name as JOHN PAUL JONES?" Dr. Bruder's reply was short and to the point: "It must be some kind of internal style. There is no grammar rule about it." It seemed that these particular grammatical experts had no idea why proper names were written in all caps, so we began to assemble an extensive collection of reference books authored by various publishers, governments, and legal authorities to find the answer. What English grammar reference books say Manual on Usage & Style One of the reference books obtained was the "Manual on Usage & Style," Eighth Edition, ISBN I-878674-51-X, published by the Texas Law Review in 1995. Section D, CAPITALIZATION, paragraph D: 1:1 states: "Always capitalize proper nouns... [Proper nouns], independent of the context in which they are used, refer to specific persons, places, or things (e.g., Dan, Austin, Rolls Royce)." Paragraph D: 3:2 of Section D states: "Capitalize People, State, and any other terms used to refer to the government as a litigant (e.g., the People's case, the State's argument), but do not capitalize other words used to refer to litigants (e.g., the plaintiff, defendant Manson)." Either no attorney, judge, or law clerk in Texas has ever read the recognized law style manual that purports to pertain to them, or the act is a deliberate violation of the rules for undisclosed reasons. In either ignorance (“ignorance of the law is no excuse”) or violation (one violating the law he enforces on others is acting under title of nobility and abrogating the principle of equality under the law) of law, they continue to write "Plaintiff,” "Defendant," "THE STATE OF TEXAS" and proper names of parties in all capital letters on every court document. The Elements of Style Another well-recognized reference book is "The Elements of Style," Fourth Edition, ISBN 0-205-30902-X, written by William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White, published by Allyn & Bacon in 1999. Within this renowned English grammar and style reference book, is found only one reference to capitalization, located within the Glossary at "proper noun," page 94, where it states: "The name of a particular person (Frank Sinatra), place (Boston), or thing (Moby Dick). Proper nouns are capitalized." There's an obvious and legally evident difference between capitalizing the first letter of a proper name as compared to capitalizing every letter used to portray the name. The American Heritage Book of English Usage The American Heritage Book of English Usage, A Practical and Authoritative Guide to Contemporary English, published in 1996, at Chapter 9, E-Mail, Conventions and Quirks, Informality, states: "To give a message special emphasis, an E-mailer may write entirely in capital letters, a device E-mailers refer to as screaming. Some of these visual conventions have emerged as away of getting around the constraints on data transmission that now limit many networks". Here is a reference source, within contemporary — modern — English, that states it is of an informal manner to write every word of — specifically — an electronic message, a.k.a. e-mail, in capital letters. They say it's "screaming" to do so. By standard definition, we presume that is the same as shouting or yelling. Are all judges, as well as their court clerks and attorneys, shouting at us when they corrupt our proper names in this manner? (If so, what happened to the decorum of a court if everyone is yelling?) Is the insurance company screaming at us for paying the increased premium on our Policy? This is doubtful as to any standard generalization, even though specific individual instances may indicate this to be true. It is safe to conclude, however, that it would also be informal to write a proper name in the same way. Does this also imply that those in the legal profession are writing our Christian names informally on court documents? Are not attorneys and the courts supposed to be specific, formally writing all legal documents to the "letter of the law?" If the law is at once both precise and not precise, what is its significance, credibility, and force and effect? New Oxford Dictionary of English "The New Oxford Dictionary of English" is published by the Oxford University Press. Besides being considered the foremost authority on the British English language, this dictionary is also designed to reflect the way language is used today through example sentences and phrases. We submit the following definitions from the 1998 edition: Proper noun (also proper name). Noun. A name used for an individual person, place, ororganization, spelled with an initial capital letter, e.g. Jane, London, and Oxfam. Name. Noun 1 A word or set of words by which a person, animal, place, or thing is known,addressed, or referred to: my name is Parsons, John Parsons. Kalkwasser is the German name for limewater. Verb 2 Identify by name; give the correct name for: the dead man has been named as John Mackintosh. Phrases. 3 In the name of. Bearing or using the name of aspecified person or organization: a driving license in the name of William Sanders. From the "Newbury House Dictionary of American English," published by Monroe Allen Publishers, Inc., (1999): name n. I [C] a word by which a person, place, or thing is known: Her name is Diane Daniel. We can find absolutely no example in any recognized reference book that specifies or allows the use of all capitalized names, proper or common. There is no doubt that a proper name, to be grammatically correct, must be written with only the first letter capitalized, with the remainder of the word in a name spelled with lower case letters. US Government Style Manual Is the spelling and usage of a proper name defined officially by US Government? Yes. The United States Government Printing Office in their "Style Manual," March 1984 edition (the most recent edition published as of March 2000), provides comprehensive grammar, style and usage for all government publications, including court and legal writing. Chapter 3, "Capitalization," at § 3.2, prescribes rules for proper names: "Proper names are capitalized. [Examples given are] Rome, Brussels, John Macadam, Macadam family, Italy, Anglo-Saxon." At Chapter 17, "Courtwork, the rules of capitalization," as mentioned in Chapter 3, are further reiterated: "17.1. Courtwork differs in style from other work only as set forth in this section; otherwise the style prescribed in the preceding sections will be followed." After reading §17 in entirety, I found no other references that would change the grammatical rules and styles specified in Chapter 3 pertaining to capitalization. At § 17.9, this same official US Government manual states: "In the titles of cases the first letter of all principal words are capitalized, but not such terms as defendant and appellee." This wholly agrees with Texas Law Review's Manual on "Usage & Style" as referenced above. Examples shown in § 17.12 are also consistent with the aforementioned §17.9 specification: that is, all proper names are to be spelled with capital first letters; the balance of each spelled with lower case letters. Grammar, Punctuation, and Capitalization "The National Aeronautics and Space Administration" (NASA) has publish one of the most concise US Government resources on capitalization. NASA publication SP49;7084, "Grammar, Punctuation, and Capitalization." A Handbook for Technical Writers and Editors, was compiled and written by the NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. At Chapter 4, "Capitalization," they state in 4.1 "Introduction:" "First we should define terms used when discussing capitalization: • All caps means that every letter in an expression is capital, LIKE THIS. • Caps & lc means that the principal words of an expression are capitalized, Like This. • Caps and small caps refer to a particular font of type containing small capital letters instead of lowercase letters.Elements in a document such as headings, titles, and captions may be capitalized in either sentence style or headline style: • Sentence style calls for capitalization of the first letter, and proper nouns of course.• Headline style calls for capitalization of all principal words (also called caps & lc). Modern publishers tend toward a down style of capitalization, that is, toward use of fewer capitals, rather than an up style." Here we see that in headlines, titles, captions, and in sentences, there is no authorized usage of all caps. At 4.4.1. "Capitalization With Acronyms," we find the first authoritative use for all caps: "Acronyms are always formed with capital letters. Acronyms are often coined for a particular program or study and therefore require definition. The letters of the acronym are not capitalized in the definition unless the acronym stands for a proper name: Wrong - The best electronic publishing systems combine What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG) features... Correct - The best electronic publishing systems combine what you see is what you get (WYSIWYG) features... But Langley is involved with the National Aero-Space Plane (NASP) Program.” This cites, by example, that using all caps is allowable in an acronym. "Acronyms" are words formed from the initial letters of successive parts of a term. They never contain periods and are often not standard, so that definition is required. Could this apply to lawful proper Christian names? If that were true, then JOHN SMITH would have to follow a definition of some sort, which it does not. For example, only if JOHN SMITH were defined as 'John Orley Holistic Nutrition of the Smith Medical Institute To Holistics (JOHN SMITH)' would this apply. The most significant section appears at 4.5., "Administrative Names": "Official designations of political divisions and of other organized bodies are capitalized:• Names of political divisions;• Canada, New York State;• United States Northwest Territories;• Virgin Islands, Ontario Province;• Names of governmental units, US Government Executive Department, US Congress, US Army; • US Navy.” According to this official US Government publication, the States are never to be spelled in all caps such as “NEW YORK STATE.” The proper English grammar — and legal — style is “New York State.” This agrees, once again, with Texas Law. Review's Manual on Usage & Style. The Use of a Legal Fiction The Real Life Dictionary of the Law The authors of "The Real Life Dictionary of the Law," Gerald and Kathleen Hill, are accomplished scholars and writers. Gerald Hill is an experienced attorney, judge, and law instructor. Here is how the term legal fiction is described: "Legal fiction. n. A presumption of fact assumed by a court for convenience, consistency orto achieve justice. There is an old adage: Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions.' Oran's Dictionary of the Law From Oran's "Dictionary of the Law," published by the West Group 1999, within the definition of "Fiction" is found: "A legal fiction is an assumption that something that is (or may be) false or nonexistent is true or real. Legal fictions are assumed or invented to help do justice. For example, bringing a lawsuit to throw a nonexistent ‘John Doe’ off your property used to be the only way to establish a clear right to the property when legal title was uncertain." Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law "Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law" 1996 states: "legal fiction: something assumed in law to be fact irrespective of the truth or accuracy of that assumption. Example: the legal fiction that a day has no fractions — Fields V. Fairbanks North Star Borough, 818 P.2d 658 (1991)." This is the reason behind the use of all caps when writing a proper name. The US and State Governments are deliberately using a legal fiction to "address" the lawful, real, flesh-and-blood man or woman. We say Poster Comment: "Why do attorneys, court clerks, prosecutors judges, insurance companies, banks, credit card companies, utility companies, etc. always use all capital letters when writing a proper name?" Assuming you all are a "living flesh and blood human beings" as compared to a bank, insurance company, credit card company, utility company, etc. you CAN NOT deal with the aforementioned "legal fictions". Since a bank is a "Legal fiction" and NOT a "flesh and blood" being, you 'authorise' the strawman, 'all caps' counterfit name of yours at the top of your check by signing at the bottom right of your check. Thus there are two "legal fictions" dealing with each other, the bank and your all caps "strawman name". If you look at the line you sign your name on with a somewhat powerful magnifying glass you will see that it IS NOT A LINE but actually is "micro printing".
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.
#12. To: Itistoolate (#0)
don't you mean UN-CONNNN stitutional? and wouldn't an "Un-CON" be a good thing? ;-/
don't you mean UN-CONNNN stitutional? and wouldn't an "Un-CON" be a good thing? ;-/ I like your way of thinking. "... Now, what people have to realize is there are remedies for the problems that not just America faces, but the World. There are people all over the World that know what is going on and they are doing something about it. People all over America are emerging victorious over the images in their minds. Let us not forget the absolute astonishing amount of debt discharges that have taken place over the last few months. What is happening in America is unbelievable. People are coming out of the delusions, they have figured and realized that the United States is a fiction and that it only exists in our minds. Tens of thousands of people now know that the "United States" does not exist and that it never has. There is no such thing as the National debt or a loan from the bank. Has any one ever seen "current credit money ?" The entire governmental system only exists in your mind. ......" [ATKHWDI note to God's people, His church : this is where bible.cc/isaiah/10-24.htm comes in....see Matthew Henry's word to the church. Take heart, I believe God is on the move: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...?ArtNum=96074&Disp=51#C51 ]. By: Stephen Kimbol Ames Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows: S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows: "This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997." Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law. Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.' **** What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were working hand-n-hand to bring the people of America to there knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15) Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80. On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not incredible the King funded both sides of the War. But there was more work that needed to be done. Now the Articles of Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12 " All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed,and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged." Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were not done yet. Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so called founding fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt. On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don't believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject. What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person. "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272 There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction. Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution. Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it states; All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it. The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol.The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the floundering fathers and their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. [ATKHWDI Note: **** Major prophecy regarding America fulfilled, as I have said for years now: Genesis 15:13-14 bible.cc/genesis/15-13.htm / Galatians 3:16...29 bible.cc/galatians/3-16.htm / bible.cc/galatians/3-29.htm / ] How many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!! [Amen: Genesis 15:13] If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states " But, indeed, **** no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it." Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) which states that it is the militia's job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States.... the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is their to collect our substance. As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves. [Patrick Henry SMELLED THE RAT!!! and wouldn't sign the CONNNNN-stitution!] If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was , he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King wanted them here. Here is the key to were this started: Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit: "Everything in the **** Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. [ATKHWDI note: ummmm....I believe the One the Babylonian Talmud calls a "false prophet, boiling in hell in hot excrement and semen", said this. http://kingjbible.com/galatians/4.htm , verse 25.] Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactment's and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher." We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure"). Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that ***** the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that ***** the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how ***** the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, ***** which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. ***** The written credit agreement -- the Jewish shetar is a lien on all property (realty) and today it's called the mortgage! ***** The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great Britain and the Jews are in charge of the BaNking system. *****We are living under the Babylonian Talmud, it is were all of our problems come from. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist. Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people, ***** you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below. "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520 You have to understand that Great Britain,(Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why ? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why ? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of examples: "The primary control and custody of infant is with the government" Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62 " Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146. "The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor. "The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under government." Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481 Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States Government. All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. with holding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a. These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form. [ATKHWDI Note: 1040 is the year the Jews came out of Babylon.] IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K. Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through **** a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One. and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets connected to it's udders ? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the other slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor. You are called an extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don;t want to be a slave. But, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they want bow down and worship corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not the problem, it is the other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be-slaves were gone. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope would not even exist, because no one would acknowledge them. I for a matter of fact, think that those who are in power are also tired of the slaves. All the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free healthcare, free education, free housing and they beg those who are in power to disarm them I do agree that a slave should not have access to a firearm. How can you disagree with the government passing out birth control ? I hope the breeding of slaves stops or at the very least slows down. You see we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope. Now to Rome......." [it continues] [pardon my yelling.] Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security THE ULTIMATE DELUSION http://www.apfn.org/APFN/queen.htm [I believe Eustace Mullins, who of course has investigated the "Federal" "Reserve" for over 60 years, says the Vatican is also owned by the bankers.] ============================================== COME OUT OF BABYLON, MY PEOPLE, SO THAT YOU DO NOT RECEIVE OF HER PLAGUES..... COME OUT AND TOUCH NOT THE UNCLEAN THING, AND I WILL BE A FATHER UNTO YOU, AND YOU SHALL BE MY SONS AND DAUGHTERS. bible.cc/2_corinthians/6-17.htm / http://kingjbible.com/2_corinthians/6.htm THEN SHALL THE KING SAY UNTO THEM ON HIS RIGHT HAND, COME, YE BLESSED OF MY FATHER, INHERIT THE KINGDOM PREPARED FOR YOU FROM THE FOUNDATION OF THE WORLD: ================================= 7 The LORD taketh my part with them that help me: therefore shall I see my desire upon them that hate me. 8 It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man. 9 It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in princes. 10 All nations compassed me about: but in the name of the LORD will I destroy them. 11 They compassed me about; yea, they compassed me about: but in the name of the LORD I will destroy them. 12 They compassed me about like bees: they are quenched as the fire of thorns: ["BEEHIVE" http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...?ArtNum=96074&Disp=51#C51 ] for in the name of the LORD I will destroy them. [ bible.cc/micah/4-13.htm ] 13 Thou hast thrust sore at me that I might fall: but the LORD helped me. [ bible.cc/micah/4-13.htm ]. 14 The LORD is my strength and song, and is become my salvation. 15 The voice of rejoicing and salvation is in the tabernacles of the righteous: the right hand of the LORD doeth valiantly. 16 The right hand of the LORD is exalted: the right hand of the LORD doeth valiantly. 17 I shall not die, but live, and declare the works of the LORD. 18 The LORD hath chastened me sore: but he hath not given me over unto death. [ bible.cc/zechariah/9-12.htm ]. 19 Open to me the gates of righteousness: I will go into them, and I will praise the LORD: 20 This gate of the LORD, into which the righteous shall enter. 21 I will praise thee: for thou hast heard me, and art become my salvation. 22 The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner. 23 This is the LORD's doing; it is marvellous in our eyes. 24 This is the day which the LORD hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. 25 Save now, I beseech thee, O LORD: O LORD, I beseech thee, send now prosperity. [ EDIT: bible.cc/2_chronicles/7-14.htm / Ephesians 3:14-15 http://kingjbible.com/ephesians/3.htm ] 26 Blessed be he that cometh in the name of the LORD: we have blessed you out of the house of the LORD. 27 God is the LORD, which hath shewed us light: bind the sacrifice with cords, even unto the horns of the altar. 28 Thou art my God, and I will praise thee: thou art my God, I will exalt thee. 29 O give thanks unto the LORD; for he is good: for his mercy endureth for ever. http://kingjbible.com/psalms/118.htm ======================================== As I said over here: http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...gi?ArtNum=96568&Disp=3#C3 ................ **** Nail it to the church door. Tell them it's time to wakie, wakie: http://kingjbible.com/isaiah/52.htm How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the floundering fathers and their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. BUT "THEIR" PLANTATION IS NOT THEIRS, BUT THE LORD'S: CROSS AT CAPE HENRY: The enduring legacy of the First Landing Apr 27, 2007 ... ... The event was the first landing of the Jamestown settlers. ... In fact, it was an actual gauntlet thrown in the face of the enemies of Christianity. ... "This land now belongs to Christ and His people." http://www.worldnetdaily.com/new...icle.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55421 [and as I said, pardon me for yelling.]
great information, I'm gonna save it for a more careful read later. do you have any more info on this specifically?
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England? Save this: FEDERAL JUDGE STATES 717-567-7675. 5/98: [quoting] **** During the trial of James and Sharon Patterson, (Case 6:97-CR-51) William Wayne Justice, Judge of the United States District Court Texas-Eastern Division when presented with law stated: "I take my orders from England. This is not a law this court goes by." For all of those who did not believe that the United States was under Great Britain here it is straight from the mouth of a Federal Judge. How much more evidence 'do you need?' America has never been Free. The Revolutionary war was a fraud perpetrated on the American people. The war's purpose was to centralize power and make the people easier to control. All Federal Judges, Congressmen, U.S. Attorneys, State Judges, Legislators and most Attorneys know this and are in fact British Agents. Their job is to keep the people in line and to be productive slaves which they (The British Agents) are greatly compensated for. The police do not know that they work for Great Britain they too have been decieved so don't attack them. It is time for everyone in America to know the Truth. Let us all work together in exposing the British Empire. Please re-fax and e-mail this release to every Attorney, Judge, and Legislator in your area to let them know they have been unmasked. Please get out your Yellow Pages and start faxing everyone in your area and also read this release over every radio show possible. We have printed thousands of evidence packages and mailed them across America that prove that the United States is a British Colony. It is time to send the British back to England. We must work together because if, we do not. we are all doomed. Your Friend. Stephen Kinbol Ames Jr. For More Information: Stephen Kinbol Ames, c/o P.O. Box 5373. Harrisburg. Pennsylvania 17110 Phone: 717-567-7675; Fax-717-567-2564 (And if one needs any further information, see August 22, 1997issue of Intelligence Review article "Britain's 'Invisible' Empire Unleashes The Dogs of War") [End quoting] Here is very good verification or what Hatonn has been telling us all along - "from the horse's mouth" see also: Secret Oath www.apfn.org/apfn/declaration.htm. ******************************. Royal oath soon no bar to lawyers. Tuesday 11 April 2000. Most lawyers can't wait ... www.apfn.org/APFN/secretoath.htm Lawyers Secret Oath Lawyers Secret Oath [link to http://www.apfn.org] Notice the part, down the page, where the Judge refuses to answer who the Principle is, ... www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message570574/pg1
sorry....this is very long....but it leads up to GOD'S END GAME: More by Stephen Ames: THE AMERICAN HALLUCINATION AN INDICTMENT OF THE AMERICAN MIND Subject: THE AMERICAN HALLUCINATION Here are some very shocking Essays that were written by Stephen Ames. I stumbled across them a while back. These Essays made me quite upset after reading them. The most shocking subjects in these essays has to be that Social Security numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF and what Stephen deduced from the bombing of the Murrah Building. He saw something in the bombing that I have never read or heard anyone talk about. When you read these Essays you will come to a complete understanding of how controlled we all are. Nicole Terry AN INDICTMENT OF THE AMERICAN MIND BY: Stephen Ames So how do most American's resolve conflicts they face when authority figures command them to negate human life or human dignity? The most important and best known study on obedience to authority was carried out by Stanely Milgram at Yale University in the early 1960's. His work can be found in the Journal of Abnormal and Social psychology, 67, 371-378 (1963) and in a book authored by him "Obedience to Authority" published by Harper and Row (1974). The most fascinating aspect of Milgram's work was that the results he came up with surprised both himself and his colleagues. In fact his work almost entirely escaped one of the most common complaints leveled at psychological research, namely that the experimental findings merely confirm common sense. There was a wide variety of people of different ages and occupations involved in the experiment. This is how the experiment worked. You are taken into a room and met by a 31 year old biology teacher, the experimenter. The other person in the room is a 47 year old accountant who is mild mannered and likable. The experimenter tells you that he is interested in learning about the effects of punishment on learning. It is decided by drawing lots that the accountant will be the learner and you will be the teacher. You go into a room where the learner is strapped into an "electric chair" and an electrode is strapped to his wrist. Electrode paste is applied to his wrist to avoid burns and blisters. You are told that the electrode is connected to a nearby shock generator. You go into another room, which has the shock generator unit in it. It has 30 lever switches, each labeled with a voltage between 15 and 450 volts. Groups of four switches of increasing voltage are labeled Slight Shock, moderate Shock, Strong Shock, very Strong Shock, Intense Shock, extreme Intensity Shock, and DANGER: Severe Shock. The final two levers are simply marked XXX. You are told to administer a shock to the learner each time he answers wrong and to move one level higher each time. As the learning tasks proceeds, the learner would make a number of mistakes and receive more intense shocks. After receiving shocks of 75, 90 and 105 volts, he would merely grunt. At 120 volts he would yell to the experimenter that the shocks were becoming painful. At 150 volts he would yell 'Get me out of here ! I won't be in this experiment anymore! I refuse to go on!" At 180 volts he yells "I can't stand the pain", and at 270 volts his response becomes a scream. Thereafter, there are screams of agony, and a vehement refusal to go on with the experiment or provide answers to questions. When the 300 volt shock is reached, he pounds on the wall. If you , the "teacher", say at any point that you don't want to continue the experiment, the experimenter calmly informs you that you must. What would you do in that situation? What do you think other people would do? Stanely Milgram put these two questions to psychiatrists, students and middle class adults. When predicting their own behavior, absolutely everyone predicted that they would defy the experimenter and refuse to continue with the experiment. People tend to have a high opinion of themselves. For example, psychiatrists at a leading medical school predicted that only 3.73 percent of subjects would obey the experimenter at 300 volts and that only 1 in a 1000 would go to the 450 volt stage. Most people unfamiliar with the actual results would predict that only a psychopath or a sadist would be likely to keep on administering intense electric shocks to an obviously distraught, tortured and unwilling subject. But, in fact, Milgram found that 62 percent of the people exposed to the conditions just described continued to obey the experimenter to the lethal 450 volt level! In fact 500 times as many individuals prepared to administer the maximum shock as predicted by a group of psychiatrists! The learner was in collusion with the experimenter and did not actually receive any electric shocks at all. The study was rigged so that the mild mannered accountant was always the learner and the subject would always be the teacher. Milgram also argued that what critics of his work really objected to was the terrible picture it drew of human nature rather than the deception or methodology involved. Would the Milgram study have been the subject of public outrage if all the participants had disobeyed the experimenter at the first sign of discomfort from the learner? The evidence suggests not. Several people were given a description of the Milgram study; some were told that most of the participants were obedient to the experimenter, and the rest that most of them were disobedient. They rated the experiment as more harmful and as providing a worse experience when there was a large measure of obedience. In the Milgram study, the experimenter represented an authority figure. His authority was enhanced by the special coat he wore, by his association with Yale university, by his aura of expertise in human behavior. On the other hand the "learner" in the Milgram study did everything he could to persuade the subject to stop administering shocks. He screamed, he begged the subject to stop and in some cases he even said he had a heart condition. The participant was unable to satisfy both the experimenter and the victim of torture. Most people chose to side with the experimenter. The experimenter was perceived as a authority figure so obedience, even commands to commit torture were considered the norm. After the experiment the subjects were debriefed and it was explained to them that the were not really electrocuting the learner. When a human being was replaced with a puppy in a Milgram type experiment in which actual electricity was used because you can't make a puppy yelp and howl without pain. Only 54 per cent of male participants would administer a genuine electric shock to the puppy. But 100 per cent of the female participants were prepared to give the most severe shock to the howling and yelping puppy. This I find very troubling. A psychiatrist by the name of R.D. Laing along with numerous other psychiatrists claim that mental illness is a myth. They argue, anyone allegedly suffering from mental illness is simply behaving in ways which deviate from those which are expected. I would like to point out that anyone who would not inflict 450 volts into another human being on command is outside of the normal in American Society Largely America (62 per cent) is made up of sadists, psychopaths and potential murderers and considers behavior outside of their own as abnormal. They label those who are unlike them as mentally ill or criminals. For example, most American's tend to become quite upset if you do not want to pay the Internal Revenue Service. First, the Internal Revenue Service is not a United States Government Agency, it is an Agency of the International Monetary Fund; second, there is no law in the United States Code requiring the vast majority of the American people to pay or file anything with the Internal Revenue Service; third, a 1040 form is for a payment of a debt to Great Britain; fourth, not one electron collected by the Internal Revenue Service goes to the United States government (The United States has not had a Treasury since 1921); fifth, the Internal Revenue Service does not collect money, It collects electrons. It has to collect these electrons or pretended hyperinflation would set in. The electrons collected by the Internal Revenue Service are not placed into an account, the electrons are simply deleted. People do not seem to be able to grasp that a loan is nothing more than computer key strokes. The only reason that there is interest on a pretended loan is because people might figure out what is going on, because in their minds banks make money by charging interest on loans. The reality of the situation is banks do not make loans. Banks put electrons into circulation. People make payments in electrons on what they think is the principle plus the interest of a loan. If you want to pay the Internal revenue Service or a Bank just send them a nine volt battery and tell them to keep the change. Whether they collect electrons or not is debatable. It depends on whether or not you agree with Max Planck, because waves are particles and particles are waves. (We are told that there is not a unified theory and that physicists are searching for it, that is not true. Your entire existence, commerce, religion, reality and very thoughts can be summed up in this equation. This equation is not a theory but, a proof. The proof is: 1.602 x 10-19 C à E¥ FT = h /E¥m h/ E¥m [coupled with] Ft = I I à D3 D3 = R (R being "Reality") eR = 0 Zero is the absence of quantity and a linguistic element. To make matters even worse , when you don't pay the Internal Revenue Service or a bank, people consider you a criminal or a dead beat. You are then prosecuted by someone who is a subordinate (Pretended U.S. Attorney paid by the IMF in electrons) of the Alien Property Custodian (Pretended Attorney General of the United States, INTERPOL agent, paid in electrons by IMF). I almost forgot: You are the Alien. Read the list below: 1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. 2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. 3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. 4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. 5. The Attorney General of the U.S. is not employed by the U.S. But is an Agent of INTERPOL which is head quartered in Lyons, France. 6. The United States does not have any employees. 7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. 8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. 9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. 10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. 11. You are an "Institutional Unit" in which your body and labor are pledged to the UN through the IMF. 12. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System. 13. Your Social Security number is your slave number. Just about everyone in the World has a Social Security number from the UN through the IMF. 14. The UN is a One World Super Government. 15. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations. 16. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct. 17. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. 18. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. 19. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. 20. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. GUESS WHO AND WHAT OWNS YOU AND THE UNITED NATIONS ? As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives, imagined Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal Judges are not paid by the United States Government. Actually the United States Government does not have any employees They are paid by the International Monetary Fund in electrons. You see there is no such thing as the United States Government. In reality there are no Governments. There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the Federal Reserve Inc., and the United States Inc., which in fact are private corporations. The United States Inc., is just a slave management company. Guess what that makes you? If you said property, you are correct! You are Human Capital. The shares that were issued for the Federal Reserve when it was created back in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain. To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 U.S.C. 903, 12 U.S.C. 95, 18 U.S.C.A. 914, 22 U.S.C. 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public Law 89-719, Public Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151 Public Law 103-465, House Report 103-826 T.D.O 150-10, T.D.O. 92, 41 Stat. Chap 214 pg. 654, Emergency Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of Agreement 60 Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2), United Nations Secretariat Revised System of National Accounting, Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Cromelin v. United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United States, 493 F.Supp 673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, United States v. LePatourel, 571 F2d 405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30, Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493. 42 Pa.C.S.A. 502. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs. When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has been nothing but a hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that there is NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are fictions accepted by you because you have been lied to and poisoned your entire life.. What would you do without an external authority commanding you what to do and what not to do? Would you be lost? Did you ever think that maybe you would find yourself? I am not afraid to acknowledge that I am an incomplete 'Being in motion' searching for my reason for existing in this Petry dish commonly called Earth. The evidence in my possession cannot be rebutted. Think twice before labeling me. One can quickly become diagnosed mentally ill for stating the facts listed above. Most American's want people who research and discover things such as those listed above to be locked away or murdered because, it holds a mirror up to them and shows the evil that actually lurks in their hearts. That is exactly what has happened to me. Don't you want my death? The people here in Pennsylvania love death. They also want Mumia Jamal, Lisa Lambert and a host of other innocent people murdered. When federal Judge Danzell released Lisa Lambert on a Habeas Corpus the people here in Central Pennsylvania wanted Judge Danzell impeached. They want Lisa Lambert dead. Judge Danzell said that Lisa Lambert's case was the worst case that he has ever seen in the English speaking world. Like Jim Morrison said in the film "The Doors", "Hatred is a very under estimated emotion." I will be dead soon enough. I am living in a "madhouse" now. I have been living here for a couple of months. I am on a steady diet of Lithium Haldol etc., which sooner or later kills you. It's not that I really want to live in this world but, the death caused by the mixture of Lithium and Haldol is a terrible form of torture. I don't like it here. I don't have anyone to talk to. I don't even have my own room. I feel so sorry for the people that live here. In my opinion not one of them is mentally ill. They all seem to be suffering from living through terrible childhood's and never having anyone in their lives who cared about or loved them. I am glad that they did allow me to bring my computer with me. So I just sit here on the floor and type away. This essay will probably never be read by anyone. It is more of a diary than an essay. I am writing it for myself and my children. I write everyday and save it on disk so that when my children grow up, they can read for themselves why their dad was locked away in a home for the Insane. I never thought that they would go this far and do this to me and rob my children of their father. But, I do the unspeakable -- I commit thought crimes. THE END Labels for you and me. By: Stephen Ames The importance of labels was memorably expressed by R.D.Laing. He claimed that if someone labeled a scientist said "All men are machines", he might receive a Nobel prize. In contrast, if someone labeled a schizophrenic said "I am a machine", he would promptly be locked away. An attempt to evaluate the relative merits of these two diametrically opposed positions, was made by David Rosenhan of Stanford University. David Rosenhan was extremely interested in the various approaches that have been adopted towards the treatment of psychiatric disorders. He wondered, is it really as simple to distinguish between normality and abnormality as is implied by the medical model? Finally he came up with a way of trying to determine how well psychiatrist are able to distinguish between the normal and the abnormal, or between the sane and insane. What would happen if a number of entirely sane people attempted to gain admission to a mental hospital by pretending to have one of the symptoms of insanity? Would they be classified insane ? If they were admitted, would the staff realize that a mistake had been made? The answers to these and other questions were obtained in a study in which eight normal people, five men and three women, attempted to gain admission to twelve different psychiatric hospitals. The twelve psychiatric hospitals were located in five different states on the East and West coasts. Each of the eight participants phoned the hospital asking for an appointment. Upon arrival at the admissions office, each of them complained of hearing voices (these voices were often unclear, but appeared to be saying 'empty', 'hollow', and 'thud'. All were judged to be insane, and all were admitted to the hospital, on the basis of their symptom. One was diagnosed as manic-depressive psychosis, the others as schizophrenic. But as soon as they had been admitted the participants stopped simulating signs of abnormality, although several had a brief period of nervousness and anxiety because they felt they would immediately be exposed as frauds. While in the hospital, the participants indicated that they felt well and were no longer troubled by 'voices'. In general, they behaved in a friendly and cooperative way. The only strange activity they engaged in was they spent time writing down their observations about the ward they were in. To begin with, these notes were written in secret, but it became clear that the staff did not notice, so the note-taking was done quite openly. This, in my humble opinion, was accomplished because most people who work on a psychiatric ward (This is from personal experience) are some of the lowest functioning people in society. Their main concern is control of your thoughts and emotions. They seem to enjoy overpowering you to the point of the destruction of your mental faculties. What they can not accomplish with torture and punishment, they accomplish through pharmaceuticals. If you resist the taking of the pharmaceuticals, you will be held down and be given them by either injection or enema. The structure of the various hospitals was such that those of the greatest professional status had the least to do with their patients. The average daily contact of the participants was about 6 minutes. The actual length of hospitalization ranged from 7 to 52 days. The fact that all the participants were released within a few weeks would make you think that the psychiatric staff discovered that they had been sane all the time, but no. All of the participants were discharged with a diagnosis of 'schizophrenia in remission.' Quite a number of the real patients did become suspicious about the participants. The first three participants were placed in wards with a total of 118 patients, 35 of the patients voiced their doubts that the participants were mentally ill. They said things like 'You're a journalist, or a professor. You're checking up on the hospital.' These findings suggest that the distinction between the sane and insane is so blurred that psychiatrists constantly diagnose the sane for the insane. It is ironic that over 30 percent of the real patients knew that the participants were sane. As a matter of fact the participants, after insisting that they were ill to the real bona-fide patients, the real patients still didn't buy it and insisted that the participants were sane. Rosenhan wondered whether he could show the opposite effect, the insane being sane. He chose as his testing ground a research and teaching hospital. The staff there had heard about the previous experiment and informed Rosenhan that they would not be fooled. The first thing Rosenhan did was inform the hospital staff at this hospital that he was going to send in one or more pseudo-patients and have them attempt to gain admission into the psychiatric ward during the following three months. Each member of the staff was asked to observe all patients who presented themselves for admission or in the ward and say whether they thought they were his pseudo-patients or genuine patients. Judgments were made on a total of 193 patients admitted for psychiatric treatment. Forty-one genuine patients were judged to be his pseudo-patients by at least one member of the staff. Nineteen patients were suspected of being frauds by one of the psychiatrists and another member of the staff. But the fact is, none of Rosenhan's pseudo-patients sought admittance during this time. The people that were judged to be impostors were in fact real patients. The staff did not know the difference. This proves that mental hospital staff do know that they are admitting people, diagnosing them mentally ill, prescribing them dangerous pharmaceuticals, even forcing them to ingest the pharmaceuticals when they know quite well that the people are sane. Rosenhan's conclusion was: 'It's clear that we cannot distinguish the sane from the insane in psychiatric hospitals'. One of the other points made by Rosenhan concerned the degrading conditions experienced by his pseudo-patients during their stays in the Psychiatric Wards. Rosenhan himself saw a patient beaten for walking up to one of the staff members and saying 'I like you'. On numerous occasions, when the pseudo-patients approached staff members with polite requests for information, the staff simply ignored the request over 80 percent of the time and did not answer. When a question was presented to a psychiatrist it went unanswered and ignored over 70 percent of the time. That is how people are treated in the psychiatric wards at the hospitals that I have been admitted to also. Then if you ask more than once you are then threatened. Now think about this. How many people receive chemotherapy for cancer when the fact is they don't have cancer at all. What about heart disease ? How many people are prescribed dangerous pharmaceuticals for heart disease that do not have heart disease. Last year over 170,000 people's deaths were caused by prescription drugs. Yet the American people line up for them. About 3,500 deaths were caused by illicit drugs such as crack, meth, heroin etc and zero deaths from marijuana. Yet you will go to prison if you are caught possessing one of these drugs and you will go to prison for a very long time if you are caught selling one of these drugs. The bottom line is that the drug dealer on the corner is responsible for far less deaths than medical doctors. The difference is that the drug dealer on the corner does not have a license to KILL like the M.D.! These are prime examples of the Cognitive Dissonance of the common American mind. THE END The Thoughtless Mind BY: Stephen Ames The bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City is one of the most sensational experiments ever conducted on the American people. Everyone thinks there is a Government cover-up. The truth of the matter is there is no Government cover-up. The Government wants you to think that there is a cover-up. On the first day of the bombing when they kept reporting that there were more bombs in the building when actually there weren't. They want you to think that there were more bombs in the building. Then in a few hours they changed their story after heavily reporting the existence of more bombs. You see the reason they committed such a tragic event was to keep you glued to the television. The bombing was committed to see how malleable the minds of the American people are. They needed something sensational to keep you tuned in. The bombing's only purpose was to see if the people would have a complete lack of memory not just day to day but hour to hour. The bombing was not about passing laws or attacking the patriot or militia movement. It was about time factors and the malleability of facts after they are presented over and over. They actually killed more than one bird with this stone. They then proceeded to get people to say that there was a cover-up happening. That is what they want you to think. If they can't convince you that there is a cover-up, then it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt just how non-thinking the American people are. This was by far one of the most high risk maneuvers ever by the Government. But, they needed to know. The results are astounding, most people are convinced that Timothy McVeigh in a Ryder truck did it. Other people think that the Government did it and that they screwed up and are trying to cover it up. The truth is Timothy Mcveigh didn't do it, the Government did it and the Government is NOT trying to cover it up. Actually everything went as planned and is still going that way. There are numerous books and tapes about the supposed cover-up. People who are producing these tapes and books don't know it, but they are doing the leg work. The American people do not understand psychology and the experimentation that is performed on their minds on a daily basis. I would venture to say excluding lawyers and their kind, that maybe one in a hundred thousand understand what the bombing of the Murrah Building was for. [[See APFN web page: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_coverup.htm ]] A great example of symbolism is their Gold Fringed Flag. Which according to various pretend Army regulations and executive order signifies when flown in a courtroom, that the court is a Military court. I know they laugh when someone argues with a pretended judge that his court is a Military court. The person does not seem to realize that he has just acknowledged that he is insane because he just called the room in which he is standing a courtroom. When in fact there is no such thing. [[See APFN web page: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm ]] **** An exceptional act that these pretended judges and lawyers are not laughing about is a process that is known as Redemption. Does this process work? You bet it does. The Redemption Process is entirely based on fictions. By engaging in this Process known as Redemption life is being breathed into the ultimate fictional code that binds their fictional system together. This fictional law is known as the Uniform Commercial Code. People pretend that they are a creditor instead of pretending that they are a debtor. This allows people to do anything they want and not be prosecuted for it and if one really understands the Uniform Commercial Code, one can purchase anything one wants without having to labor like the rest of the slaves. The act of acknowledging the Code brings the entire pretended government to life. When you pretend to be a creditor instead of a debtor the pretended judges and lawyers become your servants. You have to know exactly what you are doing or they will warehouse you. The Uniform Commercial Code is the rules of the Hallucination. That is why the Redemption Process is successful. The idea and concept that in order for me to trade goods and services with someone on the other side of an imaginary line, I must pay a pretended tax with pretended money (a few electrons) known as a tariff. Tariffs were created for one reason and one reason only. That reason is so you would think that there is a such thing as a Country. Countries are needed to keep people divided so that wars can be manufactured. The wars also serve the purpose of making you think that there is such a thing as a Country. By keeping the people divided it becomes necessary in the minds of the people to have a Government to protect them from the bad Countries. Of course what you think is a bad Country is the good Country in the eyes of the people who live there and your Country is the bad Country. Much of the division is based on religion. People will readily commit acts of genocide in the name of their religion. Marriage is a really strange concept. You purchase a license from a pretended government with electrons. Then you enter into a building that has a large phallus on top of it. Then you stand in front of an agent from the International Monetary Fund and take a vow that you will have sex with the same person for the rest of your life which of course you know isn't true. Not only do you enter into a contract with the other person, but the pretended government that you purchased the License from is also a party to it. Actually it is the controlling party. It is also an alter-ego of the International Monetary Fund. I have this all documented. I almost forgot: most of the buildings that people get married in, also fly the Gold Fringed Flag. Voting is total lunacy. You vote for pretended Senators, Representatives and a President who are your sworn enemies. Don't believe it? In march of 1933 the "Trading with The Enemy Act" was amended declaring those who call themselves "citizens of the United States" the enemy. That is how Frank captured the gold, by executive order from the American people. You are literally the enemy of the Fictional U.S. Government. America is not in a moral crisis. America is in an Intelligence crisis. Over 50 percent of American's have an I.Q. between 90 and 110. This allows them to eat, sleep, labor and breed but not much more. It is an impossibility for most American's to understand even the simplest of abstract concepts or to follow the simplest of instructions. Logic, analytical and quantum reasoning are completely out of the question. Most American's are functionally illiterate. THIS IS NOT THEIR FAULT! It is because of the food supply being deficient in nutrition. American's lack of intelligence is also caused by vaccines, pharmaceuticals, fluorides, detergents, industrial cleaners commonly called shampoo etc. Americans have been poisoned. Less than 0.5 percent of American's have an I.Q. of 140 or over. Most of these people rule over the others. Take lawyers for example. You just don't decide to be a lawyer. After four years of schooling you have to take the LSAT. The LSAT is a test based mostly on analytical reasoning. The LSAT plays a major role in what Magic Law School one may be accepted into. Not all Magic Law School's are created equal. Yale University only accepts 3 percent of the applicants. Now a buffoon would not even apply to such a prestigious School so, we are talking the best of the best and out of them only three percent are accepted. So after four years of schooling in a pre law program you have to attend Magic Law School for three years in order to become a lawyer. Even after all of that you still must pass the BAR exam. To be a 'Magic Law Man' (Lawyer) it takes a lot of study, discipline and intelligence. I don't like lawyers but, I do like watching them work their magic. I really enjoy reading their magic papers such as motions and briefs. To me, watching a lawyer at work is by far the most enjoyable activity one can engage in. Even after all of the horrible things that lawyers have done to me, I still enjoy them. All lawyers lie. They have to in order to keep the people hallucinating. Lawyers will ever tell the truth. No one would believe them anyway. They want your mind. They even are confident enough to report it in the Congressional Record. For example: "We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain." Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical School, Congressional Record, No 26, vol. 118 February 24, 1974. People have to come to grips with the fact that enlightenment is the casting off the bonds of concept (ignorance) so that one may directly perceive the inexpressible nature of undifferentiated reality. For some reason that I do not understand, people do not look at undifferentiated reality the same as an enlightened being. Words only represent (re-present) something else. Words are not real things. In an illusory reality everything is a symbol. The reality of symbols is illusory. One must understand that governments are brought into your mind through symbols such as flags, codes, constitutions and statutes which are the will of your Master being imposed on you. Undifferentiated reality can not be expressed. Symbols cannot be used to describe it. Enlightenment is a state of being and it is not describable. People seem to want to make the description of the state of being, the state itself. A state of being is an experience. A description of a state of being is a symbol. Symbols and experiences are not governed by the same rules. Max Born wrote: The ultimate origin of the difficulty lies in the fact (or philosophical principle) that we are compelled to use words of common language when we wish to describe a phenomenon, not by logical or mathematical analysis, but by a picture appealing to the imagination. Common language has grown by everyday experience and can never surpass these limits. THE END Crime and Commerce By Stephen Ames Let us examine just what a crime is. Crime. A positive or negative act in violation of penal law; an offense against the State or United States. Remember that the States and United States are fictions so, how can you damage a fiction. What about a Tort? Tort. ( from Lat. torquere, to twist, tortus, twisted, wrestled aside). A private or civil wrong or injury, including action for bad faith breach of contract, for which the court will provide a remedy in the form of an action for damages. K Mart Corp. v. Ponsock, 103 Nev. 39, 732 P2d 1364, 1368. A legal wrong committed upon the person or property independent of contract. It may be either (1) a direct invasion of some legal right of the individual; (2) the infraction of some public duty by which special damage accrues to the individual: (3) the violation of some private obligation by which like damage accrues to the individual. Notice that a crime is an act against the State, but a tort is against an individual. So if you murder someone how is that a crime against the State? Please note that when you are charged with an offense, you are charged with violating a code or statute, not for violating the individual. The reason this is being done is because the State claims to own you, so if you kill someone it is the State that has been damaged. A tort is either mala in se or a breech of contract that causes a damage. There must be intent, but to commit a crime against the State there does not need to be intent. Mala prohibita. Prohibited wrongs or offenses; acts which are made offenses by positive laws, and prohibited as such. Acts or omissions which are made criminal by statute but which, of themselves, are not criminal. Generally, no criminal intent or mens rea is required and the mere accomplishment of the act or omission is sufficient for criminal liability. Term is used in contrast to mala in se which are acts which are wrong in themselves such as robbery. When you don't file a 1040, that is an omission. Statute. A formal written enactment of a legislative body, whether federal, state, city, or county. An act of the legislature declaring, commanding, or prohibiting something; a particular law enacted and established by the will of the legislative department of government; the written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms necessary to constitute it the law of the state. Such may be public or private, declaratory, mandatory, directory, or enabling in nature. Will. Wish; desire; pleasure; inclination; choice; the faculty of conscious, and especially of deliberate, action. When a person expresses his "will" that a particular disposition be made of his property, his words are words of command, and the word "will" as so used is mandatory, comprehensive, and dispositive in nature. Will. An Instrument by which a person makes a disposition of his real and personal property, to take effect after his death, and which by its own nature is ambulatory and revocable during his lifetime. In re Brown's Estate, Tex Civ. App., 507 S.W. 2d 801, 803. Instrument. Anything reduced to writing, a document of a formal or solemn character, a writing given as a means of affording evidence. A document or writing which gives formal expression to a legal act or agreement, for the purpose of creating, securing, modifying, or terminating a right. A writing executed and delivered as the evidence of an act or agreement. Moore v. Diamond Dry Goods Co., 47 Ariz 128, 54 P2d 553, 554. Do you understand the Two different ways they use the word "will." What they do is reduce their "will" to writing and then enforce it at the point of a gun. This writing is also called a "Will." Will, Statute, Instrument, and Code are synonymous. Do you understand where this going? "Will" is the disposition of property by someone's command. A Statute is the Written Will of a Legislature. It used to be stated as "will and testament" Do you understand that when a Legislature passes an act they are creating or modifying a will. You are considered property of the State. Are you getting the picture? A code or statute is a "Will." The Codes and Statutes of every State are Wills. (Note. When you are charged and warehoused in a jail it is because you went against the "Will" of your "Master." It is not because you harmed another Being. --Nicole) Does not a 1040 form have a label? Label. Anything appended to a larger writing, as a codicil. In English law, a copy of a writ in the Exchequer. Exchequer. That department of the English government which has charge of the collection of the national revenue; the treasury department. Codicil. A supplement or addition to a will; it may explain, modify, add to, subtract from, qualify, alter, restrain or revoke provisions in existing will. Such does not purport to dispose of entire estate or to contain the entire will of testator, nor does it ordinarily expressly or by necessary implication revoke in toto a prior will. In re Crooke Estate, 388 Pa. 125, 130 A.2d 185, 187. Do you understand why people are forced to file a 1040 ? Because King George was the Prince Elector and Arch Treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire and of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA.[[ See APFN web page: http://www.apfn.org/apfn/colony.htm ]] ***** The Constitution is the "Will." Why do you think in the preamble to the Constitution it says "to ourselves and our Posterity?" Just read Article six section one. Remember the loans, IRS Publication 6209 (1040 for UK), the First Bank of the United States and numerous debt collection acts. Do you understand why in 26 U.S.C. there is no law requiring you to file? It is the Constitution that requires you to file, Article six section one! Do the IRS agents know this? Look at all of the Acts (Supplements to the Will) that have been passed to collect your labor, the symbols (electrons) that represent your labor. Now do you understand why the Constitution was never put to the people for a vote? It is because they were the property (citizens, persons, etc.) mentioned in the Will (Constitution). Now do you see why the Constitution was drafted in secret? Do you understand that when you pay with your labor you are adding electrons to the Estate and when you get a refund (electrons) you are subtracting from the Estate? Do you understand the importance of Codicil and Label? They don't even have to connect the machine to our udders, we are self-milking slaves. The words charge and discharge are used in the imaginary laws of commerce because we are forced through our ignorance to use electrons as a medium of exchange. Don't you ever wonder why you are asked by a cashier if you would like to charge it? The slip that the cashier hands you is the symbol of the electrons that have just entered the Circuit. Why do you think when you are dragged into one of their 'courts' they tell you that you have been 'charged'? What do you think a 'Transmitting Utility' in Article nine of the Uniform Commercial Code is? So guess what the Transmitter is? Guess what is being broadcast, charged and discharged? People do not see the wave only the symbol of the wave. They do not know that the wave even exists. Why do you think that they pass bills? A bill is a charge for goods or services. Then you have the 'Bill of Rights'. A 'Right' is one mans ability with the assistance of the state to control others (Blacks Law Dict.). That is why you must pay a filing fee when you file a suit against someone. You are being charged to use the State to force other people to be jurors, witnesses etc. Jurors are people who are being controlled by the State on your behalf. This is just a sampling of what has been done to us because of our greed, laziness, contempt for our fellow man, having the nerve to pretend to make laws and wanting something for nothing. We are having Electronic Warfare perpetrated on us. Our very physical bodies work upon electricity. Our thoughts are electricity. The thoughts that are placed into our minds are placed there through the use of electricity. The thoughts that you think are your own are not. You have to become aware. Please make an attempt to analyze the program that has been placed in you. You have to understand that the person who is in 'charge' is the one who controls thought by way of controlling the electricity in your brain. Think about it. If you had a plumber to your home and he tracked mud all over your carpet you would phone the company who employed him and ask to speak to the person in charge. The person in charge is the one who controls the electric current in the plumbers brain. Now if the plumber can not be controlled, he will be 'fired' or in other words discharged. What do people do when they are upset, they write to a legislator, one of their Masters? Legislatures were created for one purpose, to make you the property and to manage the electrical current in your brain. If a group of people can command you to act or not to act and take your labor, what are you? If they have the power to declare that an act that is not criminal, is a criminal act, what are they? You are a slave and they are your master. The thought that legislators, judges etc are in 'charge' has been willfully and deliberately placed in your brain so that you will be their slaves. E I x R A bank is a capacitor in which the electrons flow to from ground. A check or money order etc. are the symbol which represents the electrons. (See definition of money in U.C.C.) A loan is actually the procedure that is done to cause electrons to enter into the circuit. The check that you receive from the bank is the symbol of the electrons that have been put into a capacitor (account) in your name. This is accomplished by a few key strokes on a computer key board. The charge (electrons) are transferred from account to account (capacitor to capacitor) when a good or service is transmitted. This is done either by wire or satellite. (See Electronic Fund Transfer Blacks Law Dict. 6th Ed.) Remember an electron is both a wave and a particle. The system must never be allowed to become balanced. There has to always be a debt (something owed) in order for the electrons to flow. If electrons were not removed from the circuit the capacitors would all become equally charged and all commerce would cease. If the capacitors were all equal and the circuit was balanced how could one capacitor discharge into another. The Internal Revenue Service withdraws electrons from the Circuit by way of what is called an 'Income Tax'. Income is the Electrons that have flowed into the circuit. There are other ways that remove electrons but this is the most noticeable. There has to be a load on the system in order for the electrons to flow. This must be done in order to allow commerce to flow. A debt can never be paid. A debt can only be discharged. The Circuit can be controlled by changing the Force, Current, or Resistance. Your labor is actually dissipated. The harder the people labor the more electrons they remove from the Circuit. There becomes too many electrons in the Circuit for the amount of goods and services consumed. So 'Taxes' must be raised or, in other words, the load must be increased. When they tell you that the economy is expanding it means that the Circuit is getting larger. Notice that when they tell you the economy is expanding most people are working harder and their standard of living is dropping. Now, what do the electrons symbolize? People exist by symbols. Everything in this fictional world symbolizes something else. Those who refuse to bow to the IRS are in actuality keeping those who do alive. Those who bow to the IRS are destroying themselves. If we do not send electrons to the Banks and the IRS, this ultimate system of control will come crashing to the GROUND. In the present situation the peoples standard of living can only go down. Both parents now must labor in order to survive. Any variable in the system can modify it. One who is skilled in the art of controlling the Circuit is called an Economist. It is impossible for the mass of people to be paranoid. Paranoia is defined as a heightened sense of awareness. People are not even at the level of being aware, let alone paranoid. They (the mass of people) have their voltage (thoughts) supplied to them. How can you be aware when in your entire life you have never had a thought? THE END The Ultimate Delusion. By: Stephen Ames Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows: S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. ............... I hope you learned someting from the Essays. Stephen wrote hundreds of them. Some of them will never be released because they are extremely controversial and would really upset just about everyone. However, to see what a Police State Pennsylvania is go to http://www.prisoners.com. This site is dedicated to showing the world what is happening in Pennsylvania. You won't believe it. There are hundreds of examples on this site of the absolutely twisted actions of the people of Pennsylvania. I'm not going to tell you exactly what is on the site, you will have to see it for yourself. It is beyond your wildest nightmares. Read everything in the Public Enemies section in its entirety first. There are about a hundred articles in this section alone. You will never come to Pennsylvania again after reading them. Another web site dedicated to the tens of thousands of atrocities committed here in Pennsylvania recently is http://www.keystonereport.com. I recommend the Philly Atrocities section and its weekly archives. This section is found in the left side column. If you would like to read more essays that were written by Stephen Ames and others let me know. I can be reached at: Nicole Terry http://www.freedomdomain.com/Policestate/hallucination.html ====================================== prisonplanet.... "....[that] opened not the house of his prisoners?......" whole chapter: http://www.blueletterbible.org/B...?b=Isa&c=14&v=19&t=KJV#19 http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...?ArtNum=96074&Disp=23#C23 - 56..... ====================== **** An exceptional act that these pretended judges and lawyers are not laughing about is a process that is known as **** Redemption. Does this process work? You bet it does. The Redemption Process is entirely based on fictions. By engaging in this Process known as Redemption life is being breathed into the ultimate fictional code that binds their fictional system together. This fictional law is known as the Uniform Commercial Code. People pretend that they are a creditor instead of pretending that they are a debtor. This allows people to do anything they want and not be prosecuted for it and if one really understands the Uniform Commercial Code, one can purchase anything one wants without having to labor like the rest of the slaves. The act of acknowledging the Code brings the entire pretended government to life. When you pretend to be a creditor instead of a debtor the pretended judges and lawyers become your servants. You have to know exactly what you are doing or they will warehouse you. The Uniform Commercial Code is the rules of the Hallucination. That is why the Redemption Process is successful For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. bible.cc/1_corinthians/3-19.htm Psa 9:15 The heathen are sunk down in the pit [that] they made: in the net which they hid is their own foot taken. Psa 9:16 The LORD is known [by] the judgment [which] he executeth: the wicked is snared in the work of his own hands. Higgaion. Selah. Psa 141:10 Let the wicked fall into their own nets, whilst that I withal escape..... http://www.blueletterbible.org/s....cfm?b=1Cr&c=3&v=19&t=KJV ========================================== I originally saw the following at the www.truthsetsusfree.com website. I seem to only be able to pull up the intro. Now I could have sworn I posted this on 4um, but google doesn't seem to have any record of it. Several websites have seemed to pick up on this article [do search]. Here is one: Meet Your Straw Man This is must know information. Visit and download the Meet Your Strawman pdf and other related documents from FTP Server #1. LOOK in the "ExposingTheSystem" folder. NOTE: Some of the information within this site is content from U.S. sources. As far as government and legal matters between Canada and U.S., 90% of the documentation is similar to each other. Meet Your Straw Man Disclaimer The material in this essay is for educational purposes only and not to be construed as legal advice about what you should or should not do. The information herein is to assist you in performing your own due diligence before implementing any strategy. Formal notice is hereby given that: You have 10 days after reviewing any material on this web site to notify Truth Sets Us Free (TSUF) in writing of any word, phrase, reference or statement which is inaccurate, incorrect, misleading or not in full compliance with state and federal law and to give TSUF 30 days to correct and cure any alleged potential flaw. TSUF's intent is to be in strict compliance with the law. As a child, you have had an imaginary friend. You may be surprised to learn that evidence exists that you have had a make-believe twin from the time your mother and father permitted a Birth Certificate to be filed for you. This make-believe friend is not real, but artificial. It is a straw man, an artificial entity that has a name very similar to yours. Here is a definition of straw man: "A 'front'; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction ..." [Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition] "The term is also used in commercial and property contexts when a transfer is made to a party, the straw man, simply for the purpose of retransferring to the transferor in order to accomplish some purpose not otherwise permitted." [Barron's, 3rd Edition] So, in layman's terms, what is a straw man? The straw man is an artificial person. The straw man was created by law shortly after you were born via the registration of the application for your birth certificate. The name for the straw man is your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. You will notice that the inscription on the birth certificate is your name in all-capital letters. The English language has precise rules of grammar that make no provision for writing proper nouns in all-capital letters. So, your name spelled with all-capital letters is a fictitious name. Your straw man has a same-sounding name as your name, but is an artificial entity which exists only "by force of or in contemplation of law." The all-caps name is not your "true name" which consists of the given (Christian) name plus the surname (family name), and appears with only initial letters capitalized. The all-caps version of your name is a TRADE NAME, the name under which you "do business." We may also say that the straw man is a "person" according to the legal dictionary. "Person. 1. a human being. 2. An entity (such as a corporation) that is recognized by law as having the rights and duties of a human being…" [Blacks Law Dictionary, 7th Edition] The straw man may also be said to be an "artificial person" which is also defined in the legal dictionary. "An entity, such as a corporation, created by law and given certain legal rights and duties of a human being; a being, real or imaginary, who for the purpose of legal reasoning is treated more or less as a human being. – Also termed fictitious person; juristic person; legal person; moral person." [Blacks Law Dictionary, 7th Edition] A straw man may also be thought of as a "legal fiction." "Legal fiction. Assumption of fact made by court as basis for deciding a legal question. A situation contrived by the law to permit a court to dispose of a matter …" [Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition] As we explore further, we must distinguish between the straw man (an it or person), and the real, flesh and blood being (human being) which we will call a "man." "Man" has a legal definition. "A human being. A person of the male sex. A male of the human species above the age of puberty. In the most extended sense the term includes not only the adult male sex of the human species, but women and children. … In feudal law, a vassal; a tenant or feudatory." [Blacks Law Dictionary, 5th Edition] So we conclude that "man" is a term of nature. But who created nature? Some would say God, others would say the Creator (a term often used by the founder of our country), while others might hold a different view. On the other hand, we see "person" as a term of the civil law. Who is the creator of civil law? "Civil law … a rule of civil conduct prescribed by the supreme power of a state … the civil or municipal law of the Roman empire." [Ballentine’s Law Dictionary, 3rd Edition] So kings, emperors or legislative bodies acting in a sovereign capacity are the "creators" of civil law. When our government acts as a sovereign, it is acting outside it's constitutional authority. So we see that a man and a person are very different terms identifying very different things. If you study Roman civil law, you will see that it originates and uses fictions of law – that is, concepts that are contrary to the natural order of things, and based upon presumptions that are untrue. You will realize that this person recognized in the civil law is a fictional entity. You will come to see the vast difference between man and person. So the straw man is a person, a public name that is recognized in a civil society. We've mentioned "legal fiction" and "fiction of law", so let's see how these are defined. "Fiction of law. An assumption or supposition of law that something which is or may be false is true, or that a state of facts exists which has never really taken place. An assumption, for purposes of justice, of a fact that does not or may not exist. A rule of law which assumes as true, and will not allow to be disproved, something which is false, but not impossible." [Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition] This distinction between a man and a person is a difficult concept to grasp. But a proper understanding of the relationship between the government, the man and the straw man is essential to gaining increased freedom. While the concept of these relationships is very simple, there are some foundational principles that must be explored. We have mentioned that the straw man is an artificial entity or person. But there are several types of organizations or artificial entities. There are corporation soles, aggregate corporations, municipal corporations, revocable living trusts (sole), and unincorporated business organizations. Many people use these entities for various reasons including maintaining personal control over their assets; protection from lawsuits and judgments; avoidance of probate; avoidance of estate taxes; reduction in tax liability; and many other reasons. We will look into the difference between a sole entity and an aggregate entity; the construction of these entities and the results of that construction as it apply to the straw man. In all organizations there are two basic operational positions: 1) the stock holder/owner/beneficiary (we will call this the beneficiary position); and 2) The officer/president/chairman/trustee (we will call this the operational position). A sole corporation, as defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, is one consisting of one person only and his successors in some particular station, who are incorporated by law in order to give them some legal capacities and advantages, particularly that of perpetuity, which in their natural state as persons they could not have. In a corporation sole, one person holds both operational positions of the organization. A corporation sole may be established under legislative authority. It is considered by statute a citizen of the government. As such, the safe guards of the bill of rights do not extend to corporate soles. The courts have warned that statutory licensed sole proprietorships are in a fact a government agency by definition of how they are created. Most people who chose a sole organization do so because they maintain personal control over their assets. An aggregate corporation such as corporations or business trusts, according to Black's Law Dictionary, is composed of a number of individuals vested with corporate powers. With an aggregate organization, different parties must hold the beneficiary and operational positions. If the same party holds them, they are a sole organization. Family members are always counted as one party, therefore would be a sole organization. In an aggregate organization, the one who is in control is immune from damages or liabilities of the beneficiaries. In an aggregate corporation, the holder of the first operative position controls the assets for the holder of the second operative position. The control of the assets has been turned over to someone else's control. The founder of the wealthy Rockefeller family said one his secrets to wealth was to "own nothing, but control everything". In other words, always function from an aggregate relationship. Do not own the straw man; control the straw man. If you are not the beneficiary/owner of the straw man you are not liable for his debts or obligations. If you are in control, you have the highest lien hold interest on the straw man; you must be paid before anyone else collects from the straw man, and you cannot go to jail for his misdoing. A look at the structure of the straw man entity shows the ownership/control relationship, and which position it is best to hold. Prior to the redemption process [redemption is a term used among freedom loving people to describe the process of regaining control of your straw man], the man is considered both a beneficiary in the relationship and surety for the straw man. After redemption, the man is no longer a beneficiary, and is no longer surety. After redemption, the man is the controller and creditor with the highest lien hold interest in the straw man. The man is now in an aggregate relationship with the straw man. He does not own the straw man but he controls the straw man by the primary lien hold interest. In this country, the power was granted to government by the people. Power is granted to the government by the people individually - to create States, and by the people as a whole to create the National government. Once the people decided individually to create States, they can only change the policy or law of the State as people collectively. That is because they have agreed to become part of the public. They are one person in a larger body of people that act collectively. The people are in the State and National government at that same time. The public government is an artificial entity. The government is owned and controlled by the same people. So the government is a sole organization, not an aggregate organization. As long as a man is dealing publicly, he is in a sole relationship with the public. The straw man, being artificial, lives in the artificial place called the public. At the same time as people are acting collectively in the larger body of people called the State and National government, they maintain their ability to act individually on a private basis. The people did not give up the rights they did not delegate to the government - they retained those rights. Any man can contract privately as they see fit and government cannot interfere with the private contracts of men. The straw man lives in the public side of government. He is part of the public government, and functions under the laws of the public. This is necessary and proper because the creator of an entity has the right to control it. [Personal edit from site owner: The Straw Man could not have come into existence without your parent's signature and your continuance of use of it. Therefore it does not belong solely to the government and you could make a claim to it as the government never would.] Since the government created the straw man, it is only right that the straw man live under the rules of it's creator. But once the straw man has been redeemed, the government is no longer in control of the straw man. He is now controlled by the man using his right to private contracts. The man has left the public as a beneficiary in sole relationship to the straw man to live privately as creditor in an aggregate relationship with the straw man. As far as this relationship is concerned, the straw man is privately controlled. The straw man still exists as a public entity because that is the only world in which he has reality. His relationship with the man is private. The relationship with the man being is controlling because the man has a higher priority lien on the straw man than the government. Now that we understand who the straw man is, it is appropriate to ask who benefits from the creation of the straw man? We will see that the straw man benefits the creator (the government), any company that uses it and you. The government began to benefit from the straw man in 1933. In the Article on the U.S. Bankruptcy, we've already seen evidence that the United States went bankrupt in 1933. When this happened, the governors of all the states met to discuss what should be done. The state governors made a "pledge" to the federal government, to fund the bankruptcy. They pledged the assets and the energy of the people belonging to the state governments. They would back the "government" and secure the national debt. But there was one problem: The states could only speak for the people in their public capacity. They could not pledge private, living human beings or property. So it was necessary to create a "bridge" between the living people and the creditors for the bankruptcy. The answer was to create straw men to stand in the place of the people. Now the only problem was devising a scheme whereby the people would agree to contract with the straw man as its surety. When the governors made the pledge, they agreed to register the application form for the birth certificates of the people with the U.S. Department of Commerce. The application form for the birth certificate is the security instrument (collateral) used to back the pledge. The straw man, the legal fiction was created by using the name on the birth certificate and writing it in all capital letters, the designation for a legal fiction. Then, because of the "pledge", the people were determined to be the representative and surety for the legal fiction. This is how they made us responsible to pay back the debt of the United States. When the "government" or any corporation uses any process whatsoever, they are using it against the legal fiction, which they want the people to think is them. But when a name is written in all capital letters, IT IS NOT the name of a real person! It is the designation of a legal fiction - that is an entirely separate entity. A living human cannot be a legal fiction, and a legal fiction cannot be a living human. One is real or natural, the other is created by "law." Because the entire thing is based on paying the bankruptcy, the straw man is the debtor and the "government" is agent for the creditor, the international bankers who own the Federal Reserve. Whenever a government agency (such as a court) determines liability, it is a liability of the legal straw man since everything is done in commerce. The people are presumed, as evidenced by the pledge of their governors, to be the surety for the straw man and they must pay the liability. Now let's see how the straw man benefits others. Our straw man though of as a "transmitting utility" which we define as “an agent solely utilized for the purpose of transmitting commercial activity for the benefit of the Secured Party”. Government and big business have set up a system so that the only way a man can access the goods and services of the nation is through the straw man. The straw man serves as a utility through which goods and services may be transmitted to you. You are forced to interface with society through your straw man. You will notice that the straw man's name is used on virtually all public documents, including but not limited to: birth certificate, driver’s license, passport, Social Security card, bank account (checks and statements), credit cards, the checks you receive from your employer, legal documents, any letter from the government entity at any level, etc. You will discover that government agencies, banks and other corporations, courts and tax agencies deal with you exclusively through the straw man. These organizations insist on dealing with you only via an all-caps version of your name in any and all key documents, contracts, accounts, and agreements with them. One of the many "benefits" and services made available through your straw man is your Social Security Number (SSN). The SSN is a "public" number associated with a "public persona," your straw man. The SSN is a benefit because it allows you to open a bank account or to get a job. A federal law was passed in 1994 that made it a requirement to give your SSN to get a driver's license. It would be difficult (though not impossible) to do any of these things without using the SSN. All of these things, and many more, can be thought of as "benefits" granted to the straw man. But these benefits come with a price. It should be obvious that the straw man has not body, and that you benefit from the consumption/use of the goods and services made available through the straw man. At this point, you probably do not hold title to your straw man (the redemption process can correct this problem). Since these things are true, it is also true that you are the one responsible for discharging the public liabilities associated with the "benefits" that you enjoy courtesy of your straw man. These public liabilities include but are not limited to income tax, social security tax, plus any and all debts that the straw man incurs. For further evidence that the straw man is not you, look at your personal checks. Here is an example of a check. [ATKHWDI Note: see link....I tried to put the image here, but it made this page grow to the right.] Notice the two read arrows. Their first arrow points to the all-caps name, John’s straw man. You will not find your true name on your checks. The second arrow points to the signature line that ends with the letters "MP" which stands for "micro-print". If you look carefully at the signature, you will notice that it is not a solid line. The line is made up of some words and spaces that are repeated over and over again as shown here. The next image shows a section of the signature line magnified 60 times. You can clearly see that the words that make up the line are "AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE." (You can also read about security features on checks on the "Deluxe" site.) The reason the signature line on personal checks is made up of the words "AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE" is because it is a physical impossibility for the account holder (your straw man) to sign the check. Remember, your straw man has no hands with which to sign the check. The banks know that every signature appearing on a personal check is the signature of the flesh-and- blood agent, the authorized representative, you. However, the words are printed in micro-print to disguise the fact that you are the authorized representative rather than the principal on the account. When you sign the check or any other document for the straw man, you are actually an accommodating party, i.e. surety, and therefore 100% liable for everything the principal (straw man) is liable for. Further proof that you are liable for the benefits you receive through your straw man. Do not despair, there is a way out of this malaise. There are a couple of elements to a strategy to gain freedom. One element is to copyright your name (both your true name, the all-caps version and all it's derivatives). A second element is to use UCC filings to take control of your straw man (a process that is often called redemption). Names are nothing more than property. No one is his TRADE NAME (all-caps spelling of your name), nor is anyone his true name. A name can be trademarked, service-marked, and copyrighted by the owner for the purpose of restricting others form unauthorized use and unjust enrichment at the expense of the owner. If you are 18 or older, you, the flesh-and-blood man or woman, own your name and you may copyright it under the common law. After copyrighting your name, no one will be able to use your name to enrich themselves without first gaining your agreement. Let's say a police officer pulled you over and wanted to give you a ticket. You can warn the officer that he is using your copyrighted name for financial benefit and that is a violation of your copyright. You should also inform him that to persist in the use of your copyrighted material without your permission carries an automatic penalty of $500,000. You have just formed a legally binding verbal contract with the officer. If the officer then persists in using your name without permission, he has breached the contract. You then have the right, under UCC article 9, to default judgment against them using non-judicial proceedings to collect on the debt that he owes you. This is a very powerful concept that can be used in dozens to hundreds of ways. The copyright notices also establishes a private contract between you and your straw man whereby you offer services to the straw man (e.g. signing documents for it) in exchange for certain considerations. You become the creditor over your straw man who becomes the debtor to you. You can file a UCC financing statement to receive official, government acknowledgment of this private contract. This UCC is a financing statement which creates an interest in property that secures payment/performance of an obligation by your straw man for the services you render to it. This UCC filing establishes a seniority position of claim over other creditors who may make a claim based upon date and time of filing. In this way, if any party ever attacks your straw man’s assets, you will have a superior claim on it. For further study in your journey toward greater freedom, read about "The Exemption" and "Redemption". Take note: A response from Office of the Registrar General and a Toronto Star article that blantantly points out a fact. [embedded links] FAIR USE/DEALING NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair dealing' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Part III section 29 of the Canadian Copyright Act. In accordance with Part III section 29 of the Canadian Copyright Act, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Formore information visit http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-42/39129.html. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair dealing' and/or 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. http://www.nomoretyranny.org/strawman.htm [note....Names can be trademarked, but I don't think they can be copyrighted.] Since all so-called law is now public policy, this is how it is supposed to work. However, I have also heard so many people had gotten wind of this, that the government has clamped down, blew up some towers and a pentagon, and passed a "patriot act" to apprehend these rebels, or, as the British called them in 1776, INSURGENTS. "O my people that dwelleth in Zion....He will lift up the rod against you, after the manner of Egypt...." ======================= can anyone shrink the size of that check?? ========================== HERE'S THE ONE WE WANT: EXCERPT PAGE 14 ".....Everything in society has been paid for at the manufacturing level with the money that was created from us and our property. Therefore, everything in existence in our society is an extension of what we are owed and therefore everything is pre-paid by us and for us. How much are we owed for all that we have given? One way to answer this is to see how much “money” was created from each of us. One person tried to find the answer to this question by sending a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request. This person asked how much money had been created from his/her social security number. A letter was returned explaining that the government could not provide a full list of the Federal Reserve Notes that had been created from the social security number unless the person was willing to send them $2800, at 10¢/page, to provide a copying cost. This means there were a total of 28,000 pages. A few pages were attached to the letter that listed Federal Reserve Note serial numbers and value of each note. Based upon this information, let’s see if we can create a model to estimate the amount of money this 28,000 pages would represent. Let’s assume that each page contained two columns of note numbers and denominations and that there were two columns per page, a total of 60 notes per page. Let’s further assume the there is an even distribution of the following note denominations evenly distributed across all the pages: $1, $5, $10, $20, $50, and $100. This would mean that 280,000 notes of each denomination would be listed. These assumptions would yield a total of $52,080,000. This is just an estimate, but it should give you some idea that the government has created an enormous amount of money from each of us. The Exemption – What We Are Owed What do we get in exchange for all that has been created from us? We would suggest that what the people are owed is manifest in two ways: the people are beneficiaries in the trust and the people have been given an exemption. In the broadest terms, we call what is owed us an exemption. Exemption. Freedom from a general duty or service; immunity form a general burden, tax or charge. Immunity from certain legal obligations … [Blacks Law Dictionary 5th Edition] We have been given an exemption from having to pay our debts. We now have the ability to discharge our debts. Do you suppose there is a way to use this exemption to discharge our debts by accessing what is owed to us and held in trust? We believe this is quite possible. To begin to understand how we might access this exemption, we need to look at various forms of payment. We already know that that “all coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve notes … ) … shall be legal tender.” But it appears that there are other forms of payment which are also valid that are not included in those listed above. A quote from the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) will illustrate this point. § 2.304. Price Payable in Money, Goods, Realty, or Otherwise (a) The price can be made payable in money or otherwise. If it is payable in whole or in part in goods each party is a seller of the goods which he is to transfer. This quote makes it clear that we may discharge our debts in something other than money, goods, or realty. What could this mean? A quote from a Federal Reserve publication will shed some light on this question. Modern monetary systems have a fiat base – literally money by decree – with depository institutions, acting as fiduciaries, creating obligations against themselves with the fiat base acting in part as reserves. The decree appears on the currency notes: “This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private.” While no individual could refuse to accept such money for debt repayment, exchange contracts could easily be composed to thwart its use in everyday commerce. However, a forceful explanation as to why money is accepted is that the federal government requires it as payment for tax liabilities. Anticipation of the need to clear this debt creates a demand for the pure fiat dollar. [“Money, Credit and Velocity,” Review, May, 1982, Vol. 64. No. 5, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, p. 25] The Federal Reserve is saying that the people could easily replace the use of Federal Reserve Notes in daily life by using exchange contracts. This is amazing news. It means that we can use exchange contracts to discharge out debts. We will leave the discussion of what an exchange contract is and how it might be used for another essay. For now, let’s turn our attention to what we currently use for money or call money, Federal Reserve Notes. What is a note? Note. An instrument containing an express and absolute promise of signer (i.e. maker) to pay to a specified person or order, or bearer, a definite sum of money at a specified time… [Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition] So a note is a promise to pay. The definition says that the note must be signed. If you look at a FRN you will notice there are two signatures (two witnesses) promising to pay, the Treasurer of the United States and the Secretary of the Treasury. So a FRN is a pledge on the part of the government to pay a debt. This means that an FRN is a liability and not an asset. It means that every FRN, currency, that is in circulation is actually a liability. Accounting Accounting. An act or system of making up or settling accounts; a statement of account, or a debit and credit in financial transaction… Rendition of an account, either voluntarily or by order of a court. In the latter case, it imports a rendition of a judgment from the balance ascertained to be due. the term may include payment of the amount due… Major accounting methods are the cash basis and the accrual basis. [Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition] Account. A detailed statement of the mutual demands in the nature of debit and credit between parties, arising out of contract or some fiduciary relation. A statement in writing, of debits and credits, or of receipts and payments; a list of items of debits and credits, with their respective dates. … Any account with a bank; including a checking, time, interest or saving account. … Account means any right to payment for goods sold or leased or for services rendered which is not evidence by an instrument or chattel paper, whether or not it has been earned by performance… [Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition] These definitions suggests that an account is something to keep track of debits and credits and accounting would be the practice of keeping track of debits and credits. Accounts are only needed when payment of goods and services are not made in full at the time of purchase. When you buy something on credit (house, credit card, car), an account is established to keep track of how much you owe. You open a checking account when you no longer want to pay for everything with cash. The checking account allows the bank to keep track of how much “money” you have. Black’s 7th edition lists a number of different kinds of accounts, but for our purposes, there are three that are particularly interesting. closed account. An account that no further credits or debits may be added to but that remains open for adjustment and setoff. [Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Edition] offset account. One of two accounts that balance against each other and cancel each other out when the books are closed. [Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Edition] open account. 1. An unpaid or unsettled account. 2. An account that is left open for ongoing debit and credit entries and that has a fluctuating balance until each party finds it convenient to settle and close… [Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Edition] From these definitions it becomes clear that so long as there is still activity occurring, an account remains open but once all public activity (debit and credit) has ceased, the account is closed. When you make the final payment on a loan, the account is closed. When you no longer need a checking account, you withdrawal all the funds and close it. But a closed account remains open for two types of transactions, adjustments and setoffs. The idea of an offset account suggests that when two parties owe one another, setoffs can be used to cancel out opposing debts. The definition of setoff will give us another clue on how to use our exemption. setoff. … 2. A debtor’s right to reduce the amount of a debt by any sum the creditor owes the debtor; the counterbalancing sum owed by the creditor. … Set-off signifies the subtraction or taking away of one demand from another opposite or cross demand, so as to distinguish the smaller demand and reduce the greater by the amount of the less… [Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Edition] It appears that if two parties owe one another opposing sums, a portion of the larger debt can be discharged by the amount of the smaller debt. The one who is owed the larger amount is called the creditor and the one who owes the smaller amount is the debtor. We have already seen that we are the creditor over the government, who is the debtor, and that it owes us vast sums. Since we are the creditor, it would appear that there should be some method of using what the government owes us to setoff what we owe to other creditors. We have already been introduced to the concept of a bill of exchange. Various people and groups have researched how a bill of exchange and other instruments might be used to access our exemption in order to discharge our debts. They have discovered that these instruments can be effective. Our goal is to eventually discover how a man can use bills of exchange or other instruments to discharge all of his debts. The implications of such a discovery would be staggering. It would mean complete financial freedom for those who discover and learn to apply these principles. It is beyond the scope of this essay to cover the exact mechanisms for using these instruments to discharge debts. Our purpose here was to demonstrate that “We the People” are the creditors and that the government owes us a huge debt which we call our exemption........." "....If you choose to be financially free, then we should also talk about the fact that freedom is found in Jesus. The scriptures tell us that where the Spirit of the Lord is there is freedom (2 Cor. 3:17). It also tells us to no longer take on the yoke of (economic) slavery (Gal. 5:1). It further instructs us not to turn our freedom into an opportunity for the flesh but rather to serve our brothers (Gal. 5:13). The Apostle Peter warns us to not use our freedom for evil but to continue as bondservants of Christ. These scriptures lead us to some questions which I will ask you to prayerfully consider. If we can successfully use our exemption to discharge all of debts, then we have no need to work to earn a living. If that were true, then why should we work? The scripture is very clear about the need to work. The Old Testament says that man is under a curse because of our sin and that we must work to eat (Gen 3:17-19). I believe that Jesus fully satisfied the requirement of the law under the old covenant. However, the New Testament (the covenant for those who are in Christ) says that if a man does not work he should not eat (2 Thess. 3:10). I believe that even under the new covenant that we are commanded to work. But that leaves the question of what kind of work. There are two kinds of work: work you do to be paid and work you do to serve others. If there is no need to work to be paid, since all of your needs can be met through the exemption, then we are free to work to serve others....... http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/TheExemption.pdf Now we should understand why God said we would take their ill-gotten gain and consecrate it to Him: http://bible.cc/micah/4-13.htm ...........and why THE AMERICAN ECONOMY IS NOT COMING BACK AS WE KNEW IT. God has always had other plans for some of us: http://bible.cc/revelation/5-10.htm ============================== For thus saith the LORD, Ye have sold yourselves for nought; and ye shall be redeemed without money. http://bible.cc/isaiah/52-3.htm / http://kingjbible.com/isaiah/52.htm
If you try this you will be laughed out of court. And you will lose.
United we stand, divided we fall. This is why the churches MUST be corrected in their corruption by the leaven of the Pharisees. The kingdom is full of it as predicted by Cornwallis to Washington, and here: bible.cc/matthew/13-33.htm Christians are the Israel of God: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/..._Church_Is_Israel_Now.htm ....and America is our Promised Land: http://www.moseshand.com/studies/pitts.htm The robbers and thieves WILL stand down [Psalm 2:12 final warning], or they will end up as that Great Sacrifice on the fields of America: Ezekiel 39:17
There are no replies to Comment # 22. End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestVery long but very informative !! "Our" entire "legal" system and "government" are UN-constitutional !!!
#13. To: Artisan, Itistoolate (#12)
(Edited)
Very long but very informative !! "Our" entire "legal" system and "government" are UN-constitutional !!!
"Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
#14. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#13)
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from England?
#16. To: Artisan (#14)
do you have any more info on this specifically?
IN COURT THAT
HE GETS HIS ORDERS
FROM ENGLAND
#19. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, noone, Old Friend, Artisan (#16)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:06:18 -0400
From: "Nicole Terry" Dimenzions@paonline.com
630k Willow St., Highspire, Pennsylvania 17034
PH: 717-986-0239
EMAIL: Factseeker@Hotpop.com
by Moses G. Washington
revised on 10/27/03 
If our currency is a liability, then there must also be some assets to balance the books. So it is apparent that we need to understand some basic accounting. First, let’s first see how accounting and account are defined.
#21. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#19)
After copyrighting your name, no one will be able to use your name to enrich themselves without first gaining your agreement. Let's say a police officer pulled you over and wanted to give you a ticket. You can warn the officer that he is using your copyrighted name for financial benefit and that is a violation of your copyright. You should also inform him that to persist in the use of your copyrighted material without your permission carries an automatic penalty of $500,000. You have just formed a legally binding verbal contract with the officer. If the officer then persists in using your name without permission, he has breached the contract. You then have the right, under UCC article 9, to default judgment against them using non-judicial proceedings to collect on the debt that he owes you. This is a very powerful concept that can be used in dozens to hundreds of ways.
#22. To: Old Friend (#21)
Replies to Comment # 22.