[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine

President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture

Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA

F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest


Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: AP Newsbreak: Clergy abuse claims rose last year
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090313 ... n_re_us/rel_church_abuse_costs
Published: Mar 13, 2009
Author: Rachel Zoll
Post Date: 2009-03-13 09:34:20 by richard9151
Keywords: None
Views: 531
Comments: 34

By RACHEL ZOLL, AP Religion Writer – 39 mins ago

NEW YORK – Roman Catholic dioceses and religious orders saw a rise in molestation claims against clergy last year, according to a new report from U.S. bishops. Nearly all the 803 cases involved adults who said they had been abused as children decades ago.

Church leaders paid less in settlements, attorney fees and other abuse-related costs. Still, the amount reached just over $436 million, bringing the total payouts for abuse to more than $2.6 billion since 1950, according to studies commissioned by the prelates.

The statistics are part of an annual review of child safety in American dioceses and religious orders that is mandated by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. The report is set to be released Friday. The Associated Press obtained a copy.

As part of the review, auditors found that all but one of the dioceses they evaluated had fully implemented the bishops' child protection policies by the end of the year.

The safeguards include background checks for employees and volunteers, safe environment training for children and a discipline plan for offenders that removes them from any public church work. Dioceses increased their spending on safety programs to $23 million in 2008.

Two dioceses — in Lincoln, Neb. and Baker, Ore. — refused to participate in the audit. Five eparchies, or regional districts for parishes that follow the Eastern rite, also refused.

The reports from the bishops are part of the reforms they enacted in 2002, at the height of the scandal, which began with the case of one predatory priest in the Archdiocese of Boston and spread throughout the U.S. and beyond. Thousands of clergy have been accused since 1950.

The number of abuse claims in 2008 increased by 16 percent over 2007, when 691 claims were made. Similar to past years, more than 80 percent of the clergy accused in 2008 are dead, missing or already out of public ministry or the priesthood altogether. However, 40 percent of the men accused last year had never been named in previous abuse cases.

Following a pattern that researchers discovered in previous studies, most of the people who made claims last year were men and more than half said they were between the ages of 10 and 14 when they were molested. Only 30 percent of the new claims came through attorneys; about half of the victims came forward on their own.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#1. To: richard9151, scrapper2 (#0)

The Cat'lick Church has a STRICT policy against homosexuality in place.

.sarcasm

war  posted on  2009-03-13   9:51:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: war (#1)

The Cat'lick Church has a STRICT policy against homosexuality in place.

.sarcasm

The Vatican had a long standing policy to keep gays out of the priesthood but the US Catholic Churches ignored the Vatican's policy and that's why over 10,000 minors were sexually abused stateside, most of them being young males by gay priest predators.

And it's social liberals like yourself that want to allow gays to adopt same sex children and adolescents because it was all an coincidence that gay priests victimized young males in America.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-03-13   23:23:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: scrapper2 (#10)

Read it and weep

war  posted on  2009-03-14   10:36:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: war (#11)

Read it and weep

I read it and laughed.

"* Mark E. Pietrzyk is an independent researcher in the Washington, D.C. area and a member of the Independent Gay Forum (www.indegayforum.org)."

scrapper2  posted on  2009-03-17   2:27:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: scrapper2 (#12)

"* Mark E. Pietrzyk is an independent researcher in the Washington, D.C. area and a member of the Independent Gay Forum (www.indegayforum.org)."

You do realize that he is citing peer reviewed studies and ressearch? Of course you do; your logic is akin to a defense attorney trying to impeach a the eyesight of a prostitute simply because she's a prostitute.

You've been measured and found to be woefully short.

The "footnotes" that YOU cited, princess, was a NAMBLA member trying to claim that he was simply a homosexual and which was resoundinlgly rejected by just about everyone. Ditto your "sibling" study. Sad for you, what I linked you to is accepted as fact.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   9:38:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: war (#13)

a. You do realize that he is citing peer reviewed studies and ressearch? Of course you do; your logic is You've been measured and found to be woefully short.

b. The "footnotes" that YOU cited, princess, was a NAMBLA member trying to claim that he was simply a homosexual and which was resoundinlgly rejected by just about everyone. Ditto your "sibling" study. Sad for you, what I linked you to is accepted as fact.

a. Until such time that your own attributes are long enough or substantial enough to warrant comparison with others,I'd suggest that you endeavor to growing what little you have at hand rather than sitting in judgement of others.

I did not read your article, moron. When I saw that the author had this as his credentials ""* Mark E. Pietrzyk is an independent researcher in the Washington, D.C. area and a member of the Independent Gay Forum (www.indegayforum.org).", I decided not to waste my time and rightly so. Why would I read something that amounts to a focused picking and choosing of studies that supported gay sloganeering? What are Mr. Pietrzyk's medical credentials? He did not have an MD beside his name so I assume his only credential for doing his highly selective research paper was that he was gay. But don't let my cynicism stop you from holding his article on high, as your PC Holy Grail. BELIEVE! yuck, yuck....

b. The author of the "study" you linked to had his name and "credential" at the bottom linked to a gay chapter. That's all I copy and pasted. So what are you babbling about about my citing "footnotes?"

As for your sweeping statement about "my" sibling studies (????) and NAMBLA members not having gays as members (???) and everything being "resoundinlgly rejected by just about everyone" - ???? - again, I ask you, what are you babbling about?

Catch a clue, why don't you. This clue doesn't come from a paper written by a gay with vested interests. This clue comes from Reality Lab 101. The 10,000 victims of pederast priests in the US Catholic Church should serve as the best study and teaching aid ever published - the lesson should be loud and clear that when you put adolescent males in vulnerable situations with practicing gays as authority figures - there is a very great risk that sexual abuse will occur. End of story.

No research can compare to the very sad results which occurred in the US Catholic Church that allowed a very great number of gay priests to enter the priesthood - against Vatican policy - and to have access to adolescent male altar boys and parishioners.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-03-17   12:28:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: scrapper2 (#14)

Catch a clue, why don't you. This clue doesn't come from a paper written by a gay with vested interests.

Said the person who posted an alleged health study in opposition o gay marriage as promoted by the Catholic Church which averred, unsupported, that gays are pedohiles.

To say that I insulted your intellignce would be an affront to intelligence by assuming you had it.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   12:35:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: war (#16) (Edited)

a. Said the person who posted an alleged health study in opposition o gay marriage as promoted by the Catholic Church which averred, unsupported, that gays are pedohiles.

To say that I insulted your intellignce would be an affront to intelligence by assuming you had it.

a. As is your modus operandi - when faced with disturbing facts that do not support your PC mindset - you lie and try to conflate what was posted previously.

FACT #1: The studies the Vatican ordered be done was in the after math of the sexual abuse cases that occurred in the US Catholic Church. The studies revealed that most of the 10,000 victims were adolescent males who were groomed and subsequently molested by gay priests.

FACT #2: a group of physician-specialists analyzed the results of research published in medical journals, including the Journal of Homosexuality, and they presented their findings to the Canadian Parliamentarians. These MD specialists were not in the pay of the Catholic Church. Nor did these MD specialists suggest that all gays are pederasts. They simply presented risk factors as were identified in a breadth of medical research journals regarding gay behavior that society should not ignore in light of society's responsibility to protect minors.

b. You keep blabbing about gays and pedophilia - the sexual abuse crimes that happened in the US Catholic Church were those involving pederasty not pedophilia. The vast majority of victims were male adolescents - they were not children and they were males in 9 out of 10 cases - and the vast majority of criminals were found to be gay priests. How can you deny these facts to be true? Are you suggesting that most of the sexual victims in US Catholic churches were children - ie. under age 12 - and that there were as many girls as boys molested? If so, prove it. Show me the statistics you have found in your "research" that challenges what the studies commissioned by the Vatican demonstrated.

c. I would not say you have ever insulted my intelligence. You are like a mosquito to me - how can a mosquito be capable of doing anything that resembles "insult to intelligence?"

scrapper2  posted on  2009-03-17   13:42:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: scrapper2 (#18)

FACT #1: The studies the Vatican ordered be done was in the after math of the sexual abuse cases that occurred in the US Catholic Church. The studies revealed that most of the 10,000 victims were adolescent males who were groomed and subsequently molested by gay priests.

You've provided 0 evidence that those priests were gay beyond your discredited definition.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   14:32:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: war (#19)

You've provided 0 evidence that those priests were gay beyond your discredited definition.

My "discredited definition" - ???? - what definition did I give and who discredited that definition, if I gave one?

Here's some facts - try to discredit them.

Over 10,000 victims were abused by priests in US Catholic Chruches, which coincidently had become infested with gays.

Of the 10,000 victims, 9 out of 10 were teenage males.

The abusive priests sticking their penises into the anuses of teenaged males were male in gender.

Male on male sex is referred to as homosexual sex. Male on female sex is referred to as heterosexual sex. Adult male sex with adolescent males is referred to as pederasty.

Look up the definition of pederasty in any dictionary on the net - they are not my definitions - they are commonly recognized definitions around the world, doofus. Here are a few - note the common theme in the definition of pederasty - adult male sodomizing a male adolescent. That's what happened in the US Catholic Church. Ergo if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck...

"Pederasty or paederasty refers to an erotic relationship between an adolescent boy and an adult male outside his immediate family."

"pederasty, paederasty a sexual act between two males, especially when one is a minor.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-03-17   15:07:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: scrapper2 (#21)

Of the 10,000 victims, 9 out of 10 were teenage males.

Bzzzzt....Chart on Page 2

war  posted on  2009-03-17   15:51:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

#26. To: All (#25)

Working link I hope

war  posted on  2009-03-17 15:53:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war (#25) (Edited)

What's your point?

I had posted the results of the Jay study for discussion more than a week ago and you referred to my postings, as "spam" at the time. The Jay study showed that 81% were male, when gender was identified, which is greater than 8 out of 10, I believe.

****The Jay study was released in early 2004. Following the release of the Jay study, here's what was stated in an interview dated May 2004 by Dr. Rick Fitzgibbons, a principal contributor to the Catholic Medical Association's statement on "Homosexuality and Hope," ... some cut and paste for your perusal...enjoy the statistics provided in the interview as well as the identification of the "root cause" for the sexual abuse cases that occurred in the US Catholic Church. Fyi Dr. Fitzgibbons is an MD, a psychiatrist as a matter of fact.

www.opusbonosacerdotii.or...ke_of_sex_abuse_study.htm

Q: The John Jay report states that 80% to 90% of priests who sexually abused children over the past 52 years had been involved with adolescent boys -- ephebophilia -- not prepubescent boys -- pedophilia. What conclusions can be made about these findings?

Fitzgibbons: The John Jay report has revealed clearly that the crisis in the Church is not one of pedophilia, but of homosexuality. The primary victims have not been children, but adolescent males.

Q: Has the Church in the United States adequately faced the root causes of the sexual-abuse problem?

Fitzgibbons: Prior to the release of the John Jay report the basic root cause of the problem had not been clearly identified.

We can be thankful that this misunderstanding has been corrected. Hopefully, this clarification in regard to homosexuality as the basic problem that caused the crisis will result in a number of new steps being taken to protect the Church, the priesthood and teen-agers and children.

****Here are Dr. Fitzgibbon's credentials - in case you were wondering - the good doctor's credentials are impressive.*****

Richard P. Fitzgibbons, M.D., P.C.

Director 1988 - Present, Comprehensive Counseling Services, W. Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

Staff 1996 - Present, International Institute of Forgiveness, Madison, Wisconsin.

Consultant with Adoptive and Foster Children; 1978 - 1980, Counseling and Guidance Center of Catholic Social Services, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Private Practice of Psychiatry, 1976 - Present.

Residence in Psychiatry, 1973 - 1976, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia.

Child Guidance Center, 1975 - 1976, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Family Practice, 1970 - 1973, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Diplomat - American Board of Family, 1974 - 1981, Practice.

Mixed Medical Internship, 1969 - 1970, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C.

Temple University, School of Medicine, 1965 - 1969 M.D., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

St. Josephs University, 1961 - 1965 B.S., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

scrapper2  posted on  2009-03-17 16:36:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]