[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Veteran CIA officer who drugged and sexually assaulted dozens of women gets 30 years in prison

Poll: How Will Diddy [and Trump's latest wannabe assassin] Get Suicided in Jail?

After Overwhelming Pro-Trump Polling, Teamsters Will Not Endorse Any Candidate For First Time Since 1996

The US is averaging one assassination attempt per month. How did we get here?

LARGE ISRAELI MILITARY CONVOYS ARE MOVING TOWARDS THE LEBANESE BORDER

Americans are depleting capital faster than producing, negative net savings since early 2023.

CBS Correspondent Baffles Cohosts When Nevada Trip Nets One Kamala Supporter Per Stop

FBI Puts Up Billboards in Haitian Creole Encouraging People to Report 'Hate Crimes' in Springfield

WEF Is Planning THIS!! Summer Davos 2024 & What It Means For You!

The U.S. government is running a $2 trillion deficit, while gold prices rise, signaling a potential fiscal disaster ahead.

Meet The Hate-Crime Commissar Of New Normal Berlin

Billionaire stock market visionary reveals SHOCK financial move he'll make, if Harris wins the election

Ukraine Loses Over 14,200 Soldiers During Operation in Kursk Area -MOD

Israel blocks over 80 percent of food aid from entering Gaza

CNN Fact Checks Kamala Harris Campaign, 8 Repeated Examples of Deception

Trans-Identifying 19-Year-Old Arrested After Expressing Desire To Shoot Up Elementary School

John Deere SCREWED Farmers, Now They're Paying The Price!

Top Oncologist Raises Alarm: Every New Cancer Patient Is Under 45

Hint: This Election is About the Cats and Dogs! (VIDEO)

Italian Socialite Slams Car on Alleged Moroccan Handbag Thief and Kills Him

Not Just 'Russia, Russia, Russia': Hillary Demands Criminal Charges For Americans "Engaged" In "Propaganda"

Popular Female Comedian Wrongfully Banned By Leftist Moles Still Inside X Appeals To Elon Musk

"This is Hezbollah's 9/11 and it's DEVASTATING"

Nassim Taleb: People Aren't Seeing The Real De-Dollarization

"Operation Beef Bandit": Four Thieves Caught In Multi-Million Dollar Chain Of Food Heists Spanning 3 Years

Cash Jordan: Destroy a Park For Immigrant Housing

FBI whistleblower WARNS about agent investigating 2nd Trump assassination attempt

Arrogance not frustration is fueling political violence

Hillary to Maddow: We Need Criminal Penalties For Misinformation

The liberal outlet ‘The Hill’ is pushing a new NAACP poll focused on black voters and Kamala Harris


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 UAL 175 Plane on Radar AFTER It Has 'Crashed' Into The WTC; (MSNBC)
Source: ,
URL Source: http://,
Published: Mar 16, 2009
Author: msnbc
Post Date: 2009-03-16 13:04:41 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 12067
Comments: 607

youtube link

http://conspiracyrealitytv.com/911-ual-175-plane-on-radar-after-it-has-crashed-into-the-wtc/

Kudos to SEATNINEB for this. Check forum here at: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=14399

FAA radar is tracking, in real time, flight 175 after it has supposedly crashed into the WTC. This is perhaps an hour later. Although many people do not believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help.

3 IFR aircraft in the air in a 30 mile radius of New york city is consistent with one hour of diversions and forced landings.

One hour before you would expect a very large multiple of 3 aircraft to be in the air. NY has several incredibly busy airports.Check anytime on FLIGHT AWARE and count the aircraft within a 30 mile radius of NY. There should be 60 to 100


Poster Comment: any debunkers? Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-22) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#23. To: Original_Intent (#22)

Actually my prediction was more along the order of "if I step out into a rain shower that I would get wet.

The difference being what? In BOTH cases you failed to cover yourself...

Why do YOU believe thatthe Towers fell?

war  posted on  2009-03-16   15:12:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Original_Intent (#21)

Blah Blah Blah...

One of the "facts" that you kooks try to morph into misinformation is the one on which FDNY pulled its personnel from 7. Youl idiots claim it means that they blew up the building...

war  posted on  2009-03-16   15:14:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: war (#23)

Why do YOU believe thatthe Towers fell?

.


"It is like a trance. So what can break a trance? The only thing that can break the trance is the light of truth."
~ Canadian Philosopher John McMurtry as he comments on the psychological warfare that has afflicted us all

wudidiz  posted on  2009-03-16   15:20:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: war (#24)

Blah Blah Blah...

Here, chew on this:

"It makes the debate over Obama’s citizenship a rather short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?

A: Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel under?

A: There are only three possibilities. 1. He traveled with a U.S. passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport.

Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981. (Oh My God!!! Quick come up with a smarmy reply for this! It's too damaging to let stand without some immediate name calling and hysterics!)

Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he was traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he was traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a “natural born” American citizen between 1981 and 2008. Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.

Is he a “natural born” citizen, or isn’t he? It seems pretty clear from the available evidence that he is not. If that proves to be the case he should minimize the damage to the country and follow the Nixon example; he should simply resign from office so that we can begin to clean up the mess he leaves behind."

And, you reply is.....

Photobucket

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-16   15:46:17 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: HOUNDDAWG (#26)

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.

WRONG!!!

That corrected...big fucking deal...Pakistan did not forbid US citizens to travel to it. Up until a few years ago, you could fly to Canada and then to Havana and be admitted ON A US PASSPORT...

Thge propblem with you people is that you're stupid. You don't think things through with any objective sense and so it makes it easy for people to lie to you.

war  posted on  2009-03-16   15:53:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: war (#27)

How 911 was Done
how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

Itistoolate  posted on  2009-03-16   16:11:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: wudidiz (#25)

Thats a great vid!

Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-03-16   16:15:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Artisan (#1)

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=101561

Information in the thread linked above may be useful.

Flight Explorer is a virtual display of information from a number of sources, including radar. However, it is not the same as a primary radar display.

Regardless, this is an important find worthy of closer examination.

Great post.

honway  posted on  2009-03-16   16:17:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: war, HOUNDDAWG, PSUSA, Original_Intent (#27)

Thge propblem with you people is that you're stupid. You don't think things through with any objective sense and so it makes it easy for people to lie to you.

Oh, the irony.

Btw, you spelt stoopid wrong.


"It is like a trance. So what can break a trance? The only thing that can break the trance is the light of truth."
~ Canadian Philosopher John McMurtry as he comments on the psychological warfare that has afflicted us all

wudidiz  posted on  2009-03-16   18:17:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Artisan (#0)

If the plane is still in the air is it hovering?

war  posted on  2009-03-16   21:52:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: war (#27) (Edited)

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.

WRONG!!!

Corrected?

Funny.

You mean Obama showed you the US passport he used when he was 20 years old?

It's a shame he won't show it to anyone else.

Corrected indeed.

If he has nothing to hide then why is he hiding it?

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   0:26:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: HOUNDDAWG (#33)

If he has nothing to hide then why is he hiding it?

bump

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   0:36:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: litus (#34)

And, how about this?

"Linda Starr Posts New Information Jump to Comments

Posted Jan 19 from Obamacrimes:

how many of you picked up on what Phil said on tonight’s radio show about the FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator? Do you understand and comprehend the enormity of that announcement? Do you all realize what it means? I can tell you now that is one part of several pieces of good news we had the other day that I hinted at and could not reveal. That information confirms Barry had to renew an Indonesian passport to go to Pakistan in 81. That means Barry swore an Oath of Allegiance to Indonesia and had to renounce all other allegiances to get that passport. This is independent confirmation of information we’ve had and from OUR OWN State Department, Barry couldn’t go to Pakistan on an American passport if he didn’t have one.

There are so many amazing pieces of good news coming in. I wish I could tell you all about it. I will say this, I am skeptical of the announcement Barry will be served with papers to block his swearing in tomorrow, but it’s not inconceivable in light of other information I have heard today. Again, I have no way to verify anything except that which we have obtained certified documents.

Despite the media's worst efforts to suppress this, if Barry wants to be reelected he'll have to produce something.

Of course all of his diehard blow jobbers will disappear by then the way those who used to support Nixon (and Clinton and Bush) now have....

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   0:50:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: HOUNDDAWG (#35)

FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator?

This will get buried....

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   1:03:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: litus (#36)

FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator?

This will get buried....

Perhaps.

But, I have a feeling that he ain't gonna pull this off.

If anything, he'll forever serve as the textbook example of "just how sneaky them Muslims can be...."

Obama will do for Muslims what Julius and Ethyl did for Jews.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   1:10:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: HOUNDDAWG (#37)

If anything, he'll forever serve as the textbook example of "just how sneaky them Muslims can be...."

Obama will do for Muslims what Julius and Ethyl did for Jews.

I would like for that to be the case, but I'm not so optimistic.

We shall see.

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   1:14:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Artisan (#0)

they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC

This is absurd. Of course two planes hit the WTC towers. They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them. Anyone saying no planes hit the WTC towers is putting out disinfo to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-17   1:20:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: litus (#38)

I would like for that to be the case, but I'm not so optimistic.

We shall see.

Well, after Clinton/Gore slipped the noose for selling America to the Chinese, I suppose I have no reason to be optimistic.

(Not to mention Mega's unfettered access to everything in The White House)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   1:37:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: HOUNDDAWG (#40)

Mega's unfettered access

sorry...who's Mega?

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   1:42:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: litus (#41)

Mega's unfettered access

sorry...who's Mega?

Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government.

Most likely Rahm Emmanuel.

""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-03-17   2:44:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Itistoolate (#28)

Your (link) as to how 9/11 was done is the best overview I've seen so far. I theorized alternative 2 but the first one is probably more realistic considering that criminals like to keep things simple.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2009-03-17   4:29:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: wudidiz (#31)

That doesn't bother me. IT's not like this is the first time it's ever happened.

Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-03-17   6:32:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: litus, Original Intent (#41)

Mega's unfettered access

sorry...who's Mega?

Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government.

Most likely Rahm Emmanuel.

Israeli Spies: 'Mega Was Not An Agent; Mega Was the Boss'

link

And thanks, OI.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   7:32:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Original_Intent (#42) (Edited)

Given the seriousness of the Mega security breach, the abrupt shutdown of the mole hunt naturally prompted some wild speculation about the circumstances under which the search for Mega was abandoned. In March 1999, British author Gordon Thomas released a book, Gideon's Spies, which alleged that Israel had blackmailed the Clinton Administration, with the threat to release tapped telephone conversations between the President and Monica Lewinsky, to force Washington to abandon the Mega hunt. Indeed, in her testimony before independent counsel Kenneth Starr, Lewinsky had reported that the President had warned her, on March 29, 1997, at the height of the Mega hunt, that he suspected the White House telephones were being tapped by agents of an unnamed foreign country.

An "unnamed foreign country"?

Them dam Eskimos and Micronesians-you just can't trust em!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   7:34:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: RickyJ (#39) (Edited)

they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC

This is absurd. Of course two planes hit the WTC towers. They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them. Anyone saying no planes hit the WTC towers is putting out disinfo to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.

I agree.

The real flight may have been remotely piloted out over the water and dumped in an ocean trench, and that would explain why it was spotted on Radar after it reportedly crashed.

Now that demons are in control no act of cold blooded murder is unthinkable.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   7:48:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: HOUNDDAWG (#35)

...about the FOIA confirming [he] never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama

More proof that you are stupid and easily lied to.

Unless Obama authorized the release of that information FOIA would have protecetd his file from release.

171.12 Processing requests.

The Information and Privacy Coordinator is responsible for acting on all initial requests except for requests for records coming under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Consular Affairs, the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the Bureau of Human Resources, the Office of Medical Services, and the Office of the Inspector General.

(a) Third party requests. Except for requests under the Privacy Act by a parent of a minor or by a legal guardian (Sec. 171.32(c)), requests for records pertaining to another individual shall be processed under the FOIA and must be accompanied by a written authorization for access by the individual, notarized or made under penalty of perjury, or by proof that the individual is deceased (e.g., death certificate or obituary).

If you are requesting information on behalf of an individual, the Department also requires a statement authorizing you to receive the subject’s personal information.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   8:01:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: RickyJ (#39)

They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them.

The second plane was clearly visible to me as I stood at th cporner of Church and Libertu as a United 767...it's an image that I will never lose until I turn cold and am burned and scattered...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   8:07:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: HOUNDDAWG (#33)

You mean Obama showed you the US passport he used when he was 20 years old?

Did he show you his Indonesian one?

war  posted on  2009-03-17   8:16:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: wudidiz (#31)

So I hit the "p" key which is right next to the "o" key. Sue me...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   9:45:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Original_Intent, HOUNDDAWG (#42)

Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government.

Most likely Rahm Emmanuel.

Never heard of this, or him, before. Thanks. I'll do some research on that.

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   9:47:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: HOUNDDAWG, Original Intent (#45)

Thanks for the link! bookmarked for later leisure reading today.

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   9:48:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: war (#10)

Why are you even here on this forum war? Did Goldi give you a timeout for not praising the brave Israeli soldiers as they murdered little kids as much as she liked?

Or are you here just to troll for lack of anything better to do?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:25:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: war (#24)

One of the "facts" that you kooks

Are you BeAChooser?

Regardless, how do you explain the impossible freefall speed of the towers? The undamaged structure below the impact area would not have behaved like thin air, yet the structures (both towers, AND the relatively undamaged WTC7) fell at free fall speeds as if falling through thin air. What's your scientific explanation (and please don't say "pancaking" as even THAT would not occur at free fall speed).

Do you not find the fact that all records and evidence pertaining to the Enron investigation was destroyed in the relatively undamaged WTC7 to be just a tad suspicious?

What proof is there that the individuals cited as the 9/11 hijackers actually carried out the attacks, especially when some of them are still alive and have been on TV?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:32:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: FormerLurker (#54)

LP got too kooky and racist for him.

As a remedy, he obviously felt he should double down and go hang out with the REAL kooks.

longnose gar  posted on  2009-03-17   10:32:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: FormerLurker (#54)

Why are you even here on this forum war?

I'd rather post on a forum in which there are basically no rules and thus nothing is enforced rather than one that claims to have them and then are selectively enforced. It's really nothing against Goldi. It's her forum and she can exercise or not exercise her editorial discsretion in any manner that she sees fit. I just happen to disagree with it. I like Goldi.

And, I still post at LP, btw...just not as much...

But as to WHY I am here...I was invited 3 and a half years ago to check this site out. I registered and lurked.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:33:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: longnose gar (#56)

Now THAT was funny.

Actually, I enjoy being around those who make no pretense about their beliefs as opposed to those who use innuendo or are coy about it.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:35:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: war (#17)

Explain this. See how the top of the tower is tilting on an angle? Simple physics would determine that the top of the tower should have toppled over and tumbled, as there is less resistance to the air than there would be to the steel and concrete below it, thus it would have continued it's rotational movement and toppled over.

Why did it all of a sudden drop like a rock straight down through the steel and concrete rather than simply topple over as it appears ready to do in the following picture?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:41:40 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: FormerLurker (#55)

Are you BeAChooser?

Good God no...

Regardless, how do you explain the impossible freefall speed of the towers?

They did not fall at free fall speed. The towers fell because the weigth bearing walls were actually the outside of the building. Once they were compromised as well as the support trusses it becamse an exercise in simple physics.

Do you not find the fact that all records and evidence pertaining to the Enron investigation was destroyed in the relatively undamaged WTC7 to be just a tad suspicious?

Uh...considering that they were not I don't find it suspicious at all.

the relatively undamaged WTC7

WTC 7 was no "realtively undamaged". Almost teh whole of the South Facade was gone and fires raged within it...

What proof is there that the individuals cited as the 9/11 hijackers actually carried out the attacks, especially when some of them are still alive and have been on TV?

Wha...chuckle...huh?

I'll buy the fact that some of the 9/11 hijackers most likely used aliases...BFD...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:42:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: FormerLurker (#59)

As you can see it's not dropping stright...your own photo shows the tilt...in the case of 1 it fell into the Deutsche Bank Building and in the case of 2 it fell into 7...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:45:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: longnose gar (#56)

longnose gar

Oh looky here, we have a live shill onboard. I remember you from past 9/11 "discussions". Aren't you McCainRocks over at LP, and used to be HappyFunBalls, amongst a whole bunch of other names?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:45:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: war (#61)

The top of the tower should have continued it's fall to where it would have flipped to the side and fallen down without going through the rest of the entire tower. Sort of like putting a can on top of a damaged box of cereral and pushing down on one end of the can till it tilts if you want an analogy. The can wouldn't fall through the box, it'd simply slide off the box and fall.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:48:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (64 - 607) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]