[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 UAL 175 Plane on Radar AFTER It Has 'Crashed' Into The WTC; (MSNBC)
Source: ,
URL Source: http://,
Published: Mar 16, 2009
Author: msnbc
Post Date: 2009-03-16 13:04:41 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 38607
Comments: 607

youtube link

http://conspiracyrealitytv.com/911-ual-175-plane-on-radar-after-it-has-crashed-into-the-wtc/

Kudos to SEATNINEB for this. Check forum here at: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=14399

FAA radar is tracking, in real time, flight 175 after it has supposedly crashed into the WTC. This is perhaps an hour later. Although many people do not believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help.

3 IFR aircraft in the air in a 30 mile radius of New york city is consistent with one hour of diversions and forced landings.

One hour before you would expect a very large multiple of 3 aircraft to be in the air. NY has several incredibly busy airports.Check anytime on FLIGHT AWARE and count the aircraft within a 30 mile radius of NY. There should be 60 to 100


Poster Comment: any debunkers? Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 501.

#480. To: Artisan, Christine, Jethro Tull, Itistoolate, Diana, All (#0)

any debunkers?

I've looked at these issues with total disgust. You're seeing a "re-creation" which can be anything that the program operator wants it to be. The major question being, "Okay, where's the original computer data, from which these images were created???"

I've never discovered anything valid which denies that the Tower hits were anything but as valid as what we saw on the news of 9-11. The give-away of the truth of the Twin Towers is the difficulty of the last-second maneuvering of both aircraft; as those buildings become a really difficult target to hit, at those kinds of flying speeds. That also tells a professional pilot that there were no idiots at the controls of those aircraft - and that the strikes were hand-flown; at least in the last seconds. The 'mystery' being in the identity/nationality of the actual pros who did that flying. Who else has a cause worth dying for (It wasn't Islam!)


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2009-03-21   2:04:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#481. To: SKYDRIFTER (#480)

So you don't think it was remote controlled?

With a camera mounted in the plane I don't see why a pilot on the ground couldn't have done it.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-21   2:08:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#482. To: RickyJ, Coral Snake, Christine, Jethro Tull, Itistoolate, Diana, All (#481)

With a camera mounted in the plane I don't see why a pilot on the ground couldn't have done it.

I've hand-flown that generation of aircraft into 'tight' airports such as Burbank & Orange County. With landing gear down, & full flaps at 150 mph, it's tough enough to hit the landing zone; at that speed. Take the speed up to 300 knots & no remote control pilot could do it. Add that no such camera would go undetected by maintenance or the pilots.

Add that the pilots would have to be done-in, to preclude their override of any "remote control." The "remote control" debate fails the smell-test, from the very beginning.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2009-03-21   2:26:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#497. To: SKYDRIFTER (#482)

Take the speed up to 300 knots & no remote control pilot could do it. Add that no such camera would go undetected by maintenance or the pilots.

Add that the pilots would have to be done-in, to preclude their override of any "remote control." The "remote control" debate fails the smell-test, from the very beginning.

You're assuming that the government's bag of equipment contains the same equipment you can buy off the shelf. Of course they would have technology MUCH more sophisticated than anything publicly available, and it would CLASSIFIED so neither you nor anyone else would know what feats could be performed using THEIR remote control equipment.

Needless to say, if a cruise missile can hit its target, so can a larger and slower aircraft.

As far as the maintenance crew, who's to say the crew wasn't infiltrated by black ops? And who knows how well the government could conceal a device if they really wanted to...

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-21   14:56:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#500. To: FormerLurker (#497) (Edited)

Needless to say, if a cruise missile can hit its target, so can a larger and slower aircraft.

As far as the maintenance crew, who's to say the crew wasn't infiltrated by black ops? And who knows how well the government could conceal a device if they really wanted to...

There may have been no crew at all, no passengers, just a military jet plane guided using the latest missile guiding technology to hit the WTC buildings. At 550 MPH that would be a piece of cake with our current technology.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-21   15:01:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#501. To: RickyJ (#500)

I watched the second plane go in and I a) knew it was UAL and b) was pretty sure it was a 767 b ut I did have some question that it might have been a 737...

Your other problem is that the second flight has been captured on several videos and yet another problem you have is the recorded conversation between the AA 11's flight attendent and AA's ground ops.

war  posted on  2009-03-21   15:22:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 501.

#502. To: war (#501) (Edited)

I watched the second plane go in and I a) knew it was UAL

You knew no such thing. You only know what you saw, you have no way of knowing what plane that really was despite markings on it. It would be very easy to put a United logo on a military plane.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-21 15:28:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#504. To: war (#501)

Your other problem is that the second flight has been captured on several videos and yet another problem you have is the recorded conversation between the AA 11's flight attendent and AA's ground ops.

All very easy to manufacture with voice technology. They can get Osama to say what ever they want him to say, just as they can anyone else.

Your problem is that 9/11 truth is coming out and government stooges will not have an easy life.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-21 15:35:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 501.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]