[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Feds Raid Alfie Oakes’ Naples Home and Farm with Battering Ram

Democrats Have a New Leader: Kamala Is Out, Says GOP Strategist

The Colorado Voting Machine Fiasco

Trump Lawyer WARNS Letitia James, Vows RETRIBUTION After Trump Win: 'We'll Put Your Fat A** In JAIL'

Tucker Carlson:11/7/2024 "now that Trump is president, i can tell you everything"

Fear-Stricken Pharma Big-Wigs Convene Emergency Teleconference to Thwart RFK Jr.

Judge strikes down Joe Biden administration program aimed at easing citizenship pathway for some undocumented immigrants

CNN faces another defamation lawsuit after appeals court sides with Project Veritas

These Hollywood Celebrities Swore They'd Leave America If Trump Won All Talk, No Walk

Blaze News original: Border Patrol whistleblower's career on the line after spotlighting trafficking horrors

Dems open can of worms by asking about millions of 2020 Biden voters who somehow disappeared in 2024

Deadline: US says Israel failing in aid efforts. What happens now?

Kash Patel, Rumored Pick for CIA Chief, Announces Massive Declassification Will Occur

Hezbollah unveils ‘Fateh 110’ ballistic missile in targeting Israeli sites

Pentagon running low on air-defense missiles as Israel, Ukraine gobble up remaining supplies

An Open Letter To Elon Musk

Is this why Trump was allowed to win?

This Is The Median Home Price In Each US State

Alex Soros Shocked That the Incumbent Political Order Is Being Crushed Around The Globe

Beverly Hills Lawyer Disbarred Two Years After Admitting He Paid a Ringer to Take the Bar

Lumumba: 'I am not guilty, and so I will not proceed as a guilty man.'

Lauren Boebert Wins House Election After Switching to More Conservative Colorado District

AIPAC Boasts of Influence Over Congress, Ousting 'Eleven Anti-Israel Candidates'

Police Searching for 40 Escaped Monkeys After Mass Breakout from South Carolina Research Facility

"You Don't Deserve Any Respect!": Steve Bannon Goes Scorched Earth On Democrats On Election Night Livestream

Putin's ready to talk now that the mentally ill homosexuals have been brushed aside

Trump, the Economy & World War III: Col. Douglas Macgregor

Ex-Top Official Catherine Austin Fitts: Inside Trump’s Victory, RFK Jr., and the Deep State

10 Big Losers That Weren't On The Ballot

Elon’s first day working for the Federal Government


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 UAL 175 Plane on Radar AFTER It Has 'Crashed' Into The WTC; (MSNBC)
Source: ,
URL Source: http://,
Published: Mar 16, 2009
Author: msnbc
Post Date: 2009-03-16 13:04:41 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 14601
Comments: 607

youtube link

http://conspiracyrealitytv.com/911-ual-175-plane-on-radar-after-it-has-crashed-into-the-wtc/

Kudos to SEATNINEB for this. Check forum here at: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=14399

FAA radar is tracking, in real time, flight 175 after it has supposedly crashed into the WTC. This is perhaps an hour later. Although many people do not believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help.

3 IFR aircraft in the air in a 30 mile radius of New york city is consistent with one hour of diversions and forced landings.

One hour before you would expect a very large multiple of 3 aircraft to be in the air. NY has several incredibly busy airports.Check anytime on FLIGHT AWARE and count the aircraft within a 30 mile radius of NY. There should be 60 to 100


Poster Comment: any debunkers? Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-34) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#35. To: litus (#34)

And, how about this?

"Linda Starr Posts New Information Jump to Comments

Posted Jan 19 from Obamacrimes:

how many of you picked up on what Phil said on tonight’s radio show about the FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator? Do you understand and comprehend the enormity of that announcement? Do you all realize what it means? I can tell you now that is one part of several pieces of good news we had the other day that I hinted at and could not reveal. That information confirms Barry had to renew an Indonesian passport to go to Pakistan in 81. That means Barry swore an Oath of Allegiance to Indonesia and had to renounce all other allegiances to get that passport. This is independent confirmation of information we’ve had and from OUR OWN State Department, Barry couldn’t go to Pakistan on an American passport if he didn’t have one.

There are so many amazing pieces of good news coming in. I wish I could tell you all about it. I will say this, I am skeptical of the announcement Barry will be served with papers to block his swearing in tomorrow, but it’s not inconceivable in light of other information I have heard today. Again, I have no way to verify anything except that which we have obtained certified documents.

Despite the media's worst efforts to suppress this, if Barry wants to be reelected he'll have to produce something.

Of course all of his diehard blow jobbers will disappear by then the way those who used to support Nixon (and Clinton and Bush) now have....

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   0:50:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: HOUNDDAWG (#35)

FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator?

This will get buried....

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   1:03:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: litus (#36)

FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator?

This will get buried....

Perhaps.

But, I have a feeling that he ain't gonna pull this off.

If anything, he'll forever serve as the textbook example of "just how sneaky them Muslims can be...."

Obama will do for Muslims what Julius and Ethyl did for Jews.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   1:10:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: HOUNDDAWG (#37)

If anything, he'll forever serve as the textbook example of "just how sneaky them Muslims can be...."

Obama will do for Muslims what Julius and Ethyl did for Jews.

I would like for that to be the case, but I'm not so optimistic.

We shall see.

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   1:14:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Artisan (#0)

they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC

This is absurd. Of course two planes hit the WTC towers. They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them. Anyone saying no planes hit the WTC towers is putting out disinfo to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-17   1:20:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: litus (#38)

I would like for that to be the case, but I'm not so optimistic.

We shall see.

Well, after Clinton/Gore slipped the noose for selling America to the Chinese, I suppose I have no reason to be optimistic.

(Not to mention Mega's unfettered access to everything in The White House)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   1:37:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: HOUNDDAWG (#40)

Mega's unfettered access

sorry...who's Mega?

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   1:42:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: litus (#41)

Mega's unfettered access

sorry...who's Mega?

Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government.

Most likely Rahm Emmanuel.

""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician

Original_Intent  posted on  2009-03-17   2:44:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Itistoolate (#28)

Your (link) as to how 9/11 was done is the best overview I've seen so far. I theorized alternative 2 but the first one is probably more realistic considering that criminals like to keep things simple.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2009-03-17   4:29:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: wudidiz (#31)

That doesn't bother me. IT's not like this is the first time it's ever happened.

Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

PSUSA  posted on  2009-03-17   6:32:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: litus, Original Intent (#41)

Mega's unfettered access

sorry...who's Mega?

Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government.

Most likely Rahm Emmanuel.

Israeli Spies: 'Mega Was Not An Agent; Mega Was the Boss'

link

And thanks, OI.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   7:32:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Original_Intent (#42) (Edited)

Given the seriousness of the Mega security breach, the abrupt shutdown of the mole hunt naturally prompted some wild speculation about the circumstances under which the search for Mega was abandoned. In March 1999, British author Gordon Thomas released a book, Gideon's Spies, which alleged that Israel had blackmailed the Clinton Administration, with the threat to release tapped telephone conversations between the President and Monica Lewinsky, to force Washington to abandon the Mega hunt. Indeed, in her testimony before independent counsel Kenneth Starr, Lewinsky had reported that the President had warned her, on March 29, 1997, at the height of the Mega hunt, that he suspected the White House telephones were being tapped by agents of an unnamed foreign country.

An "unnamed foreign country"?

Them dam Eskimos and Micronesians-you just can't trust em!

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   7:34:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: RickyJ (#39) (Edited)

they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC

This is absurd. Of course two planes hit the WTC towers. They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them. Anyone saying no planes hit the WTC towers is putting out disinfo to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.

I agree.

The real flight may have been remotely piloted out over the water and dumped in an ocean trench, and that would explain why it was spotted on Radar after it reportedly crashed.

Now that demons are in control no act of cold blooded murder is unthinkable.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-17   7:48:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: HOUNDDAWG (#35)

...about the FOIA confirming [he] never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama

More proof that you are stupid and easily lied to.

Unless Obama authorized the release of that information FOIA would have protecetd his file from release.

171.12 Processing requests.

The Information and Privacy Coordinator is responsible for acting on all initial requests except for requests for records coming under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Consular Affairs, the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the Bureau of Human Resources, the Office of Medical Services, and the Office of the Inspector General.

(a) Third party requests. Except for requests under the Privacy Act by a parent of a minor or by a legal guardian (Sec. 171.32(c)), requests for records pertaining to another individual shall be processed under the FOIA and must be accompanied by a written authorization for access by the individual, notarized or made under penalty of perjury, or by proof that the individual is deceased (e.g., death certificate or obituary).

If you are requesting information on behalf of an individual, the Department also requires a statement authorizing you to receive the subject’s personal information.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   8:01:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: RickyJ (#39)

They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them.

The second plane was clearly visible to me as I stood at th cporner of Church and Libertu as a United 767...it's an image that I will never lose until I turn cold and am burned and scattered...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   8:07:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: HOUNDDAWG (#33)

You mean Obama showed you the US passport he used when he was 20 years old?

Did he show you his Indonesian one?

war  posted on  2009-03-17   8:16:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: wudidiz (#31)

So I hit the "p" key which is right next to the "o" key. Sue me...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   9:45:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: Original_Intent, HOUNDDAWG (#42)

Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government.

Most likely Rahm Emmanuel.

Never heard of this, or him, before. Thanks. I'll do some research on that.

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   9:47:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: HOUNDDAWG, Original Intent (#45)

Thanks for the link! bookmarked for later leisure reading today.

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   9:48:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: war (#10)

Why are you even here on this forum war? Did Goldi give you a timeout for not praising the brave Israeli soldiers as they murdered little kids as much as she liked?

Or are you here just to troll for lack of anything better to do?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:25:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: war (#24)

One of the "facts" that you kooks

Are you BeAChooser?

Regardless, how do you explain the impossible freefall speed of the towers? The undamaged structure below the impact area would not have behaved like thin air, yet the structures (both towers, AND the relatively undamaged WTC7) fell at free fall speeds as if falling through thin air. What's your scientific explanation (and please don't say "pancaking" as even THAT would not occur at free fall speed).

Do you not find the fact that all records and evidence pertaining to the Enron investigation was destroyed in the relatively undamaged WTC7 to be just a tad suspicious?

What proof is there that the individuals cited as the 9/11 hijackers actually carried out the attacks, especially when some of them are still alive and have been on TV?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:32:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: FormerLurker (#54)

LP got too kooky and racist for him.

As a remedy, he obviously felt he should double down and go hang out with the REAL kooks.

longnose gar  posted on  2009-03-17   10:32:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: FormerLurker (#54)

Why are you even here on this forum war?

I'd rather post on a forum in which there are basically no rules and thus nothing is enforced rather than one that claims to have them and then are selectively enforced. It's really nothing against Goldi. It's her forum and she can exercise or not exercise her editorial discsretion in any manner that she sees fit. I just happen to disagree with it. I like Goldi.

And, I still post at LP, btw...just not as much...

But as to WHY I am here...I was invited 3 and a half years ago to check this site out. I registered and lurked.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:33:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: longnose gar (#56)

Now THAT was funny.

Actually, I enjoy being around those who make no pretense about their beliefs as opposed to those who use innuendo or are coy about it.

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:35:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: war (#17)

Explain this. See how the top of the tower is tilting on an angle? Simple physics would determine that the top of the tower should have toppled over and tumbled, as there is less resistance to the air than there would be to the steel and concrete below it, thus it would have continued it's rotational movement and toppled over.

Why did it all of a sudden drop like a rock straight down through the steel and concrete rather than simply topple over as it appears ready to do in the following picture?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:41:40 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: FormerLurker (#55)

Are you BeAChooser?

Good God no...

Regardless, how do you explain the impossible freefall speed of the towers?

They did not fall at free fall speed. The towers fell because the weigth bearing walls were actually the outside of the building. Once they were compromised as well as the support trusses it becamse an exercise in simple physics.

Do you not find the fact that all records and evidence pertaining to the Enron investigation was destroyed in the relatively undamaged WTC7 to be just a tad suspicious?

Uh...considering that they were not I don't find it suspicious at all.

the relatively undamaged WTC7

WTC 7 was no "realtively undamaged". Almost teh whole of the South Facade was gone and fires raged within it...

What proof is there that the individuals cited as the 9/11 hijackers actually carried out the attacks, especially when some of them are still alive and have been on TV?

Wha...chuckle...huh?

I'll buy the fact that some of the 9/11 hijackers most likely used aliases...BFD...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:42:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#61. To: FormerLurker (#59)

As you can see it's not dropping stright...your own photo shows the tilt...in the case of 1 it fell into the Deutsche Bank Building and in the case of 2 it fell into 7...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:45:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#62. To: longnose gar (#56)

longnose gar

Oh looky here, we have a live shill onboard. I remember you from past 9/11 "discussions". Aren't you McCainRocks over at LP, and used to be HappyFunBalls, amongst a whole bunch of other names?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:45:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#63. To: war (#61)

The top of the tower should have continued it's fall to where it would have flipped to the side and fallen down without going through the rest of the entire tower. Sort of like putting a can on top of a damaged box of cereral and pushing down on one end of the can till it tilts if you want an analogy. The can wouldn't fall through the box, it'd simply slide off the box and fall.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   10:48:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: FormerLurker (#63)

The top of the tower should have continued it's fall to where it would have flipped to the side and fallen down without going through the rest of the entire tower.

Uh no...it would not "flip"...gravity would take it in the most direct route of its momentum...

war  posted on  2009-03-17   10:57:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: FormerLurker (#62)

I can't believe you guys are still dwelling on that truther nonsense. As with the NAU discussions, that is so last administration.

Do you still dwell on the merits of The Brady Bunch vs Happy Days?

longnose gar  posted on  2009-03-17   10:58:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: FormerLurker, war (#55)

How could you have posted at LP and not know the difference between war and BAC? They both posted a lot and about the only agreement they had was that you truthers are about two pancakes short of a stack.

longnose gar  posted on  2009-03-17   11:03:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#67. To: war (#60)

They did not fall at free fall speed

They fell in about 10-11 seconds, where free fall through air would have been a little over 9 seconds. So you're wrong.

The towers fell because the weigth bearing walls were actually the outside of the building.

For one, the steel core bore the majority of the weight. For two, the structure supported itself without falling for quite some time. The weight that the structure supported didn't change due to the fires, nor did it change PERIOD.

As far as energy exerted due to the collapse of one floor from the height that the planes impacted, there would be minimal extra load the structure would to have needed to support. So that's bullshit.

Once they were compromised as well as the support trusses it becamse an exercise in simple physics.

Apparently we studied a different sort of physics.

Uh...considering that they were not I don't find it suspicious at all.

Where were the Enron SEC filings stored?

WTC 7 was no "realtively undamaged". Almost teh whole of the South Facade was gone and fires raged within it...

Bullshit. Even if true, WTC7 was internally reinforced. Do you think it was incapable of supporting itself without one of it's exterior walls? How do you think it kept from falling while they were building it?

You have so many childish assumptions it's sort of humorous, as you have to used really fractured logic to arrive at your conclusions.

Oh and BTW, there were no "raging fires", there was a bit of a diesel fire inside but nothing close to a "raging fire".

You think that a structure such as WTC7 would simply collapse like a deck of cards due to a relatively small internal fire a bit of damage to an exterior wall?

Geesh.

I'll buy the fact that some of the 9/11 hijackers most likely used aliases...BFD...

The individuals listed as the hijackers are not said to be using aliases, and are indentified with not only their names but their photos. There are at least several individuals identified as hijackers who are still alive, and ARE the people that are so identified.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   11:04:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: FormerLurker (#59)

Why did it all of a sudden drop like a rock straight down through the steel and concrete rather than simply topple over as it appears ready to do in the following picture?

You mean like what happens in a controlled demolition? Well, this is different....the plane hit the building (which was specifically designed to withstand the impact of a direct hit by a plane), and the plane had fuel (no matter that the fire was limited to just a couple floors, as opposed to other towers which have also had intense fire but never collapsed)....and because of the intense flames (limited to two floors?)....the structural beams just melted.......and can't you just believe these people already?!

: )

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   11:05:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#69. To: longnose gar, war (#66)

How could you have posted at LP and not know the difference between war and BAC?

Because war shills for the government when it comes to 9/11 and behaves just like BAC on that topic, especially with his use of the word KOOK.

I'm just waiting for a ROFL to go along with it...


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   11:05:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#70. To: FormerLurker (#55)

Are you BeAChooser?

That was funny.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-03-17   11:06:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#71. To: litus (#68)

can't you just believe these people already?!

It's sort of like Dorothy when she clicks her heels...

I bet that's what a lot of folks do, just click their heels and convince themselves that it's all just a bad dream. It's MUCH easier to simply believe the talking heads on TV than to actually think for themselves.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   11:08:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: war (#64)

Uh no...it would not "flip"...gravity would take it in the most direct route of its momentum...

Which is through the path of least resistance, ie. the air.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   11:09:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: litus (#68)

You forgot that it was Magickal Jet Fuel™ that can change properties at will and burn hotter than the sun. And they only ever made one batch of it and it was all used that day as evidenced by the fact that other skyscrapers have burned longer and fully engulfed since then, yet none of them fell. Not one. And some had burned before that day too and not one of those fell either. Steel skyscrapers just can't handle that Magickal Jet Fuel™.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

James Deffenbach  posted on  2009-03-17   11:09:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: longnose gar (#65)

Do you still dwell on the merits of The Brady Bunch vs Happy Days?

Do you still beat little puppies?


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-17   11:10:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: FormerLurker (#71)

It's MUCH easier to simply believe the talking heads on TV than to actually think for themselves.

So true! What I find also so insane...these very people (the media and .gov) they are believing are the very ones they admit have an agenda, do not care about the people, are only in politics for the power and money, are only on the airwaves to spout propaganda...but when it comes to 9/11, these same people (the media and .gov) become virtual truthtellers and outright angels if not saints.

litus  posted on  2009-03-17   11:11:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (76 - 607) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]