[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

MAGA Protest

The Floodgates Are Breaking In Germany's Welfare State

“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail,”

You Know What Happens Next

Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’

Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West

Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID

Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files

Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency!

Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA

Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 UAL 175 Plane on Radar AFTER It Has 'Crashed' Into The WTC; (MSNBC)
Source: ,
URL Source: http://,
Published: Mar 16, 2009
Author: msnbc
Post Date: 2009-03-16 13:04:41 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 33577
Comments: 607

youtube link

http://conspiracyrealitytv.com/911-ual-175-plane-on-radar-after-it-has-crashed-into-the-wtc/

Kudos to SEATNINEB for this. Check forum here at: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=14399

FAA radar is tracking, in real time, flight 175 after it has supposedly crashed into the WTC. This is perhaps an hour later. Although many people do not believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help.

3 IFR aircraft in the air in a 30 mile radius of New york city is consistent with one hour of diversions and forced landings.

One hour before you would expect a very large multiple of 3 aircraft to be in the air. NY has several incredibly busy airports.Check anytime on FLIGHT AWARE and count the aircraft within a 30 mile radius of NY. There should be 60 to 100


Poster Comment: any debunkers? Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 554.

#480. To: Artisan, Christine, Jethro Tull, Itistoolate, Diana, All (#0)

any debunkers?

I've looked at these issues with total disgust. You're seeing a "re-creation" which can be anything that the program operator wants it to be. The major question being, "Okay, where's the original computer data, from which these images were created???"

I've never discovered anything valid which denies that the Tower hits were anything but as valid as what we saw on the news of 9-11. The give-away of the truth of the Twin Towers is the difficulty of the last-second maneuvering of both aircraft; as those buildings become a really difficult target to hit, at those kinds of flying speeds. That also tells a professional pilot that there were no idiots at the controls of those aircraft - and that the strikes were hand-flown; at least in the last seconds. The 'mystery' being in the identity/nationality of the actual pros who did that flying. Who else has a cause worth dying for (It wasn't Islam!)


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2009-03-21   2:04:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#481. To: SKYDRIFTER (#480)

So you don't think it was remote controlled?

With a camera mounted in the plane I don't see why a pilot on the ground couldn't have done it.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-21   2:08:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#482. To: RickyJ, Coral Snake, Christine, Jethro Tull, Itistoolate, Diana, All (#481)

With a camera mounted in the plane I don't see why a pilot on the ground couldn't have done it.

I've hand-flown that generation of aircraft into 'tight' airports such as Burbank & Orange County. With landing gear down, & full flaps at 150 mph, it's tough enough to hit the landing zone; at that speed. Take the speed up to 300 knots & no remote control pilot could do it. Add that no such camera would go undetected by maintenance or the pilots.

Add that the pilots would have to be done-in, to preclude their override of any "remote control." The "remote control" debate fails the smell-test, from the very beginning.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2009-03-21   2:26:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#483. To: SKYDRIFTER (#482)

What if it was more like a guided missile system? Computers and lasers and all that? It seems hard to believe that it couldn't be done.

wudidiz  posted on  2009-03-21   2:34:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#484. To: wudidiz, Christine, Jethro Tull, All (#483)

What if it was more like a guided missile system? Computers and lasers and all that? It seems hard to believe that it couldn't be done.

There is no doubt that the technology has been available since the 60s. BUT, you can't get by the issue of maintenance (observing the alteration of the electronics), the pilots & cabin crew. There's the rub.

Trust me, I've looked at that angle very closely. It's well worth considering, but too quickly fails the probability test.

There are plenty of "possibilities," but most are quick to be excluded, by the industry professionals - if they have the guts to speak out; and that's a really small number.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2009-03-21   2:54:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#498. To: SKYDRIFTER, all (#484)

wait a minute. from my understanding this newly-found clip and those posting it simply purport not that planes didnt hit the towers, but that the planes were perhaps different planes than the originals which the govt claims hit the buildings.

I did not know you did not believe that the planes were remote controlled. I repsect your opinion which is why i asked.

so you are saying that you believe that there had to be real pilots flying the planes but that they were not arab boogeyman? who the heck were they then? some neocons with a zeal for empire? i dont know if that sounds plausible??

thanks for the reply.

Artisan  posted on  2009-03-21   14:58:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#530. To: Artisan, Christine, Jethro Tull, It istoolate, All (#498)

so you are saying that you believe that there had to be real pilots flying the planes but that they were not arab boogeyman? who the heck were they then? some neocons with a zeal for empire? i dont know if that sounds plausible??

There are a handful of viable possibilities available. If the aircraft was "remote controlled," the pilots would have the ability to either override the electronics, or at least radio that they were in dire peril, via radio, or the transponder. That pretty well rules out the "remote control" idea. It can be debated all day long, but those such as myself are qualified to cite the impossible and absurd. I keep an open mind, but there hasn't been that much viable material to speak in support of the detractor theories. Passionate nonsense & rationalization doesn't manufacture truth.

One possibility is the hand-picking of at least four black-ops pilots, willing to commit suicide. We'll probably never know.

The most important issue is that the 'official' story is so full of holes, that it looks like a chotic gause bandage. Add the massive coverup by the government agencies, aided by the robotic media.

Only Israelis were warned of 9-11, the London & Jordianian bombings. As Netanyahu said - before 'correcting' himself, "911 is very good for Israel." Being reasonable & realistic; what can anyone make of all that?

Add the Mossad "Dancing Art Students," set up to film the twin tower strikes.

Has anyone else noticed that our great "Ally" Israel never contributed as much as a troop of Boy Scouts to serve coffee in the Afghan & Iraq war crime invasions/occupations. (They don't have to!)

AND - after being the primary beneficiary of the Geneva Conventions, why is Israel not a signatory to those Conventions? By virtue of their membership in the UN, they are technically a signatory to the Geneva Conventions & Nuremberg Precedents - but tell that to the Gazzans.

We live in a time where we must subjectively establish a highly reasonable possibility. Sometimes that comes from presented facts; sometimes from presented information, which can't possibly be true.

My advice on 9-11 is to get a copy of Dr. Ray Griffin's "The New Pearl Harbor Revisited." He does quite an academic and surgical analysis of the 911 'official' accounts. I admit, I'm prejudiced on that work. I disagree with him on his conclusion that Flight 93 was shot down, but that's the only criticism I have of the book.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2009-03-21   21:50:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#533. To: SKYDRIFTER (#530)

Hi Sky - Glad to hear from you.

tom007  posted on  2009-03-22   0:22:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#538. To: tom007 (#533)

If the floors 'pancaked', then why was there no stack of floors at the bottom?

Because they were made of cement ond the force of the impact obliderated them. What do you ***think*** a good part of that "dust" was?

That said, when the Towers collapsed, the debris was up to 14 stories tall.

war  posted on  2009-03-22   8:36:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#545. To: war, tom007 (#538)

>> If the floors 'pancaked', then why was there no stack of floors at the bottom?

Because they were made of cement ond (sic) the force of the impact obliderated (sic) them.

This is what a building whose floors pancaked during an earthquake looks like.

Photobucket

As you can see, the cement was not obliterated by the force of the collisions on each floor.

The WTC tower's floors were blown up just like the rest of the building was in each building.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-22   20:17:57 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#547. To: RickyJ (#545)

The WTC tower's floors were blown up just like the rest of the building was in each building.

Ha...

HA Ha...

HA HA Ha...

HA HA HA...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

Hey Moonbat...why didn't the explosion and fire that by everyone's observation reached the core, set off any of those charges?

war  posted on  2009-03-22   20:20:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#548. To: war (#547) (Edited)

Hey Moonbat...why didn't the explosion and fire that by everyone's observation reached the core, set off any of those charges?

They did. It just didn't set off enough of them to bring the building down so they had to do it later via remote control.

Oh, and that explosion, the big fire ball of jet fuel seen outside the WTC tower after impact, was mostly outside the building.

If it were mostly inside the building then no one on any of those floors would have survived it. But many did.

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-22   20:24:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#554. To: RickyJ (#548)

Oh, and that explosion, the big fire ball of jet fuel seen outside the WTC tower after impact, was mostly outside the building.

Another one who ***thinks*** that nothing exploded inside the building...

But I'm retarded...

war  posted on  2009-03-22   20:41:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 554.

        There are no replies to Comment # 554.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 554.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]