[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pfizer Whistleblower Leaks Disturbing List of Vaccine Ingredients Previously Hidden from Public

Dems caught using FEMA dollar to drive illegal immigration

Israeli media: 50,000 troops fail to capture a single village in Lebanon

SEND IN THE US MARSHALS: Arizona Officials Caught Changing the Ballot Totals as Counting for US Senate Seat Continues

JD Vance says US could drop support for NATO if Europe tries to regulate Elon Musks platforms

Texas Democratic Party chairman steps down after admitting voters aren't on board with trans extremism

Democrat Consultants Who Joined Commiela Harriss Team Turned Out to Be CROOKS

Israeli Hooligans Provoked Clashes in Amsterdam, Interrupted Moment of Silence for Flood Victims

"Show No Mercy": Trump's Campaign Pledge To Annihilate Mexican Cartels Goes Viral

BRICS Building "Completely New Structure": Simon Hunt, Mike Green, Taggart On Threats To US Hegemony

Why Cher will STAY in the US despite vowing to flee if Donald Trump was elected over Kamala Harris

Israeli Govt Threatens Dan Bilzerian, Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens for Criticizing Gaza Genocide

Grocers ‘outraged’ after Whoopi Goldberg calls them ‘pigs’ over food inflation on ‘The View’

Californians Reject Soft on Crime Bill in 70% Landslide, Demand Action on Safety and Homelessness

Trump's return is a disaster for Ed Miliband his Net Zero dreams may soon lie in tatters

Russia Dominates US As Worlds Largest Owner Of Natural Resources

'Fasten Your Seatbelts' - Pepe Escobar Explores The 'Trumpquake'

This Is What An Electoral Landside Looks Like... And The Consequences For Democrats

Wedding-flation: The State-By-State Costs Of Tying-The-Knot

This Trend Seeks To Normalize Female Predators

Judge says New York can't use 'antiquated, unconstitutional' law to block migrant buses from Texas

This Is Orwell’s 1984 in Real Life: Internet Archive Under Siege in Massive Cyber Attack

Housing Bubble Alert! Property Values Are Set To Plunge By 25% Until December

Donald Trump ally slams 'imbecile' David Lammy and demands apology or UK will suffer

FEMA Official Removed After 'Avoid Trump Houses' Message Leaks, DeSantis Orders Investigation

​​​​​​​Mountain Miracle: One Of Maryland's Poorest Elementary Schools Outperforms Thanks To "Our Community"

Early Warning Signs Of A Total Economic And Social Collapse

The Friday Night News Dump is Heating Up!

FBI Stopped Iranian Plot To Assassinate Trump

"We Won't Be Certifying The Election..."


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9/11 UAL 175 Plane on Radar AFTER It Has 'Crashed' Into The WTC; (MSNBC)
Source: ,
URL Source: http://,
Published: Mar 16, 2009
Author: msnbc
Post Date: 2009-03-16 13:04:41 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 14989
Comments: 607

youtube link

http://conspiracyrealitytv.com/911-ual-175-plane-on-radar-after-it-has-crashed-into-the-wtc/

Kudos to SEATNINEB for this. Check forum here at: http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=14399

FAA radar is tracking, in real time, flight 175 after it has supposedly crashed into the WTC. This is perhaps an hour later. Although many people do not believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon or crashed in Shanksville, they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC. Perhaps this may help.

3 IFR aircraft in the air in a 30 mile radius of New york city is consistent with one hour of diversions and forced landings.

One hour before you would expect a very large multiple of 3 aircraft to be in the air. NY has several incredibly busy airports.Check anytime on FLIGHT AWARE and count the aircraft within a 30 mile radius of NY. There should be 60 to 100


Poster Comment: any debunkers? Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-362) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#363. To: RickyJ (#352) (Edited)

That's it. I've previously referenced the temperature from more authoritative sites which I can't find at the moment, but I'll cite WikiAnswers on this one.

I'm going out to the garage to do some fabrication work. Got some kerosene out there, and I think that I've got a thermometer that will go that high. I'll run a little experiment later and tell you how it turned out.

Join 2x4 Tuesdays & protect your RKBA.
www.righttokeepandbeararms.com

randge  posted on  2009-03-19   17:40:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#364. To: war (#97)

The top of the tower did topple over as you've been shown...

BTW, you contradict yourself here. Did it topple or did it drop staight down? It's easy to see the answer on various videos, but I'd like you to admit that it couldn't have done BOTH.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-19   17:42:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#365. To: litus (#362)

The 1975 World Trade Center Fire

The February 13, 1975 North Tower Fire has been carefully hidden from you. Here are a few reports concerning it.

The 1975 World Trade Center Fire

This 110-story steel-framed office building suffered a fire on the 11th floor on February 13, 1975. The loss was estimated at over $2000000. ...
www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_1975_fire.html - 9k - Cached -

-----------------------------

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-03-19   17:49:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#366. To: FormerLurker, war (#364)

The top of the tower did topple over as you've been shown...

BTW, you contradict yourself here. Did it topple or did it drop staight down? It's easy to see the answer on various videos, but I'd like you to admit that it couldn't have done BOTH.

I know what I saw in the videos....and it is a physical impossibility for it to do both.

: )

litus  posted on  2009-03-19   17:51:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#367. To: TwentyTwelve (#365)

This 110-story steel-framed office building

So.......were they wrong then or wrong after 9/11...."what steel frames"?????

lol!

litus  posted on  2009-03-19   17:52:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#368. To: war (#175) (Edited)

Me: Oh and BTW, there were no "raging fires", there was a bit of a diesel fire inside but nothing close to a "raging fire".

war: You're out of your fucking mind. Do I need to post yet even more pictures showing how stupid you are?


You're busted. I just noticed you posted an image of WTC5 trying to pass it off as an image of WTC7. The image properties indicate the file name is http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/attack/docs/wtc5_fire_floors.jpg, which shows that image depicts Building 5 not Building 7.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-19   18:01:36 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#369. To: war (#176)

Me: The individuals listed as the hijackers are not said to be using aliases

war: If they weren't who they said that then what else could they have been using?

Huh? Are you even an American? You don't speak the language very well...


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-19   18:04:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#370. To: litus (#367)

This 110-story steel-framed office building

So.......were they wrong then or wrong after 9/11...."what steel frames"?????

lol!

That the 1975 fire was more intense than the 9/11 fires is evident from the fact that it caused the 11th floor east side windows to break and flames could be seen pouring from these broken windows. This indicates a temperature greater than 700°C. In the 9/11 fires the windows were not broken by the heat (only by the aircraft impact) indicating a temperature below 700°C.

So now you know that the WTC towers were well designed and quite capable of surviving a serious fire. I repeat that this was a very hot fire that burnt through the open-plan office area of the eleventh floor and spread up and down the central core area for many floors. This was a serious fire.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-03-19   18:06:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#371. To: litus (#367)

www.prisonplanet.com/Pages/Apr_05/100405_WTC_Fire.html

1975 WTC fire burned six floors for three hours

New York Times | Feb 14 1975

Original Scans from archived issues of The New York Times. on 9/11 the fires burned for much shorter times and were the official cause of collapse. We have also recently seen other tall steel buildings burn for hours and stay standing.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-03-19   18:09:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#372. To: war, Original_Intent, ALL (#194) (Edited)

Oh and BTW war, I also noticed you used screenshots from a flash presentation provided by the GOVERNMENT for its case against Zacarias Moussaoui. These are NOT flight manifests, but simply a visual aid created by the government.

As far as the FLIGHT MANIFESTS, well, go ahead and find them...


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-19   18:26:19 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#373. To: war (#332)

B) I posted a chart above showing that the collapse took time well in excess of free fall speed.

It must not have been very large or colorful since I can't find it anywhere on this thread. Please point out which post it was, and/or repost the chart.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-19   18:28:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#374. To: FormerLurker, War, Litus (#372)

Oh and BTW war, I also noticed you used screenshots from a flash presentation provided by the GOVERNMENT for its case against Zacarias Moussaoui. These are NOT flight managests, but simply a visual aid created by the government.

As far as the FLIGHT MANIFESTS, well, go ahead and find them...

None of the official hijackers of the Sep11th-attack appeared on the original manifest of the passenger list.

Here is the official info about these "hijackers". Many of the real identities are still alive. The FBI ignored these facts during 2001-2002 and never updated their suspect list.

[Sept11Wiki]

Passenger List - CLICK HERE

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-03-19   18:32:57 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#375. To: war (#175)

Another particularly important part of this is to note that Towers one, two, and seven have all of the 10 characteristics of a controlled demolition, a building collapsing from fire and plane impact damage having one of the characteristics of controlled demolition is astronomically rare, the chances of this damage having all 10 characteristics of a controlled demolition and not being a controlled demolition is next to nil. These characteristics are.

1. Each collapse occurred at virtually free fall speed;

2. Each building collapsed straight down, for the most part onto its own footprint;

3. Virtually all the concrete was turned into very fine dust;

4. In the case of the Twin Towers, the dust was blown out horizontally for 200 feet or more;

5. The collapses were total, leaving no steel columns sticking up hundreds of feet into the air;

6. Videos of the collapses reveal "demolition waves", meaning "confluent rows of small explosions";

7. Most of the steel beams and columns came down in sections that were no more than 30 feet long;

8. According to many witnesses, explosions occurred within the buildings;

9. Each collapse was associated with detectable seismic vibrations (suggestive of underground explosions);

10. Each collapse produced molten steel (which would be produced by explosives), resulting in "hot spots" that remained for months.?

Source: Professor David Ray Griffin

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-03-19   18:36:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#376. To: TwentyTwelve (#374)

Those links have all been scrubbed...........

litus  posted on  2009-03-19   22:35:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#377. To: war (#175)

Oh, one other bit of info war. You know that picture you misidentified as WTC7 where it was actually an image of WTC5, well that is captioned as follows in the following link...

WTC5 – FEMA Figure 4-13

Figure 4-13 from the FEMA Report shows WTC5 burning, with labeled floors.


"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen

FormerLurker  posted on  2009-03-19   23:05:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#378. To: FormerLurker (#342)

Wherever you obtained that quote apparently can't even spell the word CHIEF.

That was my typo and there is a link there, doof.

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:05:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#379. To: FormerLurker (#342)

What you fail to consider is that the fires did not burn hot enough to weaken the structure.

What you Fail lto consider that a) they were already weakened from the impact and explposionn and b) that the fires did get hot enough to tweak the metal...

Thermal profile:

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:07:28 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#380. To: FormerLurker (#343)

Bullshit.

You're out of your fucking mind...

Look at any video of the second plane hitting the building...the explosion does not initiate outside of the building...it bursts FROM the building...

I knew Eurobroker guys in WTC 1 who were impacted by a fireball and explosion at the elevator crossover @ 44.

Your problem is that I know people who were in that building...who felt the impact explosion IN THE BUILDING...they didn't "hear it" outside the building.

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:16:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#381. To: FormerLurker (#344)

Post either of the two images and point out the actual damage to the exterior columns.

Both of those pics show massive damage to the exterior support columns...

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:22:40 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#382. To: FormerLurker (#345)

Wow, so your IQ is at around zero now, eh?

Relatively speaking you shouldn't want it to be that low...

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:23:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#383. To: FormerLurker (#346)

Inertia? It was at rest

Until it was acted upon by a plane travellng at 400+ MPH and then further acted upon by the energy expended in supporting more weight than that for which it was designed...unless for some stupid reason you believe that the plane came to a dead stop just before hitting it...which, given your insnae blatherings here, it would NOT surprise me if you did believe that...

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:26:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#384. To: FormerLurker (#348)

Again, you fail to address the question as to why it only took several seconds to demolish 100 floors of undamaged steel and concrete.

Do you understand the concept of "impressment"? Do you undertsand the concept of the relationship between velocity and weight?

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:28:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#385. To: TwentyTwelve (#355)

This what Frank A. DeMartini, WTC construction and project manag

He didn't design the building; he built it.

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:31:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#386. To: TwentyTwelve (#356)

It is important to note that Building 7 was no closer to the towers than any of several other large buildings outside of the WTC complex.

Fitterman is still undergoing reconstruction...the DB Building is being deconstructed. 1 Liberty was damaged massively and required a half year of reconstrcution.

That said, none of those buildings burned for 7 hours...

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:36:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#387. To: FormerLurker (#357)

The top of the tower had started to topple over, indicating one corner of the supporting structure below had failed. It should have continued in that direction,

When you use the word "toppling" you imply that it was already in motion and that should have been propelled away from the building.

You need to grasp a basic concept of physics as to how gravity affects a body...once it's center is established...it falls straight down...the top of the tower was a body at rest and so while it was "tilted" it was so at rest...once the support beneath it gave way it was a simple exercise of falling...the only direction in which it should have continued was down...

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:40:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#388. To: FormerLurker (#357)

The top of the tower had started to topple over, indicating one corner of the supporting structure below had failed. It should have continued in that direction, ABSENT ANY OTHER FORCE

The only force acting on it was gravity. Does gravity affect a body from the side?

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:42:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#389. To: FormerLurker, TwentyTwelve, litus, randge, scrapper2, James Deffenbach (#358)

There was not a hurricane going on that day, so resistance to horizonal force is not a factor.

Have you ever been in the Towers? If so then you know there is a natural sway to them...lateral forces were continually at work on them...

Secondly, as has been pointed out to you numerous times, the external support mitigated the vertical load and since the external support was compromised the energy being put upon and expended by the core was substanially more than normal.

Regardless, the majority of the exterior support columns were intact.

Feel free to wax eloquently on the WTC designer's using redundant support columns on the exterior.

Also, you want it both ways...you'll claim that it was controlled demolition that brought the towers down which is a process by which only some of the main supports are destroyed...but here you are claiming that because some of the support remained thatg it should not have collapsed.

Can any of you Moonbats explain to me, that if the government did this, why did they allow 22K people to escape with their lives and why did they go to the trouble of haing planes flyu into the buildings? The WTC had been bombed before. Why not just bomb it again?

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:53:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#390. To: FormerLurker (#364)

BTW, you contradict yourself here. Did it topple or did it drop staight down?

Well...I was accepting your use of the word topple which I then disputed above...the top does move angularly for the brief moment it took to establish a center of gravity...

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:55:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#391. To: litus (#367)

So.......were they wrong then or wrong after 9/11...."what steel frames"?????

Bad reporting. So what?

I've posted how the architects and engineers describe it. Not a news reporter.

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:56:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#392. To: FormerLurker (#368)

You're busted. I just noticed you posted an image of WTC5 trying to pass it off as an image of WTC7.

Nope. Wherein your post did you demand a pic of WTC 7?

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:57:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#393. To: war (#389)

Secondly, as has been pointed out to you numerous times, the external support mitigated the vertical load and since the external support was compromised the energy being put upon and expended by the core was substanially more than normal.

No, the load put on the core would not have been significantly greater than normal. The vast majority of the exterior columns were undamaged so the change in load on the core would have been minimal.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-20   8:58:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#394. To: FormerLurker (#369)

Huh? Are you even an American? You don't speak the language very well...

Family has been here since the 1680's...I typoe fast and multi-task...

Me: The individuals listed as the hijackers are not said to be using aliases

war: If they weren't who they said they were, then what else could they have been using?

Better?

war  posted on  2009-03-20   8:59:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#395. To: RickyJ (#393)

No, the load put on the core would not have been significantly greater than normal.

Please list your engineering credentials that you could contradict the designers...

Thanks...

war  posted on  2009-03-20   9:01:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#396. To: TwentyTwelve (#370)

In the 9/11 fires the windows were not broken by the heat (only by the aircraft impact) indicating a temperature below 700°C.

Nope.

The windows were broken by impact AND explosion.

But your starement is moronic from several other angles as well not the least of which was that since the fire was already vented all it had to do was feed and accelerate......

war  posted on  2009-03-20   9:04:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#397. To: TwentyTwelve (#370)

So now you know that the WTC towers were well designed and quite capable of surviving a serious fire

I never doubted that they weren't.

What they weren't designed for was an impact @ 400-500+ MPH, an internal explosion and fire.

war  posted on  2009-03-20   9:05:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#398. To: FormerLurker (#372)

As far as the FLIGHT MANIFESTS, well, go ahead and find them

I posted the one from the Boston Globe on 9/13, doof.

That said, it's been said that the flight manifests have never been published showing Arab names. Is it your concession now that they were?

war  posted on  2009-03-20   9:07:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#399. To: war (#395)

Please list your engineering credentials that you could contradict the designers...

The "designers" did not say that the load on the core was significantly greater. And even if they did any model of the WTC with similar damage would prove that it wasn't. Credentials are only required for people that need to prove a basic understanding of something to someone else becasue they have no real experience to speak of. I need no such crutch.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-20   9:08:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#400. To: FormerLurker (#373)

repost the chart.

Sorry...I probably screwed up the tag...

war  posted on  2009-03-20   9:14:41 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#401. To: FormerLurker (#373)

It must not have been very large or colorful since I can't find it anywhere on this thread

Link to the report

war  posted on  2009-03-20   9:17:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#402. To: war (#400) (Edited)

Why are you wasting your time here? We know you are a government stooge. You lack basic understanding of physics plus you are spamming this board.

If I were the owner your ass would have been banned by now.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2009-03-20   9:20:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (403 - 607) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]