See other 9/11 Articles
Title: 9/11 UAL 175 Plane on Radar AFTER It Has 'Crashed' Into The WTC; (MSNBC)
Source:
,
URL Source: http://,
Published: Mar 16, 2009
Author: msnbc
Post Date: 2009-03-16 13:04:41 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 12691
Comments: 607
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-17) not displayed.
.
.
.
#18. To: Original_Intent (#16)
ROFLMAO... Translated: YOU SHALL NOT QUESTION MY STUPIDITY.
Who do you work for? FBI CoIntelPro? CIA? ADL/Mossad? ????? A good bet - that shill works for the pervert bass turd Traitor morris. SPLC
I would ask, "Where are all the 'war games' blips that were confusing the FAA controllers?"
Try Phishing somewhere else. No takers here. Twenty Five Ways to Suppress The Truth: The Rules of Disinformation 5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues. Example: 'You believe what you read in the Spotlight? The Publisher, Willis DeCarto, is a well-known right-wing racist. I guess we know your politics -- does your Bible have a swastika on it? That certainly explains why you support this wild-eyed, right-wing conspiracy theory.' Proper response: 'You are avoiding the issue with disinformation tactics. Your imply guilt by association and attack truth on the basis of the messenger. The Spotlight is well known Populist media source responsible for releasing facts and stories well before mainstream media will discuss the issues through their veil of silence. Willis DeCarto has successfully handled lawsuits regarding slanderous statements such as yours. Your undemonstrated charges against the messenger have nothing to do with the facts or the issues, and fly in the face of reason. Why do you refuse to address the issues by use of such disinformation tactics (rule 5 - sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule)?' 9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect. 17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues. 18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
Your prediction was akin to predicting that if you pulled your pants down and tried to blow yourself in Times Square people would look. Actually my prediction was more along the order of "if I step out into a rain shower that I would get wet. Play Again?
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
The difference being what? In BOTH cases you failed to cover yourself... Why do YOU believe thatthe Towers fell?
Blah Blah Blah... One of the "facts" that you kooks try to morph into misinformation is the one on which FDNY pulled its personnel from 7. Youl idiots claim it means that they blew up the building...
.
Here, chew on this: "It makes the debate over Obama’s citizenship a rather short and simple one. Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20? A: Yes, by his own admission. Q: What passport did he travel under? A: There are only three possibilities. 1. He traveled with a U.S. passport, 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport. Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. passport in 1981? A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981. (Oh My God!!! Quick come up with a smarmy reply for this! It's too damaging to let stand without some immediate name calling and hysterics!) Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he was traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he was traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a “natural born” American citizen between 1981 and 2008. Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better. Is he a “natural born” citizen, or isn’t he? It seems pretty clear from the available evidence that he is not. If that proves to be the case he should minimize the damage to the country and follow the Nixon example; he should simply resign from office so that we can begin to clean up the mess he leaves behind." And, you reply is.....
WRONG!!! That corrected...big fucking deal...Pakistan did not forbid US citizens to travel to it. Up until a few years ago, you could fly to Canada and then to Havana and be admitted ON A US PASSPORT... Thge propblem with you people is that you're stupid. You don't think things through with any objective sense and so it makes it easy for people to lie to you.
How 911 was Done
Thats a great vid!
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=101561 Information in the thread linked above may be useful. Flight Explorer is a virtual display of information from a number of sources, including radar. However, it is not the same as a primary radar display. Regardless, this is an important find worthy of closer examination. Great post.
Oh, the irony. Btw, you spelt stoopid wrong.
If the plane is still in the air is it hovering?
WRONG!!! Corrected? Funny. You mean Obama showed you the US passport he used when he was 20 years old? It's a shame he won't show it to anyone else. Corrected indeed. If he has nothing to hide then why is he hiding it?
bump
And, how about this? "Linda Starr Posts New Information Jump to Comments Posted Jan 19 from Obamacrimes: how many of you picked up on what Phil said on tonight’s radio show about the FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator? Do you understand and comprehend the enormity of that announcement? Do you all realize what it means? I can tell you now that is one part of several pieces of good news we had the other day that I hinted at and could not reveal. That information confirms Barry had to renew an Indonesian passport to go to Pakistan in 81. That means Barry swore an Oath of Allegiance to Indonesia and had to renounce all other allegiances to get that passport. This is independent confirmation of information we’ve had and from OUR OWN State Department, Barry couldn’t go to Pakistan on an American passport if he didn’t have one. There are so many amazing pieces of good news coming in. I wish I could tell you all about it. I will say this, I am skeptical of the announcement Barry will be served with papers to block his swearing in tomorrow, but it’s not inconceivable in light of other information I have heard today. Again, I have no way to verify anything except that which we have obtained certified documents. Despite the media's worst efforts to suppress this, if Barry wants to be reelected he'll have to produce something. Of course all of his diehard blow jobbers will disappear by then the way those who used to support Nixon (and Clinton and Bush) now have....
This will get buried....
This will get buried.... Perhaps. But, I have a feeling that he ain't gonna pull this off. If anything, he'll forever serve as the textbook example of "just how sneaky them Muslims can be...." Obama will do for Muslims what Julius and Ethyl did for Jews.
Obama will do for Muslims what Julius and Ethyl did for Jews. I would like for that to be the case, but I'm not so optimistic. We shall see.
This is absurd. Of course two planes hit the WTC towers. They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them. Anyone saying no planes hit the WTC towers is putting out disinfo to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.
God is always good!
We shall see. Well, after Clinton/Gore slipped the noose for selling America to the Chinese, I suppose I have no reason to be optimistic. (Not to mention Mega's unfettered access to everything in The White House)
sorry...who's Mega?
sorry...who's Mega? Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government. Most likely Rahm Emmanuel.
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
Your (link) as to how 9/11 was done is the best overview I've seen so far. I theorized alternative 2 but the first one is probably more realistic considering that criminals like to keep things simple.
That doesn't bother me. IT's not like this is the first time it's ever happened.
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
sorry...who's Mega? Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government. Most likely Rahm Emmanuel. Israeli Spies: 'Mega Was Not An Agent; Mega Was the Boss' And thanks, OI.
Given the seriousness of the Mega security breach, the abrupt shutdown of the mole hunt naturally prompted some wild speculation about the circumstances under which the search for Mega was abandoned. In March 1999, British author Gordon Thomas released a book, Gideon's Spies, which alleged that Israel had blackmailed the Clinton Administration, with the threat to release tapped telephone conversations between the President and Monica Lewinsky, to force Washington to abandon the Mega hunt. Indeed, in her testimony before independent counsel Kenneth Starr, Lewinsky had reported that the President had warned her, on March 29, 1997, at the height of the Mega hunt, that he suspected the White House telephones were being tapped by agents of an unnamed foreign country. An "unnamed foreign country"? Them dam Eskimos and Micronesians-you just can't trust em!
This is absurd. Of course two planes hit the WTC towers. They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them. Anyone saying no planes hit the WTC towers is putting out disinfo to discredit the 9/11 truth movement. I agree. The real flight may have been remotely piloted out over the water and dumped in an ocean trench, and that would explain why it was spotted on Radar after it reportedly crashed. Now that demons are in control no act of cold blooded murder is unthinkable.
More proof that you are stupid and easily lied to. Unless Obama authorized the release of that information FOIA would have protecetd his file from release. The Information and Privacy Coordinator is responsible for acting on all initial requests except for requests for records coming under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Consular Affairs, the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the Bureau of Human Resources, the Office of Medical Services, and the Office of the Inspector General. (a) Third party requests. Except for requests under the Privacy Act by a parent of a minor or by a legal guardian (Sec. 171.32(c)), requests for records pertaining to another individual shall be processed under the FOIA and must be accompanied by a written authorization for access by the individual, notarized or made under penalty of perjury, or by proof that the individual is deceased (e.g., death certificate or obituary).
The second plane was clearly visible to me as I stood at th cporner of Church and Libertu as a United 767...it's an image that I will never lose until I turn cold and am burned and scattered...
Did he show you his Indonesian one?
So I hit the "p" key which is right next to the "o" key. Sue me...
Most likely Rahm Emmanuel. Never heard of this, or him, before. Thanks. I'll do some research on that.
Thanks for the link! bookmarked for later leisure reading today.
Why are you even here on this forum war? Did Goldi give you a timeout for not praising the brave Israeli soldiers as they murdered little kids as much as she liked? Or are you here just to troll for lack of anything better to do?
Are you BeAChooser? Regardless, how do you explain the impossible freefall speed of the towers? The undamaged structure below the impact area would not have behaved like thin air, yet the structures (both towers, AND the relatively undamaged WTC7) fell at free fall speeds as if falling through thin air. What's your scientific explanation (and please don't say "pancaking" as even THAT would not occur at free fall speed). Do you not find the fact that all records and evidence pertaining to the Enron investigation was destroyed in the relatively undamaged WTC7 to be just a tad suspicious? What proof is there that the individuals cited as the 9/11 hijackers actually carried out the attacks, especially when some of them are still alive and have been on TV?
LP got too kooky and racist for him. As a remedy, he obviously felt he should double down and go hang out with the REAL kooks.
I'd rather post on a forum in which there are basically no rules and thus nothing is enforced rather than one that claims to have them and then are selectively enforced. It's really nothing against Goldi. It's her forum and she can exercise or not exercise her editorial discsretion in any manner that she sees fit. I just happen to disagree with it. I like Goldi. And, I still post at LP, btw...just not as much... But as to WHY I am here...I was invited 3 and a half years ago to check this site out. I registered and lurked.
Comments (58 - 607) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestSorry, not walking into you pathetic attempt at setting up a trap and diversion.
#19. To: Original_Intent (#12)
Glad to oblige.
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams 
#20. To: Artisan. anyone here (#0)
#21. To: war (#17)
#22. To: war (#17)
Thank you for proving my prediction correct.
#23. To: Original_Intent (#22)
Actually my prediction was more along the order of "if I step out into a rain shower that I would get wet.
#24. To: Original_Intent (#21)
#25. To: war (#23)
Why do YOU believe thatthe Towers fell?
"It is like a trance. So what can break a trance? The only thing that can break the trance is the light of truth."
~ Canadian Philosopher John McMurtry as he comments on the psychological warfare that has afflicted us all
#26. To: war (#24)
Blah Blah Blah...
#27. To: HOUNDDAWG (#26)
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.
#28. To: war (#27)
how911wasdone.blogspot.com/
#29. To: wudidiz (#25)
#30. To: Artisan (#1)
#31. To: war, HOUNDDAWG, PSUSA, Original_Intent (#27)
Thge propblem with you people is that you're stupid. You don't think things through with any objective sense and so it makes it easy for people to lie to you.
"It is like a trance. So what can break a trance? The only thing that can break the trance is the light of truth."
~ Canadian Philosopher John McMurtry as he comments on the psychological warfare that has afflicted us all
#32. To: Artisan (#0)
#33. To: war (#27)
(Edited)
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.
#34. To: HOUNDDAWG (#33)
If he has nothing to hide then why is he hiding it?
#35. To: litus (#34)
#36. To: HOUNDDAWG (#35)
FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator?
#37. To: litus (#36)
FOIA confirming Barry never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama until his diplomatic passport issued as a US Senator?
#38. To: HOUNDDAWG (#37)
If anything, he'll forever serve as the textbook example of "just how sneaky them Muslims can be...."
#39. To: Artisan (#0)
they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC
#40. To: litus (#38)
I would like for that to be the case, but I'm not so optimistic.
#41. To: HOUNDDAWG (#40)
Mega's unfettered access
#42. To: litus (#41)
Mega's unfettered access
#43. To: Itistoolate (#28)
#44. To: wudidiz (#31)
#45. To: litus, Original Intent (#41)
Mega's unfettered access
#46. To: Original_Intent (#42)
(Edited)
#47. To: RickyJ (#39)
(Edited)
they still cannot accept that no plane hit the WTC
#48. To: HOUNDDAWG (#35)
...about the FOIA confirming [he] never had an American passport under the name of Barack Obama
#49. To: RickyJ (#39)
They weren't the planes we were told they were, but two planes hit them.
#50. To: HOUNDDAWG (#33)
You mean Obama showed you the US passport he used when he was 20 years old?
#51. To: wudidiz (#31)
#52. To: Original_Intent, HOUNDDAWG (#42)
Israel's top Mole in the U.S. Government.
#53. To: HOUNDDAWG, Original Intent (#45)
#54. To: war (#10)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#55. To: war (#24)
One of the "facts" that you kooks
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#56. To: FormerLurker (#54)
#57. To: FormerLurker (#54)
Why are you even here on this forum war?
.
.
.