[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Paul Joseph Watson: Bournemouth 1980 Vs 2025

FDA Revokes Emergency Authorization For COVID-19 Vaccines

NATO’s Worst Nightmare Is Happening Right Now in Ukraine - Odessa is Next To Fall?

Why do men lose it when their chicky-poo dies?

Christopher Caldwell: How Immigration Is Erasing Whites, Christians, and the Middle Class

SSRI Connection? Another Trans Shooter, Another Massacre – And They Erased His Video

Something 1/2 THE SIZE of the SUN has Entered our Solar System, and We Have NO CLUE What it is...

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: The Attack of Agribusiness (My Letter)
Source: Freedom4um
URL Source: http://None
Published: Mar 19, 2009
Author: Me
Post Date: 2009-03-19 18:42:27 by Original_Intent
Keywords: Rural Cleansing, Farm, Food Freedom, agribusiness
Views: 260
Comments: 25

This is the text of the message I sent regarding the horrendous farm bills and attack on food freedom.

To call the current bills HR 875, HR 814, SR 425, and HR 759 outrageous would be wrong. The correct word is obscene. To which I could add vile, disgusting, and repugnant without engaging in overstatement. The implications and impact of these bills upon small family farms, and even backyard gardeners producing only for their own use, is totally unacceptable. The small family farm, which Congress says it supports, would be made unviable by regulatory fiat and thus destroyed. These bills are so broad and so inclusive in their micromanagement that through a regime of regulation it would require the small farmer to be a lawyer as well as a farmer. Certainly the small farmer cannot retain a large legal staff as used by large corporate combines and thus would be driven out of business. The new labyrinth would literally require a farmer to file a report to the Federal Government for a farm animal straying out the yard or face draconian fines.

As always the question that must be asked is: Cui Bono? (Who benefits?) WHO BENEFITS? That is the question that must be addressed to understand the push behind these bills. These bills are solely and only for the benefit of large multinational agribusiness combines as they are the only ones with the money, lawyers, and connections to navigate this Byzantine Labyrinth . The perfidy of even allowing these bills out of committee speaks volumes. And those are neither pretty nor enlightened volumes.

These bills would not enhance food safety but degrade it, by preventing, through the creation of that maze of confusing, and needless, regulation and paperwork a legal preference only for those products produced by the major corporate players. The result is, predictably, it would drive small farms out of business and thus preventing access to wholesome locally grown farm produce. By imposing an unnecessary, and irresponsible, regulatory burdern impossible to navigate by the small farmer it makes farming unprofitable and and, because draconian fines and land seizure, even personally dangerous. Consequently it would end in killing family farms (particularly Organic Producers).

Even further the power to enforce this tyrannical regimen is invested in a non-elected "Agriculture Czar" (called an “Administrator” and no doubt well controlled by major agribusiness). The maze of counterproductive regulations would enshrine petrochemical based farming while imposing draconian penalties for non-compliance with these fundamentally unsound farming practices. And to what effect? What it would enshrine by de-facto fiat is the use of toxic pesticides, non-renewable strip mine farming, and place farmers wishing to produce a wholesome product at the mercy of well heeled corporate agribusiness effectively preventing them from saving their own seed (the processing requirements and certification, never before necessary and not now, are such as to be beyond the means of small producers) thus forcing them to purchase their seed, fertilizer, and pest control in the most toxic forms. Thus it is control and profit by a few at the expense of wholesome food production by a growing natural farming movement at which this bill is aimed. No, far from enhancing food safety, the dishonest pretext for these bills, these measures would degrade food safety while accruing to the profit only of a small clique of already massive, and rapacious, agri-combines such as Monsanto and Cargill.

The bills are so broad, and so onerous, as to effectively provide for the elimination of backyard gardens kept by those of use who learned long ago that what we could grow through our own efforts was better tasting and HEALTHIER than the mass produced, nutrient deprived, product of corporate farms.

I cannot believe that Congress Members from an agriculturally dependent State, with a rich heritage of small farms, could in good conscience support these bills. They should not be supported but opposed; and stoutly at that. I will do whatever is within my means to appraise others of these bills and the danger they offer to liberty and true food safety.

Sincerely,

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#25. To: Original_Intent (#0)

I applaud you for taking the time to send this letter.

May I make a suggestion?

Congresscritters won't read long letters unless they're obsequious (ass kissing) and complimentary.

When you write this: "...The correct word is obscene. To which I could add vile, disgusting, and repugnant without engaging in overstatement...." you're telegraphing something along the lines of "Look, Mom, I'm writing!".

You don't get points for adjectives and in fact greatly reduce the chances of the letter being read once it's apparent that it contains surplusage, particularly redundant and nego or insulting words.

If you want to make your point and assure that it will be read (first by staff and then by the rep) you need to keep it short and to the point. It's actually a learned skill to effectively economize when writing, but once you're in the proper frame of mind it gets easier with each attempt.

I've had *doctors, lawyers and retired military officers complain to me that our local paper wouldn't print a single letter to the editor of theirs, but the paper has for at least 15 years printed everything I've sent.

The nize Chooish lady who used to select the letters (she's since retired) actually took the time to explain what I was doing wrong, and I learned to pack an amazing amount of info into three or four paragraphs. In fact, I took pride in writing so succinctly that no editing was done to my letters or columns. (I sometimes got 18 column inches to explain fish and wildlife issues or dredging the Chesapeake Bay and to offer my views on current topics of interest to me-I also wrote weekly columns for three small, nothing little papers in the area for a while)

EXAMPLE:

Dear Rep. Despot,

I oppose the passage of HR 875, HR 814, SR 425, and HR 759.

I'm anxious to learn if and why you'd support these bills. Perhaps you are privy to facts that I'm not, and if you share them with me I may change my mind.

But, from the Hinterland these bills appear to be remedies in search of problems or special interest legislation to further regulate people for the benefit of Monsanto and other corporate agri biz giants.

I know that you're very busy and as your staff will tell you I've never bothered them or you in the past, but, this issue is very important to me.

I'm anxiously awaiting your reply.

Thanking You In Advance,

John Smith

333 Elm St

Anywhere, USA.

_____________________________________

Notice the absence of any threats to "oppose the rat next election". Not only are threats bad form but if you succeed in angering the rat he/she may send the IRS your info and suddenly you'll get an assessment for back taxes (40 bazillion bux! That's right fella! $200 in taxes and the rest are late fees and penalties!) And the timing will be unmistakable even though you can't prove a thing in court. And, if you try to use the sudden tax problems to hurt the rat it will only succeed in discouraging others from becoming active in political affairs once they see you swinging from the yardarm....)

_________________________________

*They were members of the Delaware Conservative Caucus who wrote and phoned to compliment my letters in the paper. Their letters to the paper typically began with, "...Your Aug 15th editorial was typical liberal, Wilmington New Journal crap and just what I've come to expect from a bunch of commies...."

Is it any wonder that the paper doesn't print their gripes? Out of fifteen paragraphs 14 were hurling insults at the editors!

These days politicians are harried if not actually under duress (from the ewe gno hu LOBBY) and chances are those who've never displayed any courage in opposing leadership ain't gonna start now. And, considering the rate of retention of incumbents you can safely assume that the rat fears his leadership more than any (financially and therefore politically) powerless Lilliputian in his/her district. But before you begin a campaign against her, him or them you owe them the courtesy of allowing them to respond. (Or more often than not, blowing you off with a form letter response: "Dear Resident, Because of all of the terrorism in our country today I feel that these bills are necessary to safeguard our....blah blah...."

After that you can stick it to 'em in any paper that will print your letters, and on the net.

(Showing up at the reps' public appearances may result in your being ejected and/or arrested though. The bastards are all so thin skinned now that it's defacto illegal to criticize them to their faces. In fact, my single congressman and two senators don't hold town hall meetings anymore.)

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2009-03-21   21:01:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 25.

        There are no replies to Comment # 25.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]