See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Jay Rockefeller: Would It Be Better If We Hadn’t Created the Internet?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://cryptogon.com/
Published: Mar 23, 2009
Author: Jay Rockefeller
Post Date: 2009-03-23 10:52:30 by nooz
Keywords: None
Views: 811
Comments: 33
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: nooz (#0)
In other words the bankers can't control the internet like they can the media they bought up and they don't like the truth being told about them.
The world would be a better place if every damned quisling rockef**ker were dead. If I had a time machine I'd go back and nip their family in the bud over 100 years ago.
I think that's it.
If I had a time machine I'd go back and nip their family in the bud over 100 years ago. Weasels. Every one of them.
They profit from death on both sides of wars that they finance and instigate. I hope they don't flee when tshtf. Wherever on earth they go, they will be found and brought to justice.
I hope they don't flee when tshtf. Wherever on earth they go, they will be found and brought to justice. I figure all of the weasels will make it fine.
OK. He talks about "cyberterrorism" like it's a bad thing. I would not give a tinkers damn if the banks or any other .gov or .mil entity were attacked and shut down. THEY DESERVE IT! Let them rot on the vine. All of them. An attack on us and the results are worldwide. It would be a picture perfect opportunity to take this planet back from the assholes that stole it from us.
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries. -David Rockefeller in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991. We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order. -David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. -David Rockefeller - Memoirs, Random House, 2002, page 405.
I would not give a tinkers damn if the banks or any other .gov or .mil entity were attacked and shut down. THEY DESERVE IT! Let them rot on the vine. All of them. An attack on us and the results are worldwide. It would be a picture perfect opportunity to take this planet back from the assholes that stole it from us. I want my planet back!
To the Hague!
And how do we shut it down?
"Every silver lining has a dark cloud"
Agreed!
We have to blame Al Gore.
You can't. Review the Terminator movies. Or Colossus: The Forbin Project. It's too late to pull the plug. Damned Cylons.
Well they've been telling us they were going to, now they're going public with it under the same old BS.
Works for me.
"They've got the guns but we've got the numbers" "Every silver lining has a dark cloud"
I don't know.
And this from the Chair of the Senate Science Committee!
"Satan / Cheney in "08" I didn't know that.
Shouldn't he be "axin'" Al Gore 'bout dat?
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I didn't know that His real name...John D. Rockefeller...
www.prisonplanet.com/rock...onal-hazard%E2%80%9D.html
ROFL. Yeah, Jay, axe ol' Gore, he chit know. ;)
Ohh. Well wasn't JDR the one who was trying to get the 22nd Ammendment repealing Presidential term limits? Can you imagine that then OR now?
Certain cultures like to hide their real names.
Thank you Itistoolate, this is great to add some meat to the story. Rockefeller: Internet is “Number One National Hazard” Kurt Nimmo Infowars March 23, 2009 According to the great-grandson John D. Rockefeller, nephew of banker David Rockefeller, and former Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller the internet represents a serious threat to national security. Rockefeller is not alone in this assessment. His belief that the internet is the “number one national hazard” to national security is shared by the former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair. “It really almost makes you ask the question would it have been better if we had never invented the internet,” Rockefeller mused during the confirmation hearing of Gary Locke (see video), Obama’s choice for Commerce Secretary. He then cites a dubious figure of three million cyber “attacks” launched against the Department of Defense every day. “Everybody is attacked, anybody can do it. People say, well it’s China and Russia, but there could be some kid in Latvia doing the same thing.” Jay Rockefeller’s comments reveal an astounding degree of ignorance – or if not ignorance, outright propaganda. Since the September 11, 2001, attacks the government has cranked up the fear quotient in regard to cyber attacks and so- called cyber terrorism, a virtually non-existent threat except in the minds security experts and politicians. In the years since the attacks, not one real instance of real cyberterrorism has been recorded. “Cyberattacks on critical components of the national infrastructure are not uncommon, but they have not been conducted by terrorists and have not sought to inflict the kind of damage that would qualify as cyberterrorism,” writes Gabriel Weimann, author of Terror on the Internet. “Nuclear weapons and other sensitive military systems, as well as the computer systems of the CIA and FBI, are ‘air-gapped,’ making them inaccessible to outside hackers. Systems in the private sector tend to be less well protected, but they are far from defenseless, and nightmarish tales of their vulnerability tend to be largely apocryphal.” “Psychological, political, and economic forces have combined to promote the fear of cyberterrorism,” Weimann continues. “From a psychological perspective, two of the greatest fears of modern time are combined in the term ‘cyberterrorism.’ The fear of random, violent victimization blends well with the distrust and outright fear of computer technology.” “The sky is not falling, and cyber-weapons seem to be of limited value in attacking national power or intimidating citizens,” notes James Lewis of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Such a threat is overblown, Lewis explains. He notes that “a brief review suggests that while many computer networks remain very vulnerable to attack, few critical infrastructures are equally vulnerable.” In other words, Rockefeller’s example of a kid in Latvia with a laptop posing a serious “hazard” to national security is little more than sensationalistic propaganda. So-called cyber terrorists are far less of a threat than government. China and Australia have recently imposed draconian censorship on internet freedom. Brazil, Denmark, Canada, Finland, Ireland , Italy, Israel, the United Kingdom, the United States, and many other countries also impose nominal censorship on internet freedom. Urgent calls to restrict the medium in various ways through legislation and government action have increased over the last few years (for more detail, see Internet Censorship: A Comparative Study). However, the real threat to internet freedom is currently posed by IT and ISP corporations, not the government. As Alex Jones explained last June, large corporate ISPs are now in the process of imposing bandwidth caps and routing traffic over their networks and blocking certain targeted websites. For instance, in 2005 AOL Time-Warner was caught blocking access to all of Jones’ flagship websites across the entire United States. Other instances of outright censorship include the UK ISP Tiscali blocking subscribers from reaching material on the 7/7 London bombings and Google’s continued and habitual censorship of 9/11 material and Alex Jones’ films on the ever-popular YouTube. There are many other instances as well. (See Censoring the Internet: A Collection of Essential Links on Infowars.) Jay Rockefeller’s warning about virtually non-existent and largely absurd cyberterrorism reveals increasing government nervousness and apprehension about the medium as a whole, especially as the internet grows by leaps and bounds as an alternative news and activism medium. On numerous occasions over the last few years alternative websites have posted articles exposing government crime, articles the corporate media has largely ignored. During the Bush years, the internet served as a vital resource for information on everything from torture and the destruction of civil liberties to the invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, information the corporate media was often unable or unwilling to carry. For instance, earlier this month Infowars broke a story concerning the Missouri Information Analysis Center and its effort to profile Libertarians and Ron Paul supporters as terrorists. The story was subsequently picked up by the corporate media (although Alex Jones and Infowars did not receive attribution). As more corporate media outlets fail — as evinced by several high profile newspapers going out of business recently — and more people flock to the internet to get their news and information, the government will increasingly employ fear tactics designed to portray the medium as a refuge for terrorists, pedophiles, and other miscreants. It appears the Obama administration is attempting to micromanage this effort. Last week CNet “obtained a summary of a proposal from Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-W.V.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) that would create an Office of the National Cybersecurity Advisor, part of the Executive Office of the President. That office would receive the power to disconnect, if it believes they’re at risk of a cyberattack, ‘critical’ computer networks from the Internet.” As well, the effort would put the White House National Cybersecurity Advisor in charge of coordinating cyber efforts within the intelligence community and within civilian agencies.
Yeah, I've seen that too.
Rockefeller: His belief that Fixed for accuracy.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition You think the people of this country exist to provide you with position. I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom.~~William Wallace ALAS, BABYLON. It's over. Last one here turn out the lights.
You bet it does...to Israel's security as more and more Americans realize the horrendous price they're paying to protect a bunch of Zionist thieves in their illegal state.
Fixed for accuracy. Much better.
Apparently, this will continue until the world has been right-sized.
#2. To: nooz (#0)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams 
#3. To: DWornock (#1)
In other words the bankers can't control the internet like they can the media they bought up and they don't like the truth being told about them.
#4. To: Rotara (#2)
The world would be a better place if every damned quisling rockef**ker were dead.
#5. To: nooz (#4)
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
#6. To: Rotara (#5)
They profit from death on both sides of wars that they finance and instigate.
#7. To: nooz (#0)
#8. To: nooz (#0)
#9. To: PSUSA (#7)
OK. He talks about "cyberterrorism" like it's a bad thing.
#10. To: litus (#8)
that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
#11. To: nooz (#0)
Jay Rockefeller: Would It Be Better If We Hadn’t Created the Internet?
#12. To: nooz (#10)
To the Hague!
#13. To: nooz (#0)
#14. To: Joe Btfsplk (#11)
And how do we shut it down?
#15. To: Joe Btfsplk (#11)
And how do we shut it down?
#16. To: TooConservative (#13)
We have to blame Al Gore.
#17. To: nooz (#15)
Well they've been telling us they were going to, now they're going public with it under the same old BS.
--Jim Morrison, "Five To One"
#18. To: Joe Btfsplk (#17)
They've got the guns but we've got the numbers"
#19. To: nooz (#0)
#20. To: tom007 (#19)
And this from the Chair of the Senate Science Committee!
#21. To: nooz (#0)
Jay Rockefeller: Would It Be Better If We Hadn’t Created the Internet?
Lord Acton
#22. To: nooz (#20)
And this from the Chair of the Senate Science Committee!
#23. To: nooz (#20)
#24. To: James Deffenbach (#21)
Shouldn't he be "axin'" Al Gore 'bout dat?
#25. To: Cynicom (#22)
His real name...John D. Rockefeller...
#26. To: nooz (#25)
#27. To: Itistoolate (#23)
www.prisonplanet.com/rock...onal-hazard%E2%80%9D.html
#28. To: Cynicom (#26)
Certain cultures like to hide their real names.
#29. To: nooz, all (#27)
His belief that the internet is the “number one national hazard” to national security is shared by the former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair.
the internet FREE SPEECH is the “number one national hazard” to national security is shared by the former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair. 
"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." ~~ IndieTx
#30. To: nooz (#27)
...the internet represents a serious threat to national security.
#31. To: Tatarewicz (#30)
#32. To: IndieTX (#29)
Rockefeller: His belief that the internet FREE SPEECH is the “number one national hazard” to national security is shared by the former Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Obama’s current director Admiral Dennis C. Blair.
#33. To: Tatarewicz (#30)
You bet it does...to Israel's security as more and more Americans realize the horrendous price they're paying to protect a bunch of Zionist thieves in their illegal state.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest