See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Source:
whatreallyhappened.com
URL Source: http://whatreallyhappened.com/conte ... world-trade-center-catastrophe
Published: Apr 5, 2009
Author: whatreallyhappened.com
Post Date: 2009-04-05 01:25:36 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: 9/11, 911, Thermite, WTC Collapses
Views: 12219
Comments: 690
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic. Webmaster's Commentary: Folks, this is a major story and will be totally ignored by ABCNNBBCBS. This is a peer-reviewed report in a science journal which confirms the presence of a manufactured material consisting of tiny flakes of aluminum metal coated with iron oxide discovered at four different locations in the wreckage of the World Trade Center. Aluminum and iron oxide, mixed equally by weight, is the classic recipe for thermite. This material is very fine, increasing its burn speed, and apparently has some additional components (besides the very fine granular size) which lower the ignition temperature. This report directly contradicts the official government claim that there was no trace of internal explosives in the ruins of the World Trade Center. See Thermite and the WTC Collapses Posted on Apr 04, 2009 at 07:49 Tags: * 911
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-145) not displayed.
.
.
.
#146. To: mininggold (#142)
Nope. It's the same force dynamics explanation that not one of you Moonbats has been able to refute.
"Especially since you claim to work in an area full of buildings ready to collapse from small office fires." I've never made the claim that these buildings are ready to collapse form small offioce fires. And, if you are claimiong that the fires in WTC were only small office fires then you are lying again.
Those pictures are "normal and natural" to New Yawkers. Another sign that common sense and logic seems out of fashion there. No wonder this country is in such dire straits.
What did you think that 100odd floors of sheetrock and concrete falling down would look like? BTW, to answer the question in that picture I'd suggest that you avail yourself of the concept of what air does as it is displaced...
If it was "pulverized into flour" where did all this "stuff" come from?
Then how did that WTC7 building collapse? Was it made out of wood? All you have to do is show us one example where a similiar building under similiar circunstances came a tumbling down in similiar fashion. One itty bitty example. Come on.... you are good for it.
So you admit you have no examples. LOLOL.
An out of control fire across most of its floors compromised a major support beam which, in turn, caused cascading failure which resulted in the building's collapse... Thanks for asking...
Why was the fire out of control, no sprinkler system? and one major support beam was all that was supporting that building? My, my .... you need to take this up with the building department. Aren't you the least bit concerned?? How many other similiar buildings are precariously waiting for their turn to collapse in New Yawk? The tourist industry needs to let other know about NYs lack of concern for their under engineered buildings.
What? You can beat off three of your gay friends at once? "triathlete" = TRIES TO BE AN ATHLETE. LOL. These lame dudes like wart who choose to run, bike, and swim all over the place for absolutely no reason are much like those poor desperate gerbils on the spinning wheel -- a useless waste of time. I feel his pain. His tights are hurting his groin. lol
Right on. Please let me to agree ith you over here. You are right Let's start over here. Okay?
Correct...FDNY had to use all available water elsewhere... and one major support beam was all that was supporting that building? Nope...It's failure was coupled to beams weakened by heat unable to compensate for the increased load... Feel free to show any previous controlled demoltion that started at the top floor...
1st, 2nd, and 3rd. All in the same day. What are the odds of this happening?
When has a similar catastrophe occurred? oops...another question... hey...if I put a period at the ned of my questions will I then get an answer. Let's try it...
It's been refuted countless times you idiot. You've never once addressed my analysis of the collapse which calls into question the official explanation. For one, there was NOT enough energy to cause a collapse of the lower floors since the energy was spent pulverizing the upper floors. Energy can't be used once it's gone.
Where is the 'ned' of your question?
Do you think the public would have so easily accepted the "pancake" theory if the collapse had started from the bottom floors? The collapse HAD to be made to look as if it was due to the aircraft collision in order to be believable.
No need to worry Otis...the world needs town drunks and fat gardeners too...you're doubly qualified...
Here...
I bet you're a big fan of his "squeal like a pig" performance, eh?
1st, 2nd, and 3rd. All in the same day. What are the odds of this happening? Impossible.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition You think the people of this country exist to provide you with position. I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom.~~William Wallace ALAS, BABYLON. It's over. Last one here turn out the lights.
When has a similar catastrophe occurred? The Empire State Building. It's still standing!!
The crash tore a hole about 18 ft (5.5 m) wide by 20 ft (6 m) tall in the 34th Street exterior of the Empire State Building. While the 78th and 79th floors bore the brunt of the damage, one of the B-25's engines fell down an elevator shaft and set off a major fire in the basement. The other engine hurtled across the building and tore through seven walls before emerging from the 33rd Street side of the tower. The debris crashed through the roof of a thirteen-story building across the street where another fire erupted. Other heavy wreckage, including the landing gear, also caused damage to the Empire State and nearby buildings while Stan Lomax reportedly saw part of a wing catapulting towards Madison Avenue.
Bullshit. You posted a picture of Building FIVE which WAS experiencing a major fire, trying to pass it off as Building SEVEN. Building SEVEN had a very minor fire yet collapsed, whereas Building FIVE had a seriously out of control fire yet DIDN'T collapse.
war has lost all credibility.
BTW, are you still tickling Rim Job's bunghole with your moustache?
I've caught him in numerous lies, and when called on it he simply ignores me and continues on with his repetitive BS.
You ARE the scumbag shill in my tagline video, aren't you?
So now it's back to the pancake explanation. Keep your stories straight please.
#147. To: mininggold (#144)
What did I lie about?
#148. To: TwentyTwelve (#145)
#149. To: TwentyTwelve (#140)
#150. To: mininggold (#148)
Those pictures are "normal and natural" to New Yawkers. Another sign that common sense and logic seems out of fashion there. No wonder this country is in such dire straits.
#151. To: war (#147)
I've never made the claim that these buildings are ready to collapse form small offioce fires. And, if you are claimiong that the fires in WTC were only small office fires then you are lying again.
#152. To: Critter (#132)
Dimwits like you do a great service to our cause.
#153. To: war (#152)
Critter.......2012.......mininggold...
#154. To: mininggold (#151)
Then how did that WTC7 building collapse?
#155. To: war (#154)
An out of control fire across most of its floors compromised a major support beam which, in turn, caused cascading failure which resulted in the building's collapse... Thanks for asking...
#156. To: mininggold (#155)
(Edited)
#157. To: Critter (#121)
Actually, I'm a triathlete.
#158. To: mininggold (#151)
Then how did that WTC7 building collapse? Was it made out of wood? All you have to do is show us one example where a similiar building under similiar circunstances came a tumbling down in similiar fashion. One itty bitty example. Come on.... you are good for it.
#159. To: mininggold (#155)
Why was the fire out of control, no sprinkler system?
#160. To: mininggold, war (#151)
Then how did that WTC7 building collapse? Was it made out of wood? All you have to do is show us one example where a similiar building under similiar circunstances came a tumbling down in similiar fashion. One itty bitty example. Come on.... you are good for it.
"This was the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building," the agency stated.
#161. To: litus, mininggold, war (#160)
"This was the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building," the agency stated.
#162. To: TwentyTwelve (#161)
What are the odds of this happening?
#163. To: war, mininggold (#146)
It's the same force dynamics explanation that not one of you Moonbats has been able to refute.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#164. To: war (#162)
if I put a period at the ned of my questions will I then get an answer
#165. To: war (#159)
Feel free to show any previous controlled demoltion that started at the top floor...
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#166. To: beyond the sea (#157)
#167. To: abraxas (#164)
Where is the 'ned' of your question?
#168. To: war (#167)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#169. To: TwentyTwelve, christine (#161)
(Edited)
"This was the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building," the agency stated.
"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." ~~ IndieTx
#170. To: war (#162)
(Edited)
#171. To: war, TwentyTwelve (#162)
What are the odds of this happening?
#172. To: war, TwentyTwelve, IndieTX (#171)
(Edited)
At the last moment, Lt. Col. Smith must have seen the profile of the Empire State Building looming out of the fog. He tried to pull up while banking away, but the distance was too short and the bomber's velocity too great. At approximately 9:49 AM, the B-25 plunged into the 78th and 79th floors of the skyscraper some 975 ft (295 m) above ground level. The plane impacted at an estimated speed of 200 miles per hour (320 km/h) making the building shake under the force of the collision. The high-speed crash also caused the plane's fuel tanks to explode, sending a fireball 100 ft (30 m) high and releasing blazing gasoline down the facade of the building. Sheets of flame also raced through the maze of hallways and stairwells inside the building, reaching at least as far down as the 75th floor.
Amazing!!! The Empire State Building did not collapse, nor the other buildings, which were hit by debris causing fires to erupt.
#173. To: war, mininggold (#154)
An out of control fire across most of its floors compromised a major support beam which, in turn, caused cascading failure which resulted in the building's collapse...
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#174. To: FormerLurker, mininggold, Litus, Wudidiz, war (#173)
To war: Bullshit. You posted a picture of Building FIVE which WAS experiencing a major fire, trying to pass it off as Building SEVEN. Building SEVEN had a very minor fire yet collapsed, whereas Building FIVE had a seriously out of control fire yet DIDN'T collapse.
#175. To: war (#146)
you Moonbats
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#176. To: TwentyTwelve (#174)
war has lost all credibility.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#177. To: war, TwentyTwelve, beyond the sea, mininggold, FormerLurker (#154)
An out of control fire across most of its floors compromised a major support beam which, in turn, caused cascading failure which resulted in the building's collapse...
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Used Tires Amityville, Babylon, Lindenhurst
#178. To: FormerLurker (#176)
I've caught him in numerous lies, and when called on it he simply ignores me and continues on with his repetitive BS. I know. war's modus operandi is quite obvious.
war has lost all credibility.
#179. To: TwentyTwelve, FormerLurker, war (#174)
war has lost all credibility. Why would he have done that?
You posted a picture of Building FIVE which WAS experiencing a major fire, trying to pass it off as Building SEVEN. Building SEVEN had a very minor fire yet collapsed, whereas Building FIVE had a seriously out of control fire yet DIDN'T collapse.
#180. To: litus, FormerLurker, wudidiz (#179)
war has lost all credibility. Why would he have done that? He got caught trying to fool us. He underestimated us.
You posted a picture of Building FIVE which WAS experiencing a major fire, trying to pass it off as Building SEVEN. Building SEVEN had a very minor fire yet collapsed, whereas Building FIVE had a seriously out of control fire yet DIDN'T collapse.
#181. To: TwentyTwelve, FormerLurker, wudidiz (#180)
Sooner or later, that's what happens to all .gov shills.
He got caught....He underestimated us.
#182. To: litus, FormerLurker, wudidiz (#181)
Not just Government shills. Be on the lookout for Media and Federal Reserve shills as well.
Sooner or later, that's what happens to all .gov shills.
#183. To: TwentyTwelve, FormerLurker, wudidiz (#182)
That's true. I've already had to deal with at least one Federal Reserve shill; but it may likely have been at least three. They also resorted to lying and outright intentional misrepresentations of others' statements and comments.
Be on the lookout for Media and Federal Reserve shills as well.
#184. To: litus, TwentyTwelve, FormerLurker, wudidiz, christine (#183)
I'd love to have access to the server logs for this site. hehehe
Be on the lookout for Media and Federal Reserve shills as well.
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Used Tires Amityville, Babylon, Lindenhurst
#185. To: war (#115)
Only that you're a well-trained govbot.
#186. To: TwentyTwelve (#135)
yeah, that's fire damage alright.
.
.
.
Comments (187 - 690) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest