See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Source:
whatreallyhappened.com
URL Source: http://whatreallyhappened.com/conte ... world-trade-center-catastrophe
Published: Apr 5, 2009
Author: whatreallyhappened.com
Post Date: 2009-04-05 01:25:36 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: 9/11, 911, Thermite, WTC Collapses
Views: 11788
Comments: 690
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic. Webmaster's Commentary: Folks, this is a major story and will be totally ignored by ABCNNBBCBS. This is a peer-reviewed report in a science journal which confirms the presence of a manufactured material consisting of tiny flakes of aluminum metal coated with iron oxide discovered at four different locations in the wreckage of the World Trade Center. Aluminum and iron oxide, mixed equally by weight, is the classic recipe for thermite. This material is very fine, increasing its burn speed, and apparently has some additional components (besides the very fine granular size) which lower the ignition temperature. This report directly contradicts the official government claim that there was no trace of internal explosives in the ruins of the World Trade Center. See Thermite and the WTC Collapses Posted on Apr 04, 2009 at 07:49 Tags: * 911
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-603) not displayed.
.
.
.
#604. To: Critter (#603)
Your seeing eye dog needs glasses...
Your seeing eye dog needs glasses... I'll let your image and comments speak for themselves to anyone reading this BS.
it is less than 2 stories.
#605. To: war (#604)
(Edited)
it is less than 2 stories.
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Used Tires Amityville, Babylon, Lindenhurst
#606. To: litus (#594)
Yeah, I got a pretty good laugh out of the old boy a time or two.
And you, as well, just laughing! : )
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton
#607. To: Critter (#605)
Look at the building to its left that it's piled over McGruff...
#608. To: war (#607)
You're a twisted little twit of a shill, aintcha? Debris lying on other buildings doesn't count. Where is the stack of debris 14 stories high dipshit? How does it feel to be paid to act like a dumbass? Does one aspire to that position? Or get blackmailed into it? I can't conceive of the level of stupidity, or evil it takes to do what you do.
Look at the building to its left that it's piled over McGruff...
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Used Tires Amityville, Babylon, Lindenhurst
#609. To: Critter, War (#608)
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#610. To: James Deffenbach (#606)
That's about all you can do with these shills!!
Yeah, I got a pretty good laugh out of the old boy a time or two.
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#611. To: All (#610)
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#612. To: litus (#610)
Yep. Way I figure it, if you can get a laugh out of their foolishness once in a while you are ahead.
That's about all you can do with these shills!!
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton
#613. To: James Deffenbach (#612)
I just treated myself to a if you can get a laugh out of their foolishness once in a while you are ahead.
laugh stack. : )
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#614. To: Critter (#608)
You know he might have to give away the secrets of his trade (such as it is) to answer those questions, don't you?
How does it feel to be paid to act like a dumbass? Does one aspire to that position? Or get blackmailed into it? I can't conceive of the level of stupidity, or evil it takes to do what you do.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton
#615. To: litus (#613)
Good on ya, as they say in England.
I just treated myself to a
laugh stack. : )
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton
#616. To: James Deffenbach (#615)
: )
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#617. To: Critter (#608)
Now have your dog look back to the right and you can see that the pile of debris is higher than that building and, in fact, has spilld over onto it. You don;t tread water very well... PS: Thermite doesn't cut, it melts and the buildings did not fall at anything near free fall speed...
Debris lying on other buildings doesn't count.
#618. To: war (#617)
You're not even a very good shill. WTF? That's the best you can do is have my dog look at another pile on top of another building?
Now have your dog look back to the right and you can see that the pile of debris is higher than that building and, in fact, has spilld over onto it.
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Used Tires Amityville, Babylon, Lindenhurst
#619. To: war (#617)
#620. To: Critter (#618)
The dog has mnore sense than you do. Meabwhile...thermite STILL does not make clean cuts and the towers did not fall at anything near free fall speed...
That's the best you can do is have my dog look at another pile on top of another building?
#621. To: abraxas (#619)
Did you believe that you were giving new information?
#622. To: war (#617)
Considering how long it could have taken them to fall in a pancake collapse it was very fast indeed. Neither WTC 1 or 2 fell at near free fall speed in a vacuum. Then again, nothing does unless it is in a vacuum. However air resistance would not have slowed the fall of the buildings down any noticeable amount over such a short distance for such massive buildings. But collisions on each floor, which had to occur if you believe the government's story, would have slowed it down a very noticeable amount. But WTC7 did collapse at near free fall speed and no plane even hit it. Don't tell me it felt lonely, that is not why it collapsed. Also don't tell me news reporters are psychic and that's why they reported it fell a good 20 minutes before it did. Anyone that can't see WTC7 was a controlled demolition is either blind or dumb. Why bring a perfectly good building down on purpose? Destroy evidence? Yep, that's why it had to come down.
and the buildings did not fall at anything near free fall speed...
God is always good!
#623. To: war (#617)
Repeating the same lie over and over doesn't make it true war. They DID fall close to free fall speed and EVERYONE seems to know it except for you.
the buildings did not fall at anything near free fall speed...
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#624. To: war (#621)
Let's just say that I put more weight on what the chemist has to say than your opinions on the matter. Note that his investigation began when he witnessed the 47 story building collapse seven hours later with no airplane impact and it did so in 6.5 seconds. There really is not valid explanation as to the collapse of building seven, no matter how you spin it. If the explanation given for seven is false, then the explanations regarding the twin towers deserve more scrutiny as well.
#625. To: RickyJ (#622)
Too bad for you that they DID NOT Fall in a pancake. May I have the number of times that you will need to be again corrected on this in the future? Thanks...
Considering how long it could have taken them to fall in a pancake collapse it was very fast indeed.
#626. To: abraxas (#624)
Let's just say that I put more weight on the opinion of the overwhelming majority of industry professionals than I do the occasional Moonbat.
Let's just say that I put more weight on what the chemist has to say than your opinions on the matter.
#627. To: abraxas (#624)
He doesn't count very well...even Steven Jones says it took 13...
Note that his investigation began when he witnessed the 47 story building collapse seven hours later with no airplane impact and it did so in 6.5 seconds.
#628. To: RickyJ (#622)
Collisions on each floor were going to happen no matter how it was brought down...
But collisions on each floor, which had to occur if you believe the government's story, would have slowed it down a very noticeable amount.
#629. To: war (#626)
A majority of people are comfortable with the idea that other parties besides 19 Arabs had a hand in 9/11. The only ones defending the Official Fairy Tale are you gov/media fluffers. You guys are the moonbats, not the people that question the OFT.
#630. To: bluegrass (#629)
Riiight...and the Flat Earthers? TRUE patriots...
#631. To: war (#630)
I suggest you just hang it up and begin a new career defending the Warren Commission.
#632. To: bluegrass (#631)
Post hoc ergo propter hoc...
#633. To: war (#632)
Your logic sucks. Are you implying that the Feds never lie?
#634. To: war, abraxas (#627)
You retard, the 110 story towers fell in 13 seconds or less, and I'm pretty sure that's what Jones meant when he used that figure.
He doesn't count very well...even Steven Jones says it took 13...
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#635. To: war, abraxas (#626)
Now you're sounding like BAC. What industry are you talking about, the news industry? Certainly not the professional aviation industry, and certainly not the majority of physicists, chemists, and engineers in various disciplines such as civil and materials engineering.
Let's just say that I put more weight on the opinion of the overwhelming majority of industry professionals
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#636. To: war, RickyJ (#625)
Oh so now you're changing the official story? Ok war, did they fall down because of the wind as you tried to say earlier on, or were they brought down with explosives?
Too bad for you that they DID NOT Fall in a pancake.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#637. To: abraxas (#624)
Don't expect to get anywhere using simple logic with war. He'll refuse to accept and/or admit to the most basic fundamental facts.
If the explanation given for seven is false, then the explanations regarding the twin towers deserve more scrutiny as well.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#638. To: war (#620)
combobulate yourself, fella'! Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (August 30, 2006) 6. How could the WTC towers collapse in only 11 seconds (WTC 1) and 9 seconds (WTC 2)—speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)? NIST estimated the elapsed times for the first exterior panels to strike the ground after the collapse initiated in each of the towers to be approximately 11 seconds for WTC 1 and approximately 9 seconds for WTC 2. These elapsed times were based on: (1) precise timing of the initiation of collapse from video evidence, and (2) ground motion (seismic) signals recorded at Palisades, N.Y., that also were precisely time-calibrated for wave transmission times from lower Manhattan (see NCSTAR 1-5A). As documented in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, these collapse times show that: “… the structure below the level of collapse initiation offered minimal resistance to the falling building mass at and above the impact zone. The potential energy released by the downward movement of the large building mass far exceeded the capacity of the intact structure below to absorb that energy through energy of deformation. Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall, as seen in videos. As the stories below sequentially failed, the falling mass increased, further increasing the demand on the floors below, which were unable to arrest the moving mass.” dude, there was wicked mucho smashing of stuff, not the fuck-all suggested by the collapses' increasing swiftness (unless maybe it could have been...DEMOLITION!!!).
#543. To: postpunk (#540)
Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives
Thermite is not an explosive...it's a cutter...thus thermite is ofen referred to as a "cutter charge"
...
Meabwhile...thermite STILL does not make clean cuts and the towers did not fall at anything near free fall speed...
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster
what's important to understand is that a collapse occurring at free fall means that all potential energy is converted to kinetic energy with zero PE available for smashing. a collapse approaching free fall has PE less KE available for smashing (energy available for smashing remains arbitrarily near zero).
#639. To: FormerLurker, war (#636)
He doesn't even know what it is he is trying to defend. Yet he defends it! That's really crazy!
God is always good!
#640. To: postpunk, war (#638)
When you look at the debris pile at the bottom of this huge mas driving down through the 110 story buildings, you have to ask, what happened to the mass? There is no mass.
dude, there was wicked mucho smashing of stuff,
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Used Tires Amityville, Babylon, Lindenhurst
#641. To: FormerLurker, War, Whore, abraxas, postpunk, TwentyTwelve, Wudidiz, Litus, christine, all (#635)
Now you're sounding like BAC. What industry are you talking about, the news industry? Certainly not the professional aviation industry, and certainly not the majority of physicists, chemists, and engineers in various disciplines such as civil and materials engineering. I just love that "overwhelming majority of industry professionals". One of those great generalities the shills love which when pressed always boils down to the same short list: Dr. Thomas Eagar from MIT who was the authority for the Nova whitewash - whose theory has been totally discredited. Pop Mechanics and their Strawman Whitewash which used misrepresented photos of WTC 6 and misrepresented them as WTC 7. Edited by that great engineering jeenyus of the HEARST Publishing Company, the former editor of "Entertainment Weekly", and Michael Jerkoff's cousin as the purported author. A variety of government employees controlled by the people who engineered the 911 PsyOP. And that's about it. A few other faces and names here and there - generally with government connections such as Controlled Demolition Inc.. And the vast army of "experts" keeps dwindling and being discredited. What's a poor hard working shill to do other than fall back on non-specific generalities such as "overwhelming majority"?
Let's just say that I put more weight on the opinion of the overwhelming majority of industry professionals
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
#642. To: war, bluegrass, all (#632)
Sic transit gloria mundi ...
Post hoc ergo propter hoc...
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
#643. To: Original_Intent (#641)
Pop Mechanics and their Strawman Whitewash which used misrepresented photos of WTC 6 and misrepresented them as WTC 7. Edited by that great engineering jeenyus of the HEARST Publishing Company, the former editor of "Entertainment Weekly", and Michael Jerkoff's cousin as the purported author. A variety of government employees controlled by the people who engineered the 911 PsyOP. And that's about it. A few other faces and names here and there - generally with government connections such as Controlled Demolition Inc.. And the vast army of "experts" keeps dwindling and being discredited. Worth repeating!
Dr. Thomas Eagar from MIT who was the authority for the Nova whitewash - whose theory has been totally discredited.
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#644. To: FormerLurker (#635)
Yea...those...and until you buck uup some numbers, sport, you're once again spouting bullshit. These groups participated in analyzing the collapse...buck up sime numbers Moonie that the majority of their members dissented from the findings: The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Coalition that comprised a Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT). The ASCE Coalition Team included professional members of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE), the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY). What did the colleagues of one of your Head Moonbats, Steven Jones, do when they heard the nonsense that he was spiouting? In fact, I challenge you now to buckk up the name of ONE organziation of architects, engineers, fire professionals etc etc etc who as a group have taken issue with NIST.
Certainly not the professional aviation industry, and certainly not the majority of physicists, chemists, and engineers in various disciplines such as civil and materials engineering.
.
.
.
Comments (645 - 690) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest