[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Feds Raid Alfie Oakes’ Naples Home and Farm with Battering Ram Democrats Have a New Leader: Kamala Is Out, Says GOP Strategist The Colorado Voting Machine Fiasco Trump Lawyer WARNS Letitia James, Vows RETRIBUTION After Trump Win: 'We'll Put Your Fat A** In JAIL' Tucker Carlson:11/7/2024 "now that Trump is president, i can tell you everything" Fear-Stricken Pharma Big-Wigs Convene Emergency Teleconference to Thwart RFK Jr. Judge strikes down Joe Biden administration program aimed at easing citizenship pathway for some undocumented immigrants CNN faces another defamation lawsuit after appeals court sides with Project Veritas These Hollywood Celebrities Swore They'd Leave America If Trump Won All Talk, No Walk Blaze News original: Border Patrol whistleblower's career on the line after spotlighting trafficking horrors Dems open can of worms by asking about millions of 2020 Biden voters who somehow disappeared in 2024 Deadline: US says Israel failing in aid efforts. What happens now? Kash Patel, Rumored Pick for CIA Chief, Announces Massive Declassification Will Occur Hezbollah unveils ‘Fateh 110’ ballistic missile in targeting Israeli sites Pentagon running low on air-defense missiles as Israel, Ukraine gobble up remaining supplies An Open Letter To Elon Musk Is this why Trump was allowed to win? This Is The Median Home Price In Each US State Alex Soros Shocked That the Incumbent Political Order Is Being Crushed Around The Globe Beverly Hills Lawyer Disbarred Two Years After Admitting He Paid a Ringer to Take the Bar Lumumba: 'I am not guilty, and so I will not proceed as a guilty man.' Lauren Boebert Wins House Election After Switching to More Conservative Colorado District AIPAC Boasts of Influence Over Congress, Ousting 'Eleven Anti-Israel Candidates' Police Searching for 40 Escaped Monkeys After Mass Breakout from South Carolina Research Facility "You Don't Deserve Any Respect!": Steve Bannon Goes Scorched Earth On Democrats On Election Night Livestream Putin's ready to talk now that the mentally ill homosexuals have been brushed aside Trump, the Economy & World War III: Col. Douglas Macgregor Ex-Top Official Catherine Austin Fitts: Inside Trump’s Victory, RFK Jr., and the Deep State 10 Big Losers That Weren't On The Ballot Elon’s first day working for the Federal Government

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Source: whatreallyhappened.com
URL Source: http://whatreallyhappened.com/conte ... world-trade-center-catastrophe
Published: Apr 5, 2009
Author: whatreallyhappened.com
Post Date: 2009-04-05 01:25:36 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: 9/11, 911, Thermite, WTC Collapses
Views: 12215
Comments: 690

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

Webmaster's Commentary:

Folks, this is a major story and will be totally ignored by ABCNNBBCBS.

This is a peer-reviewed report in a science journal which confirms the presence of a manufactured material consisting of tiny flakes of aluminum metal coated with iron oxide discovered at four different locations in the wreckage of the World Trade Center.

Aluminum and iron oxide, mixed equally by weight, is the classic recipe for thermite. This material is very fine, increasing its burn speed, and apparently has some additional components (besides the very fine granular size) which lower the ignition temperature.

This report directly contradicts the official government claim that there was no trace of internal explosives in the ruins of the World Trade Center.

See Thermite and the WTC Collapses

Posted on Apr 04, 2009 at 07:49

Tags: * 911

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 64.

#4. To: TwentyTwelve (#0)

One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower...

Putting aside the absolutely incredulous nature of that statement, where was this Manhattan resident?

two the next day, and a fourth about a week later.

From where?

war  posted on  2009-04-05   12:23:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Putting aside the absolutely incredulous nature of that statement, where was this Manhattan resident?

Why is it incredulous? Aren't you interested in knowing all the reasons why these magnificient buildings whose plans were passed with flying colors by the PTB had such an Achilles Heel?

And who knows.... maybe that Manhattan resident was already making plans for his next big sale.

mininggold  posted on  2009-04-05   12:33:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Aren't you interested in knowing all the reasons why these magnificient buildings whose plans were passed with flying colors by the PTB had such an Achilles Heel?

The Achilles heel being planes impacting at over 400MPH, exploding and then multi floor fires burning out of control? Chyea...whoda thought? Obviously not the people who sent the planes into the buildings...

war  posted on  2009-04-05   12:54:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

and then multi floor fires burning out of control?

Yeah, and just moments before the collapse, a veteran battalion chief who would know what to look for if danger was present, calls down:

Critter  posted on  2009-04-05   12:57:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

One floor which was below impact is indicative of the rest including the impact zone? How many more pictures of flames shooting out of WTC must I post before you folks get it?

war  posted on  2009-04-05   13:12:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

before you folks get it?

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/bombs_inside_wtc.html

‘BOMBS INSIDE WTC’

FIRE OFFICER SAYS FIREMEN, COPS KNOW TRUTH

rss202

By Victor Thorn

NEW YORK CITY, N.Y.—On the morning of Sept. 11, 2005, New York City auxiliary fire lieutenant Paul Isaac Jr. asserted, yet again, that 9-11 was an inside job. “I know 9-11 was an inside job. The police know it’s an inside job; and the firemen know it too,” said Isaac.

The ramifications of this statement are immense: One of New York’s own firefighters says publicly that 9-11 couldn’t have been the work of Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, but instead was planned, coordinated and executed by elements within our own government.

He also added, after pointing to throngs of police officers standing around us, that, “We all have to be very careful about how we handle it.”

Isaac reiterated what a 9-11 survivor told this journalist during our protest at Ground Zero on Sept. 11, 2005—that emergency radios were buzzing with information about bombs being detonated inside the World Trade Center towers.

Also, Isaac directly addressed a gag order that has been placed on firemen and police officers in New York.

“It’s amazing how many people are afraid to talk for fear of retaliation or losing their jobs,” said Isaac, regarding the FBI gag order placed on law enforcement and fire department officials, preventing them from openly talking about any inside knowledge of 9-11. There is more information related to Isaac circulating in on-line and print reports, so here again we are hearing first-hand evidence from individuals who were on the scene, such as live witness William Rodriguez, saying that the World Trade Center towers were brought down not by the airliner’s impact or the resulting jet fuel fires, but instead by a deliberately executed controlled demolition.

Tragically, due to heavy-handed pressure from officials at the city, state and federal levels, we are still not hearing the entire story.

Researcher Vincent Sammartino, who was also at the WTC “open grave site” on the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2005, wrote the following on the on-line news web site APFN: “I just got back from Ground Zero. People know the truth. Half of the police and firemen were coming up to us and telling us that they know that 9-11 was an inside job. They were told not to talk about it. But they were supporting what we were doing. I had tears in my eyes.”

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-05   13:17:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Also, Isaac directly addressed a gag order that has been placed on firemen and police officers in New York.

There's no gag order.

war  posted on  2009-04-05   13:19:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

There's no gag order.

Prove it.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-05   13:21:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

FUck you...prove that there is...in fact. I;ve asked you to prove all of your nonsense. To date you've responded 0 times.

war  posted on  2009-04-05   13:22:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

FUck you...prove that there is...in fact. I;ve asked you to prove all of your nonsense. To date you've responded 0 times.

You know you can't prove it.

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2009-04-05   13:23:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You know you can't prove it.

I can prove it far more easily than you can. I've posted numerous interviews of firemen's accounts of the day and YOU YOURSELF have posted transcripts of FDNY exchanges form that day. If there's a gag order, shit for brains, why are these out there in the public domain?

There is also a documentary out there that was made AFTER 9/11 about FDNY and 9/11 in which NUMEROUS FDNY talk about their experiences.

So, yea, consider yourself weighed and measured as the stupid piece of cow chip that you are.

war  posted on  2009-04-05   15:46:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Why does it appear you are personally invested in "proving" that .gov is honest to the American people (when it has proven itself otherwise), operates under the Rule of Law (when it has proven itself to act otherwise), beyond recriminations on any account concerning the events leading up to and concerning the day of 9/11 (which it has proven itself to be less than forthright and candid), and sets policies that are best for the American people and the country (which it, daily, proves it does otherwise: i.e., bailouts to banks, the Federal Reserve act, invasion by illegal aliens, NAFTA, CAFTA, etc.)?

Which .gov entity is paying you?, is what I want to know.

litus  posted on  2009-04-06   10:39:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Why does it appear you are personally invested in "proving" that .gov is honest to the American people

Why would you take one instance and apply it universally?

That asked, nothing that you Moonbats have posted has stood up to scrutiny.

war  posted on  2009-04-06   11:53:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

nothing that you Moonbats have posted has stood up to scrutiny.

Speaking of painting with "broad brushes".

It's obvious that if what you claim, and what .gov claims was "crystal clear" and completely forthright and could withstand scrutiny, there would not exist duplicity in .gov statements and commentary, an unwillingness to shine a light into .gov's actions, its employees' statements and behaviors, compelling testimony and evidence which contradicts .gov claims, contradictory statements made by .gov and .gov employees, rush to eliminate evidence from a crime scene, not a presumption of "cause" for the collapse...which led to absolutely no investigation of steel support structures of the WTC7, etc.

litus  posted on  2009-04-06   12:04:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's obvious that if what you claim, and what .gov claims was "crystal clear" and completely forthright and could withstand scrutiny,

So far it has depsite what your short wave radio talking head says - this week anyway. His and the other Jones' "theories" change so often it's hard keeping up with them...

an unwillingness to shine a light into .gov's actions, its employees' statements and behaviors, compelling testimony and evidence which contradicts .gov claims, contradictory statements made by .gov and .gov employees, rush to eliminate evidence from a crime scene, not a presumption of "cause" for the collapse...which led to absolutely no investigation of steel support structures of the WTC7, etc.

And this is what I Mean...that babble may ahve some code word meaning to you Moonies but it makes 0 sense syntactically or semantically to us normal folk...

war  posted on  2009-04-06   12:36:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

rush to eliminate evidence from a crime scene, not a presumption of "cause" for the collapse...which led to absolutely no investigation of steel support structures of the WTC7, etc.

And this is what I Mean...that babble may ahve some code word meaning to you Moonies but it makes 0 sense syntactically or semantically to us normal folk...

That is why, I presume, you still have yet to answer the question I posed to you twice, now a third time:

War: Why would any other steel [from WTC7] need to be analyzed? [NOTE to War: No steel, whatsoever, from the WTC7 was analyzed]

You're joking, right? You didn't just ask "why should a criminal investigation investigate the location and debris within and surrounding the area of a crime scene?"

War: Nope. You are claiming that a controlled demo;lition occurred. To use one of your fellow Moonbat's phraseology...you can't even support he "effect" of a CD which makes your argument of "cause" moot.

So, you are admitting that the investigation into the fire and collapse of a skyscraper, which could have led to the deaths of hundreds of people, began, at the outset, with the presumption that the CRIME SCENE was not, in fact, a crime scene. The authorities (police, FBI, CIA, etc.) ruled out a crime had occurred from the outset, prior to conducting any investigations, gathering evidence, and speaking to witnesses could have occurred. From the moment of the CRIME...it was deemed "accidental" in nature, and the authorities subsequently only followed policy and procedures for accidents!

litus  posted on  2009-04-06   13:12:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What does analyzing the steel have to do with how the building fell?

/moron

war  posted on  2009-04-06   13:31:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What does analyzing the steel have to do with how the building fell?

Since when, in a criminal investigation involving the collapse of a building, explosions and fire does the investigation not include analyzing the support structures of said building....unless, of course, some kind of presumption was made prior to the investigation, which altered the normal course of investigations normally pursued for arson/criminal investigations.

I happen to know that arson investigations go much further into analyzing the "crime scene" than if it was presumed and believed, upon surface investigation that a crime was not, in fact, involved.

It was obvious to the entire world that a crime occurred on 9/11....except for the U.S. government, ATF, CIA, FBI, I guess.

litus  posted on  2009-04-06   14:14:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Since when, in a criminal investigation involving the collapse of a building, explosions and fire does the investigation not include analyzing the support structures of said building....unless, of course, some kind of presumption was made prior to the investigation, which altered the normal course of investigations normally pursued for arson/criminal investigations.

Is it your case that they set those thermite charges to activate after the building burned for six hours?

war  posted on  2009-04-07   8:31:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Is it your case that they set those thermite charges to activate after the building burned for six hours?

That's not an answer to my question, which was:

Since when, in a criminal investigation involving the collapse of a building, explosions and fire does the investigation not include analyzing the support structures of said building....unless, of course, some kind of presumption was made prior to the investigation, which altered the normal course of investigations normally pursued for arson/criminal investigations.

Did you know that when an unattended body is found dead, an autopsy is performed, even when it appears obvious as to the cause of death (i.e., multiple stabbings, gunshot wounds, etc.)? Would a thorough investigation as to the cause of death not be performed, the investigator would be considered negligent in his/her duties if the investigator merely assumed or presumed the cause of death, relying only upon surface level observations.

This type of negligence appears to be what the "investigators" of WTC 7 are guilty. And, to me, it appears intentional.

litus  posted on  2009-04-07   9:51:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 64.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 64.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]