See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Source:
whatreallyhappened.com
URL Source: http://whatreallyhappened.com/conte ... world-trade-center-catastrophe
Published: Apr 5, 2009
Author: whatreallyhappened.com
Post Date: 2009-04-05 01:25:36 by TwentyTwelve
Keywords: 9/11, 911, Thermite, WTC Collapses
Views: 10894
Comments: 690
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic. Webmaster's Commentary: Folks, this is a major story and will be totally ignored by ABCNNBBCBS. This is a peer-reviewed report in a science journal which confirms the presence of a manufactured material consisting of tiny flakes of aluminum metal coated with iron oxide discovered at four different locations in the wreckage of the World Trade Center. Aluminum and iron oxide, mixed equally by weight, is the classic recipe for thermite. This material is very fine, increasing its burn speed, and apparently has some additional components (besides the very fine granular size) which lower the ignition temperature. This report directly contradicts the official government claim that there was no trace of internal explosives in the ruins of the World Trade Center. See Thermite and the WTC Collapses Posted on Apr 04, 2009 at 07:49 Tags: * 911
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-523) not displayed.
.
.
.
#524. To: war, litus (#514)
You're like a little kid thinking if he hides under his covers, those bad
monsters in his closet will go away, then claiming he's a big brave dude
because he fought off those nasty monsters in his closet.
Twenty Five Ways to Suppress The Truth: The Rules of Disinformation Become incredulous and indignant. It's obviously a set of rules that war lives by...
I could care less if your posting days goes back to the ark. I'm starting to think that some of the other posters are right. It's YOU who wants to be the Prima Donna, either by hook or by crook.
And thanks for the compliment... :) Yes, the acting was exceptional!. yw, FL.
lolol!!
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit. These shills must have a little black book, ready with examples. You do notice he's used this one before....why, he even posted a link to his ready made, pat answer at LP!
A total overreaction to your remark. He's manufacturing what I call a hissy fit so he can Bozo you and save face at the same time.
Ridiculous and transparent.
war is certainly good at being a drama queen.
If that wasn't clear before, it most certainly is now!
After wading through your Nerd Clache this is the crux of the biscuit. THIS crap is the deflection; you Moonies are wasting bandwidth discussing your lack of honor. I do not attack people's families. Period.
I would have done so by now...
Does that somehow make time run differently?
Remarklable that all of a sudden the topic is my sense of honor and not the video that debunks your near "free fall speed" nonsense...
This doesn't debunk anything. The 9/11 commission report and the nist report give varying times for the collapses, all of which are too quick to have been a pancake collapse. If it fell in 20 seconds as your video claims, that would be 11 seconds faster than freefall. So 90 floors provided 11 seconds of resistance to the collapse? 11 / 90 = .12 .12 seconds of resistance per floor? You're ok with this? Like I said, go chase yourself back to LP, shill.
FL has been on bozo for weeks...
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#525. To: Original_Intent (#523)
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#526. To: war (#507)
Save the lecture...my days on the internet go back to 1995 to MSN and the Discuss and Debate bulletin board. I have 0 problem with being attacked personally.
#527. To: FormerLurker (#522)
That could very well explain war's tear jerking rendition of being offended due to a silly "doc slapped your mom when you were born" joke.
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#528. To: mininggold (#526)
I could care less if your posting days goes back to the ark.
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#529. To: Original_Intent, FormerLurker (#523)
This is right out of: Twenty Five Ways to Suppress The Truth: The Rules of Disinformation
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#530. To: litus (#527)
Yes, the acting was exceptional!.
#531. To: mininggold (#530)
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#532. To: litus (#527)
Yes, the acting was exceptional!.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#533. To: FormerLurker (#532)
(Edited)
war is certainly good at being a drama queen.
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#534. To: mininggold, litus, Original_Intent (#530)
A total overreaction to your remark.
#535. To: mininggold (#530)
fit so he can Bozo you
#536. To: Critter (#517)
9/11 debunked
#537. To: mininggold, litus, Original_Intent (#531)
#538. To: war (#516)
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Used Tires Amityville, Babylon, Lindenhurst
#539. To: Critter (#538)
What % of WTC was air? That asked you said: If it fell in 20 seconds as your video claims, that would be 11 seconds faster than freefall. Do you know/understand the exponential factor of gravity? Do you also realize that WTC did not fall to ground but piled up on itself to almost 14 floors? Your "story" is bullshit. It doesn't stand up to minimal scrutiny and it changes at every twist, e.g. It fell at near free fall speed!!!! So what if it fell at more than double free fall speed...!!! That all said...the video makes no claims...it simply DOCUMENTS the collapse time...why is it that none of you Moonbats have done that? Because if you did then you'd have to cue the toilet flush...
#540. To: war (#539)
yeah? and you're an ugly bag of what % water? are you a blob pooled to the ground or can you stand erect, puff out you chest, and hurl derision and bull- shittery? read the link and get back with rebuttal (something pertinent to the thread, but lacking the drama you crave, so maybe you won't touch it): As Documentation of Thermitic Materials in the WTC Twin Towers Grows, Official Story Backers Ignore, Deny, Evade, and Dissemble The NIST investigation, having posted its Final Report with its absurd Building 7 joint-breaking-thermal-expansion theory in late 2008 and FAQ by Christmas, closed its doors before the independent researchers published their findings of active aluminothermic materials in WTC dust in a mainstream scientific journal; but not before they publicized findings of aluminothermic residues in the same dust samples; and not before they extracted from NIST a series of public statements, in press conferences and in written responses to requests for correction (RFCs), about the conduct of their inquiry into the cause of the skyscrapers' total destruction. As a result, NIST spokespersons are on the record saying they did not test for pyrotechnics, and offering rationales for failing to perform such tests. Those rationale -- or rationalizations -- summarized toward the end of this essay, include the assertion that testing for pyrotechnics "would not necessarily have been conclusive". That is partially true: failing to find pyrotechnic residues wouldn't rule out demolition, since demolition might have been implemented using an untraceable fuel such as hydrogen gas. But finding abundant and distributed pyrotechnic explosive residues would conclusively favor demolition - - particularly given the persuasive deductive arguments showing that the features of the buildings' destruction are incompatable with a purely gravity- driven collapse. The following timeline is narrowly focused on the emergence of public evidence indicating the use of aluminothermic pyrotechnics, ranging from incendiaries to high-explosives, in the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7, and on the way official bodies -- particular NIST -- treated that evidence.
What % of WTC was air?
Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives
#541. To: postpunk (#540)
It's an issue created out of thin air...the thermite Moonbat crowd once used MIST's analysis of the dust to "prove" thermite ignoring that the matter used for thermite is common in building materials...
#542. To: postpunk (#540)
And, regardless, the Moonbats use thermite for screeching on about free fall or near free fall [pick a plan] when, in fact, they did not fall at anything resembling free fall or near free fall...once that is debunked, thermite becomes moot...
#543. To: postpunk (#540)
Thermite is not an explosive...it's a cutter...thus thermite is ofen referred to as a "cutter charge"
Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives
#544. To: war (#541)
what? you're claiming thermite is a building material?
#545. To: war (#542)
irrelevant and logically quite fucked
#546. To: war (#543)
ah good; you've read the title. try following each word after another until you reach the end. be sure to have handy reference item to unpuzzle tricky words, and don't fail to click interior links for full comprehension.
#547. To: postpunk (#545)
Nope...misrepresenting the actual fall time is crucial to the thermite blathering...
irrelevant and logically quite fucked
#548. To: war (#547)
Misrepresenting the actual altitude of Flight 77 was crucial so .gov could claim that it hit poles that were in reality over 300 feet below the plane.
misrepresenting the actual fall time is crucial
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#549. To: postpunk (#544)
PLease...I know that you're grossly underinformed but don't ***think*** for one minute that includes me... Jones tries to claim that his "independent" analysis of WTC dust found traces of "thermite" when, in fact, it's simply the chemicals that can be used in thermite. His analysis does not differ from NIST's...
what? you're claiming thermite is a building material?
#550. To: litus (#548)
Feel free to explain the plane parts at the Pentagon...
Misrepresenting the actual altitude of Flight 77 was crucial so .gov could claim that it hit poles that were in reality over 300 feet below the plane.
#551. To: war (#550)
Feel free to explain how a plane could take out poles that were 300 feet below it. Feel free to explain how a plane, which appeared to be what was seen on the video, rolls across the grass to the Pentagon, but there's no marks or damage from said plane on the grass.
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#552. To: war (#547)
what's crucial to you is plain to one sufficiently cynical, but irrelevant associations are still that--irrelevant associations betraying an agenda
#553. To: war (#549)
bunkum--again, derision and bull-shittery does not rebuttal make
#554. To: war (#550) (Edited)
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/pentalawn.html
Do you think just any lawn would hold up like this after a plane crashed on it?
This is how ordinary lawns look after commercial airliners crashed on them...
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#555. To: war (#550) (Edited)
Purdue University's simulation of a Boeing 757 crashing into the Pentagon
Where's the damage to the roof????? to the grass??????
"The plane clipped light poles on nearby Route 27 and a backup generator at the Pentagon, bouncing off the ground before plowing into the building at a 45-degree angle." -USNews (12/10/01)
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#556. To: war (#549)
looky here! war's itty bitty bricks for building skyscrapers!
#557. To: war (#539)
Show me a 14 floor high pile of pancaked floors. If you can't do that, go screw.
Do you also realize that WTC did not fall to ground but piled up on itself to almost 14 floors?
This guy may be prowling 4um: |
Used Tires Amityville, Babylon, Lindenhurst
#558. To: war (#557)
Show me a 14 floor high pile of pancaked floors. Do you also realize that WTC did not fall to ground but piled up on itself to almost 14 floors?
#559. To: TwentyTwelve, war (#558)
Show me a 14 floor high pile of pancaked floors. Do you also realize that WTC did not fall to ground but piled up on itself to almost 14 floors?
~ Robert the Brus - "The Declaration of Arbroath"
#560. To: war, postpunk, FormerLurker, TwentyTwelve, litus, Rotara, christine, Wudidiz, all (#543)
Thermite is not an explosive...it's a cutter...thus thermite is ofen referred to as a "cutter charge" As usual your comment is intentionally misleading. Standard thermite or thermate is not an explosive however nano-themite is both a cutter and an explosive. As well there is nothing that says that thermite cannot be used in combination with explosives e.g., themite to cut through structural supports and explosives to initiate the collapse. Does it give you a thrill to try to confuse people smarter than you?
Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
#561. To: war (#549)
Wrong again, Charlie. First of all, it's not Jones' analysis. Secondly, these materials are bonded together in a sophisticated manner. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007 Abstract We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic. Keywords: JScanning electron microscopy, X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy, Differential scanning calorimetry, DSC analysis, World Trade Center, WTC dust, 9/11, Iron-rich microspheres, Thermite, Super-thermite, Energetic nanocomposites, Nano-thermite Affiliation: Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK- 2100, Denmark. http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/co...001/7TOCPJ.SGM ____________________________________________________________________ Message from Dr. Steven E. Jones http://visibility911.com/blog/?cat=48 Formally published in a peer-reviewed Chemical Physics journal, today: “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen The paper ends with this sentence: “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”
Jones tries to claim that his "independent" analysis of WTC dust found traces of "thermite" when, in fact, it's simply the chemicals that can be used in thermite. His analysis does not differ from NIST's...
Join 2x4 Tuesdays & protect your RKBA.
www.righttokeepandbeararms.com
#562. To: litus (#555)
The grass is easy it is the Amazing Penta-Lawn 2000. Impervious to aircraft engines, debris, and fire damage or your money back.
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
#563. To: randge (#561)
This is what you posted: “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen Tell me I am wrong again, please. Secondly. the dust in Jones' analysis was collected from where? Thirdly, a dust composition analysis done by NIST revealed what?
First of all, it's not Jones' analysis.
.
.
.
Comments (564 - 690) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest