[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: The smooth criminal transition from Bush/Cheney to Obama To sober, clear-eyed observers of history and political deception, the ascension of Barack Obama held the promise for unprecedented new dangers: a revitalized New World Order, led by the Anglo-American empires neoliberal criminal faction and an iconic, deceptive new facilitator; and a continuation of Bush/Cheney criminality and war, under smarter and much more effective management. Now, just months into their tenure, the Barack Obama administration has more than fulfilled the murderous promises he made to his elite constituency, deepening the mass destruction of Bush/Cheney, while charming its victims all over the world into enjoying their own demise. The empires facilitator Beneath his seemingly boundless charisma and charm, Barack Obama has always been an utterly ruthless politician. He has been a compromiser who has danced with the darkest forces of political and criminal power, while winning over common people; a consensus-abiding chameleon and a pragmatist. Obama is the true model of what George W. Bush only claimed to be: a uniter, not a divider. The signs were clear from the early days of the presidential contest that Obama was, like every presidential candidate, a handpicked puppet. His cadre of national security and foreign policy advisors included the most notorious war criminals, intelligence/security advisors and corrupt think tank assets in the world. His campaign was bankrolled by Wall Street, and big corporations. His policy agenda was taken from the playbook of the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Both neoliberal (and neocon) elite power and money coalesced behind Obama, as his political rivals dropped off. Obamas record in the US Senate was one of general complicity with Bush/Cheney and the status quo, including enthusiastic support of the consensus war on terrorism deception and the big 9/11 lie. Former US Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has described how, in her encounters with Obama, the senator from Illinois repeatedly refused to act in opposition to Bush/Cheney policies. Time again, during his days in the Senate, and throughout the presidential campaign, Obama has not only fully supported the Bush/Cheney administration on the USAPATRIOT Act, and the wholesale militarization and criminalization of the United States. Immediate destabilization The naïve, the hopeful and the ignorant have continued to harbor fantasies about change, even as Obama promptly destroyed every single hope, starting with the composition of his administration. He handpicked a transition team, and then a cabinet consisting entirely of legendary war criminals and corrupt elites, each more malodorous and corrupt than the next. From Iran-Contra participant Robert Gates and war criminal Richard Holbrooke, to Hillary Clinton and an economic advisory team comprised of the architects of Wall Street destruction, including Paul Volcker, Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and new Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Under Geithner and Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke, the Ponzi scheme that is Wall Street, the wholesale robbery of the American people begun by Alan Greenspan, Bernanke, and Bush/Cheney Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, has not only continued unabated, but has metastasized with each new bailout, and every new fraud orchestrated by Geithner. While the people on Main Street have continued to suffer a new Great Depression without real assistance from the Obama administration, the New World Orders financial coffers continue to fill with stolen US taxpayer money. No relief for the impoverished, while the administration bails out banks and Wall Street, under such frauds as the Public Private Partnership Program. Leaving the wolves in charge of the financial henhouse, Geithner and the Obama administration authorized Congress to toss out securities pricing standards on toxic assets. (Also see this op-ed, and the piece by Arthur Leavitt, former head of the SEC, and the Carlyle Group.) Essentially, the Obama administration is simply going to let the banks and financial institutions, that created the crisis with their massive Ponzi schemes, determine how they wish to price their own toxic assets. This move, not surprisingly, sparked a huge Wall Street rally. Some even hailed it as the end of the crisis. A criminal stimulus plan Obamas so-called stimulus package is yet another Trojan horse. As exhaustively and incisively detailed by Michel Chossudovsky in Americas Fiscal Collapse: This is a War Budget. The austerity measures hit all major federal spending programs with the exception of: 1. Defence and the Middle East War: 2. the Wall Street bank bailout, 3. Interest payments on a staggering public debt. The Obama stimulus program constitutes a continuation of the Bush administrations bank bailout packages. The proposed policy solution to the crisis becomes the cause, ultimately resulting in further real economy bankruptcies and a corresponding collapse of the standard of living of Americans. Both the Bush and Obama bank bailouts are intended to come to the rescue of troubled financial institutions, to ensure the payment of inter-bank debt operations. In practice, large amounts of money transit through the banking system, from the banks to the hedge funds, to offshore banking havens and back to the banks. What we are dealing with is the fraudulent transfer and confiscation of lifelong savings and pension funds, the fraudulent appropriation of tax revenues to finance the bank bailouts, etc. To understand what has happened: follow the money trail of electronic transfers with a view to establishing where the money has gone. What is at stake is the outright criminalization of the financial system: financial theft on an unprecedented scale. The monetary system, which is integrated into the State budgetary process, has been destabilized. AIG: Obama strikes back for the empire The Obama administrations most telling criminal hand was revealed in its handling of American International Group (AIG), one of the largest beneficiaries of the bailout frenzy. The Obama-AIG conspiracy, which continues to unfold, is also the least well understood. While popular outrage has been channeled (by the corporate media, Obama, and Congress) to focus on the least important symptoms of the problem -- bonuses paid to AIG executives -- the greater crime that is AIG itself has gone unnoticed. As was the case with Enron, and with every action of Bush/Cheney, the AIG outrage is another limited hangout and cover-up. AIG is not too big to fail. It is simply too important a repository of dirty money and dirty secrets to be exposed. Barack Obama and his administration know this. AIG, one of the largest pools of investment capital on earth, is also one of the largest launderers of drug money and illegal funds for covert operations. Mike Rupperts investigation AIG (From The Wilderness, August 14, 2001) exhaustively deconstructed Greenberg and AIG, exposing continuing connections to covert operations, narco trafficking, money laundering, and AIGs central role in the Wall Street/Washington power nexus. AIGs involvement in US covert operations stretches back to World War II, in its roots as C.V. Starr, the intelligence-related proprietary founded by OSS agent Cornelius Vander Starr. The Starr proprietary was connected to CIA/OSS figures Paul Helliwell and Tommy Corcoran. The notorious CIA fronts connected to C.V. Starr, including Civil Air Transport, Sea Supply, and Air America/Pacific Corp were exposed by Peter Dale Scott in his book Drugs, Oil, and War: The United States in Afghanistan, Colombia, and Indochina. It is also a huge financial pass-through, whose counter-parties include Goldman Sachs and (not surprisingly) the same major financial institutions that are the top recipients of the US governments TARP bailout. It is no surprise that Barack Obama is the top recipient of AIG funds. AIGs money also lines the pockets of other members of the Obama administration, and prominent members of Congress, including Senator Christopher Dodd, who has been accused of a sweetheart deal aiding AIG. The man in the shadows AIGs former CEO, Maurice Hank Greenberg, remains a pivotal figure connected to the institution, which he has fought against, sued, and publicly lambasts the officials in charge of his former company, his baby. Greenberg is a member of world planning groups (Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission) and the Heritage Foundation, a former candidate for CIA director (1995). He is longtime friend of the Bush family. David Boies (of Bush v. Gore fame) is his attorney. So well-connected is Greenberg that he was considered as a nominee for CIA director by Bill Clinton in 1995. The profile of Greenberg in the June 20, 2005, edition of Time magazine, Down But Not Out, details Greenbergs career as a government asset, foreign policy guru, and strongman. In 2005, while still heading AIG, Greenberg was the target of multiple investigations into the orchestration of sham transactions, the inflation of reserves, illegal stock trades, deception, and book-cooking in an investigation by Eliot Spitzer, who declared that AIG was a black box run with an iron fist by a CEO who did not tell the public the truth. Spitzers probes of AIG, and other Wall Street malfeasance, was subsequently and conveniently stopped in its tracks, when Spitzer became entangled in a prostitution scandal. Although Greenberg was forced to resign as CEO and chairman of the AIG board, he remains,to this day, the CEO of Starr International (SICO) and C.V. Starr, the private holding companies that control billions in AIG stock. It is the Starr companies that constitute the conglomerates original roots as an intelligence-related proprietary. In other words, Greenberg remains in charge of the heart of AIG. Was AIG manipulation behind Wall Street rally? For the past few weeks, the US stock market has enjoyed a robust rally, despite otherwise nightmarish economic news. One of the factors that sparked this rally was the news that major banks such as Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America -- banks that were reportedly on the verge of collapse, and subsequently major recipients of TARP bailout funds -- posted profits in January and February 2009. How was this possible? A report by Tyler Durden, citing an anonymous insider trader involved with AIG trades, reveals that manipulation fraudulently transferred US taxpayer money to AIGs counter-parties -- the top banks and financial institutions -- with AIG as the pass-through. The profit report sparked a market rally that comes at the expense of US taxpayers. The complete report (thanks to Jenna and the Mike Ruppert Blogspot for this find) is damning and startling: Exclusive: Big Banks Recent Profitability Due to AIG Scam? Excerpt: AIG, knowing it would need to ask for more capital from Treasury imminently, decided to throw in the towel, and gifted major bank counter-parties with trades which were egregiously profitable to the banks, and even more egregiously money-losing to the U.S. taxpayers, who had to dump more and more cash into AIG, without having the U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner disclose the real extent of this -- for lack of a better word -- fraudulent scam. . . . What this all means is that the statements by major banks, i.e., JP Morgan Chase, Citi, and BofA, regarding abnormal profitability in January and February were true, however these profits were a) one-time in nature due to wholesale unwinds of AIG portfolios, b) entirely at the expense of AIG, and thus taxpayers, c) executed with Tim Geithners (and thus the administrations) full knowledge and intent, d) were basically a transfer of money from taxpayers to banks (in yet another form) using AIG as an intermediary [my emphasis-LC]. For banks to proclaim their profitability in January and February is about as close to criminal hypocrisy as is possible. And again, the taxpayers fund this one time profit, which causes a market rally, thus allowing the banks to promptly turn around and start selling more expensive equity . . . also funded by taxpayers money flows into the market. If the administration is truly aware of these events (and if Zero Hedge [the name of the author-LC] knows about it, it is safe to say Tim Geithner also got the memo), then the potential fallout would be staggering once this information makes the light of day . . . This wholesale manipulation of markets, investors and taxpayers has gone on long enough. Bush/Cheneys war is also Obamas war On March 27, 2009, Obama launched his new strategy for Afghanistan. This new strategy is a continuation and expansion of the Bush/Cheney war plan, hatched in the wake of the false flag operation of 9/11, utilizing the identical war on terrorism and 9/11 lies as justification. As articulated by Obama: I want the American people to understand that we have a clear and focused goal: to disrupt, dismantle and defeat Al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan and to prevent their return to either country in the future. That is a cause that could not be more just. I remind everybody, the United States did not choose to fight a war in Afghanistan. Nearly 3,000 of our people were killed on Sept. 11, 2001, for doing nothing more than going about their daily lives. The consensus Al-Qaeda deception is not only alive and well under Obama, it is now the justification for a surge of 21,000 US troops into Afghanistan, massive covert operations throughout Central Asia and the Middle East, and an even more aggressive war on terrorism. This is the conquest of the Grand Chessboard that the Anglo-American elites wanted to execute after 9/11, but squandered due to the Bush/Cheney administrations fumble in Iraq. Obama, who made the rounds with the G-20 leadership, will not fumble with a war that is consistent with the war on terrorism goals that he has articulated for years, and promised to deliver (to his New World Order bosses) throughout his campaign. As detailed by Michel Chossudovsky in The Democrats endorse the Global War on Terrorism: Obama goes after Osama, the Obama promise is more perpetual war: 9/11 constitutes for Obama the main justification for waging a humanitarian war in the Middle East and Central Asia. In this regard, his position does not differ from that of the Bush administration. Withdraw from Iraq, but remain in Afghanistan. Confront Iran, challenge Russia . . . Apart from the rhetoric of bringing the troops home from war torn Iraq, which may or may not be carried out, what distinguishes the Democrats from the Republicans? A more articulate, knowledgeable and charismatic President? A more dignified and diplomatic approach to US foreign policy? As a pacifying and unifying icon, Obama was positioned to perpetuate the cover-up of the American Empires crimes, and retrieve the squandered opportunity presented by the false-flag operation of 9/11: a world united behind imperial war. An opportunity to the US ruling elite to present a different face to the world that could revive illusions to its democratic pretensions, not only internationally but within the United States as well. . . . A spurious and counterfeit humanitarian approach to Empire, which serves to mask the truth and gain popular support. A less reckless Commander in Chief, who has an understanding of geopolitics and is capable of taking foreign policy decisions. A more carefully thought out military agenda than that experienced during the Bush administration? But no substantive shift in direction. A means to quelling mounting dissent and opposition to the ruling corporate establishment by providing the illusion that the Democrats constitute a Real Alternative. A means to sustaining the illusion that African-Americans can move up the social ladder in America and that their fundamental rights are being upheld. A means to undermining real progressive movements by further embedding civil society organizations, trade unions and grass roots organizations, not to mention Leftist intellectuals into the realm of the Democratic Party. A distraction from the extensive war crimes committed under successive US administrations. A human face to war and globalization? A call to resist As this writer warned in Obama: return to elite status quo, written shortly following Obamas victory: . . . the arrival of Obama as the new imperial figurehead of the Anglo-American empire is not a victory of, or for, the people. It will not signify a dramatic upheaval, in any way, and by no means is any sort of revolution at hand. This election was a necessary rotation of management, scripted at the highest levels of the Anglo-American elite. The change that a Barack Obama presidency will bring to America and the world will be one of style, not substance: a return to the centrist corporate globalism of the Clinton and Carter eras, complete with regurgitated Democratic Party elites from those administrations, and new neoliberal politicians touting similar ideologies. . . . The velvet gloves will be slipped back over the iron fists, but the fists will still be wielded aggressively. Within months, the global conquest that Bush-Cheney started will resume under the vastly more convincing and adored Obama, who has consistently stated his intention to intensify the war in Afghanistan, and kill terrorists across the Middle East. For those who have spent the past eight hellish years opposing and resisting the crimes of Bush/Cheney, prepare yourselves for worse: the friendliest fascism, and the most dangerous stealth messenger in history.
Poster Comment: Chin's title jumped out at me because I have used the expression numerous times that there is always a smooth transition of corruption from one administration to the next.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: *Obama Reality Check*, Brian S, Ferret Mike, a vast rightwing conspirator, iconoclast, war, Arator, all Obama voters (#0)
For those who have spent the past eight hellish years opposing and resisting the crimes of Bush/Cheney, prepare yourselves for worse: the friendliest fascism, and the most dangerous stealth messenger in history.
I'm really looking forward to at least 4 more years with the new Emperor.
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition You think the people of this country exist to provide you with position. I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom.~~William Wallace ALAS, BABYLON. It's over. Last one here turn out the lights.
While the devout Kool-Aid drinkers are still swilling the stuff by the gallon some are beginning to get a bit defensive. Yes Oh'bummer is a charming Axeman but there are some of his legions beginning to wake up. I think Alex Jones's Movie "The Obama Deception" is going viral and the Empire has played this schtick too many times. Of course the brain dead are still brain dead but the dichotomy between his words and deeds is beginning to get noticed.
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
But most Americans will still have no clue who Hank Greenberg is. Obama's the front designed to be torn down in the press when everything goes south.
Aw c'mon give them some credit: 12 Seasons with Det. 1 with Pit. Batted Right Handed. Threw Right Handed. Lifetime Batting Avg.: .314 331 Career Home Runs
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
I had no idea that one of the head vampires played ball.
Just being funny - different Hank Greenberg - same name different person. The Baseball Hall of Fame Hank Greenberg died in 1986.
""I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology...It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda...Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russel, Eugenicist and Logician
Me too. ; )
What blows my mind is that a few here cannot see this transition from one set of criminals to another. They love and vote for the Gambinos because they dont like the Genovese family.
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
That was resisting? It made no long term difference. If the patriot movement hasn't already found out, we all will learn soon that white Americans should have brought down the white, "conservative" Bush administration while we had a chance. We would have been policing our own. It will be much easier to marginalize nationalist whites, who now oppose the Obama administration for the same reasons, as racists. Instead of only opposing amnesty and the war, nationalists should have pressured Congress to act on demands for impeachment. The Bush administration tested us and we failed. The McCain nomination tested us and we failed. The impotent, "educational" Ron Paul campaign tested us and we failed. The day will come when millions of non-whites will understand that they were also betrayed by the Obama camp, which can't possibly deliver on any of the promises he made to them. For a moment then, we will have another chance then to wake up the whole country. But for now, do not expect the majority of Americans to realize that one puppet has been replaced by another, or to do anything meaningful about it, if they did know it.
Thanks for the heads up...
The Os, much like their mirror opposites the FReepers, seem to have already developed the capacity to ignore unflattering Obama reality. They prefer to remain wed to the two party political illusion.
There's only so much a person can do, and most of it is "illegal" so I wont go into that. The way I see it, if a person wont act on their own, they wont act in a group. That sounds backwards, I know, since conventional wisdom says people are more likely to act as a part of a group, but it still seems to be true. Too many talk when they are already a part of a group, but too few act when those acts are of a personal nature as opposed to group actions. They just bitch and pound keyboards and consider that to be activism. Edit to add: Thats hard to put into words. Let's just say that they use groups as a cover for personal cowardice. They talk a good fight in a group setting but there is no personal action to match their tough sounding words. We'll never have a majority, IMO. We dont need one. .
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
Mass media's ability to control popular opinions is much stronger than anything the original colonists experienced. The leaders of the first revolution were held in high esteem by their fellow citizens, even the ones who didn't agree with them. They were the leading intellectuals of their time. Many pastors were even giving anti-British sermons. And let's remember that when the Obama administration calls for greater media diversity, they're not talking about adding anti-Zionist or anti-globalist voices.
Agreed. It's just a crying shame that people give up their control to the media. Thinking sure is hard. Lazy twits.
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files
It may take time but I can see future generations weaning themselves off the passive media teat.
"I remind everybody, the United States did not choose to fight a war in Afghanistan. Nearly 3,000 of our people were killed on Sept. 11, 2001, for doing nothing more than going about their daily lives." That's all you need to hear from Obama to know what he is: just more of the same criminal, deceptive script, with installment of the New World Order thrown in.
All of this was said about Herr Hitler during the early 1930's. Everybody who voted for this political hack should be horse-whipped to death.
_________________________________________________________________________ |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|